Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a prevalent metabolic disorder with a complex pathogenesis. Although epitranscriptomic modifications such as N6-methyladenosine (m6A) have been implicated in NAFLD, the role of N1-methyladenosine (m1A) and its regulators is largely unexplored. Recently, YTHDF1, a well-characterized m6A reader, was also shown to recognize m1A; however, the functional consequences of this dual specificity are unknown. This study aimed to investigate the role of YTHDF1 in NAFLD pathogenesis and to explore whether its function is mediated through recognition of RNA methylation modification on specific target mRNAs.

Expression of YTHDF1 in NAFLD was analyzed in the GEO database. Loss-of-function studies for YTHDF1 were conducted in vivo (high-fat diet-fed mice) and in vitro (free fatty acid-treated HepG2 cells) in models of NAFLD. We employed RNA-seq and m1A-MeRIP-seq to identify key targets, followed by mechanistic validation of the YTHDF1–m1A–NUPR1 axis using biochemical, histological, and mRNA stability assays.

We identified a critical role for YTHDF1 in promoting hepatic steatosis. NUPR1, a stress-induced transcriptional regulator, undergoes m1A modification. YTHDF1 directly binds to m1A-modified NUPR1 mRNA, enhancing its stability, thereby leading to elevated NUPR1 protein levels. Functionally, upregulated NUPR1 acts as a core driver of NAFLD pathogenesis by activating lipogenic and suppressing fatty acid β-oxidation genes, thereby exacerbating hepatic lipid accumulation.

Our study unveils a novel epitranscriptomic mechanism in which YTHDF1, functioning as a dual-specificity reader, governs NAFLD progression through the m1A-NUPR1 axis. This not only expands the understanding of RNA modification recognition but also establishes the YTHDF1–m1A–NUPR1 pathway as a promising therapeutic target for metabolic liver disease.

Unlike the traditional staging treatment of tumors, the core of “Green Tumor Treatment” is to divide the treatment of tumors into three stages: Hegemony (directly targeting the cancer focus), Kingship (supporting the body’s vital energy and eliminating pathogenic factors), and Imperialism (improving the internal environment), based on the urgency of the tumor and the patient’s physical condition. This approach guides the clinical treatment of tumors. Its treatment system incorporates all minimally invasive and low-damage treatment methods, combining internal and external treatments, traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine, as well as local and systemic treatments. It aims to maximize treatment outcomes while ensuring the patient’s quality of life, which is highly consistent with the treatment goals for primary liver cancer. This review aims to explore the integrated Traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment model for primary liver cancer under the guidance of the Green Tumor Treatment concept.

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is an autosomal codominant genetic disorder caused by mutations in the SERPINA1 gene. It results in reduced circulating levels of alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT), a serine proteinase inhibitor (PI) primarily produced by hepatocytes. The most common deficient alleles are PI*S and PI*Z, with PI*ZZ homozygotes having the most severe deficiency and highest risk for lung and liver disease. While AATD is well established as a cause of early-onset emphysema and liver cirrhosis, emerging evidence suggests a potential association with the formation of arterial aneurysms. The pathophysiological rationale for this association centers on protease-antiprotease imbalance and potential extracellular matrix degradation of elastin in arterial vessel walls. Several studies have reported increased frequencies of AATD alleles in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms and intracranial aneurysms compared to the general population, with some demonstrating statistically significant associations. Additionally, patients with the PI*ZZ genotype have been shown to have larger aortic diameters, greater aortic stiffness, and reduced distensibility compared to controls. However, the evidence is inconsistent, as several large studies have failed to demonstrate significant associations between AATD and aneurysm formation. Overall, current evidence suggests an association of AATD with the development of arterial aneurysms. However, it is also clear that the presence of AATD alone is not sufficient to increase the risk of developing new-onset arterial aneurysms.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) lacks a universally accepted definition, and recent efforts have proposed consensus organ failure criteria. In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical validity of a recently proposed consensus ACLF framework with the outcome-calibrated A-TANGO classification.

We performed a multinational cohort study including 2,398 patients from the TIH cohort (India) and 2,568 from the CATCH-LIFE cohort (China) who were hospitalized with acute decompensation of cirrhosis. ACLF was defined using A-TANGO and an operationalized version of the 2025 consensus framework. Outcomes were 28- and 90-day mortality. Analyses assessed case capture, overlap, mortality risk, sensitivity, specificity, and net reclassification improvement (NRI).

ACLF prevalence differed substantially by definition. In TIH, A-TANGO classified 79.2% as ACLF versus 42.3% by the consensus definition; in CATCH-LIFE, the corresponding values were 31.4% versus 5.8%, respectively. Most consensus ACLF cases were captured by A-TANGO, which additionally classified 26%–37% of patients as having ACLF. These patients had substantial mortality (28-day: 18.1%–26.9%; 90-day: 33.2%–37.9%), significantly higher than those negative by both frameworks and comparable to established ACLF risk thresholds. A-TANGO showed higher sensitivity for 28-day mortality (TIH: 94.1% vs. 67.8%; CATCH-LIFE: 76.1% vs. 25.6%), whereas consensus criteria were more specific. Reclassification analyses showed improved discrimination with A-TANGO (NRI: 17.1% in TIH; 27.4% in CATCH-LIFE). Within the consensus non-ACLF group, A-TANGO further stratified patients into distinct risk groups with stepwise increase in mortality.

In conclusion, the two frameworks identify fundamentally different populations. The consensus definition significantly reduces sensitivity and under-recognizes high-risk patients. Compared with consensus definitions, the outcome-calibrated framework better supports diagnosis, clinical decision-making, risk stratification, and trial design in ACLF.

Primary liver cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in China, which seriously threatens people’s lives and health. In recent years, with the advancement of basic and clinical research, the diagnosis and treatment methods for primary liver cancer have been continually enriched. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has played an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer, but there is no unified standard for differentiation and treatment, and efficacy evaluation. In order to further standardize the TCM diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer, according to the requirements of TCM standardization and related technical guidance documents, the drafting team compiled this guideline through literature research, expert interviews, questionnaire surveys, consensus meetings, etc., for reference by clinicians. This guideline is approved and issued by the China Association of Chinese Medicine, standard number: T/CACM 1575-2024.

Amatoxin-containing mushroom poisoning causes fatal acute liver failure with >50% mortality despite maximal medical therapy. Interrupting the enterohepatic recirculation of amatoxins is a mechanistically rational but unproven therapeutic strategy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biliary drainage (BD) in patients with pre-acute liver failure caused by amatoxin-containing mushroom poisoning.

In this prospective cohort study (ChiCTR2300073442), consecutive adults with amatoxin-induced pre-acute liver failure received standardized care (silibinin, N-acetylcysteine, dehydration). Patients undergoing percutaneous or endoscopic BD were compared to non-BD controls. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge.

Nine patients were enrolled (mean age: 63.3 ± 15.6 years; 44.4% female). All five patients who underwent BD (performed at a median of three days after ingestion) survived (100%), whereas only one of the four non-BD patients survived (25%; P = 0.048). BD initiated a rapid biochemical recovery: within 48 h, mean alanine and aspartate transaminase levels decreased by 67.6% and 91.6%, respectively, from their peak levels (P < 0.001), and the international normalized ratio decreased from 1.99 to 1.27 (P = 0.008). Non-survivors in the non-BD group progressed to multiorgan failure. Procedure-related complications (transient pancreatitis/amylasemia) occurred in three of the five BD patients but resolved with conservative management.

Timely BD was associated with 100% survival after amatoxin-induced pre-acute liver failure, contrasting sharply with 75% mortality in non-BD controls. The dramatic biochemical improvement after BD supports enterohepatic recirculation interruption as a mechanistic intervention. BD represents a potentially definitive, life-saving intervention for this lethal poisoning as a preliminary finding; larger, multicenter studies are required to confirm the observed association between BD and survival.