Home
JournalsCollections
For Authors For Reviewers For Editorial Board Members
Article Processing Charges Open Access
Ethics Advertising Policy
Editorial Policy Resource Center
Company Information Contact Us
OPEN ACCESS

Expanding Role of Epigenetics in Human Health and Disease

  • Swarup K. Chakrabarti1,*  and
  • Dhrubajyoti Chattopadhyay1,2
Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine   2024;9(3):221-235

doi: 10.14218/ERHM.2023.00086

Received:

Revised:

Accepted:

Published online:

 Author information

Citation: Chakrabarti SK, Chattopadhyay D. Expanding Role of Epigenetics in Human Health and Disease. Explor Res Hypothesis Med. 2024;9(3):221-235. doi: 10.14218/ERHM.2023.00086.

Abstract

The traditional definition of epigenetics encompasses all molecular pathways that affect how a genotype expresses itself on the way to a particular phenotype, with epigenetics serving as the interface between genotype and phenotype. Unlike genetic changes, which may have protracted, irreversible effects on health and the emergence of illnesses, epigenetic modifications are reversible and do not change the DNA sequence. However, they can affect how our bodies interpret DNA sequences. Gene expression regulated by epigenetics has emerged as a major contributing element to the etiology of many diseases over time and a crucial determinant of human health. One of the strongest arguments in support of gene expression controlled by epigenetics comes from the startling discovery that DNA methylation causes X-chromosome inactivation, which has been connected to several diseases. The intrinsic uterine environment, where the embryo and fetus grow and develop over time to become neonates is vulnerable to early epigenetic settings throughout development, affecting the offspring’s long-term health as well as their predisposition for different diseases. The epigenetic settings of germ cell development are influenced by environmental factors, which can result in transgenerational epigenetic effects. Therefore, in this article, we essentially provide a summary of the present level of understanding concerning the function of epigenetics regarding critical facets of human health, including in embryonic development and adulthood, with a particular emphasis on explaining the underlying diverse epigenetic mechanisms that regulate the onset of many human diseases, as well as cutting-edge technological tools used to study the human epigenome. Finally, we talk about the state of epigenetic therapies, which might be put to use in the treatment of a range of human diseases.

Keywords

Epigenetic, Diseases, Public health, Chromatin, Transcription

Introduction

Conrad H Waddington’s early 1940s definition of epigenetics states that the term’s original definition encompasses all molecular pathways that affect how a genotype expresses itself on the way to a particular phenotype, with epigenetics serving as the interface between genotype and phenotype.1 The current definition of epigenetics, which is universally accepted among biologists, is the in-depth examination of heritable alterations in gene activity during mitosis and/or meiosis, however, without ever changing the sequence of the DNA.2 For instance, a wide range of progressive epigenetic changes ensures the development of a healthy individual.3–5 The evidence that critical epigenetic reprogramming events occur in mammals while germ cells are forming as well as during the early stages of embryogenesis reinforces this.6,7 In plain language, epigenetics is the study of how environmental factors, such as diet, specific nutrients, poverty, ultraviolet radiation, etc., affect how an individual’s genes function.8,9 Contrary to genetic alterations, which may have enduring, irreversible effects on health and the onset of diseases, epigenetic modifications are changeable without altering the sequence of DNA but can affect how our bodies interpret DNA sequences.10,11 Even though every cell in an organism has essentially the same DNA, there are distinct differences in terms of cell types and their functions. These alterations in gene expression, which are predominantly caused by qualitative and quantitative variations, are mediated by cis- and trans-acting factors, including transcription factors (TFs) that affect cellular differentiation and development and are under epigenetic control.12,13 It is generally believed that epigenetic mechanisms like DNA methylation and chromatin modifications (including different RNA-mediated processes, e.g., noncoding RNAs), primarily affect the expression of genes, specifically transcription as well as at post-transcriptional, translational, and/or post-translational levels; since those processes are all regulated by epigenetics, they cause cell-specific gene expression patterns and have an impact on the overall development of the organism.14–18

History of epigenetics

As stated above, the British developmental biologist, embryologist, and geneticist Conrad H Waddington, who worked at Cambridge University, first introduced the phrase epigenetics in 1942.1 Waddington did not, however, know at the time that genes existed or that they played a hereditary role. In accordance with this, a second theory concerning the existence of epigenetics, advanced by David L Nanney in 1958, pushed the field’s definition and improved its comprehension to where it is today.19 Nanney postulated the presence of two systems that regulate cells. While one system primarily depends on DNA-template-driven transcription, which is genetic, the other system envisions a complementary system with vastly different operating principles that primarily regulates which data is represented in a specific cell based on epigenetic regulation. However, the conception of epigenetics by these two pioneering researchers ran counter to Muller’s initial findings in 1930 from his seminal research examining deletions, inversions, translocations, and in Drosophila melanogaster chromosomes exposed to radiation which firmly indicated that not having any additional genetic alterations like mutational changes in the DNA or epigenetic changes; importantly, the mere gene positioning inside the genome could alone alter the expression of the gene.20

Hannah, in 1951, was able to correctly interpret the variegation effect (juxtaposition of euchromatin and heterochromatin) as observed by Muller and support the crucial role of epigenetics in gene expression by claiming that specific genes in the genomic regions that are euchromatic were moved to the heterochromatic regions of the genome, altering the way the genes behaved in their previous location.21 Interestingly, long before the term epigenetics was coined and recognized, Darwin and Kant’s theories indicated that the surroundings played a significant part in strictly regulating the phenotypic changes of an organism, resulting in the idea of the concept of evolution.22

The Mendel’s principles, which were developed in 1865, solidified the ideas of heredity and genetics.23 Isolation of the DNA molecule in 1869 by Friedrich Miescher, a Swiss scientist who wanted to study the chemistry of cells, also contributed.24 Finally, the DNA double helix structure was determined by Watson and Crick in 1959, about a century later.25 These findings collectively supported and validated the original epigenetics theory, according to which genetics can then provide the framework for epigenetics to explain how environmental factors affect the genome.

Importantly, Waddington created his iconic representation of the epigenetic landscape in 1957, demonstrating how a cell, in analogy to a ball, might take distinct routes based on the surface unevenness that effectively mirrors environmental factors inside and outside of cells.26 This idea essentially demonstrates how a cell changes throughout development from an undifferentiated state to one of several distinct, individual, differentiated cell fates, which are controlled by epigenetic mechanisms (Fig. 1).

Synopsis of basic epigenetic mechanisms governing the transformation of a cell type from an undifferentiated to a differentiated state.
Fig. 1  Synopsis of basic epigenetic mechanisms governing the transformation of a cell type from an undifferentiated to a differentiated state.

A few significant post-translational histone modifications produced by effector enzymes including chromatin remodelers, histone acetyl transferases (HATs), histone methyl transferases (HMTs), and DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) are shown. Cell-specific transcription factors (TFs) work in tandem with epigenetic machinery to steer the course of an undifferentiated cell type during a transcriptional pause, such as the euchromatin state, in order to attain biological functions characteristic of a differentiated cell type. lncRNA, long noncoding RNA.

Furthermore, several research teams discovered that effective embryogenesis required the union of male and female gamete genomes. This resulted in determining imprinted genes, which are controlled in a sex-specific manner as a result of genomic imprinting potentiated by epigenetic processes, and resulted in the variable level of gene expression based on the parent from whom it came.27 X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) was first observed in mammals in 1961 and is a mammalian paradigm of transgenerational epigenetic transmission that silences genes only on the paternally inherited X chromosome; as such, it is a notable instance of epigenetics-induced imprinting on the genome.28,29 Both Prader-Willi and the Angelman syndromes, which map to human chromosome 15q11-q13, include alterations of the imprinted genes’ expression caused by the methylation of DNA.30

The characterization of the nucleosome’s structure by Kornberg and Thomas in 1974 also marked a significant advance in the study of epigenetics.31 The identification of the double helix structure in DNA also led to the identification of other significant chromatin alterations, like DNA methylation (5-methylcytosine, 5mC) and post-translational histone modifications (PTMs). Indeed, methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitylation, and sumoylation of histones, and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) histone ribosylation were documented between 1962 and 1977. DNA methylation was first identified in 1965.32,33 It is important to note that Jenuwein and Allis’ seminal work at the University of Virginia, where his team discovered the histone code in 2001, has made it easier to decipher the biological significance of these PTMs.34

It is also crucial to remember that not all epigenetic alterations as described in the literature are heritable and that some of them might only be transient. The fact that monozygotic twins have similar epigenomes in their early years of life yet display significant changes in their epigenomes as they become older is proof that the epigenome is metastable and exhibits temporal variability.1,35–38

Table 1 contains a timeline of important events in the development of epigenetics.1,16,21,26,28,31,34,39–58

Table 1

Timeline of significant events in the history of epigenetics

YearKey finding
1759Theory of epigenesis by CF Wolff. According to the epigenesis theory, structures that have not yet (pre-) developed emerge throughout development.39
1802JB Lamarck proposed that the environment might directly and heritably alter phenotype.40
1879Cytologist W Flemming coined the term chromatin to refer to the structure of the stainable cell nucleus, later referred to as chromosomes, which were visible when cells divided.41
1898Discovery of a nucleotide known as tuberculinic acid that is not recognized as a prerequisite to the identification of DNA methylation.42
1942The term epigenetics was coined to clarify how genes interact with the surroundings to develop an organism’s physical characteristics.1
1951First isolation of 5-methylcytosine from nucleic acids.43
1957CWaddington creates a model of the epigenetic landscape to demonstrate how cells make decisions during biological development.26
1961For the first time, genes associated with X-chromosome inactivation were found in female mouse embryos.28
1962Discovery of histone methylation.16
1964Discovery of histone acetylation.44
1965Discovery of DNA methylation.42
1974First structural resolution of a nucleosome.45
1975Identification of histone phosphorylation; DNA methylation proposed as a process for the embryonic silencing of the X-chromosome; The idea that DNA methylation may regulate gene expression was proposed by Holliday and Riggs.28,46,47
1977Discovery of histone ubiquitylation; Franklin and Zweidler used acid-urea-Triton X polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to extract histone variants from human tissues for the first time.48,49
1981The first proof that DNA methylation is responsible for X-chromosome silencing.28
1982Discovery of bromodomain and prions.31,50
1985DNA methylation takes place on particular DNA regions known as CpG islands.42
1988Cloning of the first enzyme found in mammals that catalyzes the addition of a methyl moiety to DNA, or DNA methyltransferase, or DNMT.51
1992SIRT1, discovery of a NAD+-dependent deacetylase; A technique was developed to determine which particular DNA strands contain a methylated cytosine, opening the door to perform DNA methylation genome sequencing; To examine the connection between disease and methylation of DNA, the initial transgenic mouse model was developed.44,47,51
1995The first conclusive study to show that decreased methylation of DNA resulted in the onset of cancers.52
1996Discovery of histone acetyl transferase and histone deacetylase.44
1997Discovery of RNA interference and DNMT1.51
1999The first demonstration in mammals is that epigenetic alterations may be propagated through generations; Colorectal cancer was linked to DNA methylation of CpG islands.53,54
2001The first chromodomain-containing protein, heterochromatin protein 1, was reported to explain position effect variegation in Drosophila, a phenomenon that occurs when an active gene is translocated into the heterochromatin environment, resulting in gene suppression; A particular subclass of ncRNA called miRNA was discovered in vertebrates.21,34,55
2004Identification of first histone demethylase.56
2011Modification of histone proteins could be another method of epigenetic inheritance.57
2014Most current definitions of epigenetics, according to Felsenfeld et al., never make a distinction between circumstances as the modifications may be passed down during cell division, aiding in the maintenance of a particular gene expression pattern, and in circumstances where the changes are merely a component of the transcribing apparatus.58

Fundamental knowledge of the epigenetic control of gene expression

Over the years, the control of gene expression by epigenetic means has become recognized as a significant essential route in the pathogenesis of numerous diseases.3,59–62 Also, there has been an explosion of data revealing the epigenetic mechanisms regulating health and disease.

DNA methylation

A number of physiological and pathological processes are controlled by methylation of DNA, and aberrant methylation of DNA is often linked to the emergence of many diseases as well as to adaptations like the concept of Developmental Origin of Health and Disease (DOHaD).1,10,12,16,17,38,42,43,63

DNA methylation affects DNA repair processes

Genomic regions abundant in patterns made up of a cytosine nucleotide coming before a guanine nucleotide are referred to as cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) islands.64 The most common way to influence biological processes through DNA methylation is dynamic modulation concerning the CpG islands’ methylation state in any particular gene’s regulatory region. The specific nucleotide and location of its methylation varies between types, despite the fact that methylation of the DNA is thought to exist in every organism.65 In humans, methylation of a cytosine nucleotide occurs when it is located directly 5′ to a guanine nucleotide. Despite the fact that both methylated and unmethylated cytosines can spontaneously deaminate under physiological conditions, DNA repair mechanisms accurately repair unmethylated cytosine’s conversion to uracil, maintaining the CpG dinucleotide in the island. However, when methylated cytosine is deaminated, thymine is produced, which DNA repair mechanisms cannot recognize, and cannot repair.66 As a result, over time these defects may reduce the frequency of the human genome’s CpG dinucleotides, disrupting the islands constituted of CpGs and causing adverse effects on health, ultimately resulting in diseases.67

DNA methylation regulates gene transcription, controlling health and disease

When a key regulatory region of the gene such as a promoter containing CpG islands is hypermethylated, the chromatin is often compacted or closed, resulting in transcriptional inactivation of relevant genes. Due to the compacted chromatin, TFs can be inhibited from attaching to the DNA. Moreover, the proteins binding methyl-CpGs have a greater affinity for the promoter sequence, as opposed to a specific TF, when methylation occurs in a promoter region containing cytosine.68 The binding proteins of methyl-CpG also collaborate with other proteins to form a complex that has histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity.69 This complex then causes euchromatin (an open chromatin structure) to adopt a closed conformation, becoming heterochromatin, which prevents TFs from accessing the promoter sequence and repressing transcription of that gene. By contrast, CpG island hypomethylation causes a euchromatic state, which is frequently associated with the transcriptional activation of genes.70–72 Additionally, CpG island hypermethylation occurs as part of regular physiological processes, such as XCI in females.28 Also, while repeating sequences like satellites and long interspersed nuclear elements, Arthrobacter luteus infection, etc., contribute to a variety of physiological processes, they can cause chromosomal instability that can be avoided by hypermethylation of repetitive DNA elements.73

Key roles of DNA methyltransferases in the DNA methylation of the gene

DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) assist in modifying cytosine in organisms, producing 5mC. Five DNMTs have been identified within the genome to date, namely DNMT-(1, 2), DNMT-(3a, 3b), and DNMT3L. The canonical DNA methyltransferases 1, 3a, and 3b directly add methyl groups to cytosine by catalysis.16,17,42,50–52 However, DNMT2 lacks the large N-terminal domains found in the DNMT-(1, 2, 3) families that is otherwise essential for methylating DNA and/or RNA.

Chromatin modification

Gene regulation and expression depend on chromatin structure and are accomplished by bringing in various chromatin-modifying complexes.74–76 For instance, the euchromatin state of embryonic stem cells is an illustration of the particular chromatin organization, which enables accessibility for the expression of all genes globally and makes it easier to reprogram a cell to become pluripotent.77

Diverse types of PTMs regulate gene expression

Nucleosomes, or DNA with 146 base pairs surrounding an octamer of histone proteins made up of two molecules of each histone (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4), make up about 99% of the genome. Using data from mass spectrometry and specific antibodies, Kouzarides et al.78 were able to provide a thorough discussion of a variety of chromatin alterations, such as acetylation, phosphorylation, lysine/arginine methylation, deimination, ubiquitylation, sumoylation, and ribosylation of the ADP; each of these alters the DNA-histone interactions in nucleosomes. The complex network of distinct histone residues that are methylated, demethylated, acetylated, phosphorylated, dephosphorylated, and even methylated and acetylated between each other gives rise to a histone code.34

Acetylation of histones usually occurs at lysine residues that have positive charges, loosening the bond between DNA and histones and allowing transcription by opening up the chromatin.79 For example, transcriptional activation is associated with acetylation of H3’s lysines 9 and 27, which are designated as H3K9ac and H3K27ac, respectively.80,81 Methylation of a histone, by contrast, is more complex since it may entail adding 1–2 methyl groups to an arginine and 1–3 methyl groups to a lysine while maintaining the charge of the histone protein.82 As an illustration, lysine 27 trimethylation on H3, designated as H3K27me3, results in inhibition of transcription while lysine 4 methylation on H3, designated as H3K4me, is linked to gene activation.83,84 Moreover, histone phosphorylation adds a negative phosphate group to the histone tail; however, its function is largely unknown apart from its role in response to DNA damage and subsequent repair caused by H2A histone family member X phosphorylation.47 Allis’s group has shown that the H2AX variant is also phosphorylated on tyrosine (Y) 142 and that this modification is controlled in a way that depends on DNA damage.34 Moreover, histone phosphorylation has also been shown to be connected with transcription regulation. For instance, regulation of transcription of epidermal growth-factor responsive genes is linked to serine phosphorylation at the 10 and 28 residues of H3 and H2B’s serine 32.85 In addition, a large ubiquitin molecule can be inserted into the lysine residues on histones. Examples of ubiquitylated histones are H2AK119ub, which is associated with gene silencing, and H2BK123ub, which is connected to transcription activation.86,87 Also, PTMs on histone proteins can be conjugated to small ubiquitin-like modifiers that dynamically alter chromatin structure and gene expression. Even though it was originally believed to only suppress gene transcription, recent evidence seems to point to diverse roles for histone sumoylation in cotranscription mechanisms, namely chromatin reorganization, extension of transcription, and avoiding cryptic transcription.88,89 Also, ADP-ribosylation of histones has been demonstrated in studies to be associated with histone acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation, and to have important roles in DNA repair, replication, transcription, and cell proliferation.90–92

Energy-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes alter chromatin function

Cells are equipped with additional highly regulated epigenetic mechanisms that are mediated by chromatin remodeling complexes that use adenosine triphosphate (ATP) for their activity.75,76 The majority of evidence for the four families of chromatin remodeling complexes that use ATP-SWItch/sucrose nonfermentable, imitation SWI/Sucrose Non-Fermentable, IN080, and chromodomain-helicase-DNA binding has come from their structural similarities. Chromatin remodelers can catalyze a wide variety of chromatin structural changes, such as nucleosome sliding, which causes histone variant exchange.93 As an illustration, it has been demonstrated that the ATP-reliant chromatin remodeling complexes’ nucleosome remodeling factor SWI2/Sucrose Non-Fermentable 2-related 1 chromatin remodeling complex catalyzes the transfer of the H2A variant H2AZ and the histone octamer sliding along the DNA, respectively, to promote transcription.94

Noncoding RNAs control human health and disease

The largest number of transcripts in the human genome that are highly transcribed are noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), which represent the greatest majority of transcripts.95 Three distinct ncRNAs form [microRNAs (miRNAs), long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs)] have a significant impact on human health as well as the development of diseases.96,97

MiRNAs control chromatin activity by interacting with the methylation process of DNA and histone alteration

Small ncRNAs known as miRNAs, which range in length from 18 to 25 nucleotides, are becoming increasingly recognized as one of the main epigenetic regulators in eukaryotes.98 The global miRNA database, miRbase, currently lists references for more than 2,500 miRNAs. MiRNAs produced by Drosha and Dicer in two sequential cleavage steps from defective hairpin conformations are seen in precursors of lengthy ncRNAs or intronic segments of DNA of coding or noncoding genes.99 Although the precise mechanism by which miRNAs downregulate protein translation is still unknown, it may include degradation of mRNA, inhibition of translation, or a blending of these processes together. Furthermore, epigenetic changes such as methylation of DNA, modification of RNA, and modification of histones can affect how miRNAs are expressed.100 Also, an miRNA-epigenetic feedback loop that promotes reciprocal communication can be established by miRNAs targeting epigenetic modifier enzymes involved in epigenetic modifications. For instance, miR-9 is a notable miRNA that is regulated by epigenetic mechanisms. Its regulation has been linked to hypermethylation of a CpG island across the miR-9 locus. Many cancers, including solid tumors in the breast, colon, and other organs, along with hematological malignancies like acute lymphoblastic leukemia, exhibit miR-9 hypermethylation.101,102

The structure and function of chromatin are regulated by lncRNAs

RNAs that exceed 200 nucleotides in length but do not encode proteins are known as lncRNA transcripts. Given the multitude of ways that lncRNAs might work, one way to group them involves the way that they operate, i.e. as a signal, decoy, guide, scaffold, enhancer, or sponge lncRNAs.103

Signal lncRNAs

In general, signal lncRNAs respond to particular physiological and environmental cues to modulate downstream genes and exhibit expression according to cell type, either on their own or in conjunction with specific TFs, PTMs, and histone-modifying enzymes.103–105 For instance, XCI is assisted by the well-known lncRNA X-inactive specific transcript in a biological process by which one of the two X-chromosomes in female cells becomes inactivated to balance the genes’ expressions in mammalian males and females.106 Additionally, signal lncRNAs have the ability to control chromatin dynamics because their negative changes can balance out positively charged histone tails, causing chromatin to decompact (go from heterochromatin to euchromatin) and potentiating gene activation.107

Decoy lncRNAs

LncRNAs have the potential to function as a kind of chromatin decoy by, among other things, preventing some chromatin modifiers from interacting with the promoters of target genes.108 For instance, the lncRNA lncPRESS1 sequesters the HDAC sirtuin 6, a deacetylase that causes gene repression, away from the promoters of several pluripotency genes, allowing human embryonic stem cells to retain their pluripotency and become transcriptionally poised towards cellular factors.109

Guide lncRNAs

Guide lncRNAs direct regulatory proteins to their target sites in subcellular locations where they attach to them to form ribonucleoprotein molecules, causing expression or silencing of the target genomic regions.95 This could entail chromatin-modifying enzymes being recruited, which then alter the state of the chromatin by forming intricate complexes among RNAs, RNA-DNA hybrid molecules, and effector proteins-RNA-DNA. As an illustration, the polycomb repressor complex 2 attaches to the lncRNA HOX transcript antisense RNA 5′-domain, which then triggers DNA methylation and gene silencing. On the other hand, the 3′-domain interacts with the complex of lysine demethylase/RE1 silencing transcription factor and causes the removal of methylation marks from the gene, which activates transcription.110

Scaffold lncRNAs

Scaffold lncRNAs have a range of binding sites that allow them to form functional complexes with additional proteins that mediate transcriptional activation or repression. A well-known example of a scaffold lncRNA is the telomeric repeat-containing RNA, an element of telomeric heterochromatin that interacts with telomerase RNA to suppress telomerase activity.95,111 As a result, lncRNA telomeric repeat-containing RNA-expressing cells are accelerated toward an early stage of senescence.

Enhancer lncRNAs

Enhancer lncRNAs function in cis to control target gene expression by bringing remote enhancers close to the promoter region containing the basal transcriptional machinery by binding, as a result of facilitated long-distance communication between the enhancer and promoter.112 An enhancer lncRNA called lncRNA enhances endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression, which increases endothelial nitric oxide synthase (commonly known as eNOS) level, can aid in RNA polymerase II recruitment to the eNOS promoter, which augments the transcription of eNOS precursor RNA.113

Sponge lncRNAs

There is growing evidence that lncRNAs can perform as miRNA sponges and face off against protein-coding transcripts for miRNA binding. Because sponge lncRNAs and miRNAs have complementary sequences, they can bind to each other and restrict the amount of miRNAs that transcription machinery can access to control the transcription of target genes.114 For instance, the sponge lncRNA phosphatase 1 nuclear targeting subunit has seven sequences that are complementary to miRNA-205, decreasing the capacity of miRNA-205 to attach and repress the mRNAs of the zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 and zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 2.115

CircRNAs

Single-stranded nucleotide molecules with covalent encapsulation that lack 3′ poly A tails or 5′ caps, unlike mRNAs, are known as circRNAs.95,103 The size of the spliced circle molecule might range from less than 100 nucleotides to more than 4 kb. Similar to lncRNAs, sponging miRNAs represent one process whereby circRNAs regulate post-transcriptional gene expression in the cytoplasm of a cell. However, very few research studies have revealed that circRNAs function by means of interacting with proteins. In addition to the several other potential methods of action, circRNAs can recruit TFs, chromatin-modifying enzymes, and enzymes that modify DNA or histones to alter gene expression, either activating or inhibiting it.116

Importance of epigenetics in embryonic development and adulthood

Despite the long-held belief that an individual’s phenotype is primarily determined by means of their parents’ genetic code, more acceptance is coming forth for the idea that genetic code-determined phenotypes can be further modulated by a variety of epigenomes that arise during development as a result of epigenetic plasticity established during the initial stages of embryogenesis.117 The intrinsic uterine surroundings, wherein the embryo, fetus, and neonate develop over time, are susceptible to the early epigenetic settings throughout development, affecting the long-term health of the offspring as well as their propensity for various disorders.118 In fact, environmental factors that affect the epigenetic setting of germ cell development may cause some of these modifications to be passed down through generations. They all work together to explain DOHaD.119–122

Epigenetic processes direct embryo development

The process of rapid cell proliferation causing embryo growth begins with the formation of a single-cell embryo (zygote) produced by the fertilization of an ovum by a sperm.123 The cells that are produced initially all possess the unique ability known as totipotency, which allows them to develop into every kind of specialized cell found in the embryo, membranes outside the embryo, and the placenta. While an embryo’s cell population grows, it gradually starts to differentiate, giving rise to distinct cell populations (pluripotency to multipotency).124 Each of these groups exhibits an increasingly narrower variety of developmental results, primarily mediated through a range of epigenetic mechanisms, which when combined give rise to permanent gene expression patterns that are unique to a particular lineage.125 At about the 5th-day mark after fertilization the human embryo, which has between 50 and 150 cells and is made up of the trophectoderm and an inner cell mass, transforms into a blastocyst.126 Trophectoderm cells have a very limited capacity to differentiate because they can only become the various cell types seen in the placenta. As a result, they are regarded as multipotent cells. On the other hand, the inner cell mass has a rich collection of pluripotent stem cells that are embryonic in nature, able to develop into a variety of genuine fetal cell types since they have unconstrained developmental potential. Implantation is the process of the blastocyst embedding into the endometrial lining of the uterus, which generally occurs in week 2 of development.127 Typically, the human blastocyst implants in the endometrium. Early implantation begins with the blastocyst adhering to the uterine wall, which is known as apposition. Next, the blastocyst attaches to the receptive endometrium, which is known as adhesion, and finally, the attached blastocyst invades the endometrial stroma by crossing through the endometrial epithelial basement membrane, a process known as invasion.128

Impact of epigenetic changes on preimplantation embryo development

While early literature focused solely on the substrates and culture conditions required for embryonic development, particularly in the context of in vitro fertilization, more recent findings suggest that the epigenome can be changed by the surrounding environment, which can then influence developmental competence by affecting embryo metabolism, etc.129 Aside from the metabolic effect, epigenetic reprogramming and modification provide critical molecular functions during embryonic development, primarily by regulating expression of genes that determine cell fate by influencing cellular differentiation and stabilizing monoallelic gene expression at critical loci.120 CpG methylation has had its function studied in epigenetic reprogramming among numerous species, and new research is unraveling the collaborative roles among CpG methylation, chromatin changes, and ncRNAs when altering the early epigenetic landscape during embryonic development.130 Zygotic genome activation (ZGA) occurs after zygote formation in initial embryonic growth and is another important aspect of preimplantation embryonic development, which is controlled by epigenetic processes.130 Histone alterations not only help to establish totipotency but are also important in ZGA. During ZGA, gene activation markers like trimethylated H3 lysine 4 are more prevalent among humans, whereas gene inactivation markers like H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) are less prevalent.131

Embryo implantation is dependent on epigenetic regulation of the endometrium

The endometrium and the embryo that is implanting communicate with one another throughout the highly regulated process of implantation; this is necessary for establishing and maintaining the pregnancy and is highly reliant on endometrial receptivity.127 For instance, the endometrium’s regenerative capacity is extraordinary in that it thickens to a depth of 5–7 mm within a cycle, up from 0.5–1 mm following menstruation.132 As a result, the endometrium necessitates the active engagement of mechanisms like angiogenesis, as controlled by TFs along with epigenetic processes such as methylation of DNA and chromatin modifications.133

Adult development is linked to epigenetic processes

Recent studies appear to support the idea that epigenetics related to age is more significant than genetics in deciding which body genes express themselves, which in turn influences a person’s vulnerability to specific diseases.5 For instance, age-related changes in methylation of DNA patterns have been noted. In addition, variations in histone modifications with aging can affect the genomic stability needed to maintain physiologically appropriate processes. Recent studies have also revealed that human classical CD14+CD16 monocytes age regularly, with H3K27me3 declining and H3K27me1 increasing; this is yet another example of how epigenetics has a major impact on controlling the physiological fitness of health as people age.134

Methods of analyzing chromatin’s DNA methylation patterns

DNA methylation involves the addition of a methyl group to a certain base pair by chemical means. Conversion based on bisulfite, enrichment based on affinity, and together with approaches based on restriction enzymes can all be used to evaluate DNA methylation across the entire genome. The term whole-genome bisulfite sequencing refers to the process that entails sequencing the entire DNA sample following bisulfite treatment. In contrast, reduced representation of bisulfite sequencing enriches between 1% and 5% of the genome with rich CpG density using restriction enzymes, bisulfite conversion, and size selection.135 Enriched genomic interest regions by targeted sequencing utilizing special bisulfite padlock probes or hybridization capture probes such as TruSeq Methyl Capture EPIC made by Illumina Corporation (San Diego, CA, USA) is a more versatile but also more expensive method. Additionally, the Pacific Biosciences (Menlo Park, CA, USA) platform has developed long-read sequencing, which enables direct detection of DNA base modifications like cytosine during sequencing.135 Moreover, nanopore sequencing is another innovative sequencing method that has the ability to distinguish between methylation and unmethylated cytosines. Affinity enrichment, on the other hand, uses a binding protein against methylcytosine or antibodies directed against 5 mC followed by sequencing as a substitute to converting DNA methylation status by bisulfite conversion.135,136

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) methods to examine DNA-protein interactions

ChIP is a widely used method to examine DNA-protein interactions, including histone modifications. This technique makes use of antibodies with a particular affinity for binding to desired histone modifications. ChIP, subsequent to sequencing, in the method known as ChIP-seq, is the principal approach for evaluating the epigenome’s overall state of histone marks.92,137,138 ChIP-exo is an improvement over ChIP-seq that enables binding site resolution to be increased to a single base from hundreds of base pairs. Although more expensive, ChIP-nexus is essentially an enhanced edition of ChIP-exo that uses an intramolecular ligation approach for library preparation that is more effective. ChIP mentation is a method that immediately tags ChIP fragments with Tn5 transposase and is then followed by sequencing; this approach lowers the cost and input requirements of regular ChIP-sequencing. Also, cleavage under targets and release using a nuclease is a different approach for histone profiling that has lately grown in favor because it requires less sample DNA input. In contrast, cleavage under targets and tagmentation with Tn5 (a fusion protein of protein A and transposase) involves loading with sequencing adapters to address some of the drawbacks of cleavage under targets and release using a nuclease. The latter typically results in DNA loss caused by micrococcal nuclease digestion.

Methods of analyzing chromatin structural patterns

Genomic regions vary regarding nucleosome occupancy and the DNA’s accessibility to proteins. To quantify these traits across the genome, numerous techniques have been devised. Sequencing targeting DNase I hypersensitive sites and deep sequencing using micrococcal nuclease digestion were the first of these techniques to be established.139 Another comparable test that considers genomic DNA within a euchromatic state specifically vulnerable to sonication-assisted shearing is the identification of regulatory elements by using formaldehyde subsequent to sequencing. Additionally, the transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing (ATAC-seq) technique is the most recent method to examine chromatin accessibility.140 By using tagmentation, ATAC-seq is the fastest and highest sensitivity among all existing techniques and significantly decreases the amount of input DNA required.

Chromatin conformation capture methods to investigate long-distance genomic sequence interactions

Moreover, across the genome, regulatory elements engage in long-distance interactions. Different crosslinking and ligation-based approaches with differing degrees of coverage and specificity have been developed to detect and characterize them across the entire genome. For instance, chromatin conformation capture is an innovative approach that relies on ligating and crosslinking physically interconnected chromosomal areas.141 Reversal of the crosslinking produces fragments of linear DNA. The characterization of interconnecting domains from various chromosomes can then be carried out downstream using a variety of techniques. Hi-C is a whole-genome implementation of chromatin conformation capture, which exploits next-generation sequencing for high-throughput measurement among every chromatin interaction. In addition, techniques like HiChIP, which combines Hi-C with ChIP, and analysis of chromatin interactions via a method known as paired-end tag sequencing are also used to explore the long-distance interactions of specific chromatin regions.142

Multiomics assays to investigate epigenetic alterations

Recent years have observed the growth of a number of multiomics assays for the simultaneous characterization of numerous epigenomic levels across the genome.143 For instance, measurement of both DNA methylation and chromatin accessibility can be performed simultaneously in the same sample using a technique known as nucleosome occupancy methylome sequencing. EpiMethylTag is a different technique that combines ATAC-seq or ChIP-seq, known as M-ATAC or M-ChIP, respectively with bisulfite conversion. This also enables the simultaneous analysis looking at the changes in methylation patterns along with histone modifications on identical DNA molecules. Another approach is known as ATAC-Me resembling EpiMethylTag and it combines ATAC-seq and bisulfite sequencing. In addition, researchers have recently developed high-resolution epigenomic methods at the single-cell level by utilizing breakthroughs in single-cell sequencing methods.144,145

Epigenetic pathways control the emergence of human diseases

The role epigenetics plays in human illnesses has increased recently, and academics from all around the world are becoming increasingly interested in this area of research. Abnormal epigenetic alterations are linked to a variety of diseases, such as oncogenesis, neural problems, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, infectious diseases, etc.

The link between epigenetics and cancer

Oncological outcomes are significantly influenced by epigenetic changes.146–148 One way to inactivate several tumor suppressor functions is to hypermethylate tumor suppressor gene promoter regions.149 Besides, additional genes participating in the vast array of essential physiological properties have also shown hypermethylation, which leads to oncogenesis. It is interesting to note that ncRNAs have been widely researched for their function in the epigenetic regulation of breast cancer.150 Due to CpG hypermethylation in miRNA genes or deregulation of miRNA biosynthetic processes, miRNAs aberrantly control genes in cancer.151 Additionally, the activation of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)-related genes and oncogenesis have been linked to the extent of arginine methylation of histone that is protein arginine methyltransferase-dependent at particular genomic locations.152 Additionally, an extensive DNA hypomethylation across the genome has been identified by whole-genome analysis as the most notable and early known alteration in DNA methylation patterns of neoplastic cells.153 It is likely DNA demethylation may have a role in aneuploidy and genomic instability, two prominent characteristics of cancer.154 DNA methylation loss may result in transcriptional activation, allowing gene expression of repeated sequences, transposable elements, and cancer-causing genes.153–155 Also, the histone acetylation pattern is altered in GBM cells and has been linked to tumor aggressiveness, as shown by the findings that HDAC1, 2, and 3 are critical for the etiology of gliomas.156

Taken together, the onset and prognosis of cancer, which was once thought to be a genetic disease, is now understood to require both genetic changes and anomalies in the epigenome. Current development in the rapidly progressing research in the field of cancer epigenetics has shown extensive dysregulation of every part of the cancer’s epigenetic machinery.151,157 However, this article’s breadth does not allow for a thorough description of the role of epigenetics in oncogenesis.

Epigenetic changes cause neurological disorders

The fundamental premise that the basis of neurogenesis depends on the epigenetic mechanisms governing developmental outcomes in a healthy individual strongly supports the deep effects of their deregulation on the etiology of many neural diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD), etc.158–160 For instance, DNA methylation in multiple genes linked to AD such as amyloid precursor protein, ankirin, and apolipoprotein E, is changed.161 Moreover, in AD patients’ brains as well as AD mice with transgenes, histone acetylation levels were found to be significantly lower.162,163 Particularly significant is that postmortem examination of brain tissue from AD patients revealed H3 acetylation enrichment along lysine 27 in genomic regions regulating tubulin-associated unit (tau) and pathology dependent on β-amyloid formation, inducing concurrent hyperexpression among the important genes found there; namely, these are precursor protein for amyloid, presenilin 1 and 2, and protein tau associated with microtubules that regulate tau and β–amyloid formation in the brain.164

On the other hand, hypomethylation has been found throughout the genome and is not confined to the gene that encodes α-synuclein, leading to hyperexpression and protein buildup in Lewy bodies in PD neurons.165 Additionally, a recent study looked at the PTMs of genes in the substantia nigra of two PD patients, which showed that the synuclein alpha promoter region is associated with two substantial histone methylations, namely H3K4me3 and H3K27me3. M3k4me3 is increased and enhances transcription initiation in PD patients’ brains. H3K27me3, on the other hand, is related to the snuffing out of the SNCA gene’s expression.166 Moreover, epigenetic modifications (primarily aberrant histone modifications) have been seen in Huntington’s disease.167,168 Complex gene-environment interactions are believed to cause the onset and development of multiple sclerosis, a persistent inflammatory state having an impact on the brain, even though epigenome modifications may also be involved.169 Finally, human and animal hippocampus specimens with epilepsy have shown evidence of global hypermethylation, which alters processes including neuron development and remodeling.165

How epigenetics participates in the development of CVDs

Epigenetic changes have been associated with CVDs, such as atherosclerosis and hypertension.170–174 DNA methylation has frequently been seen as a significant etiologic factor in disorders of the cardiovascular system.171 However, despite their biological importance in other diseases, there is limited evidence to support the activities of DNA methylating and demethylating enzymes in CVDs, to date. Nonetheless, there has been evidence of large-scale DNA hypomethylation in some atherosclerotic lesions while DNA hypermethylation is found in genes that protect against agatherosclerosis.175 While DNA methylation might not be enough by itself to influence CVD development per se, covalent changes on histone tails collaborate with subtle DNA modifications to influence chromatin structure and gene expression that have been implicated in CVD progression. For instance, HDAC5 and HDAC9 from the HDAC Class IIa family offer protection against hypertrophic remodeling. HDAC5 and HDAC9 binding inhibits Mef2C, a TF that activates prohypertrophy genes.176 Thus, the dysregulated expression of HDACs can lead to a range of heart abnormalities, such as dilated cardiomyopathy, cardiac hypertrophy, atherosclerosis, and stroke.177

The connection between T2D and chromatin changes

The initial indications of T2D epigenetic regulation were only identified 10 years ago, when it was demonstrated that various DNA methylation patterns were present in particular genes or areas of the genomes in diabetic mouse and human adipose and muscle tissues.178–181 Furthermore, T2D peripheral blood mononuclear cells exhibit lysine 4 H3 methylation in the chromosomal segment regulating the expression of nuclear factor kappa-B, a TF that modulates inflammatory reactions.182 Additionally, a significant role in epigenetics exists in the emergence of T2DM micro- and macrovascular problems.183 Importantly, insulin’s metabolic function and impaired insulin release from the pancreatic beta cells are two key factors that contribute to developing T2D.184 The DNA methylation of several genes, including IRS1, PPARG, KCNQ1, and TCF7L2, which are implicated in the effects of insulin in locations like the skeletal muscle, fat tissue, and liver, have been shown to be altered.185 Also, HDAC7 upregulation has been linked to a reduction in glucose-stimulated insulin production in human pancreatic cells of people with T2D.186 Additionally, acetylation of the FOXO1 gene, which controls PDX1, a critical TF that activates the insulin gene, affects the development of insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas and glucose homeostasis.187,188

The connection between infection and epigenetics

Interactions between hosts and pathogens are greatly influenced by epigenetic factors.189–191 These serve to increase the host genome’s accessibility so that a virus can alter histones unique to a host. The host, instead, might methylate the DNA to inactivate the expression of the viral genome integrated into the host genome, thereby inhibiting viral replication. DNA methylation controls the immune reaction of the host to bacterial infections in addition to its function in viral infection pathogenesis.192 Practically all viruses exploit host epigenetic reprogramming, which is a crucial component of their host immune evasion routes.193 Also, pathogen-associated molecular patterns found in microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa) that are engaged in the detection of pathogens may change the host immune cell’s epigenetic environment. It has been shown by Ramendra et al.194 that the strong pathogen-associated molecular patterns of 1,3-D-glucan from fungus were able to modify the epigenetic landscape and chromatin accessibility of monocytes.195 On the other hand, the HBV-encoded oncogene X protein of the hepatitis B virus can alter host miRNA patterns, which then modifies the viral burden and strengthens persistence.

Current state of epigenetic therapeutics for treating human disease

Typically, epigenetic drugs or “epidrugs” are pharmacological substances that treat DNA and histone PTMs that are abnormal in a diseased condition. Inhibitors of DNA methyltransferase, histone methyltransferase, histone demethylase, histone acetyltransferase, and histone deacetylase are the five classes into which epigenetic medications are typically divided.196 Many of these different types of inhibitors have been reviewed elsewhere.197,198 Despite the fact that the majority of these inhibitors have shown efficacy when used alone, there are powerful complementary actions of inhibitors of histone modification and DNA methylation, and such is projected to considerably boost the potential efficacy.199

Development of therapeutics based on epigenome editing

Since epigenetics research has advanced over the years, it is now possible to use epigenome editing to treat a variety of disorders. Technologies for altering the genome, like clustered regulatory interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated protein (Cas) (CRISPR-Cas), transcription activator-like effector (TALE) nuclease, zinc finger nuclease, and others are rapidly developing and may be adapted for altering epigenomes.200,201 Early investigations used zinc finger and TALE domains, which were initially utilized to develop enzymes that can edit the epigenome with selectivity for a target sequence. They can combine the binding domain for DNA that finds the intended sequence with the enzyme-containing EpiEffector molecule that consists of a group of enzymes that alter DNA and histone proteins in an epigenetic manner but they do not attach to particular DNA sequences.202 In addition to the TALE and zinc finger systems, CRISPR systems developed employing Cas proteins which are dead (which fail to break DNA since the endonuclease activity of the Cas protein has been lost) still have DNA binding capability that is programmatic.[200.201] Despite being in its early stages, this technology has already shown its potential in a number of experiments.

Challenges and future directions

Despite the importance of comprehending how epigenetic mechanisms operate in health and disease to develop novel therapeutic approaches in the treatment of human diseases, there are numerous difficulties associated with instigating targeted epigenetic modifications that aim to restore the epigenetic landscape to a normal physiological state from a diseased state. Hence, the synthesis of drugs targeting epigenetic modifications may be severely hampered by these issues, which must be resolved. For instance, because epigenetic alterations occur at numerous locations throughout the genome, it is difficult to target particular genes without impacting others. For epigenetic drugs to be effective, gene-specific targeting and reducing off-target effects are essential.198 Also, toxicity is a common feature of epigenetic drugs, which restricts the dose and time they can be administered. For the development of safer and more efficient treatments, measures to improve drug selectivity and lower side effects are crucial. Epigenetic drugs that target certain epigenomic-modifying enzymes have significant side effects on the patient because they impede all of the enzyme’s actions, which affects the complete genome. However, compared to the irreversible DNA sequence changes brought on by genomic editing, the reversible effects of epigenome editing provide a benefit.

It is imperative to take into account a number of important factors, including the unwanted genomic mutations brought on by the epigenome editing treatment, particularly with CRISPR/dead Cas-mediated epigenome editing, a thorough understanding of the nuclear structure, and how it changes during undifferentiated and differentiated cell states, cell types, and method of administration. For example, epigenome editing in differentiated cells is not only challenging but also less effective therapeutically than in undifferentiated stem and progenitor cells, making it unsustainable.200,201 Moreover, understanding and overcoming resistance pathways are necessary for the long-term efficacy of any epigenetic therapy. Also, to increase therapeutic selectivity and lower toxicity, researchers are currently investigating cutting-edge drug delivery technologies, such as nanoparticles and targeted approaches.203 Moreover, notwithstanding the challenges in using assay systems to study epigenetics in clinical settings, there are ongoing efforts that focus on translating these basic research methodologies, with a focus on the possibilities of microfluidic tools, including CRISPR-based detection systems, and epigenetic biomarkers employed as biosensors with particular reference to point-of-care use in future-generation diagnostic platforms.204 Lastly, thanks to the development of technologies for large-scale epigenome mapping and drug sensitivity testing, together with drug screening of a particular cell populace from patients identified using these technologies, it is now possible to provide a customized treatment for each patient while minimizing side effects.

Conclusions

The advanced developments in epigenetics have led to the creation of a number of technologies that have improved our understanding of the biological functions of epigenetic regulation. This includes more precisely interpreting the vast amounts of data from epigenomic mapping. Therefore, drugs that target abnormal DNA methylation, histone acetylation, or other epigenetic processes may be effective in treating a range of disorders. By lessening the toxicity of epigenetic drugs, epigenome-editing can also help with better therapeutic approaches. The effectiveness of cancer treatment can be improved by combining epidrugs with other treatments like immunotherapy or traditional chemotherapy.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

None.

Funding

The work was supported primarily by an intramural charity gift grant from Bandhan Group, India.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare having no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

Authors’ contributions

Wrote the manuscript (SKC), and reviewed and edited the manuscript (SKC and DC).

References

  1. Dupont C, Armant DR, Brenner CA. Epigenetics: definition, mechanisms and clinical perspective. Semin Reprod Med 2009;27(5):351-357 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  2. Hamilton JP. Epigenetics: principles and practice. Dig Dis 2011;29(2):130-135 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  3. Zoghbi HY, Beaudetal AL. Epigenetics and human disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2016;8(2):a019497 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  4. Kanherkar RR, Bhatia-Dey N, Csoka AB. Epigenetics across the human lifespan. Front Cell Dev Biol 2014;2:49 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  5. Pal S, Tyler JK. Epigenetics and aging. Sci Adv 2016;2(7):e1600584 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  6. Xia W, Xie W. Rebooting the epigenomes during mammalian early embryogenesis. Stem Cell Reports 2020;15(6):1158-1175 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  7. Mann MR, Bartolomei MS. Epigenetic reprogramming in the mammalian embryo: struggle of the clones. Genome Biol 2002;3(2):REVIEWS1003 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  8. Notterman DA, Mitchell C. Epigenetics and understanding the impact of social determinants of health. Pediatr Clin North Am 2015;62(5):1227-1240 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  9. Shields RK, Dudley-Javoroski S. Epigenetics and the international classification of functioning, disability and health model: bridging nature, nurture, and patient-centered population health. Phys Ther 2022;102(1):pzab247 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  10. Moosavi A, Motevalizadeh Ardekani A. Role of epigenetics in biology and human diseases. Iran Biomed J 2016;20(5):246-258 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  11. Handy DE, Castro R, Loscalzo J. Epigenetic modifications: basic mechanisms and role in cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2011;123(19):2145-2156 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  12. Bonasio R, Tu S, Reinberg D. Molecular signals of epigenetic states. Science 2010;330(6004):612-616 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  13. Wong ES, Schmitt BM, Kazachenka A, Thybert D, Redmond A, Connor F, et al. Interplay of cis and trans mechanisms driving transcription factor binding and gene expression evolution. Nat Commun 2017;8(1):1092 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  14. Kaikkonen MU, Lam MT, Glass CK. Non-coding RNAs as regulators of gene expression and epigenetics. Cardiovasc Res 2011;90(3):430-440 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  15. Bure IV, Nemtsova MV, Kuznetsova EB. Histone modifications and non-coding RNAs: mutual epigenetic regulation and role in pathogenesis. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23(10):5801 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  16. Miller JL, Grant PA. The role of DNA methylation and histone modifications in transcriptional regulation in humans. Subcell Biochem 2013;61:289-317 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  17. Jin B, Li Y, Robertson KD. DNA methylation: superior or subordinate in the epigenetic hierarchy?. Genes Cancer 2011;2(6):607-617 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  18. Hanly DJ, Esteller M, Berdasco M. Interplay between long non-coding RNAs and epigenetic machinery: emerging targets in cancer?. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2018;373(1748):20170074 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  19. Orias E, Frankel J. In Memoriam: David L. Nanney (1925-2016): Tetrahymena genetics founder and epigenetics champion. Genetics 2016;204(4):1633-1634 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  20. Pazhayam NM, Turcotte CA, Sekelsky J. Meiotic crossover patterning. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:681123 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  21. Elgin SC, Reuter G. Position-effect variegation, heterochromatin formation, and gene silencing in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013;5(8):a017780 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  22. Kováč L. A case for evolutionary hermeneutics. EMBO Rep 2019;20(2):e47620 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  23. Stenseth NC, Andersson L, Hoekstra HE. Gregor Johann Mendel and the development of modern evolutionary biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022;119(30):e2201327119 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  24. Thess A, Hoerr I, Panah BY, Jung G, Dahm R. Historic nucleic acids isolated by Friedrich Miescher contain RNA besides DNA. Biol Chem 2021;402(10):1179-1185 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  25. Tan SY, McCoy AN. Francis Harry Crick (1916-2004): Co-discoverer of the structure of DNA. Singapore Med J 2020;61(10):505-506 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  26. Tronick E, Hunter RG. Waddington, dynamic systems, and epigenetics. Front Behav Neurosci 2016;10:107 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  27. Oakey RJ, Beechey CV. Imprinted genes: identification by chromosome rearrangements and post-genomic strategies. Trends Genet 2002;18(7):359-366 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  28. Disteche CM, Berletch JB. X-chromosome inactivation and escape. J Genet 2015;94(4):591-599 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  29. Heard E, Martienssen RA. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: myths and mechanisms. Cell 2014;157(1):95-109 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  30. Ma VK, Mao R, Toth JN, Fulmer ML, Egense AS, Shankar SP. Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes: mechanisms and management. Appl Clin Genet 2023;16:41-52 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  31. Mariño-Ramírez L, Kann MG, Shoemaker BA, Landsman D. Histone structure and nucleosome stability. Expert Rev Proteomics 2005;2(5):719-729 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  32. Liu R, Wu J, Guo H, Yao W, Li S, Lu Y, et al. Post-translational modifications of histones: Mechanisms, biological functions, and therapeutic targets. MedComm (2020) 2023;4(3):e292 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  33. Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res 2011;21(3):381-395 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  34. Jenuwein T, Allis CD. Translating the histone code. Science 2001;293(5532):1074-1080 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  35. Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF, Ropero S, Setien F, Ballestar ML, et al. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102(30):10604-10609 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  36. Deans C, Maggert KA. What do you mean, “epigenetic”?. Genetics 2015;199(4):887-896 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  37. Barchetta I, Arvastsson J, Sarmiento L, Cilio CM. Epigenetic changes induced by maternal factors during fetal life: implication for type 1 diabetes. Genes (Basel) 2021;12(6):887 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  38. Zhu Z, Cao F, Li X. Epigenetic Programming and fetal metabolic programming. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019;10:764 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  39. Bednarczyk A. The concept of epigenesis and the problem of spontaneous generation. Kwart Hist Nauki Tech 2005;50(3-4):59-86. 40. Skinner MK, Nilsson EE. Role of environmentally induced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance in evolutionary biology: Unified Evolution Theory. Environ Epigenet 2021;7(1):dvab012 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  40. Skinner MK, Nilsson EE. Role of environmentally induced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance in evolutionary biology: Unified Evolution Theory. Environ Epigenet 2021;7(1):dvab012 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  41. Paulson JR, Hudson DF, Cisneros-Soberanis F, Earnshaw WC. Mitotic chromosomes. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2021;117:7-29 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  42. Tompkins JD. Discovering DNA methylation, the history and future of the writing on DNA. J Hist Biol 2022;55(4):865-887 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  43. Ginder GD, Williams DC. Readers of DNA methylation, the MBD family as potential therapeutic targets. Pharmacol Ther 2018;184:98-111 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  44. Barnes CE, English DM, Cowley SM. Acetylation & Co: an expanding repertoire of histone acylations regulates chromatin and transcription. Essays Biochem 2019;63(1):97-107 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  45. Zhou K, Gaullier G, Luger K. Nucleosome structure and dynamics are coming of age. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2019;26(1):3-13 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  46. Rossetto D, Avvakumov N, Côté J. Histone phosphorylation: a chromatin modification involved in diverse nuclear events. Epigenetics 2012;7(10):1098-1108 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  47. Minard ME, Jain AK, Barton MC. Analysis of epigenetic alterations to chromatin during development. Genesis 2009;47(8):559-572 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  48. Meas R, Mao P. Histone ubiquitylation and its roles in transcription and DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst) 2015;36:36-42 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  49. Ryan CA, Annunziato AT. Separation of histone variants and post-translationally modified isoforms by triton/acetic acid/urea polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2001;45:21.2.1-21.2.10 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  50. Zaware N, Zhou MM. Bromodomain biology and drug discovery. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2019;26(10):870-879 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  51. Moore LD, Le T, Fan G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013;38(1):23-38 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  52. Lakshminarasimhan R, Liang G. The role of DNA methylation in cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 2016;945:151-172 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  53. Trerotola M, Relli V, Simeone P, Alberti S. Epigenetic inheritance and the missing heritability. Hum Genomics 2015;9(1):17 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  54. Nazemalhosseini Mojarad E, Kuppen PJ, Aghdaei HA, Zali MR. The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2013;6(3):120-128 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  55. Bhaskaran M, Mohan M. MicroRNAs: history, biogenesis, and their evolving role in animal development and disease. Vet Pathol 2014;51(4):759-774 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  56. Shi YG, Tsukada Y. The discovery of histone demethylases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013;5(9):a017947 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  57. Deichmann U. Epigenetics: The origins and evolution of a fashionable topic. Dev Biol 2016;416(1):249-254 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  58. Felsenfeld G. The evolution of epigenetics. Perspect Biol Med 2014;57(1):132-148 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  59. Farsetti A, Illi B, Gaetano C. How epigenetics impacts on human diseases. Eur J Intern Med 2023;114:15-22 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  60. Saini A, Varshney A, Saini A, Mani I. Insight into epigenetics and human diseases. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2023;197:1-21 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  61. Egger G, Liang G, Aparicio A, Jones PA. Epigenetics in human disease and prospects for epigenetic therapy. Nature 2004;429(6990):457-463 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  62. Tiffon C. The impact of nutrition and environmental epigenetics on human health and disease. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19(11):3425 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  63. Lacagnina S. The developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD). Am J Lifestyle Med 2020;14(1):47-50 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  64. Deaton AM, Bird A. CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes Dev 2011;25(10):1010-1022 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  65. Al Adhami H, Bardet AF, Dumas M, Cleroux E, Guibert S, Fauque P, et al. A comparative methylome analysis reveals conservation and divergence of DNA methylation patterns and functions in vertebrates. BMC Biol 2022;20(1):70 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  66. Bellacosa A, Drohat AC. Role of base excision repair in maintaining the genetic and epigenetic integrity of CpG sites. DNA Repair (Amst) 2015;32:33-42 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  67. Kusmartsev V, Drożdż M, Schuster-Böckler B, Warnecke T. Cytosine methylation affects the mutability of neighboring nucleotides in germline and soma. Genetics 2020;214(4):809-823 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  68. Magdinier F, Wolffe AP. Selective association of the methyl-CpG binding protein MBD2 with the silent p14/p16 locus in human neoplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98(9):4990-4995 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  69. Nan X, Ng HH, Johnson CA, Laherty CD, Turner BM, Eisenman RN, et al. Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature 1998;393(6683):386-389 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  70. Cain JA, Montibus B, Oakey RJ. Intragenic CpG islands and their impact on gene regulation. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022;10:832348 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  71. Bender CM, Gonzalgo ML, Gonzales FA, Nguyen CT, Robertson KD, Jones PA. Roles of cell division and gene transcription in the methylation of CpG islands. Mol Cell Biol 1999;19(10):6690-6698 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  72. Bariol C, Suter C, Cheong K, Ku SL, Meagher A, Hawkins N, et al. The relationship between hypomethylation and CpG island methylation in colorectal neoplasia. Am J Pathol 2003;162(4):1361-1371 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  73. Shammas MA. Repetitive sequences, genomic instability and Barrett’s esophageal adenocarcinoma. Mob Genet Elements 2011;1(3):208-212 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  74. Stavreva DA, Hager GL. Chromatin structure and gene regulation: a dynamic view of enhancer function. Nucleus 2015;6(6):442-448 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  75. Mazina MY, Vorobyeva NE. Chromatin modifiers in transcriptional regulation: new findings and prospects. Acta Naturae 2021;13(1):16-30 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  76. Kornberg RD, Lorch Y. Chromatin-modifying and -remodeling complexes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1999;9(2):148-151 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  77. Klein DC, Hainer SJ. Chromatin regulation and dynamics in stem cells. Curr Top Dev Biol 2020;138:1-71 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  78. Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 2007;128(4):693-705 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  79. Sterner DE, Berger SL. Acetylation of histones and transcription-related factors. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2000;64(2):435-459 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  80. Gates LA, Shi J, Rohira AD, Feng Q, Zhu B, Bedford MT, et al. Acetylation on histone H3 lysine 9 mediates a switch from transcription initiation to elongation. J Biol Chem 2017;292(35):14456-14472 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  81. Shahhosseini A, Bourova-Flin E, Derakhshan S, Aminishakib P, Goudarzi A. High levels of histone H3 K27 acetylation and tri-methylation are associated with shorter survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Biomedicine (Taipei) 2023;13(1):22-38 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  82. Acharjee S, Chauhan S, Pal R, Tomar RS. Mechanisms of DNA methylation and histone modifications. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2023;197:51-92 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  83. Bogliotti YS, Ross PJ. Mechanisms of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation remodeling during early mammalian development. Epigenetics 2012;7(9):976-981 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  84. Kim DH, Tang Z, Shimada M, Fierz B, Houck-Loomis B, Bar-Dagen M, et al. Histone H3K27 trimethylation inhibits H3 binding and function of SET1-like H3K4 methyltransferase complexes. Mol Cell Biol 2013;33(24):4936-4946 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  85. Tang J, Zhuang S. Epigenetics in acute kidney injury. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2015;24(4):351-358 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  86. Zhang Z, Jones AE, Wu W, Kim J, Kang Y, Bi X, et al. Role of remodeling and spacing factor 1 in histone H2A ubiquitination-mediated gene silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017;114(38):E7949-E7958 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  87. Oss-Ronen L, Sarusi T, Cohen I. Histone mono-ubiquitination in transcriptional regulation and its mark on life: emerging roles in tissue development and disease. Cells 2022;11(15):2404 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  88. Ryu HY, Hochstrasser M. Histone sumoylation and chromatin dynamics. Nucleic Acids Res 2021;49(11):6043-6052 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  89. Du L, Liu W, Rosen ST, Chen Y. Mechanism of SUMOylation-mediated regulation of type I IFN expression. J Mol Biol 2023;435(5):167968 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  90. Messner S, Hottiger MO. Histone ADP-ribosylation in DNA repair, replication and transcription. Trends Cell Biol 2011;21(9):534-542 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  91. Zha JJ, Tang Y, Wang YL. Role of mono-ADP-ribosylation histone modification (Review). Exp Ther Med 2021;21(6):577 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  92. Martinez-Zamudio R, Ha HC. Histone ADP-ribosylation facilitates gene transcription by directly remodeling nucleosomes. Mol Cell Biol 2012;32(13):2490-2502 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  93. Tyagi M, Imam N, Verma K, Patel AK. Chromatin remodelers: We are the drivers!!. Nucleus 2016;7(4):388-404 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  94. Piatti P, Zeilner A, Lusser A. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors and their roles in affecting nucleosome fiber composition. Int J Mol Sci 2011;12(10):6544-6565 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  95. Ma L, Bajic VB, Zhang Z. On the classification of long non-coding RNAs. RNA Biol 2013;10(6):925-933 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  96. Maass PG, Luft FC, Bähring S. Long non-coding RNA in health and disease. J Mol Med (Berl) 2014;92(4):337-346 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  97. Bhatti GK, Khullar N, Sidhu IS, Navik US, Reddy AP, Reddy PH, et al. Emerging role of non-coding RNA in health and disease. Metab Brain Dis 2021;36(6):1119-1134 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  98. Ying SY, Chang DC, Lin SL. The microRNA (miRNA): overview of the RNA genes that modulate gene function. Mol Biotechnol 2008;38(3):257-268 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  99. Kozomara A, Birgaoanu M, Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: from microRNA sequences to function. Nucleic Acids Res 2019;47(D1):D155-D162 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  100. Arif KMT, Elliott EK, Haupt LM, Griffiths LR. Regulatory Mechanisms of epigenetic miRNA relationships in human cancer and potential as therapeutic targets. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12(10):2922 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  101. Selcuklu SD, Donoghue MT, Rehmet K, de Souza Gomes M, Fort A, Kovvuru P, et al. MicroRNA-9 inhibition of cell proliferation and identification of novel miR-9 targets by transcriptome profiling in breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2012;287(35):29516-29528 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  102. Chen P, Price C, Li Z, Li Y, Cao D, Wiley A, et al. miR-9 is an essential oncogenic microRNA specifically overexpressed in mixed lineage leukemia-rearranged leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110(28):11511-11516 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  103. Kung JT, Colognori D, Lee JT. Long noncoding RNAs: past, present, and future. Genetics 2013;193(3):651-669 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  104. Zhang X, Wang W, Zhu W, Dong J, Cheng Y, Yin Z, et al. Mechanisms and functions of long non-coding RNAs at multiple regulatory levels. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20(22):5573 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  105. Wang KC, Chang HY. Molecular mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell 2011;43(6):904-914 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  106. Siniscalchi C, Di Palo A, Russo A, Potenza N. The lncRNAs at X chromosome inactivation center: not just a matter of sex dosage compensation. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23(2):611 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  107. Han P, Chang CP. Long non-coding RNA and chromatin remodeling. RNA Biol 2015;12(10):1094-1098 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  108. Marchese FP, Huarte M. Long non-coding RNAs and chromatin modifiers: their place in the epigenetic code. Epigenetics 2014;9(1):21-26 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  109. Jain AK, Xi Y, McCarthy R, Allton K, Akdemir KC, Patel LR, et al. LncPRESS1 Is a p53-Regulated LncRNA that safeguards pluripotency by disrupting SIRT6-Mediated De-acetylation of Histone H3K56. Mol Cell 2016;64(5):967-981 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  110. Portoso M, Ragazzini R, Brenčič Ž, Moiani A, Michaud A, Vassilev I, et al. PRC2 is dispensable for HOTAIR-mediated transcriptional repression. EMBO J 2017;36(8):981-994 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  111. Cusanelli E, Chartrand P. Telomeric repeat-containing RNA TERRA: a noncoding RNA connecting telomere biology to genome integrity. Front Genet 2015;6:143 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  112. Hou Y, Zhang R, Sun X. Enhancer LncRNAs influence chromatin interactions in different ways. Front Genet 2019;10:936 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  113. Miao Y, Ajami NE, Huang TS, Lin FM, Lou CH, Wang YT, et al. Enhancer-associated long non-coding RNA LEENE regulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase and endothelial function. Nat Commun 2018;9(1):292 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  114. Gaiti F, Degnan BM, Tanurdzic M. Long non-coding regulatory RNAs in sponges and insights into the origin of animal multicellularity. RNA Biol 2018;15(6):696-702 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  115. Grelet S, Link LA, Howley B, Obellianne C, Palanisamy V, Gangaraju VK, et al. A regulated PNUTS mRNA to lncRNA splice switch mediates EMT and tumour progression. Nat Cell Biol 2017;19(9):1105-1115 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  116. Zhou WY, Cai ZR, Liu J, Wang DS, Ju HQ, Xu RH. Circular RNA: metabolism, functions and interactions with proteins. Mol Cancer 2020;19(1):172 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  117. Xu R, Li C, Liu X, Gao S. Insights into epigenetic patterns in mammalian early embryos. Protein Cell 2021;12(1):7-28 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  118. Peral-Sanchez I, Hojeij B, Ojeda DA, Steegers-Theunissen RPM, Willaime-Morawek S. Epigenetics in the uterine environment: how maternal diet and ART may influence the epigenome in the offspring with long-term health consequences. Genes (Basel) 2021;13(1):31 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  119. Sharma A, Mishra M, Sharan K. Editorial: Developmental origin of diseases: a special focus on the parental contribution towards offspring’s adult health. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023;14:1196653 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  120. Inadera H. Developmental origins of obesity and type 2 diabetes: molecular aspects and role of chemicals. Environ Health Prev Med 2013;18(3):185-197 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  121. Loke YJ, Galati JC, Morley R, Joo EJ, Novakovic B, Li X, et al. Association of maternal and nutrient supply line factors with DNA methylation at the imprinted IGF2/H19 locus in multiple tissues of newborn twins. Epigenetics 2013;8(10):1069-1079 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  122. Heijmans BT, Tobi EW, Stein AD, Putter H, Blauw GJ, Susser ES, et al. Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105(44):17046-17049 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  123. Georgadaki K, Khoury N, Spandidos DA, Zoumpourlis V. The molecular basis of fertilization (Review). Int J Mol Med 2016;38(4):979-986 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  124. Mitalipov S, Wolf D. Totipotency, pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2009;114:185-199 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  125. Huang CC, Hsueh YW, Chang CW, Hsu HC, Yang TC, Lin WC, et al. Establishment of the fetal-maternal interface: developmental events in human implantation and placentation. Front Cell Dev Biol 2023;11:1200330 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  126. Zakrzewski W, Dobrzyński M, Szymonowicz M, Rybak Z. Stem cells: past, present, and future. Stem Cell Res Ther 2019;10(1):68 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  127. Kim SM, Kim JS. A review of mechanisms of implantation. Dev Reprod 2017;21(4):351-359 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  128. Hiraoka T, Osuga Y, Hirota Y. Current perspectives on endometrial receptivity: A comprehensive overview of etiology and treatment. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2023;49(10):2397-2409 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  129. Chason RJ, Csokmay J, Segars JH, DeCherney AH, Armant DR. Environmental and epigenetic effects upon preimplantation embryo metabolism and development. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2011;22(10):412-420 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  130. Messerschmidt DM, Knowles BB, Solter D. DNA methylation dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the germline and preimplantation embryos. Genes Dev 2014;28(8):812-828 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  131. Bu G, Zhu W, Liu X, Zhang J, Yu L, Zhou K, et al. Coordination of zygotic genome activation entry and exit by H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 in porcine early embryos. Genome Res 2022;32(8):1487-1501 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  132. Cousins FL, Filby CE, Gargett CE. Endometrial stem/progenitor cells-their role in endometrial repair and regeneration. Front Reprod Health 2021;3:811537 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  133. Mortlock S, McKinnon B, Montgomery GW. Genetic regulation of transcription in the endometrium in health and disease. Front Reprod Health 2021;3:795464 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  134. Shchukina I, Bagaitkar J, Shpynov O, Loginicheva E, Porter S, Mogilenko DA, et al. Enhanced epigenetic profiling of classical human monocytes reveals a specific signature of healthy aging in the DNA methylome. Nat Aging 2021;1(1):124-141 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  135. Kurdyukov S, Bullock M. DNA methylation analysis: choosing the right method. Biology (Basel) 2016;5(1):3 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  136. Zuo T, Tycko B, Liu TM, Lin JJ, Huang TH. Methods in DNA methylation profiling. Epigenomics 2009;1(2):331-345 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  137. Mehrmohamadi M, Sepehri MH, Nazer N, Norouzi MR. A comparative overview of epigenomic profiling methods. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:714687 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  138. Park PJ. ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology. Nat Rev Genet 2009;10(10):669-680 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  139. Tsompana M, Buck MJ. Chromatin accessibility: a window into the genome. Epigenetics Chromatin 2014;7(1):33 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  140. Miskimen KLS, Chan ER, Haines JL. Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin Using Sequencing (ATAC-seq) Data Analysis. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 2017;92:20.4.1-20.4.13 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  141. McCord RP, Kaplan N, Giorgetti L. Chromosome conformation capture and beyond: toward an integrative view of chromosome structure and function. Mol Cell 2020;77(4):688-708 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  142. Mumbach MR, Rubin AJ, Flynn RA, Dai C, Khavari PA, Greenleaf WJ, et al. HiChIP: efficient and sensitive analysis of protein-directed genome architecture. Nat Methods 2016;13(11):919-922 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  143. Chen C, Wang J, Pan D, Wang X, Xu Y, Yan J, et al. Applications of multi-omics analysis in human diseases. MedComm (2020) 2023;4(4):e315 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  144. Lo PK, Zhou Q. Emerging techniques in single-cell epigenomics and their applications to cancer research. J Clin Genom 2018;1(1):10.4172/JCG.1000103 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  145. Harada A, Kimura H, Ohkawa Y. Recent advances in single-cell epigenomics. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2021;71:116-122 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  146. Sharma S, Kelly TK, Jones PA. Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis 2010;31(1):27-36 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  147. Baylin SB, Jones PA. Epigenetic determinants of cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2016;8(9):a019505 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  148. You JS, Jones PA. Cancer genetics and epigenetics: two sides of the same coin?. Cancer Cell 2012;22(1):9-20 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  149. Wajed SA, Laird PW, DeMeester TR. DNA methylation: an alternative pathway to cancer. Ann Surg 2001;234(1):10-20 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  150. Kumar S, Gonzalez EA, Rameshwar P, Etchegaray JP. Non-coding RNAs as mediators of epigenetic changes in malignancies. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12(12):3657 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  151. Chen S, Wang Y, Li D, Wang H, Zhao X, Yang J, et al. Mechanisms controlling microrna expression in tumor. Cells 2022;11(18):2852 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  152. Kim YZ. Altered histone modifications in gliomas. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2014;2(1):7-21 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  153. Maleknia M, Ahmadirad N, Golab F, Katebi Y, Haj Mohamad Ebrahim Ketabforoush A. DNA methylation in cancer: epigenetic view of dietary and lifestyle factors. Epigenet Insights 2023;16:25168657231199893 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  154. Ehrlich M, Lacey M. DNA hypomethylation and hemimethylation in cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 2013;754:31-56 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  155. Hur K, Cejas P, Feliu J, Moreno-Rubio J, Burgos E, Boland CR, et al. Hypomethylation of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1) leads to activation of proto-oncogenes in human colorectal cancer metastasis. Gut 2014;63(4):635-646 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  156. McCornack C, Woodiwiss T, Hardi A, Yano H, Kim AH. The function of histone methylation and acetylation regulators in GBM pathophysiology. Front Oncol 2023;13:1144184 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  157. Kanwal R, Gupta S. Epiegentic modifications in cancer. Clin Genet 2012;81(4):303-311 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  158. Kwon MJ, Kim S, Han MH, Lee SB. Epigenetic changes in neurodegenerative diseases. Mol Cells 2016;39(11):783-789 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  159. Bertogliat MJ, Morris-Blanco KC, Vemuganti R. Epigenetic mechanisms of neurodegenerative diseases and acute brain injury. Neurochem Int 2020;133:104642 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  160. Hwang JY, Aromolaran KA, Zukin RS. The emerging field of epigenetics in neurodegeneration and neuroprotection. Nat Rev Neurosci 2017;18(6):347-361 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  161. Nikolac Perkovic M, Videtic Paska A, Konjevod M, Kouter K, Svob Strac D, Nedic Erjavec G, et al. Epigenetics of Alzheimer’s disease. Biomolecules 2021;11(2):195 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  162. Zhang K, Schrag M, Crofton A, Trivedi R, Vinters H, Kirsch W. Targeted proteomics for quantification of histone acetylation in Alzheimer’s disease. Proteomics 2012;12(8):1261-1268 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  163. Francis YI, Fà M, Ashraf H, Zhang H, Staniszewski A, Latchman DS, et al. Dysregulation of histone acetylation in the APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2009;18(1):131-139 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  164. Narayan PJ, Lill C, Faull R, Curtis MA, Dragunow M. Increased acetyl and total histone levels in post-mortem Alzheimer’s disease brain. Neurobiol Dis 2015;74:281-294 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  165. Stefanis L. α-Synuclein in Parkinson’s disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2012;2(2):a009399 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  166. Guhathakurta S, Kim J, Adams L, Basu S, Song MK, Adler E, et al. Targeted attenuation of elevated histone marks at SNCA alleviates α-synuclein in Parkinson’s disease. EMBO Mol Med 2021;13(2):e12188 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  167. Grezenko H, Ekhator C, Nwabugwu NU, Ganga H, Affaf M, Abdelaziz AM, et al. Epigenetics in neurological and psychiatric disorders: a comprehensive review of current understanding and future perspectives. Cureus 2023;15(8):e43960 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  168. Sadri-Vakili G, Cha JH. Mechanisms of disease: Histone modifications in Huntington’s disease. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2006;2(6):330-338 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  169. Huynh JL, Garg P, Thin TH, Yoo S, Dutta R, Trapp BD, et al. Epigenome-wide differences in pathology-free regions of multiple sclerosis-affected brains. Nat Neurosci 2014;17(1):121-130 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  170. Ordovás JM, Smith CE. Epigenetics and cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 2010;7(9):510-519 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  171. Zhong J, Agha G, Baccarelli AA. The role of DNA methylation in cardiovascular risk and disease: methodological aspects, study design, and data analysis for epidemiological studies. Circ Res 2016;118(1):119-131 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  172. Abi Khalil C. The emerging role of epigenetics in cardiovascular disease. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2014;5(4):178-187 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  173. Prasher D, Greenway SC, Singh RB. The impact of epigenetics on cardiovascular disease. Biochem Cell Biol 2020;98(1):12-22 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  174. Wołowiec A, Wołowiec Ł, Grześk G, Jaśniak A, Osiak J, Husejko J, et al. The role of selected epigenetic pathways in cardiovascular diseases as a potential therapeutic target. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24(18):13723 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  175. Zhang Y, Mei J, Li J, Zhang Y, Zhou Q, Xu F. DNA Methylation in atherosclerosis: a new perspective. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2021;2021:6623657 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  176. Hu T, Schreiter FC, Bagchi RA, Tatman PD, Hannink M, McKinsey TA. HDAC5 catalytic activity suppresses cardiomyocyte oxidative stress and NRF2 target gene expression. J Biol Chem 2019;294(21):8640-8652 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  177. Wang Z, Zhao YT, Zhao TC. Histone deacetylases in modulating cardiac disease and their clinical translational and therapeutic implications. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2021;246(2):213-225 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  178. Ling C, Rönn T. Epigenetics in Human Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Cell Metab 2019;29(5):1028-1044 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  179. Mannar V, Boro H, Patel D, Agstam S, Dalvi M, Bundela V. Epigenetics of the pathogenesis and complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. touchREV Endocrinol 2023;19(1):46-53 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  180. Wu YL, Lin ZJ, Li CC, Lin X, Shan SK, Guo B, et al. Epigenetic regulation in metabolic diseases: mechanisms and advances in clinical study. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023;8(1):98 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  181. Kowluru RA, Mohammad G. Epigenetic modifications in diabetes. Metabolism 2022;126:154920 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  182. Ding Q, Gao Z, Chen K, Zhang Q, Hu S, Zhao L. Inflammation-related epigenetic modification: the bridge between immune and metabolism in type 2 diabetes. Front Immunol 2022;13:883410 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  183. Natarajan R. Epigenetic mechanisms in diabetic vascular complications and metabolic memory: the 2020 edwin bierman award lecture. Diabetes 2021;70(2):328-337 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  184. Taylor R. Insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2012;61(4):778-779 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  185. Raciti GA, Desiderio A, Longo M, Leone A, Zatterale F, Prevenzano I, et al. DNA methylation and type 2 diabetes: novel biomarkers for risk assessment?. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22(21):11652 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  186. Dewanjee S, Vallamkondu J, Kalra RS, Chakraborty P, Gango padhyay M, Sahu R, et al. The emerging role of HDACs: pathology and therapeutic targets in diabetes mellitus. Cells 2021;10(6):1340 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  187. Cheng Z, White MF. Targeting Forkhead box O1 from the concept to metabolic diseases: lessons from mouse models. Antioxid Redox Signal 2011;14(4):649-661 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  188. Zhang Y, Fang X, Wei J, Miao R, Wu H, Ma K, et al. PDX-1: a promising therapeutic target to reverse diabetes. Biomolecules 2022;12(12):1785 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  189. Kulkarni S, Arumugam T, Chuturgoon A, An P, Ramsuran V. Editorial: epigenetics of infectious diseases. Front Immunol 2022;13:1054151 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  190. Cole J, Morris P, Dickman MJ, Dockrell DH. The therapeutic potential of epigenetic manipulation during infectious diseases. Pharmacol Ther 2016;167:85-99 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  191. Niller HH, Minarovits J. Patho-epigenetics of Infectious Diseases Caused by Intracellular Bacteria. Adv Exp Med Biol 2016;879:107-130 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  192. Qin W, Scicluna BP, van der Poll T. The Role of host cell DNA methylation in the immune response to bacterial infection. Front Immunol 2021;12:696280 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  193. Locatelli M, Faure-Dupuy S. Virus hijacking of host epigenetic machinery to impair immune response. J Virol 2023;97(9):e0065823 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  194. Ramendra R, Mancini M, Ayala JM, Tung LT, Isnard S, Lin J, et al. Glutathione metabolism is a regulator of the acute inflammatory response of monocytes to (1→3)-β-D-Glucan. Front Immunol 2021;12:694152 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  195. Sartorius K, An P, Winkler C, Chuturgoon A, Li X, Makarova J, et al. The epigenetic modulation of cancer and immune pathways in hepatitis b virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma: the influence of HBx and miRNA dysregulation. Front Immunol 2021;12:661204 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  196. Keppler BR, Archer TK. Chromatin-modifying enzymes as therapeutic targets—Part 1. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2008;12(10):1301-1312 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  197. Majchrzak-Celińska A, Warych A, Szoszkiewicz M. Novel approaches to epigenetic therapies: from drug combinations to epigenetic editing. Genes (Basel) 2021;12(2):208 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  198. Heerboth S, Lapinska K, Snyder N, Leary M, Rollinson S, Sarkar S. Use of epigenetic drugs in disease: an overview. Genet Epigenet 2014;6:9-19 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  199. Gaj T, Sirk SJ, Shui SL, Liu J. Genome-editing technologies: principles and applications. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2016;8(12):a023754 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  200. Xie N, Zhou Y, Sun Q, Tang B. Novel epigenetic techniques provided by the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Stem Cells Int 2018;2018:7834175 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  201. Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 2013;31(7):397-405 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  202. Chen B, Li Y, Xu F, Yang X. Powerful CRISPR-based biosensing techniques and their integration with microfluidic platforms. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10:851712 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  203. Naeem M, Hoque MZ, Ovais M, Basheer C, Ahmad I. Stimulus-responsive smart nanoparticles-based CRISPR-Cas delivery for therapeutic genome editing. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22(20):11300 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  204. Li CC, Wang ZY, Wang LJ, Zhang CY. Biosensors for epigenetic biomarkers detection: A review. Biosens Bioelectron 2019;144:111695 View Article PubMed/NCBI