Dubin-Johnson syndrome (DJS) and Rotor syndrome (RS) are rare, autosomal recessive disorders that result in chronic, predominantly conjugated hyperbilirubinemia without cholestasis or hepatocellular injury. Although both conditions are benign and non-progressive, they reflect distinct molecular defects in hepatocellular transport pathways. DJS arises from mutations in the ABCC2 gene encoding the canalicular transporter multidrug resistance–associated protein 2, leading to impaired biliary excretion of conjugated bilirubin and organic anions. In contrast, RS results from combined deficiencies of the sinusoidal transporters OATP1B1 and OATP1B3, encoded by SLCO1B1 and SLCO1B3 genes, respectively, which mediate hepatic reuptake of conjugated bilirubin from the sinusoidal blood. These defects explain the characteristic biochemical and clinical distinctions between the syndromes, including the black hepatic pigmentation and markedly elevated urinary coproporphyrin I fraction in DJS, and the absence of pigmentation with moderate coproporphyrin I predominance in RS. Recent studies have expanded the understanding of how these transporters influence not only bilirubin handling but also the hepatic disposition of various drugs and endogenous metabolites. Recognition of DJS and RS is essential to prevent misdiagnosis of cholestatic or hepatocellular disease, avoid unnecessary investigations, and anticipate altered pharmacokinetics in affected individuals. This review synthesizes current evidence from molecular, biochemical, and clinical studies to highlight how these syndromes illuminate broader principles of hepatic transporter physiology and its relevance to inherited and acquired disorders of bilirubin metabolism.

Drug discovery is an exceptionally long and costly process, often taking over 10 years and costing billions of dollars. Despite these efforts, more than 90% of drug candidates fail, with most failures occurring during clinical trials due to issues related to efficacy, safety, or poor pharmacokinetics. A major contributor to these failures is biopharmaceutic barriers, including poor solubility, limited permeability, active efflux by transporters such as P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein, and extensive first-pass metabolism by CYP450 enzymes. These factors severely limit drug absorption and bioavailability, reducing therapeutic efficacy. Although traditional approaches, such as high-throughput absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion screening and improved chemical design, have achieved some progress, a major shift is now occurring through the use of in silico modeling, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning. These AI-driven tools enhance the prediction accuracy of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion profiles, identify transporter interactions, and even simulate metabolic pathways. Additionally, modern formulation technologies, such as three-dimensional printing, lipid-based nanocarriers, and biodegradable delivery systems, are increasingly being integrated with AI-powered design platforms to personalize and optimize drug delivery. However, these promising advancements also raise regulatory and ethical concerns that must be addressed before widespread adoption. This review examines the major biopharmaceutic barriers responsible for drug development failures and explores how emerging AI-driven strategies and formulation innovations are being used to overcome these limitations. It also discusses current regulatory challenges and ethical considerations associated with adopting these technologies.

Ischemic stroke is a complex cerebrovascular disorder characterized by highly unpredictable outcomes influenced by patient-specific variables, including age, stroke severity, and preventable stroke-related complications such as infections. Analyses of clinical data have indicated a cumulative post-stroke infection rate of approximately 30%, with reported rates ranging from 5% to 65%. Post-stroke infections pose a significant challenge, as they not only increase the financial burden of stroke care but are also associated with adverse clinical outcomes, prolonged hospital stays, and a higher risk of stroke recurrence. The inflammatory response plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke, encompassing the activation of inflammatory cells, the release of inflammatory mediators, and the engagement of inflammatory signaling pathways. Recent advances in molecular biology have facilitated the identification and investigation of numerous inflammation-related biomarkers. This article reviews the roles and mechanisms of key inflammatory biomarkers, including cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, inflammation-related enzymes and mediators, receptors, signaling pathway molecules, and acute-phase proteins in the context of ischemic stroke, highlighting their significance in stroke pathophysiology and prognostic assessment. Additionally, in conjunction with the latest research advances, the article discusses novel biomarkers such as microRNAs and galectin-3, which are emerging as important tools in multiple domains, including diagnosis and treatment. Drawing on clinical diagnostic and therapeutic practices, this review analyzes the diagnostic and therapeutic roles of both novel and traditional biomarkers in the progression of ischemic stroke, following the temporal sequence from disease onset to prognosis. Finally, the article addresses the limitations of current research and offers perspectives on future directions, providing insights that may contribute to the advancement of precision medicine in the management of ischemic stroke.

High-grade serous carcinoma is a rare diagnosis in cervical biopsies. Cervical serous carcinoma is no longer recognized as a primary cervical tumor in the 2020 World Health Organization classification. This study aimed to characterize the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of high-grade serous carcinoma identified in cervical or endocervical biopsies, to assess tumor origin and ensure accurate classification.

Fifty-nine cases originally diagnosed as “serous carcinoma” or “high-grade serous carcinoma” in cervical or endocervical biopsies from 2013 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data, radiologic findings, and follow-up information were analyzed. Histologic features and immunohistochemical profiles were re-evaluated. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed on a subset of cases.

The majority of tumors (96%) were determined to originate from the endometrium (n = 47) or the tubo-ovarian region (n = 4), with only one case confirmed as a primary cervical carcinoma. Morphologic patterns varied and could mimic human papillomavirus-associated adenocarcinoma. All tumors showed aberrant p53 expression and diffuse p16 positivity. WT-1 was expressed in all tubo-ovarian tumors but in only 12% of endometrial cases. Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor were frequently positive in endometrial tumors; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 was positive in 31% of cases. Molecular analysis confirmed tumor protein p53 mutations and other alterations typical of uterine serous carcinoma.

High-grade serous carcinoma identified in cervical biopsies is overwhelmingly secondary to upper genital tract tumors, most commonly of endometrial origin. A small subset of endocervical adenocarcinomas may mimic serous carcinoma. These findings support the exclusion of primary cervical serous carcinoma from the current World Health Organization classification and emphasize the importance of accurate diagnosis for appropriate management.

Precision medicine represents a paradigm shift in healthcare, emphasizing individualized approaches to disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment based on a patient’s genetic, proteomic, and immunologic profile. In the field of oncology, this paradigm has gained traction, particularly with the integration of immunotherapeutic modalities. Among the most promising advancements are therapeutic cancer vaccines, which harness the body’s immune system to fight tumors more effectively. This mini-review highlights recent developments in therapeutic vaccine engineering. It also discusses key barriers to clinical translation and summarizes findings from contemporary human clinical trials evaluating personalized cancer vaccines. In addition, it evaluates the growing potential of these therapies to redefine cancer treatment.

Breast cancer remains one of the most common cancers affecting women globally, with late detection frequently contributing to its high mortality rate. Multiple factors drive these delays, including a lack of awareness, financial constraints in low-income countries, and limited access to non-invasive and accurate biomarkers. This review aims to introduce biomarkers, particularly hematological and biochemical serum markers, as essential, non-invasive, and accurate tools for improving the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic management of breast cancer. Hematological markers are measurable blood parameters that reflect physiological and pathological processes such as inflammation, infection, cardiovascular stress, autoimmune conditions, and cancer. Routinely measured hematological markers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and red blood cell indices, are typically obtained from standard tests like the complete blood count. Regular monitoring through complete blood count is essential during cancer treatment to evaluate changes in blood cell counts and detect potential adverse effects. Because of their affordability, minimal infrastructure requirements, and broad accessibility, hematological parameters have been increasingly studied for their association with high-risk factors in breast cancer, particularly in resource-limited settings. Their utility underscores their critical role in improving patient outcomes across diverse healthcare environments. This review summarizes the clinical value of various hematological and serum-based biochemical markers in the screening and diagnosis of breast cancer. Prediction methods that incorporate hematological and serum-based biochemical parameters can support screening, diagnosis, and staging. Overall, individual or combined blood indicators hold significant potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and effectiveness.

Cortisol, the body’s primary glucocorticoid, is central to maintaining homeostasis through its regulation of metabolism, immunity, cardiovascular tone, and neurobehavioral functions. However, chronic dysregulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, whether from persistent psychological stress, lifestyle imbalance, or circadian disruption, contributes to diverse metabolic, psychiatric, and inflammatory disorders. This comprehensive review aims to explore cortisol physiology, mechanisms of dysregulation, and emerging strategies for restoring hormonal balance through integrative management. Conventional approaches such as pharmacotherapy and surgical interventions remain essential for severe endocrine disorders like Cushing’s syndrome and Addison’s disease; however, they inadequately address chronic, stress-related dysfunction. Nutritional modulation, sleep optimization, moderate physical activity, and mind-body therapies, including yoga, meditation, and mindfulness-based stress reduction, demonstrate measurable reductions in cortisol and inflammatory cytokines. Adaptogenic botanicals such as Withania somnifera, Ocimum tenuiflorum, Rhodiola rosea, and Panax ginseng exhibit robust evidence for normalizing cortisol and enhancing resilience through hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis modulation. Complementary modalities such as acupuncture, naturopathy, and homeopathy show potential in improving autonomic and neuroendocrine balance. By synthesizing biomedical, nutritional, psychological, and traditional perspectives, this review proposes an integrated model of cortisol management that harmonizes physiology and behavior. Such multidimensional frameworks offer promising, evidence-based pathways for mitigating stress-related diseases and promoting holistic well-being.

Laboratory-acquired infections (LAIs) have been documented since the first report of typhoid fever in 1885 and continue to endanger laboratory professionals despite decades of biosafety advances. This review provides a comprehensive overview of LAIs, emphasizing their history, modes of transmission, and strategies for prevention.

A historical narrative review of records, case series, and biosafety guidance (1885–2025) identified documented LAIs, their transmission routes, and preventive measures. Data were extracted on pathogen spectrum, geographic distribution, incident outcomes, and the effectiveness of biosafety interventions.

Historical analysis identified 50 laboratory-acquired typhoid infections with six deaths from 1885 to 1915, largely due to mouth pipetting and aerosol exposure. A sharp decline in fatal bacterial infections was observed following the introduction of Class II biosafety cabinets in the 1960s. From 2000 to 2021, 309 LAIs were reported across 94 studies, most commonly Salmonella enterica (56.6%), vaccinia virus (4.2%), and Brucella species (3.9%), with Brucella responsible for over half of hospital-laboratory cases (60 per 100,000 personnel-years). In Canada during 2023, 63 exposure events occurred, including three confirmed infections despite adherence to biosafety level protocols. Environmental persistence studies underscored surface-borne risks. The most effective preventative measures included abolishing mouth pipetting, mandatory use of gloves and eye/face protection, routine Class II biosafety cabinet use for aerosol-generating procedures, surface disinfection with 0.5% sodium hypochlorite, and annual competency-based biosafety training with incident reporting.

LAIs remain geographically widespread and pathogen-diverse. Quantitative historical trends and contemporary surveillance highlight critical transmission routes, including ingestion, inoculation, mucosal splash, and inhalation, while reinforcing evidence-based prevention strategies. Sustained investment in biosafety infrastructure, real-time exposure reporting, and pathogen-specific training is essential to further reduce LAI incidence and severity in the face of emerging antimicrobial resistance and novel agents.