Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), defined by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases as hepatic steatosis with at least one cardiometabolic risk factor, affects approximately 30–40% of adults worldwide. This condition may progress to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The rising prevalence, alongside obesity and type 2 diabetes, underscores the need for early risk stratification and integrated therapeutic strategies. Circadian homeostasis, orchestrated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus and core clock gene feedback loops, synchronizes hepatic metabolic pathways with environmental light–dark cycles. The objective of this review is to evaluate the role of circadian disruption and metabolic dysfunction in the development of hepatic steatosis, as well as to assess current and potential treatment modalities for both disorders. Circadian disruption through shift work, artificial light at night, sleep restriction, and chrono-nutritional misalignment destabilizes hepatic clocks, promoting insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, inflammation, and steatosis. Experimental models demonstrate that clock gene dysfunction alone can induce steatohepatitis, while progressive MASLD further impairs central circadian regulation, establishing a self-reinforcing chrono-metabolic cycle. Pharmacologic therapies, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and thyroid hormone receptor-β agonists, improve histologic endpoints and fibrosis regression, although heterogeneity among clinical trials precludes direct comparison. Recent evidence characterizing MASLD as a predominantly nocturnal metabolic disorder further highlights persistent nighttime insulin dysregulation despite weight loss, emphasizing the potential role of circadian-targeted interventions such as melatonin. In conclusion, the peripheral circadian clock is intricately linked with MASLD pathogenesis, and metabolic dysfunction, in turn, disrupts circadian pathways. Several pharmacologic therapies offer potential for the treatment of MASLD and circadian dysfunction.

Irinotecan is a camptothecin derivative that exerts its antitumor effects after conversion into the active metabolite 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), and it is widely used for the treatment of various advanced solid tumors. However, irinotecan-induced neutropenia (IIN) remains one of its most common and clinically significant hematological toxicities, increasing the risk of infection, treatment interruption, dose reduction, and poor therapeutic outcomes. This review aims to summarize the pathogenesis, risk factors, and management strategies of IIN to provide practical guidance for its clinical prevention and standardized management. Current evidence suggests that IIN is mainly associated with SN-38-mediated topoisomerase I inhibition and mitochondrial injury in hematopoietic stem cells, leading to impaired neutrophil production. The risk of IIN is influenced by irinotecan dosage, UGT1A and transporter gene polymorphisms, baseline patient characteristics, organ function, and concomitant chemotherapy. Preventive and therapeutic strategies include genotype-guided dose adjustment, careful dose optimization, oral alkalinizing agents, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support, and modulation of intestinal microbiota. In conclusion, IIN is a multifactorial and potentially manageable adverse reaction. Integrating pharmacogenetic testing, individualized dosing, supportive care, and emerging approaches such as microbiota-based interventions may improve the safety and continuity of irinotecan-based chemotherapy.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are among the leading causes of chronic liver diseases worldwide. Through the same transmission routes, HBV/HCV coinfection is widespread and aggravates liver damage. In this study, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) and the pre-treatment of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) on HBV reactivation in HBV/HCV coinfected patients.

A multicenter, prospective, single-arm, open-label 12-week trial, followed by a 12/48-week observational clinical trial, was conducted. Ninety-six adults with chronic HBV/HCV coinfection were enrolled from May 2021 to December 2024 in thirteen centers in China. Seventy-seven non-cirrhotic patients were included in Group 1 and nineteen compensated cirrhotic patients in Group 2. All subjects were enrolled to receive SOF/VEL once daily for 12 weeks. Non-cirrhotic subjects received TAF once daily for 28 weeks, and compensated cirrhotic subjects received TAF once daily for 64 weeks simultaneously. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

At the end of SOF/VEL treatment, the overall sustained virologic response was 97.9%, of which 100% was achieved in Group 2. HCV RNA, HBV DNA, and HBV RNA levels were substantially decreased in all patients. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (61.5 vs. 21.9, P < 0.001) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (50.8 vs. 25.7, P < 0.001) levels decreased, and albumin (ALB) (42.4 vs. 45.1, P < 0.001) level increased compared to pre-treatment in Group 1 at 12 weeks post-treatment. ALT (64.1 vs. 25.2, P < 0.001), AST (65.7 vs. 29.7, P < 0.001), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (111.6 vs. 88.2, P < 0.05), and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (17.9 vs. 4.7, P < 0.05) levels decreased, and ALB (41.3 vs. 42.5, P = 0.051) and platelet count (PLT) (114.0 vs. 127.2, P = 0.052) levels showed a trend toward increase compared to pre-treatment in Group 2 at 48 weeks post-treatment. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) (22.6 vs. 12.7, P < 0.01), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) (1.6 vs. 0.6, P < 0.001), and fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) (4.7 vs. 2.6, P < 0.05) significantly decreased after treatment in Group 2. Two patients in Group 1 with genotype 3 showed HBV reactivation and HCV relapse, respectively. No drug-related adverse events were observed in the study.

SOF/VEL effectively achieves a sustained virologic response and improves liver function, with an acceptable safety profile in chronic HBV/HCV coinfected patients, including those with compensated cirrhosis, who achieved modest improvement in non-invasive fibrosis indices. Pre-administration of TAF may mitigates the risk of HBV reactivation in this population.

Studies suggest that Yiguanjian (YGJ) may exert a therapeutic effect on liver fibrosis. However, the active components and molecular targets responsible for its action remain unclear. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the active ingredients and potential targets of YGJ in the treatment of liver fibrosis.

Active compounds and corresponding targets of YGJ were retrieved from the Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform (TCMSP) and the Encyclopedia of Traditional Chinese Medicine (ETCM) databases. Liver fibrosis-related datasets were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and divided into training and validation sets. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the training set were subsequently analyzed using network pharmacology, molecular dynamics simulations, and immune infiltration analysis. Three machine learning models were employed to screen for core targets, followed by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. The validation set was used to assess the expression levels and diagnostic potential of core targets.

A total of 2,887 liver fibrosis-related targets and 1,198 YGJ-related targets were identified. Three hundred and three putative targets for YGJ in the treatment of liver fibrosis were identified. Three machine learning methods further narrowed these down to five core targets. Immune infiltration analysis revealed an increase in effector B cells, resting CD4+ memory T cells, γδ T cells, and M1 macrophages during liver fibrosis progression. MR analysis showed that all five core targets (FABP4, MDM2, AKR1B1, PDGFRB, and NR1H4) had odds ratios greater than 1, indicating that they function as risk factors. Expression analyses in both the training and validation sets consistently validated the MR results, demonstrating strong diagnostic potential. GSEA revealed that the core targets were enriched in key signaling pathways, including Wnt, PPAR, and MAPK. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations showed that the active compounds of YGJ exhibited strong binding affinity and stability with the core targets.

YGJ exerts its potential antifibrotic effects by downregulating or antagonizing the risk-associated targets (FABP4, MDM2, AKR1B1, PDGFRB, and NR1H4). These findings provide new insights into the potential of YGJ for treating liver fibrosis, while offering a scientific reference for the prevention and treatment of chronic liver diseases.