Pegylated interferon alpha (PegIFNα) has been associated with altered lipid metabolism, but long-term lipid trajectories in chronic hepatitis B remain poorly characterized. We evaluated lipid profiles and virological parameters during 144 weeks of PegIFNα-based therapy.

This single-center retrospective cohort study included 129 patients with chronic hepatitis B who completed 144 weeks of PegIFNα monotherapy, PegIFNα plus tenofovir alafenamide, or PegIFNα plus entecavir. Serum lipids, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e antigen, and hepatitis B virus DNA were assessed at baseline and weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, and 144. Within-patient changes were analyzed with paired tests. Associations between early lipid changes and on-treatment HBsAg seroclearance at week 144 were examined with logistic regression.

From baseline to week 144, mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) increased by 0.10 ± 0.25 mmol/L (95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.15; P < 0.001) and mean total cholesterol decreased by 0.15 ± 0.41 mmol/L (95% confidence interval, −0.22 to −0.08; P < 0.001). Changes in triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and the triglyceride-to-HDL-C ratio were not significant. HDL-C declined early and later recovered above baseline. At week 144, 37 patients (28.7%) achieved on-treatment HBsAg seroclearance (≤ 0.05 IU/mL). Of the 34 patients with HBsAg seroclearance at week 96, 13 had detectable HBsAg again at week 144. Early lipid changes were not associated with this endpoint.

HDL-C shows an early decline followed by recovery above baseline, whereas total cholesterol decreases modestly, with no significant net changes in triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or the triglyceride-to-HDL-C ratio. Early lipid changes are not significantly associated with on-treatment HBsAg seroclearance. The durability of HBsAg loss requires post-treatment follow-up.

Hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation has traditionally been described as a binary transition from vitamin A-rich quiescent cells to alpha-smooth muscle actin-positive, collagen-producing myofibroblast-like cells. Advances in single-cell RNA sequencing, single-nucleus RNA sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and chromatin-accessibility profiling now reveal a more complex and dynamic landscape. During chronic liver injury, HSCs can adopt five overlapping activation-associated states characterized by injury sensing, inflammatory signaling, proliferation, extracellular matrix production and contractility, together with a senescent state that represents a possible fate of activated HSCs. These states differ in their molecular markers, spatial distribution, regulatory pathways, and interactions with hepatocytes, liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, macrophages, natural killer cells, and cholangiocytes. Importantly, they are not fixed lineages and may coexist or interconvert during fibrosis progression and regression. This review revisits the classical quiescent-activated framework and proposes a state-based approach for interpreting HSC heterogeneity. We summarize the defining features and translational relevance of six major HSC functional states, discuss their multicellular niches, and highlight the opportunities and limitations of function-selective therapeutic targeting. A reproducible classification that integrates molecular identity, spatial context, and causal function may help refine antifibrotic treatment strategies.

Rising resistance in Helicobacter pylori to metronidazole, clarithromycin, and fluoroquinolones has significantly reduced eradication efficacy. This narrative review explores evidence-based strategies that minimize the impact of antibiotic resistance. Current practical approaches include empirical therapy (EMT), in which regimens are selected without individual susceptibility testing based on local or regional resistance patterns, previous antibiotic exposure, guideline recommendations, and expected effectiveness, and susceptibility-guided therapy (SGT), which avoids antibiotics to which the infecting strain is resistant. EMT does not simply exclude every antibiotic with a high resistance prevalence because regimen-level efficacy may remain high despite resistance to one component. When susceptibility testing is unavailable, optimized 14-day bismuth quadruple therapy is a guideline-preferred empirical regimen and can remain effective despite metronidazole resistance with adequate dosing and treatment duration. Rifabutin-based triple therapy provides an additional empirical or rescue option for selected patients without penicillin allergy. SGT is not universally superior to well-selected EMT, but may improve eradication rates in selected populations, particularly in settings with high clarithromycin resistance or where rapid molecular testing is available. However, susceptibility testing may be time-consuming, costly, and limited to only a few antibiotics. Emerging approaches include potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs), antimicrobial stewardship, probiotics, N-acetylcysteine, nanomaterial-based drug delivery, and vaccination. Among these, vonoprazan-based regimens are the most clinically mature. Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy can reduce exposure to resistance-prone antibiotics, although its use should reflect regional effectiveness, availability, and cost. Other non-antibiotic approaches remain investigational. In conclusion, management should move from undifferentiated empirical regimen selection toward risk-stratified precision treatment. Locally validated EMT remains appropriate when susceptibility testing is unavailable, whereas SGT should be prioritized after treatment failure or in patients at high risk of resistance. Rifabutin-based and vonoprazan-amoxicillin therapies provide additional options according to treatment history, penicillin allergy, regional evidence, and accessibility.

Erosive Esophagitis (EE) is the most common complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Patients with EE can be asymptomatic or present with severe symptoms such as dysphagia and gastrointestinal bleeding. Approximately 10-15% of patients with EE have refractory disease. Optimal management of EE requires understanding its pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and available evaluation and treatment modalities. While pharmacologic treatment of EE is often successful, procedural options such as surgery and endoscopic therapy may be necessary. This article presents an evidence-based and pragmatic approach to the management of EE, the most common complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Gluten has multiple harmful effects that compromise human health, not only in gluten-dependent diseases but also in non-gluten-affected chronic inflammatory conditions. After consumption, the indigestible gluten peptides are modified by luminal microbial transglutaminase or transported through the gut epithelium to interact with the highly populated mucosal immune cells. As a disruptor of gut permeability, gluten peptides compromise tight junction integrity, allowing foreign immunogenic molecules to reach internal compartments. Gliadin peptides are distributed systemically to remote organs, where they encounter endogenous tissue transglutaminase. Following post-translational deamidation or transamidation, the peptides become immunogenic and pro-inflammatory, inducing organ dysfunction and pathology. Cross-reactivity and sequence homology between gluten/gliadin peptides and human epitopes may contribute to molecular mimicry in autoimmunity induction. A gluten-free diet can prevent these phenomena through various mechanisms. As proof of concept, gluten withdrawal alleviates disease activity in chronic inflammatory, metabolic, and autoimmune conditions, and even in neurodegeneration. We recommend combining the gluten-free and Mediterranean diets to leverage the advantages of both. Before recommending gluten withdrawal for non-gluten-dependent conditions, patients should be asked about gut symptomatology and screened for celiac-associated antibodies. The current list of gluten-induced diseases includes celiac disease, dermatitis herpetiformis, gluten ataxia, gluten allergy, and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. In view of gluten being a universal pro-inflammatory molecule, other non-celiac autoinflammatory and neurodegenerative conditions should be investigated for potential gluten avoidance.

Alcohol consumption is responsible for approximately 6% of all deaths and 5.1% of the global disease burden. The most common alcohol-related causes of death include liver cirrhosis (50% of cases), pancreatitis (25%), and esophageal cancer (22%). In this review, we provide an overview of ethanol metabolism and highlight the major diseases caused by alcohol consumption in the liver and gastrointestinal tract. Due to its central metabolic role, the liver is particularly susceptible to ethanol, which is known to cause a wide spectrum of conditions, including steatosis, steatohepatitis, alcohol-associated hepatitis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma). The gastrointestinal tract is often one of the first areas to show signs of damage from excessive alcohol consumption. Chronic alcohol abuse is a well-established risk factor for both acute and chronic pancreatitis, as well as pancreatic cancer. Approximately 70% of acute pancreatitis cases and 30% of chronic pancreatitis cases are attributable to alcohol abuse. Epidemiological studies have consistently demonstrated a negative correlation between alcohol intake and the prevalence of gallstones. Moreover, alcohol is an important risk factor for gastroenteropancreatic cancer, as ethanol metabolism produces acetaldehyde, a potent carcinogen for humans. In conclusion, chronic ethanol intake, through one of its main metabolic products, acetaldehyde, causes pathological changes in the gastrointestinal tract, liver, pancreas, and gallbladder. Even moderate amounts of alcohol may increase the risk of cancers, such as colorectal cancer. Therefore, if there is clinical suspicion of excessive alcohol intake in a patient with persistent digestive symptoms (e.g., abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and bloody stools), immediate medical evaluation is essential. Referral to specialized centers with expertise in alcohol use disorder is a key management option for patients with established alcohol use disorder.