Artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer-aided detection (CADe) has been associated with improved adenoma detection during colonoscopy. However, prior meta-analyses synthesized earlier trials, and whether the benefit remains consistent in recent contemporary trials is uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the effects of current-generation AI-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection rate (ADR) as the primary outcome and polyp detection rate (PDR) as the secondary outcome in randomized and quasi-randomized trials published from August 1, 2024, to August 18, 2026, without re-pooling trials included in earlier comprehensive meta-analyses.

MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for peer-reviewed parallel-group randomized and quasi-randomized trials enrolling adults undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy and comparing real-time AI-based CADe-assisted with conventional high-definition white-light colonoscopy. Tandem designs were excluded. The primary and secondary outcomes were ADR and PDR, respectively. Random-effects risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated; heterogeneity and leave-one-out sensitivity were assessed.

Seventeen trials comprising 15,242 patients were included for ADR; 12 trials comprising 8,665 patients reported extractable PDR data. The pooled risk ratio was 1.14 (95% CI 1.09–1.20; I² = 53.8%) for ADR and 1.13 (95% CI 1.07–1.20; I² = 63.4%) for PDR.

This meta-analysis supports an average improvement in adenoma and polyp detection with AI-assisted colonoscopy; however, moderate-to-substantial heterogeneity and variability across settings and platforms warrant cautious interpretation rather than an unqualified recommendation for routine adoption.

Viral hepatitis caused by A to E imposes a substantial global burden of liver disease. Despite US control strategies, long-term national data covering serologic markers of all five hepatitis viruses remain limited. In this study, we analyzed epidemiologic trends from 2011 to 2023 and aimed to identify prevention gaps.

We analyzed National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2011 to 2023 using weighted logistic regression, with stratification by age, sex, and race/ethnicity.

Current hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remained stable at 0.3%, while HBV susceptibility was 71.3%. Among individuals born in 1991 or later, HBV vaccination coverage declined from 90.0% to 83.6% during 2011–2020 (P for trend = 0.012); 57.0% of participants reporting vaccination were serologically susceptible. Anti-HDV positivity among participants with current HBV infection was 1.3%. Anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) seroprevalence remained 1.6%, while active HCV viremia decreased from 0.8% to 0.4%, and viremia among anti-HCV-positive participants fell from 65.5% to 31.3% (P = 0.004). Hepatitis A virus antibody seroprevalence increased from 41.6% to 48.0% (P < 0.001) with stable vaccination coverage. Anti-HEV IgM positivity increased from 1.6% to 1.7% (P = 0.004).

US viral hepatitis trends diverged from 2011 to 2023. The decrease in detectable HCV RNA was consistent with progress in HCV control, whereas persistent HBV susceptibility, declining vaccination coverage in younger birth cohorts, and increasing hepatitis A virus seroprevalence and hepatitis E virus IgM positivity indicate ongoing prevention and surveillance needs.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a well-recognized complication in patients with lymphoma receiving immunosuppressive therapy, particularly rituximab-containing regimens. We describe a 58-year-old man with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and an atypical baseline HBV serological profile: hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) positivity (102.00 U/L), antibody to hepatitis B core antigen negativity, a low-level hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) result (0.35 COI, reported as negative by the local laboratory), and undetectable HBV DNA. Thirteen days after initiation of the fourth cycle of modified R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, pirarubicin, vinorelbine and dexamethasone) chemoimmunotherapy, the anti-HBs titer had decreased to 1.31 S/CO, the HBsAg level to 0.02 S/CO, and HBV DNA was not reassessed until reactivation. Approximately 16 weeks after treatment completion, the patient developed fatigue, anorexia, and jaundice. HBsAg increased from 28.66 S/CO to 8048.30 IU/mL, hepatitis B e antigen became positive, and HBV DNA increased to 1.94 × 109 IU/mL. Despite treatment with tenofovir alafenamide fumarate and plasma exchange, the patient died of refractory liver failure and hepatic encephalopathy. These findings suggest that atypical serological profiles may not reliably indicate a low risk of severe HBV reactivation during intensive immunosuppressive therapy. Comprehensive pretreatment risk assessment and long-term monitoring of anti-HBs titers, HBsAg, and HBV DNA during and after therapy may facilitate earlier detection and intervention.

Standardized pathologic sampling and reporting are essential for pancreatic cancer staging, prognosis assessment, and comparable clinical data. This guideline aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations for standardized pathologic sampling and diagnostic reporting of pancreatic cancer in China. Literature searches were conducted in English and Chinese databases, guideline websites, Google, and reference lists for records published before December 31, 2023. Two investigators screened and extracted the evidence; methodological quality and certainty were assessed using AMSTAR/AGREE II and GRADE, respectively; and recommendations were formulated through two rounds of modified Delphi consultations, with an agreement threshold of ≥ 75% for consensus. The final guideline includes 11 recommendations, including six strong and five weak recommendations, addressing margin and surface assessment, sampling methods, histologic classification and grading, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, TNM staging, tumor regression grading after neoadjuvant therapy, background lesions, and structured reporting. These recommendations provide a standardized framework for pathologic assessment and reporting of pancreatic cancer resection specimens and may support more consistent prognostic evaluation and clinical decision-making.

Watertight-intent dural reconstruction may reduce incisional cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage after decompressive craniectomy but may prolong surgery. We aimed to evaluate whether watertight-intent reconstruction, compared with non-watertight management, was associated with direct postoperative incisional CSF leakage and operative time.

Five databases were searched through August 1, 2026. Comparative studies with explicit watertight or sealing-intent reconstruction and non-watertight comparators were included. The primary outcome was direct incisional CSF leakage; secondary outcomes included operative time, wound or surgical-site infection, hydrocephalus, mortality, and functional outcomes. Binary outcomes were expressed as risk ratios (RRs), and continuous outcomes as mean differences. Random-effects meta-analysis used restricted maximum likelihood estimation with Wald 95% confidence intervals (CIs); randomized and observational studies were examined as subgroups, with Hartung–Knapp sensitivity analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.

Twelve studies were included; nine (1,314 participants) reported direct incisional CSF leakage. Watertight-intent reconstruction was associated with fewer reported leaks (RR, 0.54; Wald 95% CI, 0.34–0.86; I² = 23.3%), although the prediction interval included the null value (0.24–1.20). The randomized subgroup was imprecise (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.32–1.73), whereas the observational subgroup favored reconstruction (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20–0.90); its Hartung–Knapp interval (0.14–1.32) crossed 1. Infection and hydrocephalus estimates were imprecise; mortality and function were not pooled. Reconstruction was associated with longer operative time (mean difference, 39.85 minutes; 95% CI, 25.14–54.56; I² = 97.4%). Certainty was very low for all key outcomes.

Watertight-intent reconstruction is associated with fewer reported incisional CSF leaks and longer operations, although certainty is very low. Limited study and event numbers, imprecise design subgroups, and multicomponent techniques preclude causal or universal treatment conclusions. Effects on infection, hydrocephalus, mortality, and function remain uncertain.

Endovascular embolization is a cornerstone treatment for intracranial aneurysms, and transfemoral access (TFA) has traditionally been the default vascular route. Transradial access (TRA) is increasingly used in neurointervention because it may reduce clinically important access-site complications, improve postprocedural comfort, and facilitate earlier ambulation. This narrative review aims to summarize direct and indirect evidence comparing TRA and TFA for intracranial aneurysm embolization, with attention to technical feasibility, access conversion, puncture-site complications, neurological events, radiation exposure, procedure duration, recovery, and cost considerations. Direct comparative evidence specific to aneurysm embolization remains limited and is mainly observational; some supporting data come from diagnostic cerebral angiography, mixed therapeutic neurointervention, and cardiovascular access literature. Available data suggest that TRA may be a safe and feasible option for selected patients when performed by experienced operators, particularly when radial anatomy is favorable and the intended device strategy is compatible with upper-extremity access. TFA remains essential for complex anatomy, large-bore device requirements, or insufficient TRA expertise. Access selection should therefore be individualized rather than based on a presumption of universal superiority. Well-designed multicenter studies are needed to define aneurysm-specific outcomes, long-term angiographic durability, patient-reported outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.