Digital pathology (DP) is transitioning from an adjunct technology to an enterprise diagnostic platform in the United States. Despite accelerating clinical adoption, many laboratories face persistent barriers, including high capital and operating costs, workflow disruption, interoperability challenges, and a complex regulatory and reimbursement environment. This narrative review proposes a practical lifecycle framework for implementing and sustaining DP programs, with an emphasis on defining and operationalizing institutional artificial intelligence (AI) readiness for safe and sustainable adoption.
We performed a targeted narrative review informed by searches of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar for English-language publications from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2025. Core search concepts included DP, whole slide imaging, image management/viewing systems, laboratory information system integration, validation, reimbursement, U.S. Food and Drug Administration clearance, Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments oversight, College of American Pathologists accreditation, interoperability standards, cybersecurity, and AI. We supplemented database searches with reference screening and review of primary guidance and public databases from regulatory and professional organizations in the United States. We prioritized peer-reviewed literature and used web-based regulatory sources when they represented the authoritative primary reference. We also incorporated our professional experience and knowledge in DP and AI.
Key implementation domains span foundational infrastructure (scanners, storage/networking, and integrated image management platforms), workflow redesign across pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic phases, validation and quality management, regulatory compliance and accreditation, cost capture, interoperability strategy, cybersecurity and access control, education and change management, and long-term governance. We also describe an institution-level AI readiness model that can be assessed across data quality, integration, validation, monitoring, governance, and workforce capabilities to support safe clinical AI deployment.
Successful DP implementation requires a lifecycle approach that couples technical build-out with workflow redesign and institutional governance. Early planning for compliance, interoperability, reimbursement strategy, and AI readiness can reduce implementation risk and position laboratories for sustained clinical and computational innovation.
Full article