Home
JournalsCollections
For Authors For Reviewers For Editorial Board Members
Article Processing Charges Open Access
Ethics Advertising Policy
Editorial Policy Resource Center
Company Information Contact Us
OPEN ACCESS

Metabolic-associated Fatty Liver Disease

  • Ming-Hua Zheng1,2,3,* 
Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology   2021;9(6):793-794

doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00439

Received:

Revised:

Accepted:

Published online:

 Author information

Citation: Zheng MH. Metabolic-associated Fatty Liver Disease. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2021;9(6):793-794. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00439.

A panel of experts from 22 countries recently proposed a name change from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, or MAFLD.1 Subsequently, new criteria for diagnosing MAFLD were provided to help guide clinicians in their clinical practice.2 The criteria are based on evidence of hepatic steatosis in the presence of one or more of overweight/obesity, type 2 diabetes, or metabolic dysregulation.3 The proposed novel diagnostic criteria represent a landmark in hepatology that combines our current understanding of obesity, metabolic syndrome and system biology into a single focus.4,5

MAFLD is highly prevalent, affecting more than a quarter of the world’s population. The prevalence in Asia is following a trajectory similar to that in the western countries, with China having a projected burden of 314 million cases by 2030,6 but disease awareness and public response in government funding have been inadequate for decades. The current problems are partially attributable to a difficult diagnosis when using the criteria for NAFLD because a range of other conditions such as excess alcohol consumption, viral hepatitis, or immune mediated liver injury must first be excluded. The need to rule out competing etiologies for fatty liver disease may prove to be counter-intuitive, as hepatologists often find chronic hepatitis B infection coexistent with liver steatosis. Conversely, a diagnosis of MAFLD allows for inclusion of mixed etiologies, such as viral hepatitis, which is a new way of thinking about fatty liver disease,7 while establishing a conceptual framework to consider other etiologies that might contribute to and worsen the liver condition.

It is likely that the general adoption of MAFLD will be challenging, and will require focused efforts by all stakeholders such as academics, practitioners, medical organizations, and policy makers.8–12 Debates that take evidence-based medicine into account may encourage others to consider alternate viewpoints, and contribute to an informed clinical decision.13–15 Therefore, in recognition of the pivotal importance of improved knowledge of fatty liver disease, the Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology has sought to provide a forum for the MAFLD vs. NAFLD debate. As the guest editor, I undertook the task of creating a special issue grounded in the science contributing to the MAFLD discussion. Since January 2021, we received over 23 reviews, meta-analyses, experimental, and clinical studies from 11 countries. Fourteen have been accepted for publication following editorial and blinded peer review (Fig. 1).

MAFLD studies included in a special issue of the <italic>Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology</italic>.
Fig. 1  MAFLD studies included in a special issue of the Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology.

MAFLD, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Transitioning from NAFLD to MAFLD may be beneficial, but the new definition should not be adopted without careful consideration. Indeed, discussion of the critical evidence is ongoing, especially the lack of exclusion of confounding conditions in the definition of MAFLD. It has led so far to numerous position statements published by liver societies and organizations worldwide. In China, a group of hepatologists and gastroenterologists representing 31 administrative regions organized by the Chinese Society of Hepatology, conducted a survey to consider before endorsing the MAFLD terminology.16 In the survey, 95.45% of participants approved the name change and 75.76% supported the updated diagnostic criteria for MAFLD. Endorsement of the MAFLD terminology has been obtained in Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa.3,17–19 The journal seeks to provide insightful articles that may improve the understanding and awareness of the disease, with the hope of promoting translation of research outcomes from research to better care of MAFLD patients.

Abbreviations

MAFLD: 

metabolic-associated fatty liver disease

NAFLD: 

nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Declarations

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82070588), High Level Creative Talents from Department of Public Health in Zhejiang Province (S2032102600032) and Project of New Century 551 Talent Nurturing in Wenzhou.

Conflict of interest

MHZ has been an associate editor of Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology since 2013.

References

  1. Eslam M, Sanyal AJ, George J. MAFLD: A Consensus-Driven Proposed Nomenclature for Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2020;158:1999-2014.e1 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  2. Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, Anstee QM, Targher G, Romero-Gomez M, et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol 2020;73:202-209 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  3. Eslam M, Sarin SK, Wong VW, Fan JG, Kawaguchi T, Ahn SH, et al. The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Hepatol Int 2020;14:889-919 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  4. Zheng KI, Fan JG, Shi JP, Wong VWS, Eslam M, George J, et al. From NAFLD to MAFLD: a “redefining” moment for fatty liver disease. Chin Med J (Engl) 2020;133:2271-2273 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  5. Zheng KI, Sun DQ, Jin Y, Zhu PW, Zheng MH. Clinical utility of the MAFLD definition. J Hepatol 2021;74:989-991 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  6. Estes C, Anstee QM, Arias-Loste MT, Bantel H, Bellentani S, Caballeria J, et al. Modeling NAFLD disease burden in China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States for the period 2016-2030. J Hepatol 2018;69:896-904 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  7. Zheng KI, Eslam M, George J, Zheng MH. When a new definition overhauls perceptions of MAFLD related cirrhosis care. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2020;9:801-804 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  8. Alem SA, Gaber Y, Abdalla M, Said E, Fouad Y. Capturing patient experience: A qualitative study of change from NAFLD to MAFLD real-time feedback. J Hepatol 2021;74:1261-1262 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  9. Angelico F, Daniele P, Del Ben M. Impact of the New Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) on NAFLD Patients Classification in Italy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;10:S1542-3565(21)00149-X View Article PubMed/NCBI
  10. Clayton M, Fabrellas N, Luo J, Alghamdi MG, Hafez A, Qadiri TA, et al. From NAFLD to MAFLD: Nurse and allied health perspective. Liver Int 2021;41:683-691 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  11. Mendez-Sanchez N, Diaz-Orozco L, Cordova-Gallardo J. Redefinition of fatty liver disease from NAFLD to MAFLD raised disease awareness: Mexican experience. J Hepatol 2021;75:221-222 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  12. Shiha G, Korenjak M, Eskridge W, Casanovas T, Velez-Moller P, Högström S, et al. Redefining fatty liver disease: an international patient perspective. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;6:73-79 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  13. Eslam M, George J. MAFLD: A holistic view to redefining fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2021;74:983-985 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  14. Sun DQ, Jin Y, Wang TY, Zheng KI, Rios RS, Zhang HY, et al. MAFLD and risk of CKD. Metabolism 2021;115:154433 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  15. Tilg H, Effenberger M. From NAFLD to MAFLD: when pathophysiology succeeds. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;17:387-388 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  16. Nan Y, An J, Bao J, Chen H, Chen Y, Ding H, et al. The Chinese Society of Hepatology position statement on the redefinition of fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2021;75:454-461 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  17. Mendez-Sanchez N, Arrese M, Gadano A, Oliveira CP, Fassio E, Arab JP, et al. The Latin American Association for the Study of the Liver (ALEH) position statement on the redefinition of fatty liver disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;6:65-72 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  18. Spearman CW, Desalegn H, Ocama P, Awuku YA, Ojo O, Elsahhar M, et al. The sub-Saharan Africa position statement on the redefinition of fatty liver disease: From NAFLD to MAFLD. J Hepatol 2021;74:1256-1258 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  19. Shiha G, Alswat K, Al Khatry M, Sharara AI, Örmeci N, Waked I, et al. Nomenclature and definition of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease: a consensus from the Middle East and north Africa. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;6:57-64 View Article PubMed/NCBI