Home
JournalsCollections
For Authors For Reviewers For Editorial Board Members
Article Processing Charges Open Access
Ethics Advertising Policy
Editorial Policy Resource Center
Company Information Contact Us
Publications > Journals > Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology> Article Full Text
Review Article
OPEN ACCESS

Download PDF

Cardiac Syndromes in Liver Disease: A Clinical Conundrum

  • Milos Brankovic1,2,* ,
  • Paul Lee1,
  • Nikolaos Pyrsopoulos3 and
  • Mark Klapholz1,4
Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology   2023;11(4):975-986

doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2022.00294

Received:

Revised:

Accepted:

Published online:

 Author information

Citation: Brankovic M, Lee P, Pyrsopoulos N, Klapholz M. Cardiac Syndromes in Liver Disease: A Clinical Conundrum. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2023;11(4):975-986. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2022.00294.

Abstract

Understanding the interaction between the heart and liver is pivotal for managing patients in whom both organs are affected. Studies have shown that cardio-hepatic interactions are bidirectional and that their identification, assessment, and treatment remain challenging. Congestive hepatopathy is a condition that develops in the setting of long-standing systemic venous congestion. If left untreated, congestive hepatopathy may lead to hepatic fibrosis. Acute cardiogenic liver injury develops as a combination of venous stasis and sudden arterial hypoperfusion due to cardiac, circulatory, or pulmonary failure. The treatment of both conditions should be directed toward optimizing the cardiac substrate. Hyperdynamic syndrome may develop in patients with advanced liver disease and lead to multiorgan failure. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy or abnormalities in pulmonary vasculature, such as hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension may also develop. Each complication has unique treatment challenges and implications for liver transplantation. The presence of atrial fibrillation and atherosclerosis in liver disease brings another layer of complexity, particularly in terms of anticoagulation and statin use. This article provides an overview of cardiac syndromes in liver disease, focusing on current treatment options and future perspectives.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Liver disease, Congestive hepatopathy, Cardiogenic liver injury, Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, Hepatopulmonary syndrome, Portopulmonary hypertension

Introduction

Understanding the interaction between the heart and liver is pivotal for managing patients in whom both organs are affected. From a heart perspective, cardiac dysfunction can lead to acute and chronic liver injury, adversely affecting patient outcomes. Moreover, patients with heart and liver disease share risk factors or present with overlapping clinical syndromes (e.g., fatigue, pedal edema, and reduced exercise capacity) that make it challenging to distinguish them.1 Also, patients with liver disease have often been excluded from cardiovascular trials, leading to scarce evidence for the efficacy and safety of many cardiovascular therapies.

From a liver perspective, the course of liver disease includes a clinically silent phase that is often referred to as compensated cirrhosis. The development and persistence of portal hypertension will cause portosystemic shunting, and decline in the metabolic and immunological functions of the liver. The resulting, increase of circulating levels of vasodilators that escape from the splanchnic into the systemic circulation causes a drop in systemic vascular resistance.2 The lack of an immunological barrier leads to translocation of bacterial products from the gut, further augmenting splanchnic and systemic vasodilatation.3 Autonomic dysfunction develops with progression of liver disease causing hyporeactivity of the cardiovascular system to adapt to splanchnic and systemic vasodilatation.4 Hyporeactivity of the cardiovascular system coupled with systemic vasodilatation reduces the effective blood volume, which triggers the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and leads to sodium-fluid retention.5 Abnormal neurohumoral regulation further alters renovascular autoregulation, aggravating renal vasoconstriction and worsening renal function.6 These changes activate compensatory mechanisms of the cardiovascular system, such as increased heart rate, cardiac output, and plasma volume, to maintain adequate organ perfusion leading to hyperdynamic syndrome (HDS).7,8 From that point, the liver disease evolves into a multiorgan syndrome affecting the heart, lungs, kidneys, and brain. However, HDS often becomes clinically evident only after the triggering event, for example bleeding esophageal varices, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, or infection, known as decompensated cirrhosis.

Thus far, studies have shown that cardio-hepatic interactions are bidirectional and that their identification, assessment, and treatment are challenging. This article provides an overview of the cardiac syndromes in liver disease, focusing on congestive hepatopathy (CH), cardiogenic liver injury (CLI), cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM), hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS), and portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH). We also discuss the implications of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atherosclerosis in liver disease regarding anticoagulation and statin use. Finally, we provide recommendations on current treatment options and future research perspectives.

How the heart affects the liver

CH

Prevalence and etiopathogenesis: CH is a chronic condition that develops in the setting of long-standing systemic venous congestion (Fig. 1). The prevalence of CH is estimated to range from 15% to 65% in patients with chronic heart failure.9,10 The primary cause of systemic venous congestion is right-side heart failure alone or, more commonly, with left-side heart failure. Systemic venous congestion leading to CH also prevails in cor pulmonale,1 tricuspid regurgitation,11 constrictive pericarditis,12 restrictive cardiomyopathy,1 and congenital heart disease.13

Clinical features of cardiac syndromes in liver disease.
Fig. 1  Clinical features of cardiac syndromes in liver disease.

Upper part of the figure depicts how a cardiac dysfunction can cause liver dysfunction including cardiogenic liver injury and congestive hepatopathy. As shown in the figure, cardiogenic liver injury is an acute event that occurs due to sudden arterial hypoperfusion superimposed on chronic venous congestion. In contrast, congestive hepatopathy is a chronic condition that develops in the setting of long-standing systemic venous congestion. The lower part of the figure depicts a cardiopulmonary complication of liver dysfunction such as hepatopulmonary syndrome. The hepatopulmonary syndrome is defined by the triad of liver disease, IPVD, and arterial deoxygenation with increased alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure gradient (A-a O2). To illustrate dissimilarities with hepatopulmonary syndrome, the PoPH was presented in the lower part of the figure. The PoPH is defined as diagnostic triad of portal hypertension, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >20 mmHg with PAWP≤15 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >2 WU. Of note, PoPH can develop in patients with portal hypertension with or without liver disease. CE-TTE, contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography; LT, liver transplantation; O2, oxygen; PaO2, arterial partial pressure of oxygen.

Patients with congenital heart disease are prone to hepatic complications because of the primary cardiac defect, concomitant pulmonary disease, or as a complication of palliative procedures like the Fontan procedure,13 The Fontan procedure separates the systemic and pulmonary circulation in patients with single-ventricle physiology by creating a bypass between systemic venous return and pulmonary arteries. Hepatic dysfunction after the Fontan procedure results from an interplay between hypoxia and systemic venous congestion because of narrowing of the Fontan conduit over time, development of pulmonary hypertension (PH), and dysfunction of the systemic ventricle.13

The pathophysiological mechanisms involved in CH. First, the lack of valves in hepatic veins allows a backward transfer of elevated pressure directly from the right atrium and inferior vena cava to hepatic veins.14 Consequently, intrahepatic cholestasis results from increased sinusoidal pressure and disruption of the tight intercellular junctions in the biliary canaliculi.15 Injury to the biliary system causes reactive inflammation leading to hepatic fibrosis. Second, stagnant blood flow and elevated sinusoidal pressure increase fluid loss into the third space and the formation of sinusoidal microthrombi, which also facilitates fibrogenesis.16 Finally, patients with heart failure often have hepatic steatosis secondary to obesity, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia or have anemia, all of which predispose the liver to hypoxic injury leading to further cell necrosis.17 A histological hallmark of CH is centrilobular cell necrosis that may eventually lead to hepatic fibrosis.18

Clinical manifestations and diagnosis

Most patients with CH are asymptomatic, so CH is usually discovered as abnormal hepatic biochemistry in patients with cardiac diseases. It is characterized by modest aminotransferase elevation of up to three-times normal, decreased albumin levels, and a predominant cholestatic pattern of elevated bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and alkaline phosphatase.19,20 If symptomatic, patients may experience dull right upper quadrant pain because of stretching of the liver capsule. Approximately one in four patients presents with ascites, usually without splenomegaly.21 In patients with ascites, a serum-to-ascites albumin gradient ≥1.1 g/dL and total ascites protein of >2.5 g/dL have 63% sensitivity and 93% specificity for a cardiac cause of ascites. The diagnostic accuracy improves when incorporating serum or ascites B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level.22

No imaging study is pathognomonic for CH. However, different imaging modalities have been investigated to assess CH in patients with heart failure. Spectral Doppler studies have shown an increased portal vein pulsatility and hepatic arterial resistance in patients with right-sided heart failure.23 Studies on shear wave elastography have demonstrated a good correlation between liver elasticity and advanced heart failure24 and right-sided filling pressures.25 Interestingly, authors reported a dose-dependent relationship between dispersion slope and heart failure severity even preceding abnormal hepatic biochemistry.24 However, the prognostic and therapeutic utility of Doppler ultrasonography and elastography remains to be proven in patients with heart failure.

Management and prognosis

The primary goal of the treatment of CH is to optimize the underlying substrate that has led to hepatic dysfunction. Diuretic therapy is the primary therapy for right-sided-volume overload to improve CH. Furthermore, a post hoc analysis of the PARDIGM-HF trial demonstrated that sacubitril/valsartan, not only reduced the risk of death and rehospitalization, but also improved all measures of liver function compared with enalapril in patients with reduced ejection fraction.26 The current American guidelines on valvular heart disease recommend valve surgery in patients with symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation to alleviate systemic venous and hepatic congestion and decrease reliance on diuretics.27 In patients refractory to medical therapy, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and heart transplantation improve liver dysfunction.28 However, the level of CH severity that determines the indication for MCS or heart transplantation is unclear.

The primary use of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score has been to prioritize patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT). However, studies have shown that MELD and MELD-XI, excluding the international normalized ratio (INR) for patients on anticoagulation, scores also indicates a poor prognosis in patients undergoing heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation.29,30 Farr et al.31 reported improved risk stratification of MELD-XI score when combined with liver biopsy in heart transplant candidates. Recently, a novel histological congestive hepatic fibrosis scoring system was validated to assess the severity and progression of CH.32 This 4-point grading system was developed using liver biopsies of patients with various cardiac etiologies, including congenital, ischemic, and valvular heart disease.33 The score was reproducible and correlated well with right atrial and ventricular dilatation, and right atrial pressure measured during right heart catheterization and estimated by echocardiography.32,33

Takent together, the clinical importance of CH is three-fold: as a marker of advanced cardiac disease, as a condition that can progress to liver cirrhosis, and as a risk factor predisposing the liver to cardiogenic injury as discussed below. Finally, Table 1 summarizes our recommendations for treatment of CH based on currently available evidence.

Table 1

Summary of recommendations for treatment of cardiac syndromes in liver disease based on current evidence

Congestive hepatopathy
  Treat underlying cardiopulmonary disease.
  Diuretic therapy should be used to optimize right-sided filling pressures.
  Consider starting or switching from ACEi/ARBs to sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure regardless of ejection fraction.
  Patients with congestive hepatopathy due to severe tricuspid regurgitation should be evaluated for transcatheter or surgical valve therapy.
  Patients with congestive hepatopathy and heart failure with ascites should be treated with combination of loop diuretics and aldosterone antagonist at natriuretic dose.
Cardiogenic liver injury
  Initial therapy is correction of an underlying cardiac, circulatory, or pulmonary failure.
  Acute heart failure with volume overload should be treated with diuretics to reduce backward venous pressure while maintaining adequate systemic perfusion
  Norepinephrine should be the first-line vasopressor for patients in circulatory shock.
  Dobutamine should be the first-line inotropic agent for patients in circulatory shock unless specific scenarios (e.g., milrinone might be a better option in patients with pulmonary hypertension).
  MCS should not be delayed for patients in circulatory shock refractory to medical therapy.
  In refractory cases, patients should be evaluated for liver transplantation.
Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy
  Volume overload should be treated with restriction of sodium intake and diuretic therapy in patients with hyperdynamic syndrome or cirrhotic cardiomyopathy.
  Patients with cirrhotic cardiomyopathy and ascites should be treated with combination of loop diuretics and aldosterone antagonist at natriuretic dose.
  Patients with cirrhotic cardiomyopathy and grade 3 ascites should be treated with large volume paracentesis.
  Consider using beta blockers with proven clinical benefit in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction for treatment of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. Consider carvedilol as the first-line beta blocker in patients with cirrhotic cardiomyopathy at risk of variceal bleeding.
  Reduce dose or hold beta-blockers in patients with ascites if hypotension or worsening renal function.
  ACEi/ARBs should be withheld in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
Hepatopulmonary syndrome
  Supportive management including oxygen therapy when arterial PaO2<60 mmHg.
  Liver transplantation is the effective treatment for hepatopulmonary syndrome to improve survival.
Portopulmonary hypertension
  Patients with confirmed diagnosis of portopulmonary hypertension should be evaluated for drugs with shown benefit in treatment of pulmonary artery hypertension. Type of agent should be chosen on an individual basis after considering adverse drug effects.
  Treatment goal should be keeping PVR normal or near normal and mPAP<35mmHg.
  All patients with portopulmonary hypertension should be monitored closely and periodically evaluated for liver transplantation.
Atrial fibrillation and liver disease
  NOACs are preferred over the Vitamin K antagonists for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with liver disease and non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
  NOACs are not recommended in Child-Pugh class C and should be used with caution in Child-Pugh class B.
  Periodical assessment of the patient’s severity of liver disease and thromboembolic risk including a shared decision making with the patient when discussing risks and benefits of anticoagulation.
Cardiovascular risk and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease
  Patients with MAFLD should be followed closely and periodically evaluated for modifiable cardiovascular risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension.
  When indicated, statins should be given at their conventional doses in patients with compensated cirrhosis.
  Statins should be avoided in patients with acute liver injury (including cardiogenic liver injury) and decompensated cirrhosis or Child-Pugh class C.

ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs, angiotensin receptor blockers; MAFLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease; mPAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure; NOAC, non-vitamin K antagonist; PaO2, partial pressure of oxygen; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance.

CLI

Prevalence and etiopathogenesis

CLI (e.g., shock liver, ischemic, or hypoxic hepatitis) is an acute condition that occurs as a combination of venous stasis and sudden hepatic hypoperfusion in the setting of acute cardiac, circulatory, or pulmonary failure (Fig. 1).34,35 The prevalence of CLI is estimated at 20 to 30% in patients with acute heart failure.36 However, that may be less than the true prevalence because CLI remains unrecognized if unsuspected. A meta-analysis by Tapper et al.37 found that an acute cardiac event preceded ischemic hepatitis in 78% of patients and septic shock in 24%, with an overall in-hospital survival rate of 51%. Importantly, even a mild hemodynamic disturbance can lead to liver injury in patients with prior venous congestion because of exhausted compensatory mechanisms of sinusoidal endothelial cells and hepatocytes to increase oxygen extraction from the blood.38 This is why patients with chronic venous stasis are at a high risk of experiencing CLI.

Clinical manifestations and diagnosis

CLI is clinically characterized by abrupt increases of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and hepatic aminotransferases of more than 20-fold, and prolongation of prothrombin time within the first 3 days from the index event.39 CLI can also present with a clinical picture like acute viral hepatitis or acute liver failure. An increase of LDH and aminotransferase levels with an ALT/LDH ratio of <1.5 and a rapid decline to normal values once the underlying substrate has been optimized are highly suggestive of hypoxic injury.40 In acute HF, studies have shown that the cholestatic liver enzyme pattern correlates strongly with signs of congestion, whereas the hepatocellular pattern correlates more with systemic hypoperfusion.39

Management and prognosis

Given that a meta-analysis of 1,782 patients with ischemic hepatitis did not reveal systemic hypotension in 43% of cases, proper management of CLI should start with suspicion of this condition.37 Of note, elevated serum phosphate levels and the development of advanced hepatic encephalopathy in patients with CLI have a poor prognosis.41 The mortality risk in patients with CLI persists even if hepatic biochemistry returns to normal values after an acute adverse event.42

The cornerstone of the management of CLI is an aggressive correction of an underlying condition. Treatment varies depending on the type of cardiac, circulatory, or pulmonary failure. For example, acute HF patients with predominant volume overload should be aggressively treated with diuretics to reduce backward venous pressure while maintaining adequate systemic perfusion. Aggressive correction of hypoxia while keeping organ perfusion intact in patients with respiratory failure is warranted. It should be noted that the splanchnic circulation is the weakest link of tissue hypoperfusion because of compensatory vasoconstriction to maintain the perfusion of vital organs such as the heart and brain. If it persists, ischemic injury to the endothelial barrier of the gut will develop, causing bacterial translocation and activation of systematic inflammatory response and multiorgan failure.43 Therefore, patients with CLI because of sudden hepatic hypoperfusion should be aggressively treated with vasoactive and/or inotropic agents. However, the choice of specific agents in CLI is controversial. In cardiogenic shock, epinephrine has been linked with an increased rate of arrythmia, refractory shock, and decreased splanchnic perfusion compared with norepinephrine.44,45 Similarly, dopamine treatment was found to induce more arrhythmia than norepinephrine46 and increased 28-day mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock.47 Norepinephrine is the vasopressor of choice for treating septic shock.48 Dobutamine is an inotropic agent of choice49 because it increases cardiac output and improves splanchnic circulation in circulatory shock.50 However, a recent trial comparing dobutamine to milrinone for treating cardiogenic shock found no difference in in-hospital death.51 Milrinone is often preferred for treating patients with severe PH because of its positive effects on pulmonary artery pressure and right ventricular function. However, milrinone has a less desirable pharmacological profile for minute-to-minute titration than dobutamine because of its longer half-life. Finally, MCS to correct tissue oxygenation and the metabolic needs of patients in circulatory shock and refractory to medical therapy should not be delayed. In refractory cases, patients should be evaluated for LT. Table 1 summarizes our recommendations for the treatment of CLI based on currently available evidence.

How the Liver Affects the Heart

CCM

Prevalence and etiopathogenesis

CCM describes a diseased heart muscle in the setting of cirrhosis and in the apparent absence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) that could explain myocardial abnormalities (Fig. 2).52 The estimated prevalence of CCM in patients with liver disease varies from 26% to 81% because of differences in the descriptive criteria.53,54 The current understanding is that CCM develops independently of the etiology of cirrhosis, but its severity is relative to the degree of liver damage.54 Several pathophysiological mechanisms have been implicated in the development and progression of CCM.55 However, the HDS has a key role (see the Introduction).56 There may be a link between reduced baroreceptor response and remodeling of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with liver disease.57 In addition, the cirrhotic proinflammatory state leading to increased cardiomyocyte apoptosis and contractile dysfunction represents another critical component in the pathogenesis of CCM.56 Additional research is needed to further clarify the mechanism for the development and progression of CCM.

Evolution of cardiac dysfunction from hyperdynamic syndrome to cirrhotic cardiomyopathy.
Fig. 2  Evolution of cardiac dysfunction from hyperdynamic syndrome to cirrhotic cardiomyopathy.

In advance stage, the liver disease leads to splanchnic and systemic vasodilatation, disruption of immunological barrier, gut bacteria translocation, and autonomic dysfunction, evolving into a multiorgan syndrome affecting the heart, lungs, kidneys, and brain. These changes activate the compensatory mechanisms of the cardiovascular system (increase heart rate, cardiac output, and plasma volume) to maintain adequate organ perfusion leading to hyperdynamic syndrome (HDS). In subgroup of patients, liver disease can further affect the heart muscle leading to cirrhotic cardiomyopathy in the absence of known cardiovascular disease that would explain myocardial abnormalities. The 2020 cirrhotic cardiomyopathy diagnostic criteria for systolic dysfunction include either resting left ventricular ejection fraction ≤50% or absolute global longitudinal strain (GLS) <18% in the absence of known cardiac disease. The diagnostic criteria for advanced diastolic dysfunction include three or more echocardiographic changes such as septal e′ velocity <7 cm/sec, E/e′ ratio≥15, left atrial volume index >34 mL/m2, and TR velocity >2.8 m/sec (in the absence of pulmonary hypertension). CO, cardiac output; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.

Clinical manifestations and diagnosis

Diagnostic criteria for CCM were first proposed in 2005 and redefined in 2020 with the addition of new recommendations on myocardial strain.55 The 2020 diagnostic criteria for systolic dysfunction include either a resting left ventricular ejection fraction ≤50% or an absolute global longitudinal strain (GLS) absolute value of <18% in the absence of known cardiac disease.58 The diagnostic criteria for advanced diastolic dysfunction include three or more echocardiographic changes, such as a septal e′ velocity of <7 cm/sec, E/e′ ratio≥15, left atrial volume index >34 mL/m2, or a tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity >2.8 m/sec in the absence of PH.58 The 2005 diagnostic criteria for CCM included supportive criteria such as chronotropic incompetence (inability to increase heart rate adequately during exercise to match cardiac output to metabolic demands), QT interval prolongation, electromechanical uncoupling (systolic time intervals or aortic pressure-ECG trace desynchrony), elevated brain natriuretic peptide or troponin I, and an enlarged left atrium.55 However, those criteria are not supported by the latest CCM definition. Elevated high sensitivity troponin T and NT-proBNP levels have been associated with the severity of liver disease, portal hypertension, and survival,59,60 but no prognostic scoring has incorporated these two biomarkers regarding liver cirrhosis and CCM, which may be worth investigating in the future.

Management and prognosis

CCM has an unfavorable prognosis, and management with established HF therapies is challenging because data from high-quality CCM trials are lacking.61 Volume overload in HDS patients is treated by restriction of sodium intake and judicious use of diuretics. Patients with cirrhosis and ascites should be treated with a combination of loop diuretics and aldosterone antagonists at natriuretic doses (spironolactone 100–400 mg/day) to counteract secondary hyperaldosteronism in HDS.62 That is important because the indicated cardiac doses of spironolactone (25–50 mg/day) do not have natriuretic effect. Studies of aldosterone antagonists have also shown improvement of left ventricular remodeling and hepatic hemodynamics by lowering the hepatic venous pressure gradient,63 and are included in both the American and British guidelines for managing ascites in cirrhosis along with large volume paracentesis in patients with grade 3 ascites.64,65

The QT interval is prolonged in CCM. It is often seen in patients with cirrhosis without CCM, and is associated with a lower survival rate.66 Patients with cirrhosis are also at risk of acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, which may further prolong the QT interval.67 Small observational studies have reported that nonselective beta-blockers like propranolol and nadolol shortened the QT interval in some patients with cirrhosis, but they did not investigate the effect on survival.68,69 A recent trial of metoprolol succinate in 78 patients with CCM did not find either a beneficial effect on cardiac remodeling or adverse effects during 6 months of follow-up. Half of the patients in the placebo and treatment arms were already on propranolol at inclusion. Given the limitations of this study, a beneficial effect of metoprolol succinate on CCM could not be excluded. Additional studies with more participants and longer follow-up are needed to investigate the effectiveness of beta-blockers in CCM. A recent meta-analysis reported that carvedilol was effective and as safe as a nonselective beta blocker for the primary and secondary prevention of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients.70 No trials have investigated the use of carvedilol to treat CCM. Current American and British guidelines recommend beta-blockers to prevent variceal bleeding in patients with ascites, with dose reduction or discontinuation in patients with hypotension or worsening renal function because of increased risk of exacerbation of systemic vasodilatation and organ hypoperfusion.65

Agents like terlipressin, which is used to treat hepatorenal syndrome, depress cardiac function and may unmask latent cardiac dysfunction.71 A recent randomized clinical trial (RCT) reported that dobutamine reversed the cardiosuppressive activity of terlipressin in patients with hepatorenal syndrome, but did not improve renal function.72 The study included only 25 patients without an established diagnosis of CCM, and no invasive hemodynamic parameters were recorded. Furthermore, the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) is limited in patients with decompensated cirrhosis as they may worsen the systemic vasodilatory state.65 A recent nationwide propensity-matched cohort of patients with cirrhosis did not find an association between ACEi/ARBs and renal failure in cirrhotic patients without ascites.73 However, the authors reported an increased risk of renal failure in cirrhotic patients with ascites regardless of ACEi/ARB use. The use of sacubitril/valsartan in CCM has not been investigated. Despite their known clinical benefits in patients with heart failure, there is limited data on using sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with cirrhosis.74 Studies of the use of SGLT2 inhibitors for treating ascites are currently underway.

CCM may worsen the outcome of invasive procedures such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and LT.75 Although controversial, there is evidence that LT can lead to a reversal of CCM and shortening of the QT interval.76 However, the resolution of CCM after LT took up to 6 months, which required close postoperative monitoring.77 It would be reasonable to repeat echocardiography 3 to 6 months after LT or TIPS in stable patients with CCM. Table 1 summarizes our recommendations for the treatment of HDS and CCM based on currently available evidence.

HPS

Liver disease and portal hypertension may affect pulmonary circulation in two distinct ways. A patient with liver disease can develop HPS characterized by intrapulmonary shunt with hypoxemia, or PoPH characterized by pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Nevertheless, overlap between HPS and PoPH may also occur.78 Despite both conditions often presenting similarly with dyspnea, treatment strategy and clinical prognosis differ significantly. It should be noted that both conditions have specific perioperative implications for LT which are discussed elsewhere.79,80

Prevalence and etiopathogenesis

HPS develops as a result of alterations in the pulmonary microcirculation that impair gas exchange in the setting of liver disease and in the absence of cardiopulmonary disease (Fig. 1).81,82 The estimated prevalence of HPS is around 25%, with a wide range depending on the diagnostic methodology used.83,84 HPS usually develops in patients with chronic liver disease with portal hypertension, but it has also been reported after CLI.85,86 The pathophysiology of HPS includes an increase in the number and size of capillary and precapillary vessels that causes a ventilation-perfusion mismatch leading to hypoxemia.87 Experimental data have demonstrated increased levels of nitric oxide synthase, endothelin-1, and TNF-alfa in the pulmonary vasculature of patients with HPS.88,89 Angiogenesis also appears to play a role in HPS pathogenesis, shown by an increase in pulmonary vessels along with activation of VEGF-A angiogenic pathways.90 Nevertheless, additional study is needed to characterize the mechanism underlying HPS.

Clinical manifestations and diagnosis

HPS is defined by a triad of liver disease, intrapulmonary vascular dilatation (IPVD), and arterial deoxygenation with increased alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure gradient.82 Patients need to meet all three criteria to establish a diagnosis. The diagnostic criteria of the International Liver Transplant Society Practice Guidelines include the presence of IPVD demonstrated by a positive contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography (CE-TTE) showing a delayed appearance of intravenously injected microbubbles in the left heart three or more cardiac cycles after visualization of microbubbles in the right heart.82,91 Arterial deoxygenation is defined as arterial hypoxemia (PaO2<70 mmHg) with an alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (AaO2) ≥15 mmHg, or >20 mmHg if >64 years of age.82 Patients with HPS often complain of dyspnea on exertion or at rest, and may present with digital clubbing, cyanosis, and diffuse telangiectasias at advance stages.82 HPS-specific findings are worsening dyspnea and oxygen desaturation, a decrease of PaO2 of >4 mmHg or SpO2 of >5%, when moving to an upright position and relief by recumbency. These findings are also known as platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome.84 Regardless of symptoms, all liver disease patients should undergo pulse oximetry screening.82 If SpO2 is below 96%, arterial blood gas analysis is needed to confirm arterial deoxygenation, and CE-TTE is needed to confirm the presence of IPVD.

Management and prognosis

Once the diagnosis is made, the HPS should be graded according to arterial PaO2 as this would dictate further management and indications for LT.80,92 There are no currently effective medical therapies for HPS except supportive management, including oxygen therapy when arterial PaO2 drops below 60 mmHg.82,93 LT is the most widely studied and only effective treatment for HPS that has been proven to improve survival.83,94 Finally, resolution of HPS after LT may take several months and requires continued supplemental oxygen therapy. Table 1 summarizes our recommendations for the treatment of HPS based on currently available evidence.

PoPH

Prevalence and etiopathogenesis

PoPH is defined as the presence of PH in the setting of portal hypertension with or without liver disease (Fig. 1),82 and is classified as a subgroup of PAH by the World Health Organization (WHO).95 The development of PoPH is not associated with the etiology or the severity of the liver disease.80 Approximately 2 to 6% of patients with portal hypertension develop PoPH, which requires right heart catheterization to establish a diagnosis and support treatment decisions.95 The pathophysiology of PoPH is unclear, but autoimmune factors and smooth muscle proliferation in the pulmonary vasculature may be involved.96 Inflammatory and vasoconstrictive mediators in the splanchnic circulation and endothelial dysfunction caused by shear stress in HDS may also be involved in PoPH.82 Additional experimental data are needed to add to our understanding of pathogenesis of PoPH and to test the relevance of newer vasoactive medications.

Clinical manifestations and diagnosis

Three clinical conditions should be considered in patients with liver disease who present with dyspnea and elevated mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) including PoPH, HDS, and CCM (Table 2). It is critical to differentiate these clinical entities as their prognosis and treatment defer tremendously. In the most recent European Society of Cardiology and European Respiratory Society guidelines on PH, the diagnostic triad of PoPH includes the presence of portal hypertension, an mPAP of >20 mmHg with a pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) of ≤15 mmHg, and a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >2 Woods units (WU) in the absence of other causes of precapillary PH including lung disease or chronic thromboembolic disease.95 However, it should be noted that patient selection in existing studies of PoPH was based on old diagnostic criteria, with mPAP≥25 mmHg, PAWP≤15 mmHg, and PVR >3 WU. Besides right heart catheterization, echocardiography is an important follow-up tool to monitor right ventricle function which is an important determinant of exercise capacity and outcome in patients with PoPH.95

Table 2

Hemodynamic patterns in patients with liver disease and elevated mean pulmonary artery pressure

Cardiac syndromemPAPbPAWPbPVRbCOb
Hyperdynamic syndrome↑WNL↓↑↑
Cirrhotic cardiomyopathya↑↑↑↑↓
Portopulmonary hypertension↑↑WNL↑↓

aCirrhotic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular dysfunction; bParameters recorded during the right/left heart catheterization. CO, cardiac output; mPAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure; PAWP, pulmonary artery wedge pressure; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; WNL, within normal limits.

Management and prognosis

Although PoPH is categorized under broader group of PAH, several management points should be appraised. First, patients with PoPH have a low response rate to pulmonary vasoreactivity testing intended to identify candidates suitable for high-dose calcium channel blockers.97 Second, patients with PoPH have been excluded from almost all RCTs investigating PAH therapies, including nitric oxide, prostacyclin analogs, endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA), phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE-5i), and guanylate cyclase stimulators.95,98 So far, the PORTICO study has been the only RCT specifically designed for patients with PoPH, which enrolled 85 PoPH patients with mean MELD score of 8.5 (44% Child-Pugh class A, and 13% class B).99 Investigators have demonstrated that macitentan significantly improved PVR compared with placebo during 12 week of follow-up, but no changes in secondary outcomes such as NT-proBNP level, 6-minute walking distance, or WHO Functional Class were observed.

Another prospective registry of 637 patients with PoPH and median MELD score of 11 (57% Child-Pugh class A and 33% class B) investigated the efficacy of ERA and PDE-5i for treatment of PoPH.100 After a median treatment of 4.5 months, both ERA and PDE-5i in combination or as monotherapy improved 6 minute walk distance, WHO-FC, cardiac output, and PVR, with overall survival of 51% at 5 years. The 5-year survival of PoPH patients who eventually underwent LT was 81%. The most recent European guidelines recommend initial monotherapy with drugs approved for PAH for PoPH patients (class IIa), but discourage their use in patients with portal hypertension and unclassified PH (i.e., mPAP>20 mmHg, elevated CO, PAWP≤15, and PVR≤2.0 WU).95 European guidelines do not recommend anticoagulation in PoPH because of increased bleeding risk and unproven survival benefits. Finally, studies have suggested that as beta-blockers worsen pulmonary hemodynamics and cardiopulmonary reserve in patients with PoPH they should not be used to lower portal pressure.101 Unlike HPS, which often improves after LT, the postoperative prognosis of PoPH is highly unpredictable and varies with the severity of the disease. Therefore, the International Liver Transplant Society has proposed a preoperative goal of pulmonary vasodilators as reduction of mPAP to <35 mmHg and PVR to <5 WU, or an mPAP of ≥35 mmHg and a PVR of <3 WU, to minimize the risk of graft failure and improve survival.82 However, the proposed goals require further validation in prospective studies. The European guidelines recommend that LT to be considered in PoPH patients as long as the PVR is normal or near normal with pulmonary vasodilators (class IIa).95 Finally, PoPH patients should be referred to centers with expertise in managing both conditions. Table 1 summarizes our recommendations for the treatment of PoPH based on currently available evidence.

AF and Liver Disease

AF is the most common arrhythmia and the primary cause of cardioembolic events,102 and chronic liver disease is associated with an increased risk of new-onset AF.103 Published data has shown patients with AF with liver disease have significantly higher rates of stroke, major bleeding, and all-cause death than patients with AF without liver disease. A significant contributor to the differences in rate may be undertreatment of patients with AF and liver disease because of fear of bleeding.104 Despite its use as a standard therapy for stroke prevention in patients with AF, its use is challenging in liver disease because decreases of both anticoagulation and clotting factors make the true coagulative state variable and unpredictable.105 Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are used to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events in AF106 and were also shown to be effective for anticoagulation compared with no treatment in patients with liver disease.107 As VKAs increase the risk of major and non-major bleeding events in patients with liver disease,107 non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) are the standard anticoagulation treatment for patients with AF.106 Patients with AF and liver disease are underrepresented in RCTs of the efficacy and safety of NOACs, but cohort studies have consistently shown reported the noninferiority of NOACs to for stroke prevention in liver disease, and a safer bleeding profiles compared with VKA.108,109

A recent meta-analysis of 4,011 patients with AF and liver cirrhosis and a pooled analysis of 20,042 patients with AF and liver disease (mean Child-Pugh score of 7.3±2.4, and MELD score of 10±6.4) found that the efficacy of NOACs for reducing the risk of stroke or thromboembolism was similar to that of VKAs, with a significantly lower risk of major and intracranial bleeding.107,110 A subgroup analysis by Chen et al.,107 found that patients treated with apixaban or dabigatran had significantly decreased rates of GI bleeding. The results are promising but were obtained in observational studies. RCTs are needed to provide the final answer. NOACs are not currently recommended in Child-Pugh class C, and should be used with caution in Child-Pugh class B.110,111 We recommend periodical assessment of the severity of liver disease and thromboembolic risk when discussing the risks and benefits of anticoagulation with the patient. Table 1 summarizes our recommendations on the use of anticoagulation in patients with AF with liver disease based on currently available evidence.

Atherosclerosis and Liver Disease

Cardiovascular risk and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD)

MAFLD, formerly known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), has an estimated global prevalence of 51% in overweight or obese individuals.112 The recent name change is a shift from a diagnosis of exclusion to one that emphasizes the metabolic dysfunction leading to fatty liver disease.113 Moreover, previous reports suggested that the MAFLD criteria are better than the NAFLD criteria for identifying patients with worsening atherosclerotic CVD risk. The MAFLD criteria are evidence of hepatic steatosis and one of the following, overweight or obesity, diabetes, or evidence of metabolic dysregulation.114 NAFLD is strongly associated with coronary heart disease even after adjusting for risk of coronary heart disease and presence of features of metabolic syndrome.115 Likewise, coronary events are the leading cause of death in NAFLD patients.116 Therefore, patients with MAFLD should be followed closely and periodically evaluated for modifiable cardiovascular risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension.117 To that end, lifestyle modifications and exercise should be emphasized to improve insulin sensitivity even without weight reduction, and statins should be prescribed for those with increased CVD risk, following the current guidelines.118

Statins and liver disease

Statins are used to treat hypercholesterolemia and have proven benefits in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.119 However, fear of hepatotoxicity has led to under prescription in liver disease patients120 despite the demonstrated safety of statins in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).121–123 Liver disease is not considered to increase the risk of statin side effects, and the benefits outweigh the low risk of serious liver injury.124 Several small RCTs and cohort studies showed that statins use were safe in patients with chronic liver disease,125–127 and the trial results are supported by a meta-analysis of 121,058 patients with chronic liver disease showing that statins were not only safe but were also associated with a decreased risk of hepatic decompensation and mortality.128 Statins care thus considered safe when administered at the indicated doses to patients with chronic liver disease, including those with compensated cirrhosis.129 However, trials of the safety of statins in decompensated disease are limited. A recent trial of pravastatin in 160 Child-Pugh class B patients found no safety issues during the follow-up period,130 but larger RCTs are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of different classes of statins in Child-Pugh class B. According to the Statin Liver Safety Task Force updated document, statins should be avoided in patients with acute liver injury and decompensated cirrhosis or Child-Pugh class C.131Table 1 summarizes our recommendations for the management of cardiovascular risk in MAFLD based on currently available evidence.

Cardiovascular Risk and Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection

Chronic HCV patients have a higher prevalence of premature atherosclerosis than the general population, with HCV RNA and HCV-related steatosis being independent risk factors associated with atherosclerosis.132 At least one study found that HCV patients had a significantly lower prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipemia than controls, but had a higher risk of coronary artery disease, even after adjustment for the risk factors of coronary artery disease.133 Another study reported a decreased risk of stroke in chronic HCV patients taking interferon-based therapy, suggesting that HCV itself is actively involved in the pathogenesis of ischemic events.134 Attention to CVD should not be neglected when caring for HCV patients. Finally, one should be aware of the drug interaction of statins with direct-acting antivirals for HCV, which is described elsewhere.135

Conclusion

This review highlights the complexity of cardiac syndromes in liver disease, particularly in patients with advanced age and multiple comorbid conditions. Such patients require multidisciplinary care involving both hepatologists and cardiologists beginning in the early stages of disease. Implementing a clinical pathway to ensure timely clinical decision making and appropriate management is the key to improving short- and long-term outcomes in patients with liver disease. Studies of cardio-hepatic interactions as a multiorgan syndrome rather than as only a liver-specific condition are recommended, including consideration of epigenetic data for targeted molecular treatments and the development of suitable animal models. Well-designed RCTs are needed to provide answers to the current questions regarding management of decompensated liver disease and preventive strategies for compensated liver disease.

Abbreviations

AF: 

Atrial fibrillation

CLI: 

Cardiogenic liver injury

CVD: 

Cardiovascular disease

CCM: 

Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy

CH: 

Congestive hepatopathy

HCV: 

Hepatitis C virus

HPS: 

Hepatopulmonary syndrome

HDS: 

Hyperdynamic syndrome

LT: 

Liver transplantation

MCS: 

Mechanical circulatory support

NOACs: 

Non-Vitamin K antagonists

PAH: 

Pulmonary arterial hypertension

PH: 

Pulmonary hypertension

PoPH: 

Portopulmonary hypertension

VKA: 

Vitamin K antagonist

Declarations

Funding

None to declare.

Conflict of interest

NP has been an associate editor of Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology since 2021. The other authors have no conflict of interests related to this publication.

Authors’ contributions

Drafting of the manuscript (MB, PL), critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content (NP, MK). All authors have made a significant contribution to this study and have approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Fouad YM, Yehia R. Hepato-cardiac disorders. World J Hepatol 2014;6(1):41-54 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  2. Bolognesi M, Di Pascoli M, Verardo A, Gatta A. Splanchnic vasodilation and hyperdynamic circulatory syndrome in cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20(10):2555-2563 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  3. Matuchansky C. Bacterial translocation in liver cirrhosis: site and role in fibrogenesis. J Hepatol 2014;61(3):709-710 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  4. Møller S, Iversen JS, Henriksen JH, Bendtsen F. Reduced baroreflex sensitivity in alcoholic cirrhosis: relations to hemodynamics and humoral systems. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007;292(6):H2966-2972 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  5. Møller S, Henriksen JH. Neurohumoral fluid regulation in chronic liver disease. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1998;58(5):361-372 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  6. Bernardi M, Trevisani F, Gasbarrini A, Gasbarrini G. Hepatorenal disorders: role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Semin Liver Dis 1994;14(1):23-34 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  7. Henriksen JH, Fuglsang S, Bendtsen F, Christensen E, Møller S. Arterial compliance in patients with cirrhosis: stroke volume-pulse pressure ratio as simplified index. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2001;280(4):G584-594 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  8. Licata A, Mazzola A, Ingrassia D, Calvaruso V, Cammà C, Craxì A. Clinical implications of the hyperdynamic syndrome in cirrhosis. Eur J Intern Med 2014;25(9):795-802 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  9. Allen LA, Felker GM, Pocock S, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, et al. Liver function abnormalities and outcome in patients with chronic heart failure: data from the Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) program. Eur J Heart Fail 2009;11(2):170-177 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  10. van Deursen VM, Damman K, Hillege HL, van Beek AP, van Veldhuisen DJ, Voors AA. Abnormal liver function in relation to hemodynamic profile in heart failure patients. J Card Fail 2010;16(1):84-90 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  11. Lau GT, Tan HC, Kritharides L. Type of liver dysfunction in heart failure and its relation to the severity of tricuspid regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 2002;90(12):1405-1409 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  12. Bergman M, Vitrai J, Salman H. Constrictive pericarditis: A reminder of a not so rare disease. Eur J Intern Med 2006;17(7):457-464 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  13. Asrani SK, Asrani NS, Freese DK, Phillips SD, Warnes CA, Heimbach J, et al. Congenital heart disease and the liver. Hepatology 2012;56(3):1160-1169 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  14. Koehne de Gonzalez AK, Lefkowitch JH. Heart Disease and the Liver: Pathologic Evaluation. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2017;46(2):421-435 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  15. Cogger VC, Fraser R, Le Couteur DG. Liver dysfunction and heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2003;91(11):1399 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  16. Wanless IR, Liu JJ, Butany J. Role of thrombosis in the pathogenesis of congestive hepatic fibrosis (cardiac cirrhosis). Hepatology 1995;21(5):1232-1237 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  17. Caraceni P, Bianchi C, Domenicali M, Maria Pertosa A, Maiolini E, Parenti Castelli G, et al. Impairment of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in rat fatty liver exposed to preservation-reperfusion injury. J Hepatol 2004;41(1):82-88 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  18. Sherlock S. The liver in heart failure; relation of anatomical, functional, and circulatory changes. Br Heart J 1951;13(3):273-293 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  19. Poelzl G, Ess M, Mussner-Seeber C, Pachinger O, Frick M, Ulmer H. Liver dysfunction in chronic heart failure: prevalence, characteristics and prognostic significance. Eur J Clin Invest 2012;42(2):153-163 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  20. Ess M, Mussner-Seeber C, Mariacher S, Lorsbach-Koehler A, Pachinger O, Frick M, et al. γ-Glutamyltransferase rather than total bilirubin predicts outcome in chronic heart failure. J Card Fail 2011;17(7):577-584 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  21. Myers RP, Cerini R, Sayegh R, Moreau R, Degott C, Lebrec D, et al. Cardiac hepatopathy: clinical, hemodynamic, and histologic characteristics and correlations. Hepatology 2003;37(2):393-400 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  22. Farias AQ, Silvestre OM, Garcia-Tsao G, da Costa Seguro LF, de Campos Mazo DF, Bacal F, et al. Serum B-type natriuretic peptide in the initial workup of patients with new onset ascites: a diagnostic accuracy study. Hepatology 2014;59(3):1043-1051 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  23. Morales A, Hirsch M, Schneider D, González D. Congestive hepatopathy: the role of the radiologist in the diagnosis. Diagn Interv Radiol 2020;26(6):541-545 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  24. Nakayama R, Takaya Y, Nakamura K, Toh N, Ito H. Efficacy of shear wave elastography for assessment of liver function in patients with heart failure. ESC Heart Fail 2021;8(3):1751-1758 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  25. Taniguchi T, Sakata Y, Ohtani T, Mizote I, Takeda Y, Asano Y, et al. Usefulness of transient elastography for noninvasive and reliable estimation of right-sided filling pressure in heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2014;113(3):552-558 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  26. Suzuki K, Claggett B, Minamisawa M, Packer M, Zile MR, Rouleau J, et al. Liver function and prognosis, and influence of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2020;22(9):1662-1671 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  27. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Gentile F, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2021;143(5):e35-e71 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  28. Dichtl W, Vogel W, Dunst KM, Grander W, Alber HF, Frick M, et al. Cardiac hepatopathy before and after heart transplantation. Transpl Int 2005;18(6):697-702 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  29. Yang JA, Kato TS, Shulman BP, Takayama H, Farr M, Jorde UP, et al. Liver dysfunction as a predictor of outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure requiring ventricular assist device support: Use of the Model of End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) and MELD eXcluding INR (MELD-XI) scoring system. J Heart Lung Transplant 2012;31(6):601-610 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  30. Chokshi A, Cheema FH, Schaefle KJ, Jiang J, Collado E, Shahzad K, et al. Hepatic dysfunction and survival after orthotopic heart transplantation: application of the MELD scoring system for outcome prediction. J Heart Lung Transplant 2012;31(6):591-600 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  31. Farr M, Mitchell J, Lippel M, Kato TS, Jin Z, Ippolito P, et al. Combination of liver biopsy with MELD-XI scores for post-transplant outcome prediction in patients with advanced heart failure and suspected liver dysfunction. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015;34(7):873-882 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  32. Bosch DE, Koro K, Richards E, Hoch BL, Jalikis F, Koch LK, et al. Validation of a Congestive Hepatic Fibrosis Scoring System. Am J Surg Pathol 2019;43(6):766-772 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  33. Dai DF, Swanson PE, Krieger EV, Liou IW, Carithers RL, Yeh MM. Congestive hepatic fibrosis score: a novel histologic assessment of clinical severity. Mod Pathol 2014;27(12):1552-1558 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  34. Birrer R, Takuda Y, Takara T. Hypoxic hepatopathy: pathophysiology and prognosis. Intern Med 2007;46(14):1063-1070 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  35. Henrion J, Schapira M, Heller FR. Ischemic hepatitis: the need for precise criteria. J Clin Gastroenterol 1996;23(4):305 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  36. Harjola VP, Mullens W, Banaszewski M, Bauersachs J, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Chioncel O, et al. Organ dysfunction, injury and failure in acute heart failure: from pathophysiology to diagnosis and management. A review on behalf of the Acute Heart Failure Committee of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur J Heart Fail 2017;19(7):821-836 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  37. Tapper EB, Sengupta N, Bonder A. The Incidence and Outcomes of Ischemic Hepatitis: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Am J Med 2015;128(12):1314-1321 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  38. Henrion J, Schapira M, Luwaert R, Colin L, Delannoy A, Heller FR. Hypoxic hepatitis: clinical and hemodynamic study in 142 consecutive cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 2003;82(6):392-406 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  39. Fuhrmann V, Kneidinger N, Herkner H, Heinz G, Nikfardjam M, Bojic A, et al. Hypoxic hepatitis: underlying conditions and risk factors for mortality in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2009;35(8):1397-1405 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  40. Cassidy WM, Reynolds TB. Serum lactic dehydrogenase in the differential diagnosis of acute hepatocellular injury. J Clin Gastroenterol 1994;19(2):118-121 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  41. Taylor RM, Tujios S, Jinjuvadia K, Davern T, Shaikh OS, Han S, et al. Short and long-term outcomes in patients with acute liver failure due to ischemic hepatitis. Dig Dis Sci 2012;57(3):777-785 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  42. Nikolaou M, Parissis J, Yilmaz MB, Seronde MF, Kivikko M, Laribi S, et al. Liver function abnormalities, clinical profile, and outcome in acute decompensated heart failure. Eur Heart J 2013;34(10):742-749 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  43. Wadia Y, Etheridge W, Smart F, Wood RP, Frazier OH. Pathophysiology of hepatic dysfunction and intrahepatic cholestasis in heart failure and after left ventricular assist device support. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24(4):361-370 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  44. Levy B, Perez P, Perny J, Thivilier C, Gerard A. Comparison of norepinephrine-dobutamine to epinephrine for hemodynamics, lactate metabolism, and organ function variables in cardiogenic shock. A prospective, randomized pilot study. Crit Care Med 2011;39(3):450-455 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  45. Levy B, Clere-Jehl R, Legras A, Morichau-Beauchant T, Leone M, Frederique G, et al. Epinephrine Versus Norepinephrine for Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72(2):173-182 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  46. Havel C, Arrich J, Losert H, Gamper G, Müllner M, Herkner H. Vasopressors for hypotensive shock. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011:Cd003709 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  47. De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, Madl C, Chochrad D, Aldecoa C, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med 2010;362(9):779-789 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  48. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med 2021;47(11):1181-1247 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  49. Scheeren TWL, Bakker J, Kaufmann T, Annane D, Asfar P, Boerma EC, et al. Current use of inotropes in circulatory shock. Ann Intensive Care 2021;11(1):21 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  50. Asfar P, De Backer D, Meier-Hellmann A, Radermacher P, Sakka SG. Clinical review: influence of vasoactive and other therapies on intestinal and hepatic circulations in patients with septic shock. Crit Care 2004;8(3):170-179 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  51. Mathew R, Di Santo P, Jung RG, Marbach JA, Hutson J, Simard T, et al. Milrinone as Compared with Dobutamine in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock. New England Journal of Medicine 2021;385(6):516-525 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  52. Moller S, Danielsen KV, Wiese S, Hove JD, Bendtsen F. An update on cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. Expert rev 2019;13(5):497-505 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  53. Voiosu AM, Daha IC, Voiosu TA, Mateescu BR, Dan GA, Baicus CR, et al. Prevalence and impact on survival of hepatopulmonary syndrome and cirrhotic cardiomyopathy in a cohort of cirrhotic patients. Liver Int 2015;35(12):2547-2555 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  54. Chahal D, Liu H, Shamatutu C, Sidhu H, Lee SS, Marquez V. Review article: comprehensive analysis of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2021;53(9):985-998 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  55. Izzy MJ, VanWagner LB. Current Concepts of Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy. Clin Liver Dis 2021;25(2):471-481 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  56. Moller S, Lee SS. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. J Hepatol 2018;69(4):958-960 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  57. Song JG, Kim YK, Shin WJ, Hwang GS. Changes in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity are related to increased ventricular mass in patients with liver cirrhosis. Circ J 2012;76(12):2807-2813 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  58. Izzy M, VanWagner LB, Lin G, Altieri M, Findlay JY, Oh JK, et al. Redefining Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy for the Modern Era. Hepatology 2020;71(1):334-345 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  59. Mihailovici AR, Donoiu I, Gheonea DI, Mirea O, Târtea GC, Buşe M, et al. NT-proBNP and Echocardiographic Parameters in Liver Cirrhosis - Correlations with Disease Severity. Med Princ Pract 2019;28(5):432-441 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  60. Wiese S, Mortensen C, Gøtze JP, Christensen E, Andersen O, Bendtsen F, et al. Cardiac and proinflammatory markers predict prognosis in cirrhosis. Liver Int 2014;34(6):e19-30 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  61. Wiese S, Hove JD, Bendtsen F, Moller S. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy: pathogenesis and clinical relevance. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;11(3):177-186 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  62. Bansal S, Lindenfeld J, Schrier RW. Sodium retention in heart failure and cirrhosis: potential role of natriuretic doses of mineralocorticoid antagonist?. Circ Heart Fail 2009;2(4):370-376 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  63. Pozzi M, Grassi G, Ratti L, Favini G, Dell’Oro R, Redaelli E, et al. Cardiac, neuroadrenergic, and portal hemodynamic effects of prolonged aldosterone blockade in postviral child A cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100(5):1110-1116 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  64. Aithal GP, Palaniyappan N, China L, Härmälä S, Macken L, Ryan JM, et al. Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis. Gut 2021;70(1):9-29 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  65. Biggins SW, Angeli P, Garcia-Tsao G, Ginès P, Ling SC, Nadim MK, et al. Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Ascites, Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Hepatorenal Syndrome: 2021 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2021;74(2):1014-1048 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  66. Bernardi M, Calandra S, Colantoni A, Trevisani F, Raimondo ML, Sica G, et al. Q-T interval prolongation in cirrhosis: prevalence, relationship with severity, and etiology of the disease and possible pathogenetic factors. Hepatology 1998;27(1):28-34 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  67. Trevisani F, Di Micoli A, Zambruni A, Biselli M, Santi V, Erroi V, et al. QT interval prolongation by acute gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Int 2012;32(10):1510-1515 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  68. Henriksen JH, Bendtsen F, Hansen EF, Møller S. Acute non-selective beta-adrenergic blockade reduces prolonged frequency-adjusted Q-T interval (QTc) in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2004;40(2):239-246 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  69. Zambruni A, Trevisani F, Di Micoli A, Savelli F, Berzigotti A, Bracci E, et al. Effect of chronic beta-blockade on QT interval in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2008;48(3):415-421 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  70. Malandris K, Paschos P, Katsoula A, Manolopoulos A, Andreadis P, Sarigianni M, et al. Carvedilol for prevention of variceal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Gastroenterol 2019;32(3):287-297 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  71. Krag A, Borup T, Møller S, Bendtsen F. Efficacy and safety of terlipressin in cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding or hepatorenal syndrome. Adv Ther 2008;25(11):1105-1140 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  72. Israelsen M, Dahl EK, Madsen BS, Wiese S, Bendtsen F, Møller S, et al. Dobutamine reverses the cardio-suppressive effects of terlipressin without improving renal function in cirrhosis and ascites: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2020;318(2):G313-g321 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  73. Hsu WF, Yu SH, Lin JT, Wu JC, Hou MC, Huang YH, et al. Renal Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2019;2019:1743290 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  74. Gao Y, Wei L, Zhang DD, Chen Y, Hou B. SGLT2 Inhibitors: A New Dawn for Recurrent/Refractory Cirrhotic Ascites. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2021;9(6):795-797 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  75. Rabie RN, Cazzaniga M, Salerno F, Wong F. The use of E/A ratio as a predictor of outcome in cirrhotic patients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104(10):2458-2466 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  76. Zardi EM, Zardi DM, Chin D, Sonnino C, Dobrina A, Abbate A. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy in the pre- and post-liver transplantation phase. J Cardiol 2016;67(2):125-130 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  77. Rahman S, Mallett SV. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy: Implications for the perioperative management of liver transplant patients. World J Hepatol 2015;7(3):507-520 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  78. Zopey R, Susanto I, Barjaktarevic I, Wang T. Transition from hepatopulmonary syndrome to portopulmonary hypertension: a case series of 3 patients. Case Rep Pulmonol 2013;2013:561870 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  79. Iqbal S, Smith KA, Khungar V. Hepatopulmonary Syndrome and Portopulmonary Hypertension: Implications for Liver Transplantation. Clin Chest Med 2017;38(4):785-795 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  80. Aldenkortt F, Aldenkortt M, Caviezel L, Waeber JL, Weber A, Schiffer E. Portopulmonary hypertension and hepatopulmonary syndrome. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20(25):8072-8081 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  81. Grace JA, Angus PW. Hepatopulmonary syndrome: update on recent advances in pathophysiology, investigation, and treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;28(2):213-219 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  82. Krowka MJ, Fallon MB, Kawut SM, Fuhrmann V, Heimbach JK, Ramsay MA, et al. International Liver Transplant Society Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Hepatopulmonary Syndrome and Portopulmonary Hypertension. Transplantation 2016;100(7):1440-1452 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  83. Swanson KL, Wiesner RH, Krowka MJ. Natural history of hepatopulmonary syndrome: Impact of liver transplantation. Hepatology 2005;41(5):1122-1129 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  84. Machicao VI, Balakrishnan M, Fallon MB. Pulmonary complications in chronic liver disease. Hepatology 2014;59(4):1627-1637 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  85. Fuhrmann V, Madl C, Mueller C, Holzinger U, Kitzberger R, Funk GC, et al. Hepatopulmonary syndrome in patients with hypoxic hepatitis. Gastroenterology 2006;131(1):69-75 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  86. Trilok G, Qing YC, Li-Jun X. Hypoxic hepatitis: a challenging diagnosis. Hepatol Int 2012;6(4):663-669 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  87. Berthelot P, Walker JG, Sherlock S, Reid L. Arterial changes in the lungs in cirrhosis of the liver—lung spider nevi. N Engl J Med 1966;274(6):291-298 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  88. Fallon MB, Abrams GA, Luo B, Hou Z, Dai J, Ku DD. The role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the pathogenesis of a rat model of hepatopulmonary syndrome. Gastroenterology 1997;113(2):606-614 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  89. Luo B, Liu L, Tang L, Zhang J, Ling Y, Fallon MB. ET-1 and TNF-alpha in HPS: analysis in prehepatic portal hypertension and biliary and nonbiliary cirrhosis in rats. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2004;286(2):G294-303 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  90. Zhang J, Luo B, Tang L, Wang Y, Stockard CR, Kadish I, et al. Pulmonary angiogenesis in a rat model of hepatopulmonary syndrome. Gastroenterology 2009;136(3):1070-1080 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  91. Abrams GA, Jaffe CC, Hoffer PB, Binder HJ, Fallon MB. Diagnostic utility of contrast echocardiography and lung perfusion scan in patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome. Gastroenterology 1995;109(4):1283-1288 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  92. Fauconnet P, Klopfenstein CE, Schiffer E. Hepatopulmonary syndrome: the anaesthetic considerations. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013;30(12):721-730 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  93. Rodríguez-Roisin R, Krowka MJ. Hepatopulmonary syndrome—a liver-induced lung vascular disorder. N Engl J Med 2008;358(22):2378-2387 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  94. Iyer VN, Swanson KL, Cartin-Ceba R, Dierkhising RA, Rosen CB, Heimbach JK, et al. Hepatopulmonary syndrome: favorable outcomes in the MELD exception era. Hepatology 2013;57(6):2427-2435 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  95. Humbert M, Kovacs G, Hoeper MM, Badagliacca R, Berger RMF, Brida M, et al. 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: Developed by the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Endorsed by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) and the European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases (ERN-LUNG). European Heart Journal 2022;43(38):3618-3731 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  96. Kawut SM, Krowka MJ, Trotter JF, Roberts KE, Benza RL, Badesch DB, et al. Clinical risk factors for portopulmonary hypertension. Hepatology 2008;48(1):196-203 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  97. Ricci GL, Melgosa MT, Burgos F, Valera JL, Pizarro S, Roca J, et al. Assessment of acute pulmonary vascular reactivity in portopulmonary hypertension. Liver Transpl 2007;13(11):1506-1514 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  98. Klinger JR, Elliott CG, Levine DJ, Bossone E, Duvall L, Fagan K, et al. Therapy for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Adults: Update of the CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest 2019;155(3):565-586 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  99. Sitbon O, Bosch J, Cottreel E, Csonka D, de Groote P, Hoeper MM, et al. Macitentan for the treatment of portopulmonary hypertension (PORTICO): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 4 trial. Lancet Respir Med 2019;7(7):594-604 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  100. Savale L, Guimas M, Ebstein N, Fertin M, Jevnikar M, Renard S, et al. Portopulmonary hypertension in the current era of pulmonary hypertension management. J Hepatol 2020;73(1):130-139 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  101. Provencher S, Herve P, Jais X, Lebrec D, Humbert M, Simonneau G, et al. Deleterious effects of beta-blockers on exercise capacity and hemodynamics in patients with portopulmonary hypertension. Gastroenterology 2006;130(1):120-126 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  102. Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation 2014;129(8):837-847 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  103. Huang WA, Dunipace EA, Sorg JM, Vaseghi M. Liver Disease as a Predictor of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7(15):e008703 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  104. Proietti M, Marzona I, Vannini T, Colacioppo P, Tettamanti M, Foresta A, et al. Impact of liver disease on oral anticoagulant prescription and major adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation: analysis from a population-based cohort study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2021;7(FI1):f84-f92 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  105. Tripodi A, Mannucci PM. The coagulopathy of chronic liver disease. N Engl J Med 2011;365(2):147-156 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  106. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74(1):104-132 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  107. Chen S, Purerfellner H, Meyer C, Sommer P, Galindo Kiuchi M, Martinek M, et al. Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation and liver disease: a pooled-analysis of >20000 patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2022;8(4):336-345 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  108. Qamar A, Antman EM, Ruff CT, Nordio F, Murphy SA, Grip LT, et al. Edoxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and History of Liver Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74(2):179-189 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  109. Lee HF, Chan YH, Chang SH, Tu HT, Chen SW, Yeh YH, et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant and Warfarin in Cirrhotic Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8(5):e011112 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  110. Lee ZY, Suah BH, Teo YH, Teo YN, Syn NLX, Yeo TC, et al. Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Concomitant Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2022;22(2):157-165 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  111. Steffel J, Verhamme P, Potpara TS, Albaladejo P, Antz M, Desteghe L, et al. The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2018;39(16):1330-1393 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  112. Liu J, Ayada I, Zhang X, Wang L, Li Y, Wen T, et al. Estimating global prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in overweight or obese adults. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022;20(3):E573-E582 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  113. Eslam M, Sanyal AJ, George J, International Consensus Panel. MAFLD: A Consensus-Driven Proposed Nomenclature for Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2020;158(7):1999-2014.E1 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  114. Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, Anstee QM, Targher G, Romero-Gomez M, et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol 2020;73(1):202-209 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  115. Arslan U, Turkoglu S, Balcioglu S, Tavil Y, Karakan T, Cengel A. Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis 2007;18(6):433-436 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  116. Rafiq N, Bai C, Fang Y, Srishord M, McCullough A, Gramlich T, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7(2):234-238 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  117. Patil R, Sood GK. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiovascular risk. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2017;8(2):51-58 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  118. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73(24):3168-3209 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  119. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 1994;344(8934):1383-1389 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  120. Blais P, Lin M, Kramer JR, El-Serag HB, Kanwal F. Statins Are Underutilized in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Dyslipidemia. Dig Dis Sci 2016;61(6):1714-1720 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  121. Bjornsson E, Jacobsen EI, Kalaitzakis E. Hepatotoxicity associated with statins: reports of idiosyncratic liver injury post-marketing. J Hepatol 2012;56(2):374-380 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  122. Lewis JH, Mortensen ME, Zweig S, Fusco MJ, Medoff JR, Belder R, et al. Efficacy and safety of high-dose pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients with well-compensated chronic liver disease: Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Hepatology 2007;46(5):1453-1463 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  123. Chalasani N, Aljadhey H, Kesterson J, Murray MD, Hall SD. Patients with elevated liver enzymes are not at higher risk for statin hepatotoxicity. Gastroenterology 2004;126(5):1287-1292 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  124. Mancini GB, Baker S, Bergeron J, Fitchett D, Frohlich J, Genest J, et al. Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management of Statin Adverse Effects and Intolerance: Canadian Consensus Working Group Update (2016). Can J Cardiol 2016;32(7 Suppl):S35-S65 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  125. Lewis JH, Mortensen ME, Zweig S, Fusco MJ, Medoff JR, Belder R. Efficacy and safety of high-dose pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients with well-compensated chronic liver disease: Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Hepatology 2007;46(5):1453-1463 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  126. Bishnu S, Ahammed SM, Sarkar A, Hembram J, Chatterjee S, Das K, et al. Effects of atorvastatin on portal hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis with portal hypertension: a proof-of-concept study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;30(1):54-59 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  127. Mohanty A, Tate JP, Garcia-Tsao G. Statins Are Associated With a Decreased Risk of Decompensation and Death in Veterans With Hepatitis C-Related Compensated Cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2016;150(2):430-440.e431 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  128. Kim RG, Loomba R, Prokop LJ, Singh S. Statin Use and Risk of Cirrhosis and Related Complications in Patients With Chronic Liver Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;15(10):1521-1530.e1528 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  129. Bosch J, Gracia-Sancho J, Abraldes JG. Cirrhosis as new indication for statins. Gut 2020;69(5):953-962 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  130. Blanc JF, Khemissa F, Bronowicki JP, Monterymard C, Perarnau JM, Bourgeois V, et al. Phase 2 trial comparing sorafenib, pravastatin, their combination or supportive care in HCC with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis. Hepatol Int 2021;15(1):93-104 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  131. Bays H, Cohen DE, Chalasani N, Harrison SA. An assessment by the Statin Liver Safety Task Force: 2014 update. J Clin Lipidol 2014;8(3 Suppl):S47-S57 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  132. Adinolfi LE, Restivo L, Zampino R, Guerrera B, Lonardo A, Ruggiero L, et al. Chronic HCV infection is a risk of atherosclerosis. Role of HCV and HCV-related steatosis. Atherosclerosis 2012;221(2):496-502 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  133. Butt AA, Xiaoqiang W, Budoff M, Leaf D, Kuller LH, Justice AC. Hepatitis C virus infection and the risk of coronary disease. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49(2):225-232 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  134. Hsu CS, Kao JH, Chao YC, Lin HH, Fan YC, Huang CJ, et al. Interferon-based therapy reduces risk of stroke in chronic hepatitis C patients: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013;38(4):415-423 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  135. Francis P, Forman L. Use of Statins in Patients With and Without Liver Disease. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2020;15(1):40-45 View Article PubMed/NCBI

Copyright © 2023 Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0), permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • © 2024 Xia & He Publishing Inc.
  • Total visits : 2649020
  • Visits today : 1628