v
Search
Advanced Search

Publications > Journals > Journal of Clinical and Translational Pathology > Article Full Text

  • Review Article
  • OPEN ACCESS

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Hepatic Injury: A Clinicopathologic Review

  • Mehran Taherian1,
  • Deyali Chatterjee1 and
  • Huamin Wang1,2,* 
 Author information  Cite
Journal of Clinical and Translational Pathology   2022;2(3):83-90

doi: 10.14218/JCTP.2022.00017

Abstract

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been a revolutionary milestone in immuno-oncology, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) may occur due to enhanced T cell activation and immune dysregulation. The irAEs can occur as early as within days to reportedly as late as up to 26 weeks. They may affect any organ system in the body, most commonly the luminal gastrointestinal tract, liver, skin, endocrine system, and lungs. The mechanisms of irAEs are complex and have not been fully understood. A breach of self-tolerance, which leads to autoantigen reactivity due to the enhanced activation and infiltration of T cells or the production of autoantibodies, and a non-specific autoinflammatory mechanism have been proposed. Limited data is available on the clinical and pathologic features of ICI-induced liver injury. This review presents an overview of the clinical and common histopathologic features and patterns of ICI-induced liver injury, the differential diagnoses, and the clinical management. Available data suggest that the histopathologic findings of ICI-induced hepatic injury are often non-specific and overlap with other challenging differential diagnoses. Therefore, a good knowledge of the histopathologic spectrum of ICI-induced hepatic injury and their differential diagnoses combined with the serological test results, clinical correlation, and communication with the clinical team is necessary to make an accurate and timely diagnosis.

Keywords

Immune checkpoint inhibitor, Immune-related adverse events, Liver, Histopathologic, Hepatitic, Cholangitic

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the new standard of care for treating many types of cancers and have been shown to improve survival in some cancer patients.1 They result in an antitumor immune response by blocking the immune cell checkpoints. Immune checkpoint proteins, including cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and protein ligand-1 (PD-L1) receptors, downregulate T cell immunity. CTLA4 is expressed on the surface of T lymphocytes, and CTLA4 signaling is triggered by binding to CD80/86 on antigen-presenting cells, which inactivates lymphocytes.2,3 Thus, blocking CTLA4 releases the functional suppression of T cells, which enables them to attack tumor cells.2,3 Blocking the interaction between PD-1 on the surface of T lymphocytes and PD-L1 expressed on cancer cells also enhances the activation of T lymphocytes and enables them to exert their cytotoxic effects against the tumor cells.4–6 In addition, alternate checkpoint molecules such as lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) and T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 have also been targeted to prevent resistance to common ICIs.7

The first clinical studies that reported significant tumor regression after being treated with ICIs were in 2003, using anti-CTLA therapy for metastatic melanoma.8,9 Clinical benefit of anti-PD-1 was first reported in 2010 in multiple advanced cancers, including colorectal carcinoma.10 In 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first ICI, the CTLA-4 blocking ipilimumab, to treat unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Since then, the FDA has approved nine more ICIs to treat different types of cancer (Table 1). The first ICI that received FDA approval for gastrointestinal cancers was pembrolizumab, which targets PD-1 for treating patients with recurrent, locally advanced, or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.11,12 Among the FDA-approved ICIs, ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab are the most widely used drugs.4

Table 1

The FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors, their mechanism, and indications

Drug (brand name)MechanismApproved indications
Atezolizumab (Tecentriq®)PD-L1 inhibitorBreast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma
Avelumab (Bavencio®)PD-L1 inhibitorMerkel cell carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma
Cemiplimab (Libtayo®)PD-1 inhibitorCutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and non-small cell lung carcinoma
Dostarlimab (Jemperli)PD-1 inhibitorMMR-deficient recurrent or advanced solid tumors
Durvalumab (Imfinzi®)PD-L1 inhibitorNon-small cell lung cancer, small cell carcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma
Ipilimumab (Yervoy®)CTLA-4 inhibitorColorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, melanoma, mesothelioma, renal cell carcinoma, and non-small cell lung carcinoma
Nivolumab (Opdivo®)PD-1 inhibitorColorectal cancer, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, mesothelioma, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and non-small cell lung carcinoma
Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®)PD-1 inhibitorBreast cancer, cervical cancer, colorectal cancer, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, esophageal carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, large B cell lymphoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, mesothelioma, Merkel cell carcinoma, MSI-high/MMR-deficient/TMB-high cancers, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and non-small cell lung carcinoma
RelatlimabLAG-3 inhibitorIn combination with Nivolumab (together known as Opdualag™) for subsets of patients with melanoma
TremelimumabCTLA-4 inhibitorMesothelioma

FDA, the Food and Drug Administration; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen 4; PD-1, programmed death-1; PD-L1, programmed death ligand-1; LAG-3, lymphocyte activation gene-3, MMR, mismatch repair; MSI, microsatellite instability; TMB, tumor mutational burden.

Although ICIs have revolutionized cancer treatment, unfavorable complications may occur due to the enhanced T cell activation and immune dysregulation, referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with a reported incidence of up to 90%.13 Ipilimumab and combination regimens have been reported with more irAEs than other approved ICIs.14 In general, the ICIs targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 are associated with a lower incidence of irAEs than CTLA-4 inhibitors.15–18 The irAEs may occur as early as within days to reportedly as late as up to 26 weeks after the initiation of ICI therapy, with a median onset of approximately 40 days.16 The irAEs can affect any organ system in the body, most commonly the luminal gastrointestinal (GI) tract, liver, skin, endocrine system, and lungs.19,20 Hepatic and GI involvements can be expected four to seven weeks after initiation of therapy, presenting as elevated liver enzymes, hepatitis, vomiting, diarrhea, and colitis.21–23

The precise immunologic mechanisms of irAEs are complex and have not been fully understood. The breach of self-tolerance, which leads to the autoantigen reactivity due to the enhanced activation and infiltration of T cells or the production of autoantibodies, and a non-specific autoinflammatory mechanism have been proposed.24 Autoantibodies, autoactivation of T cells, interleukins, and other inflammatory cytokines contribute to the pathophysiology of irAEs.25 It is unclear why some patients have immune-related severe adverse events and others do not.6 The composition of the gut microbiome has also been linked to both irAEs and tumor response to ICIs.26

This review will focus on the clinical and common histopathologic patterns and features of ICI-induced liver injury, the differential diagnoses, and the management of the hepatic toxicity associated with ICI treatment.

Clinical features

Immune-mediated hepatic injury has been reported in 3–10% of patients who received ICI monotherapy and up to 30% of patients treated with combination therapy.23,27,28 ICI-induced liver injury is even higher in patients with other irAEs, most commonly colitis.29 The most common manifestation is an asymptomatic increase in liver function tests (LFTs), particularly aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT).23,30,31 Other clinical symptoms reported are fever, fatigue, myalgia, jaundice, ascites, nausea, vomiting, confusion, and abdominal pain.27,32 Since the clinical presentations and elevated LFTs of ICI-induced liver injury are non-specific and overlap with viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, other drug-induced liver injuries (DILI), and hepatitis of other non-ICI-related etiology, it is essential to rule out non-ICI-related hepatitis before making the clinical diagnosis of ICI-induced liver injury. The baseline LFTs and clinical history before initiating ICI treatment are essential in differentiating the pre-existing liver disease/injury from the ICI-induced liver injury. Once the diagnosis is made, the clinical grading of the ICI-induced liver injury is according to the National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (Table 2).23,33

Table 2

The CTCAE grading system for the ICI-induced hepatic injury33

GradeDefinition
Grade 1AST or ALT 1–3× ULN or Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5× ULN
Grade 2AST or ALT > 3–5× ULN or Total bilirubin > 1.5–3× ULN
Grade 3AST or ALT > 5–20× ULN or Total bilirubin > 3–10× ULN
Grade 4AST or ALT > 20× ULN or Total bilirubin > 10× ULN
Grade 5Death

CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ULN, upper limit of normal.

Radiological features

ICI-induced liver injury may demonstrate variable imaging findings according to its severity. Mild cases mostly appear unremarkable, while more severe cases may show non-specific findings in various imaging modalities (CT scan, MR, and ultrasonography) such as mild hepatomegaly, attenuated hepatic parenchyma, steatosis, periportal edema and periportal lymphadenopathy, and conspicuous periportal echogenicity.34,35

Histopathological characteristics

Because ICIs are relatively new, limited data is available on the microscopic features of ICI-induced liver injury, especially when the liver biopsy is not routinely performed for all cases. Few studies reported the histopathologic changes of liver specimens in patients with ICI-induced liver injury.36–44 The reported histopathologic patterns/features and their differential diagnoses are summarized in Table 3. The frequencies of different histopathologic patterns/features of ICI-induced hepatic injury in the published studies are summarized in Table 4. The available data suggest that the histopathologic findings associated with ICI-induced hepatic injury are often non-specific. Therefore, the diagnosis of the ICI-induced hepatic injury on liver biopsies is often very challenging and requires careful correlations of the histopathologic findings with the clinical and radiological data and the laboratory testing results, including the LFTs, the viral hepatitis panel, and the autoantibodies to exclude autoimmune hepatitis, etc.

Table 3

The histopathological patterns/features of ICI-induced hepatic injury and major differential diagnoses

Microscopic patternMajor differential diagnoses
Hepatitic patternViral infections, DILI by other concurrent drugs, autoimmune hepatitis, granulomatous hepatitis, Wilson disease, malignancy
Cholangitic patternDILI, extrahepatic biliary obstruction, primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, IgG4-related cholangitis, acute cellular rejection, graft versus host disease
Mixed hepatitic and cholangitic patternDILI
Steatotic/steatohepatitic patternAlcoholic or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Granulomatous inflammationBacterial and fungal infections, sarcoidosis, primary biliary cholangitis, DILI
Mild non-specific inflammatory changesDILI, systemic conditions such as celiac and thyroid disease, vascular disorders, metabolic conditions

ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; DILI, drug-induced liver injury; Ig, immunoglobulin.

Table 4

Summary of the published studies on the histologic patterns and features of ICI-induced hepatic injury

StudyNumber of casesHistologic Patterns and Features
HepatiticCholangiticMixed hepatitic/cholangiticGranulomas including fibrin ring typeSteatosisOther features
Kleiner et al,41 201254n/an/a11n/a
Johncilla et al,40 20151191n/an/a1Central vein endotheliitis (8/11)
Everett et al,39 201722n/an/a22Endotheliitis
Doherty et al,38 20173n/a2n/an/a1Vanishing bile duct syndrome (1/3)
De Martin et al,37 20181612n/a49n/aCentral vein Endotheliitis (7/16)
Zen et al,43 201875n/a2n/a2n/a
Zhang et al,44 2020861n/a13n/a
Zen et al,42 20201061221Cholestasis with multiple bile casts (1/10)
Cohen et al,36 20216028168183Central vein endotheliitis (20/60)

ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; n/a, not applicable

Hepatitic pattern

The most common pattern of ICI-induced liver injury is the hepatitic pattern, which has been reported in 47% in an extensive study of 60 patients by Cohen et al.36 and up to 100% in smaller studies.41 This pattern is characterized by panlobular or centrilobular (zone 3) inflammation composed of predominantly lymphocyte and histiocyte aggregates with scattered neutrophils, eosinophils, and only a few plasma cells.42 The liver parenchyma shows foci of spotty/focal necrosis, and sometimes multifocal hepatocyte apoptosis, ballooning degeneration, and acidophil bodies. Portal inflammation is usually mild to moderate,45,46 and steatosis has also been reported.36 Granulomas, including fibrin ring granulomas (a central fat globule surrounded by a circumferential rim of fibrin and histiocytes), have been reported in the hepatitic pattern of ICI-induced liver injury, primarily located in the lobules.36,39 Central vein endotheliitis with centrilobular necrosis and lymphocytic infiltrate has been reported in many cases and can be a somewhat specific finding in this type of liver injury.36,40,41,43 Only minimal bile duct injury and/or ductular reaction in the hepatitic pattern may be observed (Fig. 1).36

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury, hepatitic pattern.
Fig. 1  Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury, hepatitic pattern.

(a) Lobular inflammatory infiltrate consisting of predominantly lymphocytes, histiocytes, scattered neutrophils and eosinophils, and ballooning degeneration (hematoxylin and eosin ×100); (b) Portal vein endotheliitis, characterized by lymphocytes underneath endothelial cells (hematoxylin and eosin ×100); (c) Central perivenulitis (hematoxylin and eosin ×100); (d) Early fibrin ring granuloma represented by a cluster of macrophages containing a small central lipid droplet (hematoxylin and eosin ×200).

The differential diagnoses for hepatitic patterns include viral hepatitis, other DILI, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and Wilson disease. Viral hepatitis can be further assessed by clinical history, serological viral testing, and in situ hybridization. The DILI, secondary to other drugs, does not have specific microscopic features. However, it may show prominent eosinophils and fewer histiocytes.46 The DILI manifesting as confluent necrosis and bile plugs are not common in ICI-induced hepatitis.43,47 Unlike AIH, ICI-induced hepatitis lacks a prominent plasma cell infiltrate, and the interface activity is often present in AIH. Also, features like hepatocyte rosettes and confluent necrosis are frequently noted in AIH but not reported in ICI-induced hepatic injury.43 The serological markers of AIH, such as immunoglobulin G, antinuclear antibody, and smooth muscle antibody, are usually normal in ICI-induced hepatic injury. Some studies have suggested that prominent sinusoidal histiocytes and central vein endotheliitis may help differentiate the hepatitic patterns of the ICI-induced liver injury from AIH and DILI.37,40 Fibrin ring granulomas are rare, but if seen, the differentials that need to be excluded are infections like Q fever, Epstein Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), toxoplasmosis, and systemic diseases like lupus.48,49 Wilson disease shows a spectrum of histologic features depending on the disease stage and varies from non-alcoholic steatohepatitis to features similar to AIH, and finally, the cirrhotic stage.50

Cholangitic pattern

The second most common pattern is the cholangitic pattern which has been observed in 27% of the cases in a study involving 60 liver biopsies,36 and is associated with elevated alkaline phosphatase and serum bilirubin.30 This pattern is characterized by varying degrees of bile duct injury in the form of lymphocytic cholangitis, ductular reaction, or even ductopenia. Lobular inflammation, including granulomas, is minimal or absent. The accompanying portal inflammation is composed of a mixed inflammatory infiltrate, predominated by lymphocytes (Fig. 2).37,38,42–44 Endotheliitis has not been identified in the cholangitic pattern of the liver.36,37,40

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury, cholangitic pattern.
Fig. 2  Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury, cholangitic pattern.

(a, b) Portal tract with mixed inflammatory infiltrate and bile duct injury showing inflammatory cells within the duct epithelium (hematoxylin and eosin ×200).

The primary differential diagnoses for the cholangitic pattern of the ICI-induced hepatic injury include other DILI, distal biliary obstruction, primary biliary cholangitis, acute cellular rejection in the liver transplant setting, and graft versus host disease (GVHD).45 Classic features of acute cellular rejection are the triad of mixed portal inflammation, bile duct damage with intraepithelial lymphocytes, and endotheliitis, a finding uncommonly reported in the cholangitic pattern. The ICI-induced liver injury with a cholangitic pattern is a diagnosis of exclusion. It requires reviewing the imaging, clinical history, and serological tests. The ICI-induced injury to the extrahepatic and intrahepatic bile ducts can mimic primary sclerosing cholangitis and is histologically characterized by lymphocyte infiltration of bile duct epithelium and periductal fibrosis.51 This pattern of sclerosing cholangitis should be differentiated from immunoglobulin (Ig) G4-related cholangitis by histologic features, serum IgG4, and immunohistochemistry.52 IgG4-related cholangitis presents with plasma cell infiltrate in the portal tracts and increased IgG4+/IgG+ ratio of plasma cells. It may or may not show features of obliterative phlebitis or storiform fibrosis.47 GVHD occurs after stem cell transplant and is characterized by bile duct epithelial damage, as seen in the ICI-mediated liver damage. However, portal inflammation is typically mild in GVHD, and endotheliitis may be observed.53

Mixed hepatitic and cholangitic pattern

To qualify as a mixed hepatitic/cholangitic pattern, the liver biopsy has to show both significant lobular injury as well as portal inflammation with more than minimal bile duct injury and/or ductular reaction (Fig. 3). This mixed pattern has been seen in 13% of patients treated by ICIs in the study by Cohen et al.36 The granulomas in this group are reportedly more portal-based compared to lobular-based in the hepatitic pattern.36 The major differential diagnosis for the mixed hepatitic and cholangitic patterns of ICI-induced hepatic injury is the drug induced-hepatitis caused by other drugs(s). A careful review of patient treatment history and clinical correlation are required for making the correct diagnosis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury, mixed hepatitic and cholangitic pattern.
Fig. 3  Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury, mixed hepatitic and cholangitic pattern.

(a) The liver biopsy shows bile duct injury, portal and lobular inflammation, prominent ductular reaction, and foci of hepatocellular necrosis (hematoxylin and eosin ×100); (b, c) Bile duct injury, prominent ductular reaction, portal and lobular inflammation composed of lymphocyte and histiocyte aggregates, neutrophils, and eosinophils with rare apoptotic bodies (hematoxylin and eosin ×200); (d) Perivenulitis (hematoxylin and eosin ×200).

Other patterns

Another less common histologic pattern that could develop in 5% of the cases is primarily granulomatous hepatitis.40 For cases with granulomatous hepatitis, bacterial/fungal/mycobacterial infections should be ruled out by special stains, culture, or polymerase chain reactions. Other etiology and drug-induced granulomatous hepatitis should also be considered in the differential diagnosis.

Steatosis and steatohepatitis have also been described in 5% of patients with ICI -induced hepatic injury and are indistinguishable from non-alcoholic steatosis or steatohepatitis.36,40,44 It is unclear whether this finding represents the pre-existing fatty liver disease or is genuinely related to ICI therapy. Some authors propose that fibrin ring granulomas and steatosis may be pathogenically related.48 Furthermore, the ICIs may induce only mild and non-specific changes with no or focal lobular inflammation and absent or focal mild portal inflammation;36,44 these non-specific mild changes can also be seen in systemic conditions such as celiac and thyroid disease.54 ICI-induced nodular regenerative hyperplasia has rarely been reported as well (Fig. 4).55

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury showing
Fig. 4  Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury showing

(a) nodular regenerative hyperplasia-like change, which is characterized by ill-defined parenchymal nodules with atrophic hepatocytes; no fibrous septa around nodules are seen (hematoxylin and eosin ×40); (b) The reticulin stain shows the alternating areas of nodularity and compression of the reticulin network between nodules.

Treatment

Systemic glucocorticoids represent the primary treatment for patients with ICI-induced hepatic injury whose liver enzymes do not resolve spontaneously. More frequent liver monitoring is recommended for patients with the CTCAE grade 1 ICI-induced hepatic injury. The ICI therapy should be withheld for patients with grade 2 ICI-induced hepatic injury until resolution to grade 1. For symptomatic patients, prednisone may be administered. For patients with grades 3–4 ICI-induced hepatic injury, ICI treatment should be discontinued, and consultation with a hepatologist and liver biopsy may be needed. A high dose of steroids should be initiated. Second-line immunomodulators, such as azathioprine or mycophenolate, may be considered if there is no improvement in clinical hepatitis after being treated with steroids for 3–5 days. This treatment usually leads to near or complete resolution of liver function tests in nearly all cases, confirming the diagnosis of an ICI-induced liver injury.56,57 Some studies showed that ICI-related cholangitis was more resistant to steroid therapy.38

Conclusions

With an exponential increase in the use of ICIs in cancer immunotherapy, the incidence of ICI-induced hepatic injury is also expected to rise. Pathologists play a significant role in the multidisciplinary clinical team in the early diagnosis of these hepatic irAEs to provide optimal management of cancer patients and to avoid significant morbidity and mortality. However, the histopathologic features of ICI-induced hepatic injury are not specific and overlap with other challenging differential diagnoses. Hence, a good knowledge of the histopathologic spectrum of ICI-induced hepatic injury and their differential diagnoses combined with the serological test results, clinicopathologic correlation, and communication with the clinical team is necessary to make an accurate and timely diagnosis.

Abbreviations

ICI: 

immune checkpoint inhibitor

irAEs: 

immune-related adverse events

CTLA-4: 

cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4

PD-L1: 

programmed cell death protein ligand-1

PD-1: 

programmed cell death protein-1

FDA: 

Food and Drug Administration

LFT: 

liver function tests

DILI: 

drug-induced liver injury

AIH: 

autoimmune hepatitis

Declarations

Acknowledgement

None.

Funding

HW reports receiving National Institutes of Health grants 1R01CA195651, U01CA196403, P01CA117969, and P50CA221707.

Conflict of interest

HW has been an editorial board member of the Journal of Clinical and Translational Pathology since May 2021. The authors have no other conflicts of interest related to this publication.

Authors’ contributions

Study concept and design (HW, MT), provision and collection of study materials (HW, DC, MT), drafting of the manuscript (HW, DC, MT), and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content (DC, HW). All authors have contributed significantly to this study and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Gong J, Chehrazi-Raffle A, Reddi S, Salgia R. Development of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors as a form of cancer immunotherapy: a comprehensive review of registration trials and future considerations. J Immunother Cancer 2018;6(1):8 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  2. Melero I, Hervas-Stubbs S, Glennie M, Pardoll DM, Chen L. Immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7(2):95-106 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  3. Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2012;12(4):252-264 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  4. Zen Y, Yeh MM. Checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury: A novel form of liver disease emerging in the era of cancer immunotherapy. Semin Diagn Pathol 2019;36(6):434-440 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  5. Brahmer JR, Tykodi SS, Chow LQ, Hwu WJ, Topalian SL, Hwu P, et al. Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366(26):2455-2465 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  6. Postow MA, Callahan MK, Wolchok JD. Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer Therapy. J Clin Oncol 2015;33(17):1974-1982 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  7. Andrews LP, Cillo AR, Karapetyan L, Kirkwood JM, Workman CJ, Vignali DAA. Molecular Pathways and Mechanisms of LAG-3 in Cancer Therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2022 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  8. Hodi FS, Mihm MC, Soiffer RJ, Haluska FG, Butler M, Seiden MV, et al. Biologic activity of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 antibody blockade in previously vaccinated metastatic melanoma and ovarian carcinoma patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100(8):4712-4717 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  9. Phan GQ, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Hwu P, Topalian SL, Schwartzentruber DJ, et al. Cancer regression and autoimmunity induced by cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100(14):8372-8377 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  10. Brahmer JR, Drake CG, Wollner I, Powderly JD, Picus J, Sharfman WH, et al. Phase I study of single-agent anti-programmed death-1 (MDX-1106) in refractory solid tumors: safety, clinical activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates. J Clin Oncol 2010;28(19):3167-3175 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  11. Bang YJ, Kang YK, Catenacci DV, Muro K, Fuchs CS, Geva R, et al. Pembrolizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: results from the phase II nonrandomized KEYNOTE-059 study. Gastric Cancer 2019;22(4):828-837 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  12. Fashoyin-Aje L, Donoghue M, Chen H, He K, Veeraraghavan J, Goldberg KB, et al. FDA Approval Summary: Pembrolizumab for Recurrent Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma Expressing PD-L1. Oncologist 2019;24(1):103-109 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  13. Michot JM, Bigenwald C, Champiat S, Collins M, Carbonnel F, Postel-Vinay S, et al. Immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint blockade: a comprehensive review. Eur J Cancer 2016;54:139-148 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  14. Dougan M. Checkpoint Blockade Toxicity and Immune Homeostasis in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Front Immunol 2017;8:1547 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  15. Schneider BJ, Naidoo J, Santomasso BD, Lacchetti C, Adkins S, Anadkat M, et al. Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2021;39(36):4073-4126 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  16. Raschi E, Gatti M, Gelsomino F, Ardizzoni A, Poluzzi E, De Ponti F. Lessons to be Learnt from Real-World Studies on Immune-Related Adverse Events with Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Clinical Perspective from Pharmacovigilance. Target Oncol 2020;15(4):449-466 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  17. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, et al. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015;373(1):23-34 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  18. Nishida N, Kudo M. Liver damage related to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Hepatol Int 2019;13(3):248-252 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  19. Hofmann L, Forschner A, Loquai C, Goldinger SM, Zimmer L, Ugurel S, et al. Cutaneous, gastrointestinal, hepatic, endocrine, and renal side-effects of anti-PD-1 therapy. Eur J Cancer 2016;60:190-209 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  20. Naidoo J, Page DB, Li BT, Connell LC, Schindler K, Lacouture ME, et al. Toxicities of the anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint antibodies. Ann Oncol 2016;27(7):1362 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  21. Weber JS, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD, Topalian SL, Schadendorf D, Larkin J, et al. Safety Profile of Nivolumab Monotherapy: A Pooled Analysis of Patients With Advanced Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2017;35(7):785-792 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  22. Assarzadegan N, Montgomery E, Anders RA. Immune checkpoint inhibitor colitis: the flip side of the wonder drugs. Virchows Arch 2018;472(1):125-133 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  23. Cramer P, Bresalier RS. Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Complications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2017;19(1):3 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  24. Esfahani K, Elkrief A, Calabrese C, Lapointe R, Hudson M, Routy B, et al. Moving towards personalized treatments of immune-related adverse events. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2020;17(8):504-515 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  25. Iranzo P, Callejo A, Assaf JD, Molina G, Lopez DE, Garcia-Illescas D, et al. Overview of Checkpoint Inhibitors Mechanism of Action: Role of Immune-Related Adverse Events and Their Treatment on Progression of Underlying Cancer. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022;9:875974 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  26. Das S, Johnson DB. Immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7(1):306 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  27. Miller ED, Abu-Sbeih H, Styskel B, Nogueras Gonzalez GM, Blechacz B, Naing A, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Adverse Impact of Hepatotoxicity due to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Am J Gastroenterol 2020;115(2):251-261 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  28. Spain L, Diem S, Larkin J. Management of toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Treat Rev 2016;44:51-60 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  29. Sznol M, Ferrucci PF, Hogg D, Atkins MB, Wolter P, Guidoboni M, et al. Pooled Analysis Safety Profile of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Combination Therapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2017;35(34):3815-3822 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  30. Parlati L, Vallet-Pichard A, Batista R, Hernvann A, Sogni P, Pol S, et al. Incidence of grade 3-4 liver injury under immune checkpoints inhibitors: A retrospective study. J Hepatol 2018;69(6):1396-1397 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  31. Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, Atkins MB, Brassil KJ, Caterino JM, et al. Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2018;36(17):1714-1768 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  32. Huffman BM, Kottschade LA, Kamath PS, Markovic SN. Hepatotoxicity After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Melanoma: Natural Progression and Management. Am J Clin Oncol 2018;41(8):760-765 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  33. National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5. NIH Publication; 2017. Available from: https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_8.5x11.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2022
  34. Kim KW, Ramaiya NH, Krajewski KM, Jagannathan JP, Tirumani SH, Srivastava A, et al. Ipilimumab associated hepatitis: imaging and clinicopathologic findings. Invest New Drugs 2013;31(4):1071-1077 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  35. Mekki A, Dercle L, Lichtenstein P, Marabelle A, Michot JM, Lambotte O, et al. Detection of immune-related adverse events by medical imaging in patients treated with anti-programmed cell death 1. Eur J Cancer 2018;96:91-104 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  36. Cohen JV, Dougan M, Zubiri L, Reynolds KL, Sullivan RJ, Misdraji J. Liver biopsy findings in patients on immune checkpoint inhibitors. Mod Pathol 2021;34(2):426-437 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  37. De Martin E, Michot JM, Papouin B, Champiat S, Mateus C, Lambotte O, et al. Characterization of liver injury induced by cancer immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Hepatol 2018;68(6):1181-1190 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  38. Doherty GJ, Duckworth AM, Davies SE, Mells GF, Brais R, Harden SV, et al. Severe steroid-resistant anti-PD1 T-cell checkpoint inhibitor-induced hepatotoxicity driven by biliary injury. ESMO Open 2017;2(4):e000268 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  39. Everett J, Srivastava A, Misdraji J. Fibrin Ring Granulomas in Checkpoint Inhibitor-induced Hepatitis. Am J Surg Pathol 2017;41(1):134-137 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  40. Johncilla M, Misdraji J, Pratt DS, Agoston AT, Lauwers GY, Srivastava A, et al. Ipilimumab-associated Hepatitis: Clinicopathologic Characterization in a Series of 11 Cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2015;39(8):1075-1084 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  41. Kleiner DE, Berman D. Pathologic changes in ipilimumab-related hepatitis in patients with metastatic melanoma. Dig Dis Sci 2012;57(8):2233-2240 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  42. Zen Y, Chen YY, Jeng YM, Tsai HW, Yeh MM. Immune-related adverse reactions in the hepatobiliary system: second-generation check-point inhibitors highlight diverse histological changes. Histopathology 2020;76(3):470-480 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  43. Zen Y, Yeh MM. Hepatotoxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a histology study of seven cases in comparison with autoimmune hepatitis and idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Mod Pathol 2018;31(6):965-973 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  44. Zhang D, Hart J, Ding X, Zhang X, Feely M, Yassan L, et al. Histologic patterns of liver injury induced by anti-PD-1 therapy. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2020;8(1):50-55 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  45. Zhang ML, Deshpande V. Histopathology of Gastrointestinal Immune-related Adverse Events: A Practical Review for the Practicing Pathologist. Am J Surg Pathol 2022;46(1):e15-e26 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  46. Karamchandani DM, Chetty R. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced gastrointestinal and hepatic injury: pathologists’ perspective. J Clin Pathol 2018;71(8):665-671 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  47. Patil PA, Zhang X. Pathologic Manifestations of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Injury in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021;145(5):571-582 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  48. Aguilar-Olivos N, del Carmen Manzano-Robleda M, Gutierrez-Grobe Y, Chable-Montero F, Albores-Saavedra J, Lopez-Mendez E. Granulomatous hepatitis caused by Q fever: a differential diagnosis of fever of unknown origin. Ann Hepatol 2013;12(1):138-141 PubMed/NCBI
  49. Choi K, Abu-Sbeih H, Samdani R, Nogueras Gonzalez G, Raju GS, Richards DM, et al. Can Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Induce Microscopic Colitis or a Brand New Entity?. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019;25(2):385-393 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  50. Mak CM, Lam CW. Diagnosis of Wilson’s disease: a comprehensive review. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2008;45(3):263-290 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  51. Meyerson C, Naini BV. Something old, something new: liver injury associated with total parenteral nutrition therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Hum Pathol 2020;96:39-47 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  52. Chen JH, Deshpande V. IgG4-related Disease and the Liver. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2017;46(2):195-216 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  53. Matsukuma KE, Wei D, Sun K, Ramsamooj R, Chen M. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of hepatic graft versus host disease (GVHD). J Gastrointest Oncol ;2016(Suppl 1):S21-31 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  54. Shimizu Y. Liver in systemic disease. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14(26):4111-4119 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  55. LoPiccolo J, Brener MI, Oshima K, Lipson EJ, Hamilton JP. Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia Associated With Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Hepatology 2018;68(6):2431-2433 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  56. Dougan M, Wang Y, Rubio-Tapia A, Lim JK. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Colitis and Hepatitis: Expert Review. Gastroenterology 2021;160(4):1384-1393 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  57. Reynolds K, Thomas M, Dougan M. Diagnosis and Management of Hepatitis in Patients on Checkpoint Blockade. Oncologist 2018;23(9):991-997 View Article PubMed/NCBI
Copyright © 2022 Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0), permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Journal of Clinical and Translational Pathology
  • pISSN 2993-5202
  • eISSN 2771-165X

Article Options

Metrics

Cite this Article

  • © 2024 Xia & He Publishing Inc.
  • Total visits : 2637738
  • Visits today : 3731
Back to Top

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Hepatic Injury: A Clinicopathologic Review

Mehran Taherian, Deyali Chatterjee, Huamin Wang
  • Reset Zoom
  • Download TIFF