RAAS gene network reconstruction and analysis
We started from the list of 145 genes reported to be related to RAAS and the list of direct components of RAAS and reconstructed a complete associative gene network of RAAS, which included the 145 genes and the same number of proteins encoded by them. The network was supplemented with 1,457 associations between the genes, such as regulation, catalysis, cleavage, degradation, protein transport, and gene expression, as shown in Figure 2.
One can see in Figure 2 that some genes and their proteins are not associated with other components of the network (e.g., OCRL, ACTN3); they are placed on the right in separate pairs. First, this may reflect the fact that publications on associations of these genes and/or proteins with other RAAS components were released later than the current version of the public web service ANDSystem we refer to,8 according to the regulation of its updates by the developers. Second, while the genes under investigation may have been studied in relation to RAAS dysfunction, their association with other RAAS components was not considered. Third, it is possible that the presence or absence of associations between the components of the RAAS gene network has not been the focus of experimental studies so far. The genes of interest may have been studied in the context of association with RAAS dysfunction, but their association with other RAAS components remained unconsidered. Fourth and finally, it is possible that experimental studies have not yet focused on the presence or absence of any associations between the components of the RAAS gene network existing in nature.
In the next step of this study, it would be interesting to use standard research options of the freely available web service ANDSystem in an independent analysis of all components of the associative network for their prioritization according to generally accepted characteristics of vertices in graph theory: the centrality index by mediation and the centrality index by vertex degree. The higher the centrality index by mediation for a certain component, the greater the number of shortest paths between other components of the associative network of the RAAS that pass through this component. Therefore, it may be assumed that components with the highest values of the mediation centrality index are most involved in the transmission of signals between other network components. The second characteristic of components of the RAAS associative network is the vertex degree index. It is used to prioritize the components. It numerically equals the total number of associations of the component in question with all other components of this network. Thus, the component of the RAAS associative network with the highest vertex degree may have the potential to affect the functioning of the largest number of other components of this network. The main result of this step is that the following components of the RAAS associative network with the highest values of both centrality and vertex degree were prioritized: proteins IL6, EDN1, TNFA, MK01, LEP, and JUN. All of them appear to be involved in the processes of inflammation, immune response, vasoconstriction, apoptosis, and cell growth.16–19
We also identified genes and proteins in the constructed subnetworks that participate directly in RAAS and conventionally termed them the “core”. They include the genes ACE, ACE2, AGTR1, AGTR2, AGT, MAS1, REN, CYP11B2, and CMA1 (nine in total); their proteins ACE, ACE2, AGTR1, AGTR2, AGT, MAS, RENI, C11B2, and CMA1; and proteins formed as a result of enzymatic transformations: Ang I, Ang II, Angiotensin 1-7, and Angiotensin 1-9. To study the sequence of interactions between these key components of the RAAS, we built a gene regulatory network. In the interface of the ANDSystem tool, the path length was set equal to the number of objects, 9. Additionally, the classes of objects and types of interactions between them were set. Thus, we obtained the following pipeline: {core genes of the RAAS} → {expression} → {human proteins} → {interactions, expression, and its regulation} → {human genes} → {expression} → {proteins of the associative network of the RAAS}, to simplify and systematize the complete associative network of RAAS (Fig. 2) for in silico expression analysis, as depicted in Figure 3.
The RAAS gene regulatory network includes interactions between genes involved in the up- and downregulation of expression. This network contains 21 genes, the same number of proteins, and 63 interactions. The gene regulatory network of interaction between gene expression regulation and protein components of the RAAS associative network repeats the previously constructed RAAS gene network (Fig. 2), allowing a more detailed examination of the interactions of expression regulation of the genes of our interest with their partners in biochemical reactions in the cell. The RENI and ACE2 proteins are the most central proteins of the network, as they affect the expression of several genes of the RAAS network, whereas the AGTR1 protein significantly affects the expression of the nine aforementioned core RAAS genes, but not other genes of the network. No TFs were found in the final segment of the regulatory network. Since no direct link between the core RAAS genes and TFs was found in the resulting network (Fig. 3), additional steps were included in this regulatory network to take into account intermediaries between the core RAAS genes and other RAAS-associated genes (Fig. 4): nine core RAAS genes → expression → human proteins → gene expression regulation, protein activity, catalysis, degradation and transport, interactions → human proteins → expression and its regulation → RAAS-associated genes.
It is seen in Figure 4 that the transcription-related extension of the primary gene regulatory network contained 83 genes, 58 proteins, 611 interactions, one metabolite, and two metabolic processes. According to current biological publications in factual databases, an information extract of which is the ANDSystem, we can see how the core RAAS genes (the rightmost column) can regulate, via intermediary proteins, virtually all TFs involved in RAAS with the only exception being the human FOSB gene. The regulatory mediator proteins from the core of the RAAS associative network to the FOXO1 TF gene appeared to be IGF1 and P53. For the VDR gene, the mediators were TGFB1; for ZBTB16, P53; for GATA3, IL15, IL33, and SCF; for RELA, TGFB1; for PPARG, Substance P, Ang II, and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9); for NR3C2, ANGII. For the JUN gene, the mediator proteins were TF65, MYC, and OCLN; for the NFKB2 gene, MYC.
Thus, due to the transcription-related part of the gene regulatory network of RAAS constructed in this work (Fig. 4), we showed that the core of the associative gene network of RAAS could indirectly regulate TFs involved in the entire RAAS gene network (Fig. 2). This finding fits a wide range of independent experimental data on particular cases of such regulation.
It is pertinent to note that the gene for TF FOSB was outside the transcription-related part of our gene regulatory network of RAAS (Fig. 4). However, the authors of a biomedical human disease model using rats described a downregulation of this gene simultaneously with a losartan-induced block of angiotensin type 1 receptor AGTR1,20 which is part of the core RAAS genes listed in the leftmost column in Figure 4. Thus, we assume that the extension of the complete associative gene network of RAAS (Fig. 2), which presently encompasses only natural substances, to synthetic medications, food supplements, and environmental pollutants, may be a promising next step in further inquiry in this field.
Methodological limitations of the ANDSystem program: The ANDSystem relied on specific formulations of particular interactions between components of the associative gene network. ANDSystem extracted these formulations from publications. As an example of ANDSystem’s methodological capabilities, Figure 1 shows specific phrases from articles in text fields describing the regulation of AGTR2 gene expression by the AGTR1 protein, the upregulation of AGT expression by renin, the regulation of MF gene expression by ACE2, and the regulation of the IL6 gene by AGTR2.
Reconstruction of transcriptional regulation networks
The analysis of the list of genes of the RAAS associative network revealed 10 genes encoding human TFs (Table 1).
Table 1Transcription factors and examples of their potential target genes in the RAAS associative network
| TF symbol | N300 | TF_RAAS_Genes300 | N2000 | TF_RAAS_Genes2000 |
|---|
| NR3C2 | 5 | | 56 | GATA3, JUN, PPARG, VDR, ZBTB16 |
| NFKB2 | 12 | PPARG, RELA | 68 | FOSB, FOXO1, JUN, NFKB2, NR3C2, PPARG, RELA, VDR, ZBTB16 |
| ZBTB16 | 3 | | 42 | NR3C2 |
| PPARG | 26 | VDR | 108 | FOSB, FOXO1, GATA3, JUN, NFKB2, NR3C2, PPARG, VDR, ZBTB16 |
| RELA | 16 | NR3C2, RELA | 76 | FOSB, FOXO1, JUN, NFKB2, NR3C2, RELA, VDR, ZBTB16 |
| VDR | 25 | FOSB | 103 | FOSB, GATA3, JUN, NFKB2, NR3C2, PPARG, RELA, ZBTB16 |
| FOXO1 | 9 | | 69 | FOXO1, JUN, RELA, ZBTB16 |
| JUN | 13 | FOSB, JUN | 63 | FOSB, GATA3, JUN, NFKB2, RELA, VDR, ZBTB16 |
| FOSB | 17 | JUN | 64 | FOSB, GATA3 JUN, NFKB2, PPARG, VDR, ZBTB16 |
| GATA3 | 10 | JUN | 51 | JUN, PPARG, VDR |
We recognized potential TFBSs for each of the nine TFs listed within the rightmost column in Figure 4, along with one more TF, FOSB, taken additionally into account on the grounds of biomedical data from rat models of human diseases,20 as it interacts with AGTR1. For all 10 TFs, potential TFBSs were predicted in the promoters of genes included in the RAAS associative network, gene clusters conceivably regulated by these TFs were identified (Table 1), and transcriptional regulatory networks were reconstructed (Fig. 5).
According to the data presented in Figure 5 and Table 1 (column N300), the numbers of genes potentially regulated by RAAS TFs varied from three for ZBTB16 to 26 for PPARG. Seven out of the ten considered TFs could also regulate other RAAS-related TFs. For example, the JUN TF could potentially regulate three other RAAS-related TFs, which was the highest estimate in this study.
Interestingly, JUN and RELA TFs could conceivably self-regulate. JUN and FOSB TFs could potentially regulate each other, forming a closed loop of mutual regulation. The “TF_RAAS_Gene2000” column of Table 1 shows a significant increase in the number of RAAS-related genes in whose indicated proximal promoter regions potential TFBS were detected, namely from 42 RAAS genes (for ZBTB16) to 108 (for PPARG), among a total of 145. In addition, the number of RAAS-related TFs that could potentially be targets for regulation by other RAAS-related TFs in our framework ranged from one for ZBTB16 to nine for PPARG, as well as for NFKB2. Similarly, among the 10 TFs studied here, the number of those potentially capable of autoregulation increased to six. Thus, the simplified RAAS-related transcriptional regulatory network, considering only 300-bp as the proximal promoter region, more or less adequately reflected the main features of the entire regulatory network as a whole. All other regulatory regions predominantly modulated only individual details of RAAS functioning, in accordance with modern concepts of eukaryotic transcription regulation. Finally, it was found that the single JUN TF was a potential target for all such TFs except for the ZBTB16 TF.