Home
JournalsCollections
For Authors For Reviewers For Editorial Board Members
Article Processing Charges Open Access
Ethics Advertising Policy
Editorial Policy Resource Center
Company Information Contact Us
Publications > Journals > Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology> Article Full Text
Review Article
OPEN ACCESS

Download PDF

Selecting an Appropriate Experimental Animal Model for Cholangiocarcinoma Research

  • Man Li1 ,
  • Xueli Zhou1,
  • Wei Wang1,
  • Baoan Ji2 ,
  • Yu Shao1,
  • Qianyu Du1,
  • Jinghao Yao1 and
  • Yan Yang1,* 
Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology   2022;10(4):700-710

doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00374

Received:

Revised:

Accepted:

Published online:

 Author information

Citation: Li M, Zhou X, Wang W, Ji B, Shao Y, Du Q, et al. Selecting an Appropriate Experimental Animal Model for Cholangiocarcinoma Research. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2022;10(4):700-710. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00374.

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly aggressive biliary tree malignancy with intrahepatic and extra-hepatic subtypes that differ in molecular pathogeneses, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, treatment, and prognosis. The overall prognosis and patient survival remains poor because of lack of early diagnosis and effective treatments. Preclinical in vivo studies have become increasingly paramount as they are helpful not only for the study of the fundamental molecular mechanisms of CCA but also for developing novel and effective therapeutic approaches of this fatal cancer. Recent advancements in cell and molecular biology have made it possible to mimic the pathogenicity of human CCA in chemical-mechanical, infection-induced inflammatory, implantation, and genetically engineered animal models. This review is intended to help investigators understand the particular strengths and weaknesses of the currently used in vivo animal models of human CCA and their related modeling techniques to aid in the selection of the one that is the best for their research needs.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Cholangiocarcinoma, Heterogeneity, Animal model, Genetically engineered model, Cancer cell of origin

Introduction

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) comprises a heterogeneous group of biliary tree malignancies. The overall incidence and mortality of CCA have been increasing,1 and the overall 5-year survival rate of all stages and subtypes is estimated as 7–20%.2 CCA can be intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar CCA, or distal dCCA. The latter two are described as extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA), and account for up to 90% of CCA cases. Combined hepatocellular carcinoma (cHCC) includes both HCC and iCCA. The anatomical subtypes have different molecular and clinical characteristics.3,4 The effectiveness of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has not been demonstrated in CCA,5 and the poor prognosis of CCA stems from a lack of understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of its diverse subtypes and the lack of effective treatment.

Recent discovery of genetic alterations related to CCA by next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a great leap forward. For example, the tumor protein p53 gene (TP53), Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene (Kras), recombinant human mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (SMAD4) and BRCA-associated protein 1 gene have been identified in nearly 40% of CCA cases.6 Moreover, distinct molecular mutation spectra are present in different anatomical subtypes, such as fibrous growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene fusion, mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and the BRCA-associated protein 1 gene are more common in iCCA. Kras and E74 like ETS transcription factor 3 have increased mutation frequencies in eCCA, whereas alterations of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 amplification, and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) deletion are more common in gallbladder cancer.7–9

Although NGS has broadened our knowledge of abnormal molecular alterations in CCA,10 the functional consequences of these putative driver alterations have not yet been fully interpreted and translated into effective clinical management in vivo. Suitable animal models not only help in mechanistic exploration of CCA development and progression but also provide a good platform to explore new strategies for early clinical diagnosis and precise treatment of this disease. Herein, we review several current techniques and examples of CCA induction in animal models and provide insights into the advantages and limitations of these in vivo tools. Readers are also encouraged to refer to several previous review articles.11–15 Compared with previous reviews we provide better coverage of the different aspects involved in carcinogenic mechanisms and the models used for the study of CCA. We also provide more educational background knowledge before the introduction of each specific model and its related techniques to facilitate understanding for introductory scholars. In addition, more detailed information in particular the subtypes of CCA (e.g., iCCA, eCCA, or a mixture with HCC) that can be tracked while describing each specific model is included in this review.

Chemical-mechanical and infection-induced inflammatory models

Chemical-mechanical models

Chemical carcinogens produce genotoxic effects by destroying DNA structural integrity, damaging cell membranes, and inducing inflammatory reactions, thus promoting the formation and development of CCA.16 The commonly used carcinogens are furan, thioacetamide (TAA), diethylnitrosamine (DEN), and their combined models with bile duct ligation (Table 1).

Table 1

Commonly used chemical-mechanical models

DoseRouteStrainLatencyRelated to human CCATumor typeRef.
ChemicalsFuran15–60 mg/kg bwtGavageFischer 344 rats16 monthsDeveloped intestinal epithelial metaplasia and bile duct fibrosis confined to the caudate and right hepatic lobes, eventually progressing to CCAiCCA19
TAA300 mg/LWaterSprague-Dawley rats16–22 weeksDeveloped multifocal bile duct hyperplasia with marked intestinal epithelial metaplasia, and then all of these rats developed invasive intestinal-type CCA with intense expression of CK19, similar to multistep progression of human CCAiCCA23
Chemical-mechanicalTAA-BDL0.05%WaterWistar rats30 weeksDeveloped histologically invasive intestinal and mucin-producing CCA with positive expression of CK-7 and Claudin-4CCA30
DMN-BDL20 mg/kgipSyrian hamsters40 weeksDeveloped cholangiofibrosis, mucous cystadenoma, and CCA, accompanied by sequential bile duct obstruction and dilatation, formation of large cysts and necrosis and regeneration of the BECs, but without acute proliferative cholangitic lesions and epithelial hyperplasia of second order ductsCCA31
DEN-LMBDL-DEN100 mg/kg ip and 25 mg/kg oral gavageip and oral gavageBALB/C mice28 weeksDeveloped liver injury, chronic cholestasis, fibrosis and cirrhosis, and CCA with physiopathological features of human CCA progressionCCA33

BDL, bile duct ligation; bwt, body weight; CCA, cholangiocarcinoma; DEN, diethylnitrosamine; DMN, dimethylnitrosamine; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LMBDL, left and median bile duct ligation; iCCA, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; ip, intraperitoneal injection; TAA, thioacetamide.

Furan-induced models

Furan is metabolized into reactive substances in the liver, and the long-term effects of these intermediates in reaction with hepatic macromolecular proteins may lead to a dose-dependent increase of liver tumors, including CCA.17 Maronpot et al.18 investigated the consequences of furan exposure in Fischer 344 rats, and found that continuous gavage with low concentrations of furan (2, 4, or 8 mg/kg body weight) for 2 years resulted in the formation of CCA in 86–100% of the rats. Short-term exposure to high concentrations of furan (30 mg/kg body weight) for 3 months eventually led to the evolution of biliary fibrosis to CCA in all the rats. Further mechanistic study has demonstrated that intrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesis-related cellular changes, such as cholangiofibrosis and intestinal metaplasia, were induced after treatment with high concentrations of furan for 2 to 3 weeks.19 Notably, long-term sustained furan exposure disrupted the microenvironment that stimulates hepatocyte differentiation and induces irreversible bile duct lesions at high concentrations20 or non-neoplastic bile duct lesions at lower concentrations (<2 mg/kg body weight).21

TAA models

TAA is metabolized in the liver to highly reactive sulfur dioxide, which covalently binds to cellular macromolecules to produce hepatotoxicity and induce the development of CCA. In 1984, Praet et al.22 developed the first TAA-induced CCA model by feeding TAA-containing food to Lewis rats. Subsequently, in a study of Sprague-Dawley rats fed drinking water containing 300 mg/L TAA, 50% of the rats developed multifocal bile duct hyperplasia with marked intestinal epithelial metaplasia after only 9 weeks, and all the rats developed invasive iCCA within 16–22 weeks.23 However, the model did not show systemic metastatic foci or cause death in rats at the end of the 6-month study. In contrast, severe proliferation of bile ducts and CCA with stromal desmoplasia, as seen in humans, were detected histologically in Wistar rats.24 Recently, TAA-induced iCCA rat models were used to investigate the immunogenicity and efficacy of DNA cancer vaccines targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 blockade and programmed death-ligand 1.25

Combined TAA-DEN models

TAA was found to significantly potentiate the carcinogenic effects of DEN-mediated tumorigenesis in the context of precancerous lesions. The oncogenicity mainly resulted from DEN-indued DNA alkylation damage.26,27 However, this combined TAA-DEN model has a low incidence of CCA accompanied by a high incidence of HCC, which limits the study of the iCCA subtype.

Combined models of cholestasis and carcinogens

Chronic biliary diseases such as primary sclerosing cholangitis, hepatobiliary stones, and choledochal cysts are associated with cholestasis, and the involvement of those diseases in the development of CCA is now recognized.28 Surgical procedures, such as common bile duct ligation, mimic above pathological changes.29 Various CCA models have been developed by combining the widely used chemical carcinogens DEN or dimethylnitrosamine with bile duct ligation,30–33 and the models effectively characterize the multistep pathological evolution of human CCA from cystic hyperplasia to atypical hyperplasia and to CCA. However, bile duct ligation is relatively demanding for the operator and vulnerable to anesthetic and surgical risks.33

Infection-induced inflammatory models

Liver fluke infection induces chronic inflammation of the bile ducts and is an important risk factor for CCA formation. Oral administration of Opisthorchis viverrini metacercariae combined with dimethylnitrosamine or N-dimethylaminonitrosamine induces cholangiocarcinogenesis in hamsters in vivo.34–37 Combined induction with infection and nitrosamines leads to liver injury, increased inflammation-mediated DNA fragmentation, mitochondrial apoptosis, and structural disruption, which in turn leads to tumor progression.38 Studies addressing that type of etiology will improve our knowledge of the prevention of CCA disease. Thus, the development of CCA models following infection could be of importance, especially in the Far East, in which infections with liver flukes is a public health problem. However, the latency period of such models varies.

In summary, chemical-mechanical and infection-induced models effectively mimic the continuum of pathological changes in human liver tumor initiation and progression stages caused by environmental factors and provide useful preclinical platforms to study the etiology and chemoprevention of CCA. However, such models often lead to a simultaneous development liver cancer and other systemic tumors.27 In addition, the associated genetic changes are unknown.

Implantation models

General considerations

Implantation of established human or rodent cancer cells or tissues into a host animal can generate CCA in a relatively short period of time. Modeling is influenced by various factors, such as the biological characteristics and tumorgenicity of implanted tissue or cells, the volume of cells or tissue block, the implantation route, the site and procedure, and the genetic background and immune status of the host.

Types of implantation

Allograft models

Allograft models involve the reimplantation of cells or tissues from animal into other inbred animal that have immune activity of the same strain and genetic background. Rizvi et al.39 injected seven different C57BL/6 mouse CCA cell lines (1×106 cells) into the lateral medial lobe of the liver of the same strain of mice. All mice formed tumors histologically and morphologically similar to human CCA after 4 weeks, with positive expression of the bile duct cell markers CK-7, CK-19, and SOX9, formation of hyperplastic connective tissue and malignant glands. The tumorgenicity of the implanted tissues or cells affected the modeling and the biological characteristics of CCA. For example, poorly invasive and tumorigenic BDEsp cells (4×106 cells) and highly tumorigenic BDEneu cells (4×106 cells) from the same immortalized rat BDE1 bile duct cell lines were inoculated into the bile ducts of the same strain of Fischer 344 rats. After 21–26 days the rats transplanted with BDEsp cells formed only nonmetastatic iCCA without biliary obstruction, whereas those transplanted with BDEneu cells exhibited biliary obstruction, extensive abdominal metastasis, and weight loss.40 The above two models mimicked early versus late disease progression and metastasis of human iCCA, respectively.

Allografts can be used in immunocompetent hosts, facilitating the evaluation of the therapeutic response to antitumor drugs in vivo and have profound impacts on tumor immunology research and immunotherapeutic agent development. In a syngeneic transplantation model, cancer-associated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment have been identified as a potential antitumor target.41 Moreover, the antitumor activity in vivo of imatinib mesylate,42 sorafenib,43 and vismodegib44 was confirmed in several syngeneic orthotopic transplantation models. However, it is difficult to fully mimic the complex biological and molecular heterogeneity of human CCA.45

Xenograft models

Xenotransplantation involves the implantation of tumor cell lines or tissues into immunodeficient hosts of different species. Currently, the commonly used models include cell line-derived and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). The first ectopic xenograft model was established by injecting cell line xenografts derived from intrahepatic metastatic human CCA tumor tissue subcutaneously into the flanks of nude mice. The histological characteristics were maintained after seven consecutive cell passages.46

Orthotopic xenograft models

Orthotopic transplantation involves the surgical implantation of CCA cells or tissue into the bile duct or liver. Micro-CT, MRI, ultrasound, and other methods can be used to evaluate tumor size and metastasis. Several orthotopic CCA xenograft models have been established for efficacy assessment of antitumor drugs47 and mechanistic studies of either tumor progression48 or stemness modulation49 of iCCA. However, orthotopic CCA-PDX models are usually technically challenging to establish and require expensive and laborious longitudinal imaging to monitor tumor growth and therapeutic response. Recently, an orthotopic iCCA-PDX model has been developed using ultrasound-guided intrahepatic injection and rapid and easy monitoring by minimally-invasive high-frequency ultrasound and bioluminescence imaging.50 Such an iCCA model provides a favorable experimental tool to test the anticancer efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents in autochthonous environments.

Ectopic xenograft models

Ectopic transplantation generally involves subcutaneous injection of cells or tissue directly into the flanks of mice, which facilitates direct observation of tumor growth and size. In 2016, Cavalloni et al.51 established the first iCCA-PDX model and a subsequent iCCA-PDX model endogenously expressing the FGFR2-CCDC6 fusion protein.52 In addition, various ectopic transplantation models have been used to identify the regulatory mechanisms of CCA biological behavior, such as abnormal upstream and downstream regulation of microRNAs53,54 and long noncoding RNAs,55,56 or activation of autophagy,57,58 which provide potential therapeutic targets for antitumor drug development.

In general, xenograft models are the most important tool for preclinical drug screening and efficacy assessment because of their short latency, ease of operation, and ability to mimic many of the genetic and epigenetic abnormalities of human tumors. However, xenograft models do not reflect tumorigenesis,45 immunodeficient hosts are not suitable for tumor immunology studies,59 and phase III clinical trials of antitumor drugs screened based on the results of cell line-derived xenograft models often fail.60 One reason is that the models do not fully encompass the heterogeneity of CAA. Highly transplantable iCCA and eCCA cell lines with disease heterogeneity have been established from a PDX model, which may be a promising platform for individualized anticancer drug screening.61 Moreover, fresh human tumor tissue is not easily accessible. To overcome that, some studies have generated CCA models with metastasis biopsies62 or secondary engraftment of cryopreserved tissues63 obtained from CCA patients.

Genetically engineered models

Genetically engineered models (GEMs) induce CCA by overexpression, deletion, or mutation of genes related to carcinogenesis through transgenes or gene transduction. GEMs can be used to explore the causes and molecular mechanisms of cholangiocarcinogenesis, progression, and metastasis at the level of specific genes, to identify biomarkers for prognosis, and to preclinically assess the therapeutic response to targeted drugs.64,65 More importantly, GEM-based tumors are generated de novo in immunocompetent animals and are more representative of human tumorigenesis.

Conditional GEMs

Recently, genomic complexity has been partially revealed by high-throughput sequencing, and the deletion of tumor suppressor genes such as TP53, SMAD4, and PTEN, or the activation of actionable oncogenes, like KrasG12D have been found in CCA.7 More importantly, those genetic driver mutations can be functionally mimicked by a site-specific Cre recombinase (Cre)-loxP system in specific tissues or cells without affecting normal gene expression in other tissues or cells.66 Cre activity can be induced by liver-specific albumin (Alb) promoter. Such recombinase activity is low at birth and gradually increases because of the gradual loss of a floxed target gene in the liver lineage, reaching its maximum activity at 4–6 weeks of age.67 In contrast, a modified Cre-ERT recombinase system68 can realize tissue- and time-specific manipulation of Cre recombinase activity by controlling the administration time of exogenous tamoxifen (TAM). Alb-Cre is expressed in both cholangiocytes and hepatocytes, and Alb-Cre driven GEM models often induce a mixture of iCCA and HCC. In addition to Alb, other promoters including Ah and SOX9, have also been used to mediate the activation of Cre recombinase. Here, we summarize the conditional gene expression and/or deletion models based on the commonly used Cre-loxP system in Table 2.

Table 2

Conditional genetically engineered models mediated by Cre-loxP recombinase system

Genes targetedCreChemical inductionLatencyTumor typeIHCComments (advantages/A; disadvantages/D)Ref.
SMAD4L/L; PTENL/LAlb-Cre–4–7 monthsiCCACK-19+; Mucicarmine+; Mucin 5AC+; Hep Par1−A: The formation of iCCA follows multistep progression of histopathological changes; 100% penetrance; progressed into invasive iCCA; histologically is similar to human iCCA; D: All mice died at about 10 months of age before potential HCC formation; No metastasis; Salivary gland tumor developed73
LSL-KrasV12/−; PTENL/LAhCreERTBNF/TAMNAGBC; iCCACK-19+A: Short latency; widespread papillary neoplasia of BECs formed; D: Dual mutant mice did not survive long enough to develop the types of lesions seen in PTENL/L mice; developed extensive noninvasive papillary neoplasms in the intrahepatic biliary system and invasive moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas of gall bladder with stromal desmoplasia without specific phenotype76
LSL-KrasG12D; PTENL/LAlb-Cre–7 weeks of ageiCCAα-SMA+; Mucicarmine+; CK-19+; Pan-CK+; Hep Par1−A: All AKPP mice demonstrated abdominal distension accompanied by jaundice and weight loss, which recapitulates well those frequently observed in human iCCA; D: Short median survival77
Alb-CreERT2Administered TAM at P102 monthsiCCAMucin+; CK-19+; Pan-CK+; Hep Par1−A: Developed exclusive iCCA; iCCA originated from the cholangiocytes; D: The type of cell in which Cre-mediated recombination occurs varies with age77
SOX9-CreERT2TAM12 weeksiCCA, eCCA and pancreatic cancerCK-19+A: Short latency; developed pancreatic cancer, iCCA and eCCA using Cre-loxP under the control of SOX9 promotor, indicating that SOX9 had a potential role in hepatopancreatic ductal system and the intrapancreatic and intrahepatic ductal networks; provided a mouse model for study hepatopancreatic ductal carcinomas; D: Mixed liver cancer and pancreatic cancer, not exclusive iCCA; AKPP animals succumbed rapidly to ill-health, with a marked survival deficit78
LSL-KrasG12D; TP53L/LAlb-Cre–9 weeksiCCA and HCC and cHCC-iCCAPan-CK+; AFP+A: Widespread local and distant metastasis; multistage progression; two of the most common gene mutations in human iCCA were involved; tumors arise from the malignant progression of precursor lesions in the bile ducts; D: A certain proportion of HCC is present, which may limit its application in iCCA research81
AAV8-TBG-CreDDC diet12–66 weeksiCCA and HCC and cHCC-iCCAPan-CK+, CK-19+; Hnf 4α–in iCCA; Hep Par1+ in HCCA: Full penetrance; tumor developed in the liver injury of ductular reaction, fibrosis, and inflammation similar to human liver cancer; D: Not exclusive iCCA83
SOX9-CreERT2TAM; DDC diet30 weeks (average) postinjectioniCCA and HCC and cHCC-iCCAPan-CK+; CK-19+; Hnf 4α–in iCCAA: Full penetrance; tumor developed in the liver injury, fibrosis, and inflammation; adjacent liver to iCCA showed biliary intraepithelial neoplasia similar to precursor of human iCCA; D: Not exclusive iCCA83
LSL-IDH2R172K; LSL-KrasG12DAlb-Cre–33-58 weeksiCCACK-19+; Hep Par1−A: Developed multifocal iCCA with peritoneal metastasis and splenic invasion; full penetrance; D: Long latency85
LSL-KrasG12D; TGFBR2L/L; CDH1L/LK19CreERTTAM; IL-3320 dayseCCACK-7+; CK-19+; α-SMA+A: Formed a model of biliary injury-related eCCA from EHBD; suggested PBGs as the cellular origin of eCCA; eCCA spread laterally along the biliary tree, and cancer cells were highly malignant and metastasized to the regional lymph nodes; periductal infiltrating growth and lymph node metastasis are characteristics of human eCCA; D: All KTC-K19CreERTmice died within 4 weeks after TAM administration89
TP53L/L–CCL429 weeksiCCACK-19+A: The initiation and progression of iCCA in the setting of bile duct proliferation and associated fibrosis; developed lymph node metastasis; shares feature prominent in the human disease, including the presence of intrahepatic fibrosis, increased inflammation and a molecular profile; D: Long latency; penetrance is not high (54%)93
Alb-CreERTTAM; TAA;26 weeksCCANAA: CCA arises following chronic inflammation caused by injury with TAA; developed multifocal invasive CCA; high penetrance (80%); D: Lack of detailed CCA subtype and phenotype identification results93

AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; AKPP mice, Alb-Cre+; LSL-KrasG12D; PTENL/L mice; BECs, biliary epithelial cells; BNF/TAM, β-naphthoflavone and tamoxifen; CCL4, carbon tetrachloride; CDH1, a gene encoding E-cadherin molecule; cHCC-iCCA, combined hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; CK, cytokeratin; CK-19, cytokeratin 19; DDC, 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidin; EHBD, extra-hepatic bile duct; K19CreERT, CreERT induced by TAM under the control of CK-19 promoter; NA, not available; Pan-CK, pan-cytokeratin; PBG, peribiliary gland; P10, postnatal day 10; SOX9: SRY-related high mobility group box transcription factor 9.

Liver-specific PTEN-SMAD4 knockout models

Various alterations abrogate the antagonistic effect of PTEN on the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, leading to biliary tract malignancies.69 Although the frequency of PTEN variation in CCA was found to be only 0.6–11% through NGS,7 human clinical specimens have shown that PTEN expression is lost or downregulated in CCA tissues compared with paracancerous tissues.70SMAD4 is one of the most common tumor suppressor genes in CCA, and regulates cell growth through the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signaling pathway.71 Aberrant SMAD4 expression has been found in various digestive malignancies.72 In 2006, Xu et al.73 crossed mice carrying PTEN conditional allele loss (PTENL) and/or SMAD4 conditional allele loss (SMAD4L) with mice carrying Alb-Cre recombinase. The findings showed that of the different genotypes, only Alb-Cre+; SMAD4L/L; PTENL/L mice formed invasive CCA histologically similar to human iCCA at 4–7 months of age, and all died before 10 months of age. Mice with the SMAD4L/L alone genotype did not develop tumors. In contrast, homozygous deletion of PTEN alone resulted in HCC in 66.7% (8/12) of mice at 19 months of age.74 Given the similar genetic backgrounds of mice and the gene-specific recombination system used by these two research teams, it is reasonable to assume that the model used by Xu et al.73 might be a cHCC/iCCA model if the survival time of Alb-Cre+; SMAD4L/L; PTENL/L mice is long enough. Xu et al.73 confirmed that cholangiocarcinogenesis involved the activation of AKT, mTOR, ERK, and CyclinD1, as well as the inactivation of FOXO1. However, the model was established in the absence of chronic liver injury and inflammation, and there was no distant metastasis. Notably, the model was accompanied by the formation of salivary gland tumors, which may be tied to nonspecific expression of the Alb promotor.

Models combining liver-specific PTEN deletion with Kras activation

Kras mutation has been found in 16.7% of iCCA cases.75 In 2013, Marsh et al.76 achieved PTEN deletion with Kras activation in both gallbladder epithelial cells and the intrahepatic bile duct system in adult mice with an Ah promoter-driven Cre-loxP system. It was found that PTEN deletion alone without Kras activation was sufficient to cause slow transformation of normal bile duct epithelium into low-grade malignancies, while dual mutations further shortened the latency of tumorigenesis and transformed tumors into more invasive phenotypes. Based on Cre activities mediated by Alb and TAM administration, or SOX9 promoter, mice with specific liver KrasG12D expression and PTEN homozygous deletion was induced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesis.77 Further investigation showed that in the presence of LSL-KrasG12D, the type of PTEN gene deletion (homozygous or heterozygous) determined the fate of liver tumors with regard to formation from biliary or hepatocyte lineages because immunohistochemical staining revealed that Alb-Cre+; LSL-KrasG12D; PTENL/L mice (AKPP) developed only iCCA; Alb-Cre+; LSL-KrasG12D; PTENL/+ mice (AKP) developed iCCA and HCC; while Alb-Cre+; LSL-KrasG12D; PTEN+/+ mice (AK) developed only HCC. Notably, the spatiotemporal specificity of TAM-induced recombinase activity may be correlated with specific tumor type, as evidenced by the fact that TAM administration at 10 days of age induced Cre recombinase activity in hepatocytes and biliary cells, culminating in the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesis, whereas administration on day 56 mediated genetic recombination only in hepatocytes, culminating in the formation of HCC and hepatocyte dysplasia, which also supports the conclusion that hepatocytes can serve as the cellular origin of iCCA. Based on the results obtained in the above models, Lin et al.78 crossed mice expressing the KrasG12D allele and/or the PTEN allele with mice expressing Cre recombinase under the control of the SOX9 gene and screened for SOX9+; CreERT2+; LSL-KrasG12D; PTENL/L (S+KPP) mice. The model achieved PTEN deletion and Kras activation in the intrahepatic and extra-hepatic biliary epithelium and the pancreatic ductal epithelium, which eventually formed iCCA, eCCA, and pancreatic cancer, providing a platform for studying hepatopancreatic ductal carcinoma. Notably, SOX9+ cells with deletion of the PTEN gene alone already have the potential to form HCC and iCCA using the same inducible Sox9-CreERT-based approach,79 indicating that loss of PTEN alone is sufficient to drive the transformation of SOX9+ cells in the liver. In addition, a pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 promoter-driven Cre recombination system was used to mediate the knockout of PTEN or activation of PIK3caH1047R, a mutant of PI3K. Both were found to produce conditional GEMs of eCCA,80 which faithfully recapitulates human eCCA and provides a novel platform for genome-wide mutagenesis screening.

Models combining KrasG12D activation with TP53 knockout

The most common gene mutations in CCA are Kras and TP53.6 In 2012, O’Dell et al.81 established Alb-Cre+; KrasG12D; TP53L/L CCA models. Liver tumors formed as early as 9 weeks of age and were histopathologically confirmed to be 66% iCCA, 17% mixed HCC/iCCA, and 17% HCC. Most of the mice had symptoms of bloody ascites and tumor necrosis. In addition, 75% of the tumors invaded adjacent organs or developed distant metastases. It was also found that TP53 gene deletion alone was not sufficient to cause liver lesions even over a sufficiently long time period. However, when combined with KrasG12D activation, both heterozygous and homozygous TP53 mutations accelerated tumorigenesis and metastasis. Of note, a certain proportion of HCC was present in this model. To identify mechanisms driving precancerous lesions and subsequent progression toward invasive tumors that faithfully recapitulate human iCCA, a model that combined KrasG12D expression with a 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC) diet had the potential to mimic multistep pathological changes of chronic cholangitis, ductular hyperplasia, cystic atypical hyperplasia, and eventually iCCA.82 The model well represented the initiation and evolution of iCCA precursor lesions. When combined KrasG12D activation with TP53 deletion in liver, the mice formed mixed HCC/iCCA. Notably, the cells of tumor origin differed with different promoters. For example, Cre-mediated KrasG12D activation and TP53 deletion driven by the thyroid-binding globulin promoter in mice could result in mature hepatocyte-derived cHCC/iCCA, while the same genetic alterations driven by the SOX9 promoter eventually led to HCC/iCCA of biliary lineage origin.83

Models combining Kras activation and IDH2 mutation

IDH 1/2 mutations have been found in approximately 20% of iCCA cases.84Alb-Cre+; LSL-IDH2R172K; LSL-KrasG12D mice formed multifocal and palpable CK-19+, Hep Par1– iCCA lesions at 33–58 weeks of age with peritoneal metastases and splenic invasion, whereas mice with KrasG12D activation alone formed single HCC nodules.85 Mechanistically, mutant IDH inhibited the differentiation of hepatic progenitor cells in the liver after hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α inactivation, thus promoting iCCA formation. Because of the high mutation rate of IDH in tumors and the relatively mature clinical studies of IDH inhibitors,86 the model is of great significance for the direct evaluation of therapeutic response to anti-iCCA agents. However, the model has a relatively long incubation period.

Models combining Kras activation with TGF-βR2 and CDH1 inactivation

FGFR2 gene fusions are seen in 13–45% of iCCA patients,87,88 and frequent abnormal changes in TGF-β family receptors have been detected in eCCA by NGS.6 Nakagawa et al.89 first knocked CreERT into the endogenous K19 locus to obtain K19CreERT mice with TAM administration. Effective genetic recombination was confirmed with reporter mice. Then, K19CreERT; LSL-KrasG12D; TGFβR2L/L mice (KT-K19CreERT) were generated by crossing LSL-KrasG12D, TGFβR2L/L and K19CreERT mice and induced with TAM. All (15/15) KT-K19CreERT mice died of respiratory failure, which was probably caused by lung adenocarcinoma. CDH1 gene deletion has been shown to promote liver tumor development in mice90 and to lead to a series of pathological changes similar to those of primary sclerosing cholangitis in human. These mice showed an increased ductular reaction after 7 months of a high-fat diet (HFD).91 HFDs cause nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,92 and HFD-related models are a good tool for the study of the pathogenesis of iCCA in the context of chronic liver damage. HFDs also promote the initiation and deterioration of cHCC/iCCA in CDH1L/L/KRASG12D mice.91 By crossing KT-K19CreERT and CDH1L/L mice with KrasG12D mice, Nakagawa et al.89 established a KTC-K19CreERT mouse model characterized by CDH1/TGFβR2 dual knockout and Kras activation, in which the pathological manifestations were histologically similar to human eCCA, with jaundice and lymph node metastases, but no bile duct tumors were observed with alterations in any of the aforementioned genes. However, the mice developed lung adenocarcinomas, leading to lung failure or death within 4 weeks, which is not suitable for long-term experimental studies.

Models combining TP53 deficiency with carcinogens

A common limitation of transgenic CCA models is that the tumor initiation and formation do not involve chronic inflammation and liver injury, which limits the aggressive development of tumors. The exposure of transgenic mice to carcinogens can compensate for the lack of an inflammatory background in transgenic models. Intraperitoneal injection of transgenic mice with TP53 deletions with CCL4 three times a week for 4 months resulted in 54% of TP53L/L mice developing iCCA, and approximately 14% (1/7) mice developing lymph node metastasis at 29 weeks of age.93 Using a similar approach, Guest et al.94 fed hepatotoxic TAA to biliary epithelium-specific TP53-knockout transgenic mice in an attempt to induce a tumorigenic stress response. After 26 weeks, 80% of TP53L/L mice developed multifocal, invasive CCA in the liver.

Notch models

Aberrant Notch activation can activate Notch 1 intracellular domain (NICD), which has been implicated in a variety of tumors.95 The pathophysiological role of the Notch signaling pathway has been partially elucidated in CCA GEMs. For example, Alb-Cre:: NICD transgenic mice generated by crossing mice carrying a sequence encoding NICD overexpression with Cre mice activates the Notch signaling pathway, making mature hepatocytes transdifferentiate into biliary epithelial cells.96 Implanting liver tissue from 9-month-old transgenic mice subcutaneously into SCID mice results in the formation of iCCA after 3 weeks.97 Biliary tract malignancies are often accompanied by elevated levels of phosphorylated AKT.69 Cellular fate-tracing results have shown that overexpression of NICD combined with AKT leads to the development of iCCA originating from hepatocytes.98 Cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis B and C, and liver fluke infection are major risk factors for iCCA, which is often accompanied by chronic liver inflammation. In this context, iCCA has a high rate of TP53 gene mutation.99 In the basis of liver injury by TAA administration, TP53L/L transgenic mice develop iCCA originating from biliary epithelium.100 This model mimics a common situation in human cholangiocarcinogenesis.

Nonconditional GEMs

Nonconditional GEMs are usually established by local injection in the liver or bile duct and transposon- or duct-specific promoter-mediated constitutive activation of oncogenes. Transposons can carry relatively large exogenous gene fragments for efficient transposition in animals and are important tools in the field of transgenic animal modeling, of which a relatively commonly used one is the Sleeping Beauty transposon. Currently, several iCCA models have been constructed based on that system.

Phosphorylated AKT was found to be upregulated in eCCA.101 Similar to AKT, Yes-associated protein (YAP) is a transcriptional activator associated with primary liver cancer development.102 The method used to establish AKT/YAP models was to directly inject a transposase mixture containing AKT/YAP plasmids into the bile duct of wild-type C57BL/6 mice while ligating the bile draining duct so that the targeted oncogene remained in the left lobe of the liver. The mitogen IL-33, which has the ability to promote bile duct cell proliferation, inflammation, and liver fibrosis, was continuously injected intraperitoneally for 3 days after surgery, and its effect had been confirmed in previous studies.103 Seventy-two percent of mice transduced with the AKT/YAP gene and treated with IL-33 developed tumors that had a morphology and phenotype similar to human CCA, accompanied by high expression of the cholangiocyte markers CK-7, CK-19, and SOX9. Only 20% of mice transduced with the AKT/YAP gene alone developed iCCA, indicating that IL-33 plays an important role in iCCA formation. However, knockout of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase, in AKT/YAP mice delayed iCCA development and progression.104 Wang et al.105 used the same gene delivery technique to target liver with exogenous co-expression of myr-AKT and Fbxw7F, a dominant negative form of the tumor suppressor Fbxw7, and found the development of iCCA in YAP wild-type mice within a short time of approximately 54 day. In YAP homozygous deleted mice, the tumor latency was significantly prolonged. Using the same methods, histone lysine methyltransferase G9a, and NICD have been demonstrated to be involved in cholangiocarcinogenesis.106,107 This model develops tumors quickly and can be used to study new therapeutic drugs for iCCA. However, it is technically demanding because it requires surgical ligation of the bile ducts and bile duct perfusion with drugs.

In addition to tail vein injection, electroporation can be used to introduce exogenous DNA into cells. However, different models of gene introduction have been found to have different effects on the type of tumor that develops. For example, delivery of plasmids containing Myc and mutant NRAS proto-oncogene or AKT1 via tail vein injection induces HCC, whereas transfection of the same plasmids by electroporation induces iCCA formation.108 That indicates that the tumor microenvironment plays an important role in the development of CCA, and gene overexpression based on gene transduction modalities interact with the tumor microenvironment. Bovine protein 5 is a promoter that is actively expressed in both the stratified and pseudostratified epithelia of several organs, and is an important tool for constructing animal models of gene overexpression. A mouse model overexpressing wild-type erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 under the control of the Bovine protein 5 promoter has been modeled, and all of these mice developed gallbladder adenocarcinoma at 4 months of age.109 The model recapitulates the multistep evolution of gallbladder lesions.

Recently, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9) system, a new somatic gene editing technology, has been developed to mediate highly specific and irreversible genomic screening. An advantage of the technique is that genome-wide screening identifies several novel genes associated with tumorigenesis. For example, Weber et al.110 used the method to directly mediate multiple genetic mutations of up to 18 target gene sets in adult mouse liver somatic cells, and found that 100% of mice developed mixed HCC/iCCA after 20–30 weeks. CCA mouse models have also been established either via CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of Nf1,111 or through CRISPR/Cas9 system-based KRASG12D activation and TP53 deletion.112 Notably, the latency period of iCCA in the latter was significantly shorter than that in the comparable conditional GEMs model.112 Dasatinib sensitivity was tested in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated human iCCA cells with IDH mutation.113

Taken together, somatic gene integration models, especially those based on hydrodynamic injection and Sleeping Beauty transposon, are flexible, relatively easy to establish and have a short tumorigenic latency, therefore they are important tools to study gene and promoter functions. However, target gene transfection is mainly limited to the pericentral region and only lasts for a few hours to days.114 Hydrodynamic delivery can also cause transient liver damage. In the meantime, because mutations are present in cancers in adult human cancers and affect only a small number of cells, CRISPR/Cas9-based models are more responsive to tumorigenesis in humans.

Conclusions

There is no perfect animal model that meets all the needs of human CCA research. Choosing the right animal model for each experimental purpose is key. Multiple parameters such as tumor type, host immune activity, genetic alterations, and the tumor microenvironment, should be considered to weigh the advantages and disadvantages when selecting a model. For example, chemical-mechanical and infection-induced inflammatory models can simulate the entire process of tumor development by changing environmental factors, but an obvious shortcoming is the poor specificity of the tumors that develop, which may include tumors of multiple systems. Implantation models are easy to establish, but the tumors grow in immunodeficient animals, which makes it difficult to truly reflect the growth of human tumors. In contrast, GEMs can simulate the initiation of CCA at the genetic and molecular level, but available models using Alb-driven Cre-loxP system usually induce iCCA or a mixture of iCCA and HCC. Moreover, the latency period is long, the technology is demanding, and it is difficult to develop a system where the transgenic products fully and accurately reflect the growth of human tumors.

With the development of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, PDX models and GEMs are playing key roles in precision medicine. Humanized PDX models have benefits in immunotherapy drug screening in malignancies, such as nasopharyngeal carcinoma115 and triple-negative breast cancer.116 They also recapitulate the interactions of cancer, the tumor microenvironment, and the immune system in humans. Efforts should be made to develop humanized PDX models of all CCA subtypes to promote the development of individualized immunotherapy in the future. Simultaneously, there has been an active search for promoters that specifically target intrahepatic or extra-hepatic bile duct cells. Optimization of existing genetic recombination systems is a promising option. In addition, flexible CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technique may be another favorable choice. Ongoing optimization of preclinical animal models through the integration of various technologies will contribute to rapid translation from bench to bedside.

Abbreviations

Alb: 

albumin

CCA: 

cholangiocarcinoma

CHCC: 

combined hepatocellular carcinoma

DDC: 

3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine

DEN: 

diethylnitrosamine

ECCA: 

extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma

FGFR: 

fibrous growth factor receptor

GEMs: 

genetically engineered models

HFD: 

high-fat diet

ICCA: 

intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

IDH: 

isocitrate dehydrogenase

Kras: 

Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene

NGS: 

next-generation sequencing

NICD: 

Notch 1 intracellular domain

PDXs: 

patient-derived xenografts

PTEN: 

phosphatase and tensin homolog

SMAD4: 

recombinant human mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4

TAA: 

thioacetamide

TAM: 

tamoxifen

TGF-β: 

transforming growth factor beta

TP53: 

tumor protein p53

YAP: 

Yes-associated protein

Declarations

Funding

This work was supported by the Outstanding Young Talents Program in Higher Education Institutions of Anhui Province (No. gxfx2017066), the 512 Talent Cultivation Plan of Bengbu Medical College (No. by51202208), and the internal grants from both Distinguished Young Scholars Science Foundation (No. 2019byyfyjq02) and General New Technology Project (No. 2020144) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College. Baoan Ji is supported by the NCI-funded Mayo Clinic SPORE in Hepatobiliary Cancer (P50 CA210964).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests related to this publication.

Authors’ contributions

Conceived the work, designed the outline of the review and supervised all aspects of the manuscript (YY); Participated in the literature search, scrutiny and interpretation, as well as in writing and editing the manuscript (ML, XZ, WW, YS, QD, JY); Contributed to review of the data and critical revision of the review (BJ). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Khan SA, Genus T, Morement H, Murphy A, Rous B, Tataru D. Global trends in mortality from intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 2019;71(6):1261-1262 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  2. Banales JM, Marin JJG, Lamarca A, Rodrigues PM, Khan SA, Roberts LR, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;17(9):557-588 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  3. Vicent S, Lieshout R, Saborowski A, Verstegen MMA, Raggi C, Recalcati S, et al. Experimental models to unravel the molecular pathogenesis, cell of origin and stem cell properties of cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Int 2019;39(Suppl 1):S79-S97 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  4. Rizvi S, Khan SA, Hallemeier CL, Kelley RK, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma - evolving concepts and therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018;15(2):95-111 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  5. Rizzo A, Ricci AD, Brandi G. Recent advances of immunotherapy for biliary tract cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;15(5):527-536 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  6. Nakamura H, Arai Y, Totoki Y, Shirota T, Elzawahry A, Kato M, et al. Genomic spectra of biliary tract cancer. Nat Genet 2015;47(9):1003-1010 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  7. Valle JW, Lamarca A, Goyal L, Barriuso J, Zhu AX. New Horizons for Precision Medicine in Biliary Tract Cancers. Cancer Discov 2017;7(9):943-962 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  8. Wardell CP, Fujita M, Yamada T, Simbolo M, Fassan M, Karlic R, et al. Genomic characterization of biliary tract cancers identifies driver genes and predisposing mutations. J Hepatol 2018;68(5):959-969 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  9. Montal R, Sia D, Montironi C, Leow WQ, Esteban-Fabró R, Pinyol R, et al. Molecular classification and therapeutic targets in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 2020;73(2):315-327 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  10. Bekaii-Saab TS, Bridgewater J, Normanno N. Practical considerations in screening for genetic alterations in cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Oncol 2021;32(9):1111-1126 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  11. Cadamuro M, Brivio S, Stecca T, Kaffe E, Mariotti V, Milani C, et al. Animal models of cholangiocarcinoma: What they teach us about the human disease. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2018;42(5):403-415 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  12. Loeuillard E, Fischbach SR, Gores GJ, Rizvi S. Animal models of cholangiocarcinoma. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 2019;1865(5):982-992 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  13. Mohr R, Özdirik B, Knorr J, Wree A, Demir M, Tacke F, et al. In Vivo Models for Cholangiocarcinoma-What Can We Learn for Human Disease?. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21(14):4993 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  14. Massa A, Varamo C, Vita F, Tavolari S, Peraldo-Neia C, Brandi G, et al. Evolution of the Experimental Models of Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12(8):2308 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  15. Izumiya M, Kato S, Hippo Y. Recent Advances in Implantation-Based Genetic Modeling of Biliary Carcinogenesis in Mice. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13(10):2292 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  16. Williams GM. Chemicals with carcinogenic activity in the rodent liver; mechanistic evaluation of human risk. Cancer Lett 1997;117(2):175-188 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  17. Burka LT, Washburn KD, Irwin RD. Disposition of [14C] furan in the male F344 rat. J Toxicol Environ Health 1991;34(2):245-257 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  18. Maronpot RR, Giles HD, Dykes DJ, Irwin RD. Furan-induced hepatic cholangiocarcinomas in Fischer 344 rats. Toxicol Pathol 1991;19(4 Pt 2):561-570 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  19. Elmore LW, Sirica AE. Phenotypic characterization of metaplastic intestinal glands and ductular hepatocytes in cholangiofibrotic lesions rapidly induced in the caudate liver lobe of rats treated with furan. Cancer Res 1991;51(20):5752-5759 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  20. Hickling KC, Hitchcock JM, Chipman JK, Hammond TG, Evans JG. Induction and progression of cholangiofibrosis in rat liver injured by oral administration of furan. Toxicol Pathol 2010;38(2):213-229 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  21. Von Tungeln LS, Walker NJ, Olson GR, Mendoza MC, Felton RP, Thorn BT, et al. Low dose assessment of the carcinogenicity of furan in male F344/N Nctr rats in a 2-year gavage study. Food Chem Toxicol 2017;99:170-181 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  22. Praet MM, Roels HJ. Histogenesis of cholangiomas and cholangiocarcinomas in thioacetamide fed rats. Exp Pathol 1984;26(1):3-14 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  23. Yeh CN, Maitra A, Lee KF, Jan YY, Chen MF. Thioacetamide-induced intestinal-type cholangiocarcinoma in rat: an animal model recapitulating the multi-stage progression of human cholangiocarcinoma. Carcinogenesis 2004;25(4):631-636 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  24. Al-Bader A, Mathew TC, Abul H, Al-Sayer H, Singal PK, Dashti HM. Cholangiocarcinoma and liver cirrhosis in relation to changes due to thioacetamide. Mol Cell Biochem 2000;208(1-2):1-10 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  25. Pan YR, Wu CE, Chen MH, Huang WK, Shih HJ, Lan KL, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Immune-Checkpoint DNA Cancer Vaccines in a Rat Cholangiocarcinoma Model. Vaccines (Basel) 2020;8(4):703 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  26. Fujii Y, Segawa R, Kimura M, Wang L, Ishii Y, Yamamoto R, et al. Inhibitory effect of α-lipoic acid on thioacetamide-induced tumor promotion through suppression of inflammatory cell responses in a two-stage hepatocarcinogenesis model in rats. Chem Biol Interact 2013;205(2):108-118 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  27. Romualdo GR, Grassi TF, Goto RL, Tablas MB, Bidinotto LT, Fernandes AAH, et al. An integrative analysis of chemically-induced cirrhosis-associated hepatocarcinogenesis: Histological, biochemical and molecular features. Toxicol Lett 2017;281:84-94 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  28. Bridgewater J, Galle PR, Khan SA, Llovet JM, Park JW, Patel T, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 2014;60(6):1268-1289 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  29. Dietrich CG, Geier A, Wasmuth HE, Matern S, Gartung C, de Waart DR, et al. Influence of biliary cirrhosis on the detoxification and elimination of a food derived carcinogen. Gut 2004;53(12):1850-1855 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  30. Lozano E, Sanchez-Vicente L, Monte MJ, Herraez E, Briz O, Banales JM, et al. Cocarcinogenic effects of intrahepatic bile acid accumulation in cholangiocarcinoma development. Mol Cancer Res 2014;12(1):91-100 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  31. Thamavit W, Pairojkul C, Tiwawech D, Itoh M, Shirai T, Ito N. Promotion of cholangiocarcinogenesis in the hamster liver by bile duct ligation after dimethylnitrosamine initiation. Carcinogenesis 1993;14(11):2415-2417 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  32. Liu T, Yang H, Fan W, Tu J, Li TWH, Wang J, et al. Mechanisms of MAFG Dysregulation in Cholestatic Liver Injury and Development of Liver Cancer. Gastroenterology 2018;155(2):557-571.e514 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  33. Yang H, Li TW, Peng J, Tang X, Ko KS, Xia M, et al. A mouse model of cholestasis-associated cholangiocarcinoma and transcription factors involved in progression. Gastroenterology 2011;141(1):378-388.e4 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  34. Thamavit W, Bhamarapravati N, Sahaphong S, Vajrasthira S, Angsubhakorn S. Effects of dimethylnitrosamine on induction of cholangiocarcinoma in Opisthorchis viverrini-infected Syrian golden hamsters. Cancer Res 1978;38(12):4634-4639 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  35. Loilome W, Yongvanit P, Wongkham C, Tepsiri N, Sripa B, Sithithaworn P, et al. Altered gene expression in Opisthorchis viverrini-associated cholangiocarcinoma in hamster model. Mol Carcinog 2006;45(5):279-287 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  36. Upontain S, Sereerak P, Laha T, Sripa B, Tangkawatana P, Brindley PJ, et al. Granulin Expression in Hamsters during Opisthorchis viverrini Infection-Induced Cholangiocarcinogenesis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018;19(9):2437-2445 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  37. Suksawat M, Techasen A, Namwat N, Yongvanit P, Khuntikeo N, Titapun A, et al. Upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and its upstream regulators in Opisthorchis viverrini associated cholangiocarcinoma and its clinical significance. Parasitol Int 2017;66(4):486-493 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  38. Laothong U, Pinlaor P, Boonsiri P, Pairojkul C, Priprem A, Johns NP, et al. Melatonin inhibits cholangiocarcinoma and reduces liver injury in Opisthorchis viverrini-infected and N-nitrosodimethylamine-treated hamsters. J Pineal Res 2013;55(3):257-266 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  39. Rizvi S, Fischbach SR, Bronk SF, Hirsova P, Krishnan A, Dhanasekaran R, et al. YAP-associated chromosomal instability and cholangiocarcinoma in mice. Oncotarget 2018;9(5):5892-5905 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  40. Sirica AE, Zhang Z, Lai GH, Asano T, Shen XN, Ward DJ, et al. A novel “patient-like” model of cholangiocarcinoma progression based on bile duct inoculation of tumorigenic rat cholangiocyte cell lines. Hepatology 2008;47(4):1178-1190 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  41. Mertens JC, Fingas CD, Christensen JD, Smoot RL, Bronk SF, Werneburg NW, et al. Therapeutic effects of deleting cancer-associated fibroblasts in cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Res 2013;73(2):897-907 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  42. Fingas CD, Mertens JC, Razumilava N, Bronk SF, Sirica AE, Gores GJ. Targeting PDGFR-β in Cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Int 2012;32(3):400-409 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  43. Blechacz BR, Smoot RL, Bronk SF, Werneburg NW, Sirica AE, Gores GJ. Sorafenib inhibits signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 signaling in cholangiocarcinoma cells by activating the phosphatase shatterproof 2. Hepatology 2009;50(6):1861-1870 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  44. Razumilava N, Gradilone SA, Smoot RL, Mertens JC, Bronk SF, Sirica AE, et al. Non-canonical Hedgehog signaling contributes to chemotaxis in cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 2014;60(3):599-605 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  45. De Minicis S, Kisseleva T, Francis H, Baroni GS, Benedetti A, Brenner D, et al. Liver carcinogenesis: rodent models of hepatocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Dig Liver Dis 2013;45(6):450-459 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  46. Hudd C, Euhus DM, LaRegina MC, Herbold DR, Palmer DC, Johnson FE. Effect of cholecystokinin on human cholangiocarcinoma xenografted into nude mice. Cancer Res 1985;45(3):1372-1377 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  47. Bai X, Zhang H, Zhou Y, Nagaoka K, Meng J, Ji C, et al. Ten-Eleven Translocation 1 Promotes Malignant Progression of Cholangiocarcinoma With Wild-Type Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1. Hepatology 2021;73(5):1747-1763 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  48. Zhu H, Han C, Lu D, Wu T. miR-17-92 cluster promotes cholangiocarcinoma growth: evidence for PTEN as downstream target and IL-6/Stat3 as upstream activator. Am J Pathol 2014;184(10):2828-2839 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  49. Lin Y, Cai Q, Chen Y, Shi T, Liu W, Mao L, et al. CAFs shape myeloid-derived suppressor cells to promote stemness of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma via 5-lipoxygenase. Hepatology 2022;75(1):28-42 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  50. McVeigh LE, Wijetunga I, Ingram N, Marston G, Prasad R, Markham AF, et al. Development of orthotopic tumour models using ultrasound-guided intrahepatic injection. Sci Rep 2019;9(1):9904 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  51. Cavalloni G, Peraldo-Neia C, Sassi F, Chiorino G, Sarotto I, Aglietta M, et al. Establishment of a patient-derived intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma xenograft model with KRAS mutation. BMC Cancer 2016;16:90 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  52. Wang Y, Ding X, Wang S, Moser CD, Shaleh HM, Mohamed EA, et al. Antitumor effect of FGFR inhibitors on a novel cholangiocarcinoma patient derived xenograft mouse model endogenously expressing an FGFR2-CCDC6 fusion protein. Cancer Lett 2016;380(1):163-173 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  53. Lixin S, Wei S, Haibin S, Qingfu L, Tiemin P. miR-885-5p inhibits proliferation and metastasis by targeting IGF2BP1 and GALNT3 in human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Mol Carcinog 2020;59(12):1371-1381 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  54. Gao J, Dai C, Yu X, Yin XB, Zhou F. Upregulated microRNA-194 impairs stemness of cholangiocarcinoma cells through the Rho pathway via inhibition of ECT2. J Cell Biochem 2020;121(10):4239-4250 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  55. Li F, Chen Q, Xue H, Zhang L, Wang K, Shen F. LncRNA MNX1-AS1 promotes progression of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma through the MNX1/Hippo axis. Cell Death Dis 2020;11(10):894 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  56. Yu A, Zhao L, Kang Q, Li J, Chen K, Fu H. SOX2 knockdown slows cholangiocarcinoma progression through inhibition of transcriptional activation of lncRNA PVT1. Biochem J 2020;477(18):3527-3540 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  57. Pan X, Wang G, Wang B. MicroRNA-1182 and let-7a exert synergistic inhibition on invasion, migration and autophagy of cholangiocarcinoma cells through down-regulation of NUAK1. Cancer Cell Int 2021;21(1):161 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  58. He C, Xia J, Gao Y, Chen Z, Wan X. Chlorin A-mediated photodynamic therapy induced apoptosis in human cholangiocarcinoma cells via impaired autophagy flux. Am J Transl Res 2020;12(9):5080-5094 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  59. Blanquart C, Jaurand MC, Jean D. The Biology of Malignant Mesothelioma and the Relevance of Preclinical Models. Front Oncol 2020;10:388 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  60. Kung AL. Practices and pitfalls of mouse cancer models in drug discovery. Adv Cancer Res 2007;96:191-212 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  61. Vaeteewoottacharn K, Pairojkul C, Kariya R, Muisuk K, Imtawil K, Chamgramol Y, et al. Establishment of Highly Transplantable Cholangiocarcinoma Cell Lines from a Patient-Derived Xenograft Mouse Model. Cells 2019;8(5):496 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  62. Hernandez MC, Bergquist JR, Leiting JL, Ivanics T, Yang L, Smoot RL, et al. Patient-Derived Xenografts Can Be Reliably Generated from Patient Clinical Biopsy Specimens. J Gastrointest Surg 2019;23(4):818-824 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  63. Hernandez MC, Yang L, Leiting JL, Sugihara T, Bergquist JR, Ivanics T, et al. Successful Secondary Engraftment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma Patient-Derived Xenografts After Previous Failed Primary Engraftment. Transl Oncol 2019;12(1):69-75 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  64. Walrath JC, Hawes JJ, Van Dyke T, Reilly KM. Genetically engineered mouse models in cancer research. Adv Cancer Res 2010;106:113-164 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  65. Pirenne S, Lemaigre FP. Genetically engineered animal models of biliary tract cancers. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2020;36(2):90-98 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  66. Kos CH. Cre/loxP system for generating tissue-specific knockout mouse models. Nutr Rev 2004;62(6 Pt 1):243-246 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  67. Postic C, Magnuson MA. DNA excision in liver by an albumin-Cre transgene occurs progressively with age. Genesis 2000;26(2):149-150 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  68. Kim H, Kim M, Im SK, Fang S. Mouse Cre-LoxP system: general principles to determine tissue-specific roles of target genes. Lab Anim Res 2018;34(4):147-159 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  69. Corti F, Nichetti F, Raimondi A, Niger M, Prinzi N, Torchio M, et al. Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in biliary tract cancers: A review of current evidences and future perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev 2019;72:45-55 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  70. Chung JY, Hong SM, Choi BY, Cho H, Yu E, Hewitt SM. The expression of phospho-AKT, phospho-mTOR, and PTEN in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(2):660-667 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  71. Kang YK, Kim WH, Jang JJ. Expression of G1-S modulators (p53, p16, p27, cyclin D1, Rb) and Smad4/Dpc4 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hum Pathol 2002;33(9):877-883 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  72. Miyaki M, Kuroki T. Role of Smad4 (DPC4) inactivation in human cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003;306(4):799-804 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  73. Xu X, Kobayashi S, Qiao W, Li C, Xiao C, Radaeva S, et al. Induction of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma by liver-specific disruption of Smad4 and Pten in mice. J Clin Invest 2006;116(7):1843-1852 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  74. Horie Y, Suzuki A, Kataoka E, Sasaki T, Hamada K, Sasaki J, et al. Hepatocyte-specific Pten deficiency results in steatohepatitis and hepatocellular carcinomas. J Clin Invest 2004;113(12):1774-1783 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  75. Zou S, Li J, Zhou H, Frech C, Jiang X, Chu JS, et al. Mutational landscape of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Nat Commun 2014;5:5696 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  76. Marsh V, Davies EJ, Williams GT, Clarke AR. PTEN loss and KRAS activation cooperate in murine biliary tract malignancies. J Pathol 2013;230(2):165-173 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  77. Ikenoue T, Terakado Y, Nakagawa H, Hikiba Y, Fujii T, Matsubara D, et al. A novel mouse model of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma induced by liver-specific Kras activation and Pten deletion. Sci Rep 2016;6:23899 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  78. Lin YK, Fang Z, Jiang TY, Wan ZH, Pan YF, Ma YH, et al. Combination of Kras activation and PTEN deletion contributes to murine hepatopancreatic ductal malignancy. Cancer Lett 2018;421:161-169 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  79. Chen J, Debebe A, Zeng N, Kopp J, He L, Sander M, et al. Transformation of SOX9(+) cells by Pten deletion synergizes with steatotic liver injury to drive development of hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma. Sci Rep 2021;11(1):11823 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  80. Falcomata C, Barthel S, Ulrich A, Diersch S, Veltkamp C, Rad L, et al. Genetic screens identify a context-specific PI3K/p27Kip1 node driving extrahepatic biliary cancer. Cancer Discov 2021;11(12):3158-3177 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  81. O’Dell MR, Huang JL, Whitney-Miller CL, Deshpande V, Rothberg P, Grose V, et al. Kras(G12D) and p53 mutation cause primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Res 2012;72(6):1557-1567 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  82. Di-Luoffo M, Pirenne S, Saandi T, Loriot A, Gérard C, Dauguet N, et al. A novel mouse model of cholangiocarcinoma uncovers a role for Tensin-4 in tumor progression. Hepatology 2021;74(3):1445-1460 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  83. Hill MA, Alexander WB, Guo B, Kato Y, Patra K, O’Dell MR, et al. Kras and Tp53 Mutations Cause Cholangiocyte- and Hepatocyte-Derived Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Res 2018;78(16):4445-4451 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  84. Fujiwara H, Tateishi K, Kato H, Nakatsuka T, Yamamoto K, Tanaka Y, et al. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation sensitizes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma to the BET inhibitor JQ1. Cancer Sci 2018;109(11):3602-3610 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  85. Saha SK, Parachoniak CA, Ghanta KS, Fitamant J, Ross KN, Najem MS, et al. Mutant IDH inhibits HNF-4α to block hepatocyte differentiation and promote biliary cancer. Nature 2014;513(7516):110-114 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  86. Rohle D, Popovici-Muller J, Palaskas N, Turcan S, Grommes C, Campos C, et al. An inhibitor of mutant IDH1 delays growth and promotes differentiation of glioma cells. Science 2013;340(6132):626-630 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  87. Sia D, Losic B, Moeini A, Cabellos L, Hao K, Revill K, et al. Massive parallel sequencing uncovers actionable FGFR2-PPHLN1 fusion and ARAF mutations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Nat Commun 2015;6:6087 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  88. Rizvi S, Yamada D, Hirsova P, Bronk SF, Werneburg NW, Krishnan A, et al. A Hippo and Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Autocrine Pathway in Cholangiocarcinoma. J Biol Chem 2016;291(15):8031-8047 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  89. Nakagawa H, Suzuki N, Hirata Y, Hikiba Y, Hayakawa Y, Kinoshita H, et al. Biliary epithelial injury-induced regenerative response by IL-33 promotes cholangiocarcinogenesis from peribiliary glands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017;114(19):E3806-e3815 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  90. Nakagawa H, Hikiba Y, Hirata Y, Font-Burgada J, Sakamoto K, Hayakawa Y, et al. Loss of liver E-cadherin induces sclerosing cholangitis and promotes carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111(3):1090-1095 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  91. Maeda S, Hikiba Y, Fujiwara H, Ikenoue T, Sue S, Sugimori M, et al. NAFLD exacerbates cholangitis and promotes cholangiocellular carcinoma in mice. Cancer Sci 2021;112(4):1471-1480 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  92. Kumar R, Priyadarshi RN, Anand U. Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Growing Burden, Adverse Outcomes and Associations. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2020;8(1):76-86 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  93. Farazi PA, Zeisberg M, Glickman J, Zhang Y, Kalluri R, DePinho RA. Chronic bile duct injury associated with fibrotic matrix microenvironment provokes cholangiocarcinoma in p53-deficient mice. Cancer Res 2006;66(13):6622-6627 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  94. Guest RV, Boulter L, Dwyer BJ, Kendall TJ, Man TY, Minnis-Lyons SE, et al. Notch3 drives development and progression of cholangiocarcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016;113(43):12250-12255 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  95. Bray SJ. Notch signalling: a simple pathway becomes complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006;7(9):678-689 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  96. Zong Y, Panikkar A, Xu J, Antoniou A, Raynaud P, Lemaigre F, et al. Notch signaling controls liver development by regulating biliary differentiation. Development 2009;136(10):1727-1739 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  97. Zender S, Nickeleit I, Wuestefeld T, Sörensen I, Dauch D, Bozko P, et al. A critical role for notch signaling in the formation of cholangiocellular carcinomas. Cancer Cell 2013;23(6):784-795 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  98. Fan B, Malato Y, Calvisi DF, Naqvi S, Razumilava N, Ribback S, et al. Cholangiocarcinomas can originate from hepatocytes in mice. J Clin Invest 2012;122(8):2911-2915 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  99. Ong CK, Subimerb C, Pairojkul C, Wongkham S, Cutcutache I, Yu W, et al. Exome sequencing of liver fluke-associated cholangiocarcinoma. Nat Genet 2012;44(6):690-693 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  100. Guest RV, Boulter L, Kendall TJ, Minnis-Lyons SE, Walker R, Wigmore SJ, et al. Cell lineage tracing reveals a biliary origin of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Res 2014;74(4):1005-1010 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  101. Kim BH, Kim K, Min HS, Chie EK, Jang JY, Kim SW, et al. Phosphorylated Akt Expression as a Favorable Prognostic Factor for Patients Undergoing Curative Resection and Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Proximal Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2017;40(2):158-162 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  102. Li H, Wolfe A, Septer S, Edwards G, Zhong X, Abdulkarim AB, et al. Deregulation of Hippo kinase signalling in human hepatic malignancies. Liver Int 2012;32(1):38-47 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  103. Marvie P, Lisbonne M, L’Helgoualc’h A, Rauch M, Turlin B, Preisser L, et al. Interleukin-33 overexpression is associated with liver fibrosis in mice and humans. J Cell Mol Med 2010;14(6b):1726-1739 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  104. Song X, Xu H, Wang P, Wang J, Affo S, Wang H, et al. Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) promotes cholangiocarcinoma development and progression via YAP activation. J Hepatol 2021;75(4):888-899 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  105. Wang J, Wang H, Peters M, Ding N, Ribback S, Utpatel K, et al. Loss of Fbxw7 synergizes with activated Akt signaling to promote c-Myc dependent cholangiocarcinogenesis. J Hepatol 2019;71(4):742-752 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  106. Ma W, Han C, Zhang J, Song K, Chen W, Kwon H, et al. The Histone Methyltransferase G9a Promotes Cholangiocarcinogenesis Through Regulation of the Hippo Pathway Kinase LATS2 and YAP Signaling Pathway. Hepatology 2020;72(4):1283-1297 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  107. Guo J, Fu W, Xiang M, Zhang Y, Zhou K, Xu CR, et al. Notch1 Drives the Formation and Proliferation of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Curr Med Sci 2019;39(6):929-937 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  108. Seehawer M, Heinzmann F, D’Artista L, Harbig J, Roux PF, Hoenicke L, et al. Necroptosis microenvironment directs lineage commitment in liver cancer. Nature 2018;562(7725):69-75 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  109. Kiguchi K, Carbajal S, Chan K, Beltrán L, Ruffino L, Shen J, et al. Constitutive expression of ErbB-2 in gallbladder epithelium results in development of adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 2001;61(19):6971-6976 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  110. Weber J, Öllinger R, Friedrich M, Ehmer U, Barenboim M, Steiger K, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 somatic multiplex-mutagenesis for high-throughput functional cancer genomics in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112(45):13982-13987 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  111. Song CQ, Li Y, Mou H, Moore J, Park A, Pomyen Y, et al. Genome-Wide CRISPR Screen Identifies Regulators of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase as Suppressors of Liver Tumors in Mice. Gastroenterology 2017;152(5):1161-1173.e1161 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  112. Mou H, Ozata DM, Smith JL, Sheel A, Kwan SY, Hough S, et al. CRISPR-SONIC: targeted somatic oncogene knock-in enables rapid in vivo cancer modeling. Genome Med 2019;11(1):21 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  113. Saha SK, Gordan JD, Kleinstiver BP, Vu P, Najem MS, Yeo JC, et al. Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutations Confer Dasatinib Hypersensitivity and SRC Dependence in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Discov 2016;6(7):727-739 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  114. Liu F, Song Y, Liu D. Hydrodynamics-based transfection in animals by systemic administration of plasmid DNA. Gene Ther 1999;6(7):1258-1266 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  115. Liu WN, Fong SY, Tan WWS, Tan SY, Liu M, Cheng JY, et al. Establishment and Characterization of Humanized Mouse NPC-PDX Model for Testing Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12(4):1025 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  116. Scherer SD, Riggio AI, Haroun F, DeRose YS, Ekiz HA, Fujita M, et al. An immune-humanized patient-derived xenograft model of estrogen-independent, hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2021;23(1):100 View Article PubMed/NCBI

Copyright © 2022 Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0), permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • © 2024 Xia & He Publishing Inc.
  • Total visits : 2641534
  • Visits today : 348