Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (HSOS) is a life-threatening liver vascular disorder with limited treatment options. HSOS results from the activation and injury of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs). Berberine (BBR) has been shown to protect endothelial cells in various diseases. However, whether BBR can alleviate liver injury and LSEC disruption in HSOS remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of BBR on HSOS.

Two mouse models of HSOS were established using monocrotaline or oxaliplatin. Mice in the treatment groups received a low dose (100 mg/kg) or a high dose (200 mg/kg) of BBR daily. Histology, scanning electron microscopy, immunofluorescence, and flow cytometry were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects of BBR. Cell co-culture, Transwell assays, qRT-PCR, and Western blotting were performed to investigate the molecular pathways involved.

BBR treatment dose-dependently reduced liver injury and disruption of LSECs in murine HSOS models. Moreover, BBR significantly reduced hepatic neutrophil infiltration, thereby attenuating neutrophil-mediated injury to LSECs. Additionally, BBR inhibited the effect of injured LSECs on neutrophil activation. Mechanistically, injured LSECs were identified as one of the major sources of CXCL1 in HSOS, and BBR downregulated CXCL1 expression in injured LSECs by inhibiting MAPK signaling.

In this study, we demonstrate that BBR ameliorates HSOS by inhibiting endothelial-mediated neutrophil recruitment and activation. BBR may be a promising therapeutic option for HSOS treatment.

High-throughput transcriptomic technologies have made differential gene expression analysis a cornerstone of cancer research by generating extensive lists of differentially expressed genes across tumor types and conditions. However, such lists provide limited biological insight without functional and mechanistic interpretation. This review examines the transition from descriptive gene expression profiles to a mechanistic understanding of cancer biology. We discuss integrative approaches that place expression changes within signaling pathways, transcriptional regulatory networks, and protein–protein interaction networks, thereby helping to identify functional modules and candidate upstream regulators. We emphasize the context-dependent nature of gene expression, which is shaped by genetic alterations, epigenetic landscapes, microenvironmental signals, and cellular heterogeneity. We also examine methodological advances, including gene set enrichment analysis, network-based modeling, and integration of genomic, epigenomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and single-cell transcriptomic data. Case studies across cancer types illustrate how mechanistic analyses can reveal context-specific transcriptional programs associated with oncogenic signaling, tumor suppression, metabolic reprogramming, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and tumor–immune interactions. We highlight potential translational applications, including candidate biomarker discovery, prioritization of druggable targets, rational design of combination therapies, and investigation of therapeutic resistance. Finally, we discuss current challenges and emerging technologies, such as spatial transcriptomics and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based perturbation screens, that are advancing the field toward dynamic, systems-level models of tumor biology. Integrating computational analyses with experimental validation can help translate transcriptomic data into clinically relevant hypotheses for precision oncology and personalized cancer therapy.

Early predictors of 6-month non-recovery in drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remain limited. Genetic variants are stable host characteristics that may complement baseline clinical variables. We aimed to develop and validate an interpretable, clinical-genetic machine learning model for predicting 6-month non-recovery in patients with DILI.

This retrospective, single-center study included 338 patients with DILI, who were classified as recovered (n = 171) or non-recovered (n = 167) at 6 months. Candidate single-nucleotide polymorphisms and baseline clinical variables were collected during initial hospitalization. Features were selected using complementary screening approaches. Multiple machine learning models were developed and compared. Model discrimination, calibration, clinical utility, the incremental value of genetic predictors, and interpretability using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were assessed.

Five predictors were consistently retained for model development: rs72631567, rs28521457, alanine aminotransferase, monocyte percentage, and low-density lipoprotein. Among the candidate algorithms, the light gradient boosting machine model showed the best performance, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89–0.95) in the training set and 0.81 (95% CI 0.70–0.91) in the validation set. The model showed acceptable calibration and favorable decision-curve performance. In ablation analysis, the clinical-only model showed limited discrimination (AUC 0.57, 95% CI 0.43–0.71). SHAP analysis identified rs72631567 as the most influential predictor.

An interpretable model that integrates host genetic variants with baseline clinical variables demonstrated good internal performance for early prediction of 6-month non-recovery in DILI. These findings support external validation of genotype-informed risk stratification in patients with DILI.

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and glucose index (CHG index) alone and combined with the monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR) or triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-C) for NSTE-ACS.

This cross-sectional diagnostic study included 150 patients with NSTE-ACS and 76 healthy controls. Based on the median Gensini score, patients were divided into high-risk (Gensini score ≥51, n = 75) and low-risk groups (Gensini score <51, n = 75). MHR, TG/HDL-C, and CHG index were compared between patients and controls and between high- and low-risk groups. Their correlations with Gensini scores were assessed. Univariate and Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with high-risk coronary lesions among patients with NSTE-ACS. The predictive performance of individual indicators (MHR, TG/HDL-C, and CHG index) and their combinations was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

MHR, TG/HDL-C, and CHG index were significantly higher in the patient group than in the control group (all P < 0.001) and the high-risk group than the low-risk group. Those indicators positively correlated with Gensini scores and were independently associated with high-risk coronary lesions among patients with NSTE-ACS (odds ratio (OR) = 16.051, 95% confidence interval (CI): 13.677-99.650 for MHR; OR = 3.562, 95% CI: 1.868-6.793 for TG/HDL-C; and OR = 2.455, 95% CI: 1.040-5.791 for CHG index). The areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.803 (95% CI: 0.730-0.876) for MHR, 0.746 (95% CI: 0.666-0.826) for TG/HDL-C, and 0.659 (95% CI: 0.573-0.746) for CHG index. The combination of CHG index and TG/HDL-C achieved an AUC of 0.821 (95% CI: 0.755-0.887), while the combination of CHG index and MHR achieved the higher AUC of 0.872 (95% CI: 0.815-0.929).

MHR, TG/HDL-C, and CHG index are independently associated with high-risk coronary lesions among patients with NSTE-ACS. Combining CHG index with MHR or TG/HDL-C shows numerically higher AUCs for identifying high-risk coronary lesions.

The modern intensive care unit (ICU) inundates clinicians with large volumes of data, leading to cognitive overload and a gap between data availability and actionable insight. While artificial intelligence (AI) promises a solution, its clinical adoption is limited by systemic barriers, including algorithmic bias, a lack of trust, and validation failures. This paper argues that a design philosophy that envisions AI as an autonomous decision-maker, rather than an integrated collaborative tool, has hindered its clinical adoption. We propose an alternative: a collaborative framework designed to augment the intensivist’s expertise by offloading specific cognitive burdens. This framework redefines AI’s purpose as managing data-intensive tasks, illustrated through four collaborative example roles: a synthesizer to create coherent clinical narratives, a sentinel for proactive deterioration surveillance, a simulator to forecast patient responses to interventions, and a stratifier to identify meaningful subphenotypes within complex syndromes. By delegating these computational tasks, this collaborative model frees clinicians to focus on complex synthesis, nuanced judgment, and compassionate communication. Realizing this vision requires a deliberate translational pathway focused on robust data infrastructure, human-centered design, and rigorous validation through prospective clinical trials. Ultimately, the successful integration of AI in critical care depends not on replacing clinicians but on empowering them, creating a more functional ICU in which technology supports the delivery of safer, more precise, and more humane care.

Atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently coexist, increasing thromboembolic and bleeding risks. This is a narrative review of pathophysiology and clinical evidence for anticoagulation strategies in CKD patients. Direct oral anticoagulants are preferred in CKD stages 1–4. Recent data suggest that the efficacy of apixaban and rivaroxaban is comparable to that of warfarin in end-stage renal disease. In advanced CKD, anticoagulation should be tailored with close monitoring.