Irinotecan is a camptothecin derivative that exerts its antitumor effects after conversion into the active metabolite 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), and it is widely used for the treatment of various advanced solid tumors. However, irinotecan-induced neutropenia (IIN) remains one of its most common and clinically significant hematological toxicities, increasing the risk of infection, treatment interruption, dose reduction, and poor therapeutic outcomes. This review aims to summarize the pathogenesis, risk factors, and management strategies of IIN to provide practical guidance for its clinical prevention and standardized management. Current evidence suggests that IIN is mainly associated with SN-38-mediated topoisomerase I inhibition and mitochondrial injury in hematopoietic stem cells, leading to impaired neutrophil production. The risk of IIN is influenced by irinotecan dosage, UGT1A and transporter gene polymorphisms, baseline patient characteristics, organ function, and concomitant chemotherapy. Preventive and therapeutic strategies include genotype-guided dose adjustment, careful dose optimization, oral alkalinizing agents, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support, and modulation of intestinal microbiota. In conclusion, IIN is a multifactorial and potentially manageable adverse reaction. Integrating pharmacogenetic testing, individualized dosing, supportive care, and emerging approaches such as microbiota-based interventions may improve the safety and continuity of irinotecan-based chemotherapy.

Studies suggest that Yiguanjian (YGJ) may exert a therapeutic effect on liver fibrosis. However, the active components and molecular targets responsible for its action remain unclear. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the active ingredients and potential targets of YGJ in the treatment of liver fibrosis.

Active compounds and corresponding targets of YGJ were retrieved from the Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform (TCMSP) and the Encyclopedia of Traditional Chinese Medicine (ETCM) databases. Liver fibrosis-related datasets were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and divided into training and validation sets. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the training set were subsequently analyzed using network pharmacology, molecular dynamics simulations, and immune infiltration analysis. Three machine learning models were employed to screen for core targets, followed by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. The validation set was used to assess the expression levels and diagnostic potential of core targets.

A total of 2,887 liver fibrosis-related targets and 1,198 YGJ-related targets were identified. Three hundred and three putative targets for YGJ in the treatment of liver fibrosis were identified. Three machine learning methods further narrowed these down to five core targets. Immune infiltration analysis revealed an increase in effector B cells, resting CD4+ memory T cells, γδ T cells, and M1 macrophages during liver fibrosis progression. MR analysis showed that all five core targets (FABP4, MDM2, AKR1B1, PDGFRB, and NR1H4) had odds ratios greater than 1, indicating that they function as risk factors. Expression analyses in both the training and validation sets consistently validated the MR results, demonstrating strong diagnostic potential. GSEA revealed that the core targets were enriched in key signaling pathways, including Wnt, PPAR, and MAPK. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations showed that the active compounds of YGJ exhibited strong binding affinity and stability with the core targets.

YGJ exerts its potential antifibrotic effects by downregulating or antagonizing the risk-associated targets (FABP4, MDM2, AKR1B1, PDGFRB, and NR1H4). These findings provide new insights into the potential of YGJ for treating liver fibrosis, while offering a scientific reference for the prevention and treatment of chronic liver diseases.

Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), defined by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases as hepatic steatosis with at least one cardiometabolic risk factor, affects approximately 30–40% of adults worldwide. This condition may progress to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The rising prevalence, alongside obesity and type 2 diabetes, underscores the need for early risk stratification and integrated therapeutic strategies. Circadian homeostasis, orchestrated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus and core clock gene feedback loops, synchronizes hepatic metabolic pathways with environmental light–dark cycles. The objective of this review is to evaluate the role of circadian disruption and metabolic dysfunction in the development of hepatic steatosis, as well as to assess current and potential treatment modalities for both disorders. Circadian disruption through shift work, artificial light at night, sleep restriction, and chrono-nutritional misalignment destabilizes hepatic clocks, promoting insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, inflammation, and steatosis. Experimental models demonstrate that clock gene dysfunction alone can induce steatohepatitis, while progressive MASLD further impairs central circadian regulation, establishing a self-reinforcing chrono-metabolic cycle. Pharmacologic therapies, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and thyroid hormone receptor-β agonists, improve histologic endpoints and fibrosis regression, although heterogeneity among clinical trials precludes direct comparison. Recent evidence characterizing MASLD as a predominantly nocturnal metabolic disorder further highlights persistent nighttime insulin dysregulation despite weight loss, emphasizing the potential role of circadian-targeted interventions such as melatonin. In conclusion, the peripheral circadian clock is intricately linked with MASLD pathogenesis, and metabolic dysfunction, in turn, disrupts circadian pathways. Several pharmacologic therapies offer potential for the treatment of MASLD and circadian dysfunction.

Acute leukemias with chimeric fusion genes involving FET (FUS, EWSR1, and TAF15) family proteins and ETS (E26 transformation-specific)-like transcription factors often present with unique clinical and pathological characteristics. This mini-review aims to summarize the clinical and pathological features of acute leukemia cases harboring rearrangements involving the fused in sarcoma (FUS) or Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 (EWSR1) genes.

An extensive literature review was performed on reported acute leukemia cases with fusions involving FUS or EWSR1. The details of the reported cases, as well as summarized information, are presented.

Rare cases of acute leukemia have been found to harbor either FUS or EWSR1 gene rearrangements with ETS or non-ETS proteins as partners and demonstrate heterogeneous clinical and pathological features. Acute leukemias carrying FUS gene rearrangements present with diverse immunophenotypes and are predominantly, but not exclusively, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with ERG as the most frequent fusion partner. In contrast, acute leukemias with EWSR1 gene rearrangements more commonly present as B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and mixed phenotypic acute leukemia (MPAL), with ZNF384 as the predominant partner. At present, FUS::ERG-positive AML is the only specific entity with a FET::ETS fusion that is formally recognized in the World Health Organization 5th edition hematolymphoid tumor classification (WHO-HEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) systems. Cytogenetic karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization remain crucial tools for detecting chromosomal translocations in over half of acute leukemias harboring FUS or EWSR1 gene rearrangements. However, a subset of patients may exhibit a normal karyotype and require advanced molecular diagnostic methods. EWSR1-rearranged leukemias can be difficult to distinguish from Ewing sarcoma and therefore require particular attention.

As more cases and additional data become available, it may be justified to expand this category of acute leukemias to include other specific acute leukemia entities with fusions involving FET::ETS, such as FUS::FLI1 and FUS::FEV, in addition to FUS::ERG-positive AML. However, additional data are required to support such subclassification. In contrast, AML cases with EWSR1 rearrangements are exceedingly rare and display considerable variability. Cases of B-ALL or B/myeloid MPAL with the EWSR1::ZNF384 fusion may be more appropriately classified together with other ZNF384-rearranged leukemia subtypes. Advanced molecular diagnostic methods, especially RNA-based next-generation sequencing, are suggested to improve the accurate diagnosis of acute leukemias with FUS or EWSR1 fusions. Additional pathologic workup, particularly immunohistochemical staining with hematopoietic markers, is highly recommended to differentiate EWSR1-rearranged leukemia from Ewing sarcoma.