Introduction
Cirrhosis is the end-stage of various chronic liver diseases and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In 2017, approximately 1.32 million deaths were attributable to liver cirrhosis worldwide, accounting for 2.4% of total deaths in that year.1 Most patients with cirrhosis die of hepatic decompensation. In China, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the most common cause of cirrhosis. Although oral antiviral drugs are effective in improving hepatic function and survival outcomes of patients with viral hepatitis-related decompensated cirrhosis,2 the median survival time decreases from 12 to 2–4 years once compensated cirrhosis progresses to the stage of decompensation3 and imposing a heavy healthcare cost burden.4 Liver transplantation is the only effective treatment for patients with decompensated cirrhosis, a donor shortage and high medical costs are significant barriers to its wider use. There is a growing need for therapies to improve the quality of life and survival of patients with decompensated cirrhosis, and reduce the mortality and healthcare costs.
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is a commonly used complementary and alternative therapy for patients with chronic liver diseases in China. It has been shown to improve clinical symptoms and the effectiveness of antiviral drugs for HBeAg clearance in patients with HBV infection,5 reduce the risk of cirrhosis6 and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC),7 and increase the 5-year survival of patients with decompensated cirrhosis.8 Clinical and experimental studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of Yanggan Jian (YGJ), a Chinese herbal compound, for the prevention and treatment of cirrhosis,9–11 but there is a lack of evidence from randomized clinical trials. In this study, we evaluated the short-term efficacy and safety of YGJ in HBV-infected patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Its efficacy and safety were assessed by Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, hepatic function, incidence of HCC, variceal bleeding, and mortality.
Results
Subject disposition
Patients were recruited from May 2015 to March, 2020. A total of 453 were screened, 293 of whom were excluded because of lack of intention to participate, and the remaining 160 patients with HBV-infected cirrhosis were enrolled. The subject disposition is shown in Figure 1. At the 36-week follow-up, 22 of the 160 patients had discontinued treatment, three had developed liver cancer within 3 months after enrollment, two discontinued because of AEs, 15 withdrew consent, two were lost to follow-up, and 21 were excluded from the FAS. The average age was 53.7±9.6 years (IQR 26.0–72.0 years), 69.8% were men, the average body mass index was 23.0±3.5 kg/m2, and the average CTP score was 8.5±1.7. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced (Table 1, Supplementary Tables 1–3). The globulin concentration was higher in the placebo than in the YGJ group (p=0.009), and the red blood cell count was lower (p=0.032, Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). The placebo group had a higher proportion of patients receiving concomitant treatment with other herbal decoctions (p=0.002) and Chinese patent drugs (p=0.012; Table 1, Supplementary Table 1).
Table 1Baseline demographics and disease characteristics (full analysis set)
Variable | Placebo group (n=68) | YGJ group (n=71) | p-value |
---|
Age, years | 54.2±9.41 | 52.7±9.61 | 0.349 |
Male | 43 (63.2) | 54 (76.1) | 0.100 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 22.7±2.9 | 23.2±4.0 | 0.378 |
History of hepatitis B (months) | 80.0 (13.0, 196.0) | 96.0 (12.0, 221.0) | 0.916 |
History of liver cirrhosis (months) | 8.0 (1.0, 41.0) | 23.5 (2.0, 91.0) | 0.080 |
Antiviral drugs | | | |
ETV | 48 (70.6) | 46 (64.8) | 0.764 |
TDF | 13 (19.1) | 16 (22.5) | |
Other | 7 (10.3) | 9 (12.7) | |
First treatment with antiviral drugs | 28 (42.4) | 22 (32.4) | 0.228 |
HBeAg positivity | 22 (32.4) | 25 (35.2) | 0.722 |
HBV-DNA (log10 IU/mL) | 1.8±2.4 | 1.7±2.4 | 0.929 |
HBV-DNA (positive) | 22 (32.4) | 24 (33.8) | 0.856 |
herbal decoction pieces | 29 (45.3) | 13 (19.7) | 0.002 |
Chinese patent drug | 44 (68.8) | 31 (47.0) | 0.012 |
Diabetes mellitus | 13 (20.3) | 19 (29.2) | 0.241 |
Hypertension | 9 (23.7) | 8 (22.9) | 0.933 |
Esophageal varices | 33 (60.0) | 38 (66.7) | 0.464 |
Previous variceal bleeding | 14 (25.5) | 20 (35.1) | 0.268 |
CTP score | 8.7±1.7 | 8.4±1.7 | 0.248 |
CTP class | | | |
A | 3 (4.4)* | 5 (7.0)* | 0.563 |
B | 46 (67.6) | 48 (67.6) | |
C | 19 (27.9) | 18 (25.4) | |
PT (s) | 17.34±2.972 | 16.86±2.832 | 0.332 |
Bilirubin (µmol/L) | 50.150±29.599 | 49.578±41.791 | 0.928 |
Albumin (g/L) | 30.215±5.303 | 31.147±6.481 | 0.356 |
Creatinine (µmol/L) | 69.881±23.289 | 71.572±24.594 | 0.687 |
Ascites | | | |
None | 23 (33.8) | 25 (35.2) | 0.993 |
Mild | 24 (35.3) | 23 (32.4) | |
Moderate to severe | 21 (30.9) | 23 (32.4) | |
Hepatic encephalopathy | | | |
None | 64 (94.1) | 68 (95.8) | 0.736 |
Stage 1–2 | 3 (4.4) | 2 (2.8) | |
Stage 3–4 | 1 (1.5) | 1 (1.4) | |
Changes in CTP score
The CTP scores of both groups were improved at week 24, but the proportion of patients in the YGJ group with an improvement of ≥2 points was significantly greater in the YGJ than in the placebo group [FAS, 62.0% (95% CI: 53.5–70.0) vs. 39.7% (95% CI: 31.4–48.4), p=0.009; ITT, 55.0% (95% CI: 46.9–62.9) vs. 33.8% (95% CI: 26.5–41.6, p=0.007; Table 2, Supplementary Table 4). The baseline CTP class distribution did not differ between the two groups, but was significantly different at week 24 (p=0.017). At week 24, the percentage of CTP class C patients in the YGJ group was significantly less than that in the placebo group (p<0.05; Table 2), which suggests that YGJ improved the CTP class. The baseline CTP scores in the YGJ and placebo groups were not significantly different (8.4±1.7 vs. 8.7±1.7, p=0.248; Table 1), and the CTP scores in YGJ group were significantly lower than those in the placebo group at week 12 (8.0±2.17 vs. 7.2±1.75, p=0.018; week 24 (6.50±1.60 vs. 7.50±2.38, p=0.005); and week 36 (6.6±1.74 vs. 7.4±2.49, p=0.033; Fig. 2). At week 24, the mean change in CTP score from baseline in the YGJ group [−1.8 (95% CI: −2.2 to 1.4)] was significantly greater than that in the placebo group [−1.2 (95% CI: −1.7 to –0.7, p=0.034; Table 2). There was no significant between-group difference in the proportion of patients with mild or moderate to severe ascites at baseline; but, at 24 weeks, the proportion of patients with mild or moderate to severe ascites in the YGJ group was significantly lower than that in the placebo group (p=0.024; Supplementary Table 5).
Table 2CTP score change at week 24 (full analysis set)
Variable | Placebo group (n=68) | YGJ group (n=71) | p-value |
---|
CTP score ≥2 point reduction, n (%) | 27 (39.7) | 44 (62.0) | 0.009 |
95% CI | 31.4, 48.4 | 53.5, 70.0 | |
CTP class, n (%) | | | |
A | 29 (42.6) | 40 (56.3) | 0.017 |
B | 22 (32.4) | 23 (32.4) | |
C | 13 (19.1) | 2 (2.8) * | |
Unknown | 4 (5.9) | 6 (8.5) | |
CTP score change from baseline | | | |
n | 64 | 65 | |
Mean±SD | −1.2±2.01 | −1.8±1.67 | 0.034 |
Median | −1.0 | −2.0 | |
95% CI | −1.7, −0.7 | −2.2, −1.4 | |
Change in hepatic function
Through week 24, hepatic function improved from baseline in both groups, as indicated by ALB, prothrombin time (PT), and platelet count (Table 3). The improvement in the YGJ group was significantly greater than that in the placebo group (ALB 6.175±7.144 vs. 3.248±6.307 g/dL, p=0.016; PT −1.62±2.091 vs. −0.37±2.461 s, p=0.005; platelets −4.8±21.9 vs. 9.4±26.5 ×109, p=0.003; Table 3), and prealbumin was significantly higher than in the placebo group (130.9±51.7 vs. 105.8±52.2, and 95% CI: 116.7–145.2 vs. 91.9–119.7, p=0.013; Supplementary Table 6).
Table 3Measured values and change from baseline in hepatic synthetic function at week 24
Variable | | Placebo group | YGJ group | p-value |
---|
Measured value | | | | |
PT (s) | n | 64 | 65 | |
| Mean±SD | 16.99±3.712 | 15.13±1.789 | 0.001 |
| Median (range) | 15.90 (12.2, 29) | 14.75 (11.8, 20.4) | |
| 95% CI | 16.01–17.98 | 14.64–15.62 | |
Platelets (109/L) | n | 56 | 54 | |
| Mean±SD | 82.6±49.22 | 84.8±49.37 | 0.815 |
| Median (range) | 72.0 (10–313) | 77.5 (18–202) | |
| 95% CI | 69.4–95.8 | 71.3–98.3 | |
Albumin (g/L) | n | 64 | 65 | |
| Mean±SD | 33.3±7.2 | 37.2±6.0 | 0.001 |
| Median (range) | 33.0 (16–48) | 37.5 (23–49) | |
| 95% CI | 31.5–35.1 | 35.7–38.7 | |
Change from baseline | | | |
PT (s) | n | 64 | 65 | |
| Mean±SD | −0.37±2.461 | −1.62±2.091 | 0.005 |
| Median (range) | −0.60 (−4.7, 8.3) | −1.15 (−7.3, 1.9) | |
| 95% CI | −1.02, 0.28 | −2.19, −1.05 | |
Platelets (109/L) | n | 56 | 54 | |
| Mean±SD | −4.8±21.92 | 9.4±26.50 | 0.003 |
| Median (range) | −4.5 (−56, –41) | 3.5 (−38, –98) | |
| 95% CI | −10.7–1.2 | 2.2–16.7 | |
Albumin (g/L) | n | 64 | 65 | |
| Mean±SD | 3.248±6.307 | 6.175±7.144 | 0.016 |
| Median (range) | 2.960 (−16, 16.8) | 5.270 (−9, 28) | |
| 95% CI | 1.646–4.850 | 4.390–7.959 | |
Biochemical response
At week 24, the AST and DBil levels in the YGJ group were significantly lower than those in the placebo group (AST 38.0±15.1 vs. 44.7±18.9, p=0.033 and DBil 9.8±6.7 vs. 14.4±14.1, p=0.023; Supplementary Table 6). In addition, both the cholinesterase concentration (4.9±1.7 vs. 3.9±1.7, p<0.001) and the change in concentration from baseline (1.5±1.6 vs, 0.8±1.5, p=0.009) in the YGJ group were significantly greater than those in the placebo group (Supplementary Table 6).
Change in coagulation function
At week 24, the degree of improvement in both the value of the international normalized ratio (INR, 1.2±0.2 vs. 1.4±0.4, p=0.002) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT, 39.2±4.6 vs. 41.8±6.4, p=0.019) and the change from baseline in the INR (−0.1±0.2 vs. −0.0±0.3, p=0.021) and APTT (−3.2±5.4 vs. −0.6±5.7, p=0.026) in the YGJ group were significantly better than those in the placebo group (Table 4).
Table 4Measured values and change from baseline in coagulation function at week 24
Variables | | Placebo group | YGJ group | p-value |
---|
Measured value | | | |
INR | n | 64 | 65 | |
| Mean±SD | 1.405±0.411 | 1.210±0.189 | 0.002 |
| Median (range) | 1.260 (0.94–2.73) | 1.155 (0.89–1.75) | |
| 95% CI | 1.292–1.517 | 1.156–1.263 | |
APTT (s) | n | 64 | 65 | |
| Mean±SD | 41.796±6.415 | 39.183±4.551 | 0.019 |
| Median (range) | 40.300 (27.5–60.7) | 39.000 (29.1–51.3) | |
| 95% CI | 40.010–43.582 | 37.890–40.476 | |
Change from baseline | | | |
INR | n | 64 | 65 | |
| Mean±SD | −0.019±0.267 | −0.134±0.232 | 0.021 |
| Median (range) | −0.055 | −0.080 | |
| 95% CI | −0.092, 0.054 (−0.48, 0.92) | −0.200, −0.068 (−0.81, –0.26) | |
APTT (s) | n | 64 | 65 | |
| Mean±SD | −0.614±5.658 | −3.186±5.386 | 0.026 |
| Median (range) | 0.200 (−18.1, 14.9) | −3.000 (−17.6, 6.4) | |
| 95% CI | −2.222, 0.994 | −4.804, −1.567 | |
Incidence of variceal bleeding and HCC and survival outcome
At week 36, there were no significant between-group difference in the cumulative rates of variceal bleeding, HCC and death (Table 5, Supplementary Table 7). Ten of these subjects died due to liver failure (n=8), massive bleeding from ruptured esophageal and gastric varices (n=1), or unknown cause (n=1) (Supplementary Table 8). At week 24, mortality was 4.4% in the placebo group and 1.4 in the YGJ group (FAS p=0.581; Table 5).
Table 5Outcomes of HCC occurrence and survival through 36 weeks (full analysis set)
| Placebo group (n=68) | YGJ group (n=71) | p-value |
---|
24 weeks | | | |
HCC, n (%) | 1 (1.5) | 2 (2.8) | >0.999 |
Death, n (%) | 3 (4.4) | 1 (1.4) | 0.359 |
Variceal bleeding, n (%) | 1 (1.5) | 2 (2.8) | >0.999 |
Liver transplantation, n (%) | 1 (1.5) | 1 (1.4) | >0.999 |
36 weeks | | | |
HCC, n (%) | 1 (1.5) | 2 (2.8) | >0.999 |
Death, n (%) | 6 (4.6) | 4 (4.3) | 0.526 |
Variceal bleeding, n (%) | 2 (2.9) | 2 (2.8) | >0.999 |
Liver transplantation, n (%) | 1 (1.5) | 1 (1.4) | >0.999 |
Safety
AEs were generally transient and mild-to-moderate in severity. AEs associated with treatment included diarrhea and increased stool frequency. One patient in each group discontinued the study treatment because of AEs. There were no significant between-group differences in the frequency of any AEs, treatment-associated AEs, or discontinuation because of AEs (Table 6, Supplementary Table 9). In addition, no renal function abnormalities (e.g., BUN, Cr, or UA) were observed at week 24 and 36 (Supplementary Table 10).
Table 6Summary of clinical adverse events
| Placebo group (n=80) | YGJ group (n=80) | p-value |
---|
Adverse event, n (%) | 2 (2.5) | 6 (7.5) | 0.276 |
Discontinuation due to Adverse event, n (%) | 1 (1.3) | 1 (1.3) | >0.999 |
Discussion
Liver transplantation is the only effective treatment for patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Unfortunately, many patients die while on the waiting list for transplantation because of a shortage of live donors. Treatment of HBV-infected decompensated cirrhosis is mainly etiological and symptomatic. Antiviral therapy promotes HBV DNA clearance in the vast majority of patients (Supplementary Table 11), improves liver function and retards disease progression to some extent, but the effectiveness of antiviral drugs is less than 40%, and more than 60% of patients fail to recover liver function.13,14 Our finding that only 39.7% of patients in the placebo group had a reduction in CTP score of ≥2 points with antiviral therapy, is consistent with other studies that reported reductions in 32%12 and 36%14 of patients. YGJ significantly improved hepatic function, reserve, and quality of life (e.g. low back pain, weakness of the waist and knees, and so on). YGJ was safe and well tolerated.
YGJ has been shown to be an effective treatment for liver cirrhosis in animal models.15,16 It is widely used for patients with liver cirrhosis in clinical settings; but there is a lack of evidence of its efficacy and safety. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 62% of patients in the YGJ group achieved ≥2 point reduction in CTP score, which was significantly better than that in the placebo group. YGJ also improved CTP status, CTP class distribution, and the percentage of patients with CTP class C, measured values, and change from baseline in CTP scores. Improvement in CTP score and class in the YGJ group was primarily driven by increase in albumin levels, decrease in PT, and improvement in ascites.
The physiological functions of ALB include maintenance of plasma osmotic pressure, anti-oxidative and antithrombotic activity, and immunoregulation.17,18 Evidence from clinical trials shows that long-term ALB administration to patients with cirrhosis increases the serum ALB level, reduces the occurrence of bacterial infections and renal failure, improves circulatory dysfunction, controls ascites, and improves survival.19,20 In this study, YGJ significantly increased the ALB level and improved ascites in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, which is consistent with results obtained in animal models of liver fibrosis, where YGJ significantly increased the serum and liver ALB levels.10,16 ALB is exclusively synthesized by hepatocytes; therefore, YGJ likely increased ALB level because it protected against hepatocyte damage and apoptosis and promoted the proliferation of hepatocytes.16,21 In addition, although the liver has remarkable regenerative capacity after acute damage or hepatectomy, the regenerative ability is severely impaired in decompensated cirrhosis. YGJ has been shown to promote the differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into hepatocyte-like cells to reverse dimethyl nitrosamine-induced liver cirrhosis.22 In our previous study, YGJ was found to promote the differentiation of fetal liver stem/progenitor cells into hepatocytes after transplantation to repair liver cirrhosis.10 The results suggest that YGJ promoted liver regeneration. In this trial, improvement in liver function including CTP, serum ALB, PT, and ascites control likely reflect the effects of YGJ in promoting liver regeneration.
Mortality was 1.4% (n=1) in the YGJ group, which was less than that in the placebo group (n=4, 4.4%), but the difference was not statistically significant owing to the small sample size. The CTP score is considered to be a very good predictor of the short-term mortality of patients with end-stage liver disease.23,24 In this study, As YGJ significantly improved CTP scores, it may be found to improve the short-term mortality of decompensated cirrhotic patients. However, another clinical trial with longer treatment duration is required to provide more robust evidence.
There were no significant between-group differences in WBC, Cr, BUN, or UA, suggesting that YGJ had no adverse effects on renal function or white blood cells during treatment of decompensated cirrhosis. Baseline severity of liver disease is an important factor affecting study safety, especially early mortality and the incidence of AEs. Patients with more severe liver disease were enrolled in this trial. The baseline CTP score was 8.5. Serious AEs that may be expected in patients with decompensated cirrhosis include lactic acidosis and renal failure, but none of those events occurred in this study. There were also no significant between-group differences in the frequency of any AEs, AEs related to treatment, or study discontinuation because of AEs. The most frequent AEs in the YGJ group were gastrointestinal side effects, which were relieved after the patient had adapted to YGJ. In addition, for patients with decompensated cirrhosis, the increase in defecation frequency may have helped reduce the diffusion of intestinal endotoxins and ammonia metabolism. YGJ was safe and well tolerated.
Some limitations of this study should be considered while interpreting the results. The duration of treatment and follow-up in this trial were relatively short. Second, the total dose of diuretics and other drugs, according to clinical status and requirement, taken by patients during the trial were not recorded. A larger, longer, and more rigorous multicenter randomized controlled trial is required to further confirm the safety and efficacy of YGJ.
In conclusion, the safety was acceptable, and YGJ was effectiveness in patients with HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis. YGJ significantly improved CTP scores, hepatic synthetic function and reserve, quality of life, and controlled ascites. Therefore YGJ can be considered a suitable complementary and alternative therapy for patients with HBV-infected decompensated cirrhosis.
Supporting information
Supplementary File 1
Supplementary methods.
(DOCX)
Supplementary Fig. 1
Representative chromatographic fingerprints of YGJ granules, placebo granules and reference mixture standards.
The fingerprint chromatograms of placebo granules (A), YGJ granules (B) and mixture reference standards (MSD) (C) in a positive ion model by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC)-Q-Orbitrap HRMS. The contents of targeted markers betaine, rehmannioside D, chlorogenic acid, ferulic acid, verbascoside, toosendanin and ligustilide in YGJ granules were 87.27 µg/g, 23.93 µg/g, 39.77 µg/g, 93.88 µg/g, 21.96 µg/g, 9.58 µg/g and 23.01 µg/g, respectively. The contents of targeted markers betaine, rehmannioside D, chlorogenic acid, ferulic acid, verbascoside, toosendanin and ligustilide in placebo granules were 3.57 µg/g, 1.28 µg/g, 1.86 µg/g, 5.19 µg/g, 1.14 µg/g, 0.51 µg/g and 1.04 µg/g, respectively. Betaine (1), rehmannioside D (2), chlorogenic acid (3), ferulic acid (4), verbascoside (5), toosendanin (6), ligustilide (7).
(DOCX)
Supplementary Table 1
Baseline demographics and disease characteristics (intention-to-treat analysis).
(DOCX)
Supplementary Table 2
Baseline demographics and disease characteristics (full analysis set).
(DOCX)
Supplementary Table 3
Baseline demographics and disease characteristics (intention-to-treat analysis).
(DOCX)
Supplementary Table 4
CTP score change at week 24 (intention-to-treat analysis).
(DOCX)
Supplementary Table 5
The improvement in ascites and hepatic encephalopathy after treatment for 24 weeks.
(DOCX)
Supplementary Table 6
Serum biochemical change at week 24.
(DOCX)
Supplementary Table 7
Outcomes of HCC occurrence and survival through 36 weeks (intention-to-treat analysis).
(DOCX)
Supplementary Table 8
List of death events.
(DOCX)
Supplementary Table 9
Adverse events.
(DOCX)
Supplementary Table 10
Renal function change through 36 weeks.
(DOCX)
Supplementary Table 11
Virological response rates at week 24 (full analysis set).
(DOCX)