Artificial intelligence (AI) translation in genitourinary (GU) pathology has progressed unevenly across organs and tasks. This review addresses a central clinical question: which GU pathology AI applications are deployment-ready, which require further validation, and what frameworks can guide safe implementation? We synthesize evidence across GU organs and introduce pragmatic translation frameworks to guide deployment and prioritize translational research.
Narrative review integrating foundational literature with targeted 2023–2025 publications, emphasizing regulatory milestones, external validation, and prospective studies. Literature was identified through PubMed, Embase, and conference proceedings using structured search terms for AI, digital pathology, and GU organ-specific queries. For each organ/task, we mapped evidence strength, regulatory maturity, generalizability, workflow integration, safety, and feasibility to a Translational Readiness Index (TRI) rubric (0–30 scale).
Prostate biopsy AI demonstrates the strongest maturity (TRI 26/30), supported by U.S. Food and Drug Administration-cleared systems, multi-site validation, and prospective implementations showing efficiency gains and reduced ancillary testing. Bladder cytology shows moderate readiness (TRI 19/30), with commercial offerings supporting pilotable prescreening workflows aligned with the Paris System when paired with uncertainty-aware deferral. Bladder histology, renal neoplasia, and low-prevalence domains (testis, penis) remain emerging (TRI 6–15/30), constrained by label variability, rare subtype underrepresentation, and limited external validation.
The TRI rubric, SURE-Path safety bundle, and VALIDATED/ORCHESTRATE implementation pathway provide a practical template for evidence-based deployment in GU pathology. Clinically defensible translation requires matching intended use to validation evidence, with explicit safeguards for emerging applications.
Full article