Drug discovery is an exceptionally long and costly process, often taking over 10 years and costing billions of dollars. Despite these efforts, more than 90% of drug candidates fail, with most failures occurring during clinical trials due to issues related to efficacy, safety, or poor pharmacokinetics. A major contributor to these failures is biopharmaceutic barriers, including poor solubility, limited permeability, active efflux by transporters such as P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein, and extensive first-pass metabolism by CYP450 enzymes. These factors severely limit drug absorption and bioavailability, reducing therapeutic efficacy. Although traditional approaches, such as high-throughput absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion screening and improved chemical design, have achieved some progress, a major shift is now occurring through the use of in silico modeling, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning. These AI-driven tools enhance the prediction accuracy of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion profiles, identify transporter interactions, and even simulate metabolic pathways. Additionally, modern formulation technologies, such as three-dimensional printing, lipid-based nanocarriers, and biodegradable delivery systems, are increasingly being integrated with AI-powered design platforms to personalize and optimize drug delivery. However, these promising advancements also raise regulatory and ethical concerns that must be addressed before widespread adoption. This review examines the major biopharmaceutic barriers responsible for drug development failures and explores how emerging AI-driven strategies and formulation innovations are being used to overcome these limitations. It also discusses current regulatory challenges and ethical considerations associated with adopting these technologies.

Precision medicine represents a paradigm shift in healthcare, emphasizing individualized approaches to disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment based on a patient’s genetic, proteomic, and immunologic profile. In the field of oncology, this paradigm has gained traction, particularly with the integration of immunotherapeutic modalities. Among the most promising advancements are therapeutic cancer vaccines, which harness the body’s immune system to fight tumors more effectively. This mini-review highlights recent developments in therapeutic vaccine engineering. It also discusses key barriers to clinical translation and summarizes findings from contemporary human clinical trials evaluating personalized cancer vaccines. In addition, it evaluates the growing potential of these therapies to redefine cancer treatment.

Primary liver cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in China, which seriously threatens people’s lives and health. In recent years, with the advancement of basic and clinical research, the diagnosis and treatment methods for primary liver cancer have been continually enriched. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has played an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer, but there is no unified standard for differentiation and treatment, and efficacy evaluation. In order to further standardize the TCM diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer, according to the requirements of TCM standardization and related technical guidance documents, the drafting team compiled this guideline through literature research, expert interviews, questionnaire surveys, consensus meetings, etc., for reference by clinicians. This guideline is approved and issued by the China Association of Chinese Medicine, standard number: T/CACM 1575-2024.

Breast cancer remains one of the most common cancers affecting women globally, with late detection frequently contributing to its high mortality rate. Multiple factors drive these delays, including a lack of awareness, financial constraints in low-income countries, and limited access to non-invasive and accurate biomarkers. This review aims to introduce biomarkers, particularly hematological and biochemical serum markers, as essential, non-invasive, and accurate tools for improving the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic management of breast cancer. Hematological markers are measurable blood parameters that reflect physiological and pathological processes such as inflammation, infection, cardiovascular stress, autoimmune conditions, and cancer. Routinely measured hematological markers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and red blood cell indices, are typically obtained from standard tests like the complete blood count. Regular monitoring through complete blood count is essential during cancer treatment to evaluate changes in blood cell counts and detect potential adverse effects. Because of their affordability, minimal infrastructure requirements, and broad accessibility, hematological parameters have been increasingly studied for their association with high-risk factors in breast cancer, particularly in resource-limited settings. Their utility underscores their critical role in improving patient outcomes across diverse healthcare environments. This review summarizes the clinical value of various hematological and serum-based biochemical markers in the screening and diagnosis of breast cancer. Prediction methods that incorporate hematological and serum-based biochemical parameters can support screening, diagnosis, and staging. Overall, individual or combined blood indicators hold significant potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and effectiveness.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has become one of the leading causes of chronic liver diseases in China, imposing a substantial and growing burden on the healthcare system. Considering the large number of individuals affected by MAFLD and the gap in disease management capacity at the primary care level, standardized guidance tailored to primary healthcare settings is urgently needed. In response, the Chronic Disease Management Branch of the China Medical Biotechnology Association convened a multidisciplinary working group incorporating hepatologists, general practitioners, and other specialists to initiate the first China national Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Fatty Liver Disease in Primary Care (2025). These guidelines provide recommendations and suggestions covering screening, risk assessment, diagnosis, treatment, referral pathways, and follow-up tailored for primary care institutions, thereby improving the long-term outcomes for the population with MAFLD and comprehensively strengthening the role of primary healthcare in chronic liver disease management.

Laboratory-acquired infections (LAIs) have been documented since the first report of typhoid fever in 1885 and continue to endanger laboratory professionals despite decades of biosafety advances. This review provides a comprehensive overview of LAIs, emphasizing their history, modes of transmission, and strategies for prevention.

A historical narrative review of records, case series, and biosafety guidance (1885–2025) identified documented LAIs, their transmission routes, and preventive measures. Data were extracted on pathogen spectrum, geographic distribution, incident outcomes, and the effectiveness of biosafety interventions.

Historical analysis identified 50 laboratory-acquired typhoid infections with six deaths from 1885 to 1915, largely due to mouth pipetting and aerosol exposure. A sharp decline in fatal bacterial infections was observed following the introduction of Class II biosafety cabinets in the 1960s. From 2000 to 2021, 309 LAIs were reported across 94 studies, most commonly Salmonella enterica (56.6%), vaccinia virus (4.2%), and Brucella species (3.9%), with Brucella responsible for over half of hospital-laboratory cases (60 per 100,000 personnel-years). In Canada during 2023, 63 exposure events occurred, including three confirmed infections despite adherence to biosafety level protocols. Environmental persistence studies underscored surface-borne risks. The most effective preventative measures included abolishing mouth pipetting, mandatory use of gloves and eye/face protection, routine Class II biosafety cabinet use for aerosol-generating procedures, surface disinfection with 0.5% sodium hypochlorite, and annual competency-based biosafety training with incident reporting.

LAIs remain geographically widespread and pathogen-diverse. Quantitative historical trends and contemporary surveillance highlight critical transmission routes, including ingestion, inoculation, mucosal splash, and inhalation, while reinforcing evidence-based prevention strategies. Sustained investment in biosafety infrastructure, real-time exposure reporting, and pathogen-specific training is essential to further reduce LAI incidence and severity in the face of emerging antimicrobial resistance and novel agents.

Systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare and potentially fatal disease characterized by the abnormal deposition of homogeneous, amorphous amyloid proteins in tissues and organs. This deposition leads to varying degrees of structural and functional abnormalities, ultimately causing organ dysfunction and failure. The disease often involves multiple systems and organs, including the heart, kidneys, gastrointestinal tract, liver, and nervous system, with cardiac and renal involvement being the most common. Due to its rarity, multisystem involvement, and rapid progression, a comprehensive summary of the diagnosis and treatment of AL amyloidosis is crucial for guiding clinical practice and advancing research in this field. This article reviews the progress in diagnosis and discusses future treatment of AL amyloidosis, aiming to provide expanded options for clinical practice.

The association between chronic inflammation and cancer has reshaped our understanding of tumorigenesis and cancer therapy. Inflammatory responses can both promote and suppress cancer, depending on the context and timing. Key molecular players, such as nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells, interleukin-6, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, and a variety of immune cell types, including tumor-associated macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and regulatory T cells, orchestrate an environment conducive to tumor survival, angiogenesis, metastasis, and immune evasion. In recent years, immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionized cancer treatment. However, its success varies across tumor types and patients, underscoring the need to understand the tumor microenvironment and inflammatory context. This review examines the mechanistic underpinnings of inflammation-driven cancer, discusses translational research efforts targeting inflammatory pathways, and explores clinical applications, including the integration of immunotherapy with anti-inflammatory agents and biomarkers for personalized treatment. Future directions in the field include the application of artificial intelligence, microbiome research, single-cell technologies, and gene editing tools to further tailor therapies and overcome resistance mechanisms.