Download PDF
doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2017.00026
Revised: March 31, 2017
Accepted: April 21, 2017
Published online: June 28, 2017
Citation: Ahmed F. Comment on ‘Ascitic Fluid Analysis in the Differential Diagnosis of Ascites: Focus on Cirrhotic Ascites’. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2017;5(2):184-184. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2017.00026.
First, I would like to congratulate the authors, Huang LL, Xia HH and Zhu SL, on the overall great work done in preparing the review article ‘Ascitic Fluid Analysis in the Differential Diagnosis of Ascites: Focus on Cirrhotic Ascites’.1 However, there seems to be an error in the description of diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). The authors state “SBP is defined by the presence of neutrophil cells greater than or equal to 250/mL or a positive bacterial culture in the ascitic fluid without evidence of an abdominal source.” The issue here is the fact that the authors make the presence of neutrophil cells greater than or equal to 250/mL for diagnoses of SBP an option (by using the conjunction term ‘or’) and not a condition, whereas it is proven by evidence in the literature that it is a prerequisite.2–4
The authors have no conflict of interests related to this publication.
Copyright © 2017 Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0), permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.