Amoebiasis, or amoebic dysentery, is a gastrointestinal disorder caused by the parasite Entamoeba histolytica. The disease is endemic in parts of Africa, Asia, North and South America, leading to several deaths annually. Reported adverse effects associated with the current first-line treatment for amoebiasis, coupled with the evolution of resistance to it, call for the need to search for plant-based alternatives. This study systematically reviews medicinal plants with activity against Entamoeba histolytica.

The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed to retrieve scholarly literature. The study reviewed 70 articles from 7 popular databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Booksc.org, Emerald, Scopus, and MEDLINE, highlighting several plants with anti-amoebic properties.

The primary parts of the plant used in the treatment of Entamoeba histolytica were the leaves (61%), followed by rhizomes (13%), roots (8%), seeds (8%), stems (4%), and fruits (4%). The families Asteraceae (18%) and Zingiberaceae (18%) contain most plants that are effective against Entamoeba histolytica. These medicinal plants families are rich in phytochemicals such as terpenoids and flavonoids that have anti-entamoeba histolytica activity. Maceration is the most commonly used extraction method.

The results suggest that plants are a promising source of new agents to combat amoebiasis caused by Entamoeba histolytica. The most frequently used plant parts were leaves (61%), and the maceration method was the most common extraction technique due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. The majority of studies were limited to in vitro models, with only one plant (Adenophyllum aurantium) tested in vivo. Further research is needed to establish their mechanisms of action, toxicities, and clinical potential.

The rate of functional cure (HBsAg loss) remains unsatisfactory following pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) treatment in chronic hepatitis B. To optimize PEG-IFN administration, this study aimed to evaluate virological markers to predict functional cure and/or hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss.

Relevant studies assessing virologic markers for predicting functional cure and HBeAg loss after PEG-IFN therapy were systematically retrieved from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to November 2023. Predictive effectiveness was evaluated via the summary receiver operating characteristic curve.

We analyzed 38 studies (6,179 patients). HBsAg decline at week 24 had the greatest discriminative ability according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) (0.89) and sensitivity (0.88) for predicting functional cure, whereas baseline HBsAg had a comparable AUROC (0.86) and highest specificity (0.79), with both being significantly better than baseline hepatitis B core-related antigen and hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA (all P < 0.001). For HBeAg loss or seroconversion, HBV RNA, HBV DNA, HBeAg, and HBeAg decline at week 12, as well as HBV DNA and HBeAg decline at week 24, all exhibited comparable predictive values (AUROC = 0.75–0.78). HBV RNA and HBeAg levels at week 24 showed optimal sensitivity (0.87), and HBeAg decline at week 12 had the highest specificity (0.83).

HBsAg decline at week 24 and baseline HBsAg levels are better predictors of functional cure than novel virologic markers, while on-treatment HBV RNA and HBeAg levels and dynamic changes are the most reliable indicators for HBeAg loss.

To support clinicians in making informed decisions regarding the diagnosis and management of inherited hyperbilirubinemia, including Gilbert syndrome, Crigler-Najjar syndrome, Dubin-Johnson syndrome, and Rotor syndrome, the Inherited and Metabolic Liver Disease Collaboration Group of the Hepatology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association convened a panel of Chinese experts in this field. This multidisciplinary consortium developed the present expert consensus by integrating the latest advances in both clinical practice and basic research.

Infections are frequent and lethal complications of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Reliable biomarkers to distinguish fungal from bacterial infections remain limited. Given the central role of immune dysfunction in ACLF, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum cytokines in differentiating invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) from bacterial pneumonia (BP) in HBV-associated ACLF.

This retrospective case-control study enrolled ACLF patients admitted to the Tongji Hospital, between 2018 and 2022. Patients were categorized into IPA, BP, and non-infection groups. The BP and non-infection groups were propensity score-matched to the IPA cases. Serum cytokines levels (IL-1β, sIL-2R, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α) and clinical data were collected, with the diagnostic performance of these cytokines as biomarkers assessed via ROC curves.

A total of 32 IPA, 96 BP, and 96 non-infection patients were enrolled, with balanced baseline characteristics. Compared with the non-infection group, the IPA group had higher sIL-2R (1,606.00 vs. 1,211.50 U/mL, P = 0.019) and IL-6 (69.03 vs. 15.98 pg/mL, P < 0.001) levels, but lower IL-8 levels (62.20 vs. 132.00 pg/mL, P = 0.025). The BP group showed elevated sIL-2R (1,792.00 U/mL), IL-6 (49.42 pg/mL), IL-10 (13.40 pg/mL) levels compared to the non-infection group (all P < 0.001). Also, IL-8 was lower in the IPA group than in the BP group (62.20 vs. 176.00 pg/mL, P < 0.001) and its assessment could best distinguish IPA from BP (AUC = 0.743, cut-off = 76.60 pg/mL; sensitivity = 66.7%, specificity = 82.1%).

Serum IL-8 exhibited superior diagnostic value for IPA in patients with HBV-ACLF and could effectively discriminate Aspergillus infections from bacterial infections.

Acromegaly requires multimodal management. While surgery is first-line, many patients have persistent/recurrent disease. Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) offers precise radiation, but data on its use as initial therapy remain limited. This study aimed to review the outcomes and report on our experience in treating patients with acromegaly using initial GKRS.

We retrospectively identified 33 patients with acromegaly who underwent GKRS from 1993 until 2016 at the Department of Radiotherapy, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. These patients had complete endocrine, radiological, and imaging data before and after GKRS. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate analysis was utilized to analyze the potential prognostic factors of endocrine remission and new-onset hypopituitarism.

Thirty-three patients were enrolled in the study. Fifteen patients (45.5%) were males and 18 (54.5%) were females. The median age was 44.0 years (range, 24.9–66.2 years). During a median follow-up of 65.6 months (range, 12.9–297.6), the median margin dose for GKRS was 15.0 Gy (range, 10.8–20.3 Gy). Endocrine remission was achieved in nine of the 33 patients (27.3%) over a mean follow-up of 85.1 months (range, 12.9–161.3). No prognostic factors demonstrated a significant association with endocrine remission. New-onset hypopituitarism occurred in eight patients (24.2%) after GKRS. The tumor control rate was 100%. Only one patient developed worsening visual dysfunction. No new cranial neuropathy was noted.

Initial GKRS for acromegaly provided effective tumor control and partial endocrine remission with a favorable safety profile, notably a low rate of new-onset hypopituitarism, representing a viable treatment option.

Dysphagia, a severe comorbidity of many neurological diseases, often lacks targeted therapies. Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves represents a novel therapeutic class. This critical review assessed the clinical effectiveness and safety of various approaches for electrical stimulation of the cranial nerves for treating dysphagia, categorized as implantable (directly targeting the nerve), minimally invasive (pharyngeal electrical stimulation), and non-invasive (transcutaneous). A critical literature review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed database was comprehensively searched, and studies were rigorously assessed for inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias. The analysis included 15 clinical studies: four assessing vagus nerve stimulation (including implantable and transcutaneous approaches) and eleven assessing pharyngeal electrical stimulation. Most evaluated studies, particularly for pharyngeal electrical stimulation and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation, demonstrated significant beneficial effects on validated dysphagia outcome measures. Importantly, no long-term severe adverse effects were reported across the evaluated stimulation approaches. Cumulative evidence indicates that vagus nerve stimulation and pharyngeal electrical stimulation approaches can effectively alleviate dysphagia symptoms. The different stimulation approaches appear to be complementary, with distinct profiles rendering them suitable for different therapeutic contexts (e.g., short-term hospital-based vs. long-term at-home treatment). Consequently, they represent distinct and valuable options for individualized dysphagia therapy.