v
Search
Advanced Search

Publications > Journals > Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology > Article Full Text

  • Review Article
  • OPEN ACCESS

Role of Exosomal Modulation of Macrophages in Liver Fibrosis

  • Bin Fan1,
  • He Xie2,
  • Qi Tan1,
  • Qingyuan Li3,
  • Tao Gong3,
  • Baoren He4,
  • Yujia Li1,*  and
  • Limin Chen1,2,4,* 
 Author information  Cite
Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology   2024;12(2):201-209

doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2023.00381

Abstract

Exosomes are 60–120 nm diameter double-membrane lipid organelles discharged by cells. Various studies have shown that exosomes exert multiple functions in both physical and diseased processes, such as intercellular information exchange, immune response, and disease progression. Repeated chronic injury to the liver often leads to inflammation and liver fibrosis (LF), a disorder that, if unchecked, may progress to cirrhosis, liver failure, portal hypertension, and even hepatocellular carcinoma. As an essential component of host innate immunity against pathogen invasion, macrophages play an important role in modulating inflammation homeostasis by finely tuning the polarization process of macrophages into either M1 or M2 subtypes in response to different microenvironments. As a critical contributor to the inflammation process, macrophages also play a complex and instrumental function in the progression of LF. This review focuses on recent advancements in the role of macrophage-associated exosomes implicated in LF, including macrophage-released exosomes and macrophage-targeted exosomes. In addition, the progress made in exosome-based antifibrotic therapy by in vivo and in vitro studies is also highlighted.

Keywords

Exosome, Macrophage, Liver fibrosis, Hepatocyte, Mesenchymal stem cell, Hepatic stellate cell

Introduction

Exosomes are extracellular vesicle (EVs) originating from endosomes, with an average size of approximately 100 nm in diameter. While they contribute to cellular homeostasis by eliminating unnecessary components from cells, they can also affect the function and behavior of recipient cells.1 As an intercellular material and information transport system, exosomes play an essential role in numerous biological and diseased processes, including metabolism, immune responses,2 infections,3,4 cardiovascular diseases,5,6 and cancers.7,8 Various components such as nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, and metabolites wrapped in exosomes reflect changes in cells or tissues, making exosomes valuable in disease diagnosis and progression prediction through liquid biopsies.9 In addition, they have also shown promising potential in drug delivery,10 immunotherapy,11 and vaccine development.12 Exosomes have a key role in diagnosing and treating liver diseases.13

Liver fibrosis (LF) is a typical consequence of permanent liver damage, and advanced LF, particularly end-stage cirrhosis, is one of the primary reasons for liver-related mortality worldwide.14 In the progression of LF, repetitive or chronic injury to hepatocytes leads to persistent and excessive inflammation, which may contribute to self-limiting tissue repair processes. However, dysregulated imbalanced inflammatory response aggravates liver injury, leading to the progression of LF.15,16 It has been generally agreed that increased production and storage of intractable collagen and extracellular matrix (ECM) components induce liver fibrogenesis following chronic persistent liver injuries.17 Many chronic liver diseases, such as hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus infection, alcoholic liver disease, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, contribute to LF.18 Activation of myofibroblasts, which originate from fibroblasts such as hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), portal fibroblasts, and fibroblasts, is one of the typical characteristics of LF. Prolonged injury causes fibroblast proliferation and acquisition of the myofibroblast phenotype due to the extracellular tension induced by various ECMs (e.g., fibronectin and collagen types I and III).19 Activated myofibroblasts secrete ECM and form stress-related connections that promote further ECM remodeling.20 Furthermore, uncontrolled ECM deposition and substantial alterations in the topographical distribution of ECM components lead to increased expression of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases (referred to TIMPs) to stimulate liver fibrogenesis.21,22 However, LF can be reversed if the underlying etiology is removed and the injury heals.

Hepatic macrophages, including resident macrophages (Kupffer cells, KCs) located on the surface of the endothelial sinus lumen or in the per sinus space, as well as macrophages derived from monocytes that infiltrate into the liver, are the primary regulators in this inflammation cascade.23,24 Crosstalk among macrophages, HSCs, and hepatocytes in the liver has long been the focus of LF. Activated hepatic macrophages and mast cells contribute to the inflammatory process by producing pro-inflammatory mediators and attracting monocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and eosinophils to the liver. While short-term inflammation benefits tissue regeneration and repair after liver injury or triggers the host immune response to defend pathogen infection, excessive and persistent inflammation activates HSCs to become myofibroblasts, which produce large amounts of ECM, leading to the formation of LF. As deliverers of substances and host genetic information, exosomes are undoubtedly involved in the complex regulation network of LF. This review emphasizes the roles of macrophage-targeted and macrophage-released exosomes in LF.

Origin of exosomes and their functions

Exosomes, also called microvesicles, ectosomes, migratory bodies, apoptotic bodies, or tumor bodies, are named based on the shape and size of EVs.25–28 Exosomes can be small (60–80 nm) or large (90–120 nm).29,30 Small exosomes contain proteins associated with endosomes and phagocytic vesicles derived from the endosomal compartment. Large exosomes consist of plasma membrane proteins, cell-linked proteins, and late endosomal proteins, suggesting that they may be derived from the plasma membrane and represent atypical exosomes.31 The formation of exosomes starts with the penetration of the cell membrane, which leads to the formation of endosomes, followed by the transition into multivesicular bodies. These multivesicular bodies can fuse with lysosomes immediately, be transported to the Golgi for recycling, or fuse with cell membranes to form tiny vesicles released outside the cells, creating exosomes.

Exosomes consist of a shell and cargo. Because exosomes are secreted by cells, their shell is analogous to the membrane of the cells from which they are derived and equipped with additional signal recognition, stability, and other function-related molecules.32 The cargo carried by exosomes consists of RNAs, lipids, and proteins to define their function.33 Exosomal RNAs, such as mRNAs, microRNAs (miRNAs), lncRNAs, and circRNAs, play essential roles in regulating target cells. Currently, miRNAs are the most intensively investigated class of exosomal RNAs, primarily because of their significance in the emergence and development of various diseases.34 Studies on the mechanisms of exosome-mediated intercellular communication have been conducted, with the surface signaling hypothesis being the most recognized.35 This approach necessitates connections between target receptors on recipient cells and exosomal membrane proteins, such as tetrameric proteins.36 Because they activate functional molecules that activate several signaling pathways, these interactions are essential for cellular communication.37

Exosomes exert various functions in peripheral circulation.38 (1) They function as “messengers” between cells, facilitating signal transduction and playing an essential role in initiating host immunity against invading pathogens. (2) Exosomes can be used as a targeted delivery system for pharmaceuticals. These tiny vesicles can deliver medications to specific organs, providing a potential solution for treating a wide range of diseases.39,40 (3) Exosomes have a role in immune system control. They can alter the immune response, convey immunomodulatory chemicals and antigens, and promote immune cell communication.35 (4) Exosomes in the peripheral circulation have been looked at as possible biomarkers for several illnesses, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, and neurological disorders. The state of the cells from which they come may be reflected in their contents.37

The role of exosomes in the onset and aggravation of LF has drawn much attention recently. It has been suggested that exosomes produced by cells such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), HSCs, and other cells contribute to the development of LF. For instance, MSC-derived exosomes enriched with miR-181-5P or miR-486-5P have been shown to suppress the activation of HSCs to prevent the onset of LF.41,42 Exosomes from HSCs, on the other hand, are abundant in cellular communication network factor 2, which promotes the progression of LF.43

Macrophages in the liver and their role in LF

Activation of macrophages plays an essential role in tissue remodeling and homeostasis, inflammatory responses, and immune defense.44 Macrophages are present in nearly all tissues and organs in our body, and a significant amount of heterogeneity exists among macrophages due to different environments where they are present or disease states.45 Alarmingly, macrophages in the liver account for approximately 90% of all macrophages in the human body, and these macrophages consist primarily of KCs perpetually residing in the hepatic sinusoids and peritoneal- and bone marrow-derived monocyte macrophages.46 Macrophages involve diverse pathophysiological processes, such as inflammation, tumor formation, tissue repair, and metabolism.47 Under normal conditions, most liver macrophages are KCs, and their role is maintaining the homeostasis of liver. However, when liver lesions occur, KCs are the first to respond. They differentiate into various phenotypes to produce inflammatory or anti-inflammatory factors and recruit extrahepatic macrophages into the liver, initiating inflammation or tissue repair.

Triggering of macrophages in response to stimulation by infectious agents, inflammatory responses, cytokines, or specific physicochemical factors is referred to as macrophage polarization.38,48 Briefly, macrophages can be polarized into two distinct phenotypes responding to stimuli: classically activated M1 and alternatively activated M2.49,50 M1 macrophages predominantly trigger the production of inducible nitric oxide synthase and exert pro-inflammatory action and antitumor effects by releasing various pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL1 and IL6.51,52 Therefore, M1 macrophages are essential in immune response and surveillance since they are involved in antigen presentation and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. On the other hand, M2 macrophages function in anti-inflammatory response and cancer development through the secretion of IL-10, transforming growth factor (TGF) β, and VEGF,51,52 playing a significant role in the immune surveillance.53

Previous studies have elegantly demonstrated that multiple signaling pathways intricately regulate the macrophage polarization process. TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway was reportedly involved in the M1 polarization, producing pro-inflammatory factors.54 In contrast, JAK/STAT6 is one of the crucial pathways involved in the induction of M2 polarization. In addition, STAT3 is also essential for M2 polarization, because inhibiting either the IL-6/STAT3 or the JAK3/STAT3 signaling pathway leads to the repolarization of macrophages from the M2 to M1 phenotype.55

Various studies have shown that miRNAs could affect macrophage polarization. miR-30c, miR-99a, and miR-155 inhibit M1 polarization, while miR-let7 and miR-32 stimulate M2 polarization.56 miRNAs participate in the macrophage polarization process by interacting with host signaling pathways.57 To take an example, miR-221-3p promotes M1 polarization by inhibiting the JAK3/STAT3 signaling pathway,58 and miR-1246 facilitates M2 polarization by inhibiting NF-κB and targeting TERF2IP to activate STAT3.59 Similarly, miR-34a-containing exosomes derived from adipocytes inhibit the expression of Krüppel-like factor (KLF) 4 to suppress M2 polarization.60 In contrast, miR-124-3p-contaning exosomes derived from MSCs promoted M2 macrophage polarization.61 It has also been reported that Notch signaling controls macrophage polarization via miRNAs. Li et al.62 observed an increased expression of miR-125a/miR-99b leading to the activation of Notch signaling and M1 polarization. A recent study demonstrated that Notch-induced M1 polarization is mediated by miR-148a-3p.63 Additionally, EVs derived from adipose stem cells blocked the Notch signaling pathway and M1 polarization to exhibit their anti-inflammatory effects, correlated with the reduced mir148a-3p expression.64 Not surprisingly, miRNAs wrapped in macrophage-derived exosomes may mediate the biological function of these exosomes. It has been reported that M2 macrophage-derived exosomes stimulated the progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma via the inhibitory effect of mir-501-3p on TGFBR3 and the suppressed TLR4/NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling through the downregulation of TXNIP expression by miR-148a.65

Macrophage-derived exosomes and their roles in LF

Exosomes have been reported to be able to mediate cell-to-cell communication in many cells, including macrophages. On one hand, exosomes affect the polarization and phenotype of macrophages, which determine their roles in pathological and physiological processes. For instance, tumor-derived exosomes have been reported to modulate macrophage polarization, thereby affecting cancer progression.66 Exosomes derived from MSCs induce macrophages toward M2 differentiation, exerting anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties.67 On the other hand, exosomes also provide an innovative mechanism for regulating the functions of recipient cells. M2 macrophage-derived exosomal miRNAs are believed to contribute to pulmonary fibrosis.68 And tumor-associated macrophages promote tumor proliferation and immunosuppression through exosomal lncRNAs.69 Macrophage-HSC interactions play an essential role in the progression of LF, and exosomes are heavily involved in this process. Macrophages not only induce activation but also directly regulate the behaviors of HSCs in the advance of liver fibrosis;61,70 and in the reversal of LF, macrophages promote HSCs apoptosis.71 The activated HSCs could, in turn, accelerate macrophage infiltration and drive M2 polarization.72 Moreover, liver macrophages secret cytokines to create an inflammatory environment, which impairs hepatocyte survival and further aggravates fibrosis.73,74

Macrophage-derived exosomes in the inhibition of LF

The role of hepatic macrophages in the progression of liver inflammation and fibrosis has been extensively explored. In recent decades, many studies have focused on inhibiting LF by targeting activated hepatic macrophages and their interaction with hepatocytes and HSCs via exosomes. Activation of macrophages is typically thought to play an essential role in the development of LF; however, many studies conducted in recent years have demonstrated that certain exosomes released by macrophages play a crucial role in preventing the development of LF. One study showed that IL-6-treated macrophages produce more miR-223-rich exosomes to inhibit the expression of profibrotic transcriptional activator with PDZ-binding (referred to herein as TAZ) motif in hepatocytes,75 leading to the inhibition of LF progression. Another study shows that miR-690 in KCs-derived exosomes affects different types of cells in the liver, including hepatocytes, recruited hepatic macrophages (referred to herein as RHM), and HSCs. Specifically, miR-690 directly suppresses signaling linked to the progression of LF in HSCs, reduces inflammation in RHM, and restores the normal function of hepatocytes.76 Activation of HSCs contributes to LF, and blocking HSC activation has been shown to alleviate fibrosis progression. Exosomes produced by M2 macrophages blocked the activation of HSCs significantly. More specifically, exosomal miR-411-5p from M2 macrophages blocks HSCs activation. Mechanistically, miR-411-5p in macrophage-derived exosomes has been shown to suppress the expression of calmodulin-regulated spectral-associated protein 1 (referred to herein as CAMSAP1) in HSCs, preventing them from being activated.77

In recognition of the potential role of macrophage-derived exosomes in inhibiting the progression of LF, an increasing number of studies are investigating them as drug targets for treating LFs. Owing to their ability to overcome physiological barriers and serve as effective vehicles for drugs and gene therapy, exosomes have emerged as novel treatment options for diseases such as LF, raising the possibility of “cell therapy without cells.” For example, macrophages can bind to relaxin, an antifibrotic peptide hormone, and upon binding, they transform from a profibrogenic to a proresolution phenotype. Exosomes carrying miR-30a-5p are released by macrophages with the proresolution phenotype, and these exosomes regulate the quiescence of activated HSCs.78 Based on this discovery, scientists created an innovative lipid nanoparticle that contains miR-30a-5p and relaxin gene mimics to selectively target activated HSCs in fibrotic livers, which has been proven to be effective in vivo antifibrotic treatment in mice.78 Another research demonstrated that exosomes from M2 macrophages stimulated the activation of HSCs. However, treatment with vitamin D receptor, a protein linked to macrophage polarization, changed these exosomes’ protein composition and reversed this promoting impact. Based on this discovery, researchers created a new LF treatment that combines a vitamin D receptor agonist with a macrophage-targeting exosome secretion inhibitor. The efficacy of this treatment has now been confirmed.79 Phillygenin, the active ingredient in a traditional Chinese drug called forsythia, has been found to inhibit HSCs activation and exerts significant anti-inflammatory effects. It has been reported that phillygenin inhibited M1 macrophage polarization by downregulating the JAK1/JAK2-STAT1 and Notch1 signaling pathways and reducing HSCs activation by inhibiting miR-125b-5p in macrophage exosomes that target Stard13.80

Macrophage-derived exosomes in the promotion of LF

Macrophages exhibit distinct properties and perform various functions within an organism’s intricate microenvironment. For example, macrophages are involved in the progression of LF by producing matrix metalloproteinases, such as MMP9, which actively degrade the basement membrane. This degradation facilitates the infiltration of immune cells and recruits fibroblasts into the site of injury. In vivo, a close association was observed between macrophages and collagen-producing myofibroblasts.81 In addition, macrophages are crucial in regulating myofibroblast activity by secreting cytokines and growth factors. Different subtypes of macrophages are recruited during hepatic fibrogenesis, ultimately leading to pathological scars or epithelialization.82

Increasing evidence suggests that macrophage-derived exosomes contribute to the progression of LF and may also compromise the effectiveness of medical drugs. Studies have shown that exosomes from macrophages treated with lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) have higher expression levels of miR-500, accelerating the activation of HSCs and fibrogenesis by inhibiting MFN2.83 The authors further implied the significant potential of miR-500 in serum exosomes as a diagnostic for LF. Another study showed that miR-155-5p was increased in the released exosomes from macrophages, such as THP-1, treated with LPS.84 After coculturing LPS-stimulated THP-1 with HSCs cells, the proliferative and migratory abilities, oxidative stress levels, and expression of fibrosis markers (e.g., collagen type I) of HSC cells were significantly enhanced.84 The authors concluded that miR-155-5p in the exosomes suppressed the expression of SOCS1 in the HSCs cells and further promoted the expression of p-Smad2/3, Smad2/3, and RhoA protein expression, facilitating the formation of LF. In another independent study, LPS was found to alter the miRNA profile of THP-1-derived exosomes. Specifically, miR-103-3p in exosomes has been found to promote the growth and activation of HSCs by targeting KLF4. Interaction between THP-1 macrophages and HSCs may also play a crucial role in the progression of LF.85 Further study demonstrated that combining total astragaloside and glycyrrhetinic acid could effectively inhibit HSCs activation triggered by LPS-stimulated macrophage-derived exosomes.86 This inhibitory effect may be achieved by inhibiting the phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 in the TGF-1/SMAD signaling pathway in HSCs. Although M2 macrophages blunt the immune response, M2 macrophage-derived exosomes promote LF by activating HSCs. For example, highly potent smooth muscle cell-associated protein-5 (referred to herein as SMAP-5), which is assumed to be a crucial effector protein that activates HSCs by regulating autophagic flux, is found in exosomes released by M2 macrophages.79

In conclusion, increasing numbers of studies have shown that exosomes released from macrophages regulate the development of LF (Table 1).75–80,83–85 However, there is still a great deal of ground to cover here for the following reasons: On one hand, macrophages have a role in LF primarily through the release of regulatory cytokines and chemokines, the modification of HSCs activity, and the recruitment of extrahepatic macrophages. Exosomes make up a small part of the treatment methods discovered in this investigation. On the other hand, it is challenging to identify and elucidate the mechanisms by which macrophages regulate LF via exosomes, a term more commonly used in molecular biology and bioinformatics. The same cell subtype may have two opposing effects on LF since macrophages are a very diverse cell population. For instance, SMAP-5 in exosomes produced by M2 macrophages promotes LF, whereas miR-411-5p prevents the development of hepatic fibrosis.

Table 1

Roles of macrophage-derived exosomes in LF

OriginTargetExosome componentPathway/mediatorEffectReferences
MacrophagesHepatocytesmiR-223Inhibit TAZInhibit LF75
KCsHepatocytes; RHM; HSCsmiR-690Restores normal functionInhibit LF76
M2 macrophagesHSCsmiR-411-5pInhibit CAMSAP1Inhibit LF77
MacrophagesHSCsmiR-30a-5pBind to relaxinInhibit LF78
M1 macrophagesHSCsmiR-125b-5pBoost Notch1 pathwaysPromote LF80
LPS-treated macrophagesHSCsmiR-500Inhibit MFN2Promote LF83
LPS-treated macrophagesHSCsmiR-155-5pInhibit SOCS1Promote LF84
LPS-treated macrophagesHSCsmiR-103-3pInhibit KLF4Promote LF85
M2 macrophagesHSCsSMAP-5Regulate autophagic fluxPromote LF79

CAMSAP1, calmodulin-regulated spectral-associated protein 1; HSC, hepatic stellate cell; KC, Kupffer cell; KLF4, Krüppel-like factor 4; LF, liver fibrosis; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MFN2, mitofusin-2; RHM, recruited hepatic macrophage; SOCS1, suppressor of cytokine signaling 1; TAZ, transcriptional activator with PDZ-binding.

Exosomes targeting macrophages and their roles in LF

After we summarized the role of macrophage-derived exosomes in the progression of LF in the previous section, we moved on to look at those exosomes that target macrophages and their function in

Exosomes targeting macrophages to inhibit LF

MSC-derived exosomes

MSCs, a type of embryonic stem cell, have gained attention because of their potential for the treatment of LF.87 Studies have shown that MSCs-derived exosomes can enhance liver health by attenuating LF progression, inflammation, and collagen deposition. These exosomes have been found to inhibit TGF-1/SMAD signaling to inhibit LF and stimulate hepatocyte proliferation, leading to a protective effect on hepatocytes.85,88 Similar anti-LF and hepatoprotective and regenerative effects were also observed with exosomes from various sources of MSCs, including bmMSCs,89,90 hucMSCs,91,92 hlMSCs,93 induced pluripotent MSCs,94 heMSCs,95 blood-derived MSCs,96 and adipose-derived MSCs of adipose origin.97 Numerous studies have linked the anti-LF impact of macrophages to the exosomes derived from MSCs. It has been reported that exosomes isolated from MSCs inhibit LF by releasing miR-148a, which controls intrahepatic macrophage activity via KLF3/STAT3 signaling.98 This finding identifies a potential treatment option for LF. MSCs and their exosomes mitigate both short- and long-term liver injury by promoting macrophages toward M2 polarization, leading to the activation of Treg/Breg cells and immune suppression. while the development and maturation of T cells, B cells, DCs, and NK cells were inhibited.99

MSCs have been demonstrated to be a promising treatment option for many hard-to-cure diseases, and there is accumulating evidence that exosomes mediate their therapeutic effects. MSC-derived exosomes can deliver anti-inflammatory cytokines and other bioactive proteins to a damaged liver without additional auxiliary cells. In a mouse LF model induced by CCl4, for example, infusion of exosomes derived from human umbilical cord MSCs effectively inhibited collagen production, alleviating LF.100 Furthermore, exosomes injected into mice were found to migrate to the liver and block the TGF-1/Smad pathway, decreasing levels of type I/III collagen and TGF-1 in these mice.100

Hepatocyte-derived exosomes

Although the vast majority of research indicates that hepatocytes are destroyed during the progression of LF, their role as fibrosis inhibitors is still under investigation. The effects of ezetimibe, a prescription drug commonly used to treat hypercholesterolemia, on liver cells and its therapeutic potential in LF were investigated. Ezetimibe was found to stimulate hepatocyte-derived exosome secretion, and these exosomes modulate hepatocyte-macrophage interaction by directly targeting macrophages. In addition, these exosomes inhibited the inflammatory response of macrophages by inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome-IL1β pathway in an autophagy-dependent manner and activating AMPK and TFEB nuclear translocation.101 In another study, scientists examined changes in exosomes produced by liver stem cells in a CCl4-induced fibrosis model, and they identified the increased expression of miR-142a-5p, which prevents macrophages toward M1 polarization and facilitated the production of M2 markers through targeting cathepsin B to suppress LF in mice.102

Artificial exosome system

Artificial exosomes have been explored to treat LF in recent decades. Contemporary scholarly investigations are mainly concentrated on utilizing unaltered or modified exosomes as an innovative approach for drug administration, explicitly targeting the liver to deliver antifibrotic medications with precision. The present technique is undergoing extensive investigation due to its inherent benefits in terms of heightened specificity and enhanced delivery efficiency compared to conventional medication delivery methods. In the following discourse, we have chosen several artificial exosome systems that specifically target macrophages for examination.

It has been shown that macrophage activation and plasticity are correlated with Notch signaling, which is mediated by the transcription factor RBP-J, and that myeloid-specific modulation of RBP-J expression reduces LF in rats. To target the transcription factor RBP-J, scientists created hairpin decoy oligonucleotides (ODNs) and electroporated ODNs into exosomes produced from the HEK293T cells. It has been shown that exosome-delivered RBP-J-baited ODNs successfully suppressed Notch signaling in macrophages and alleviated LF in CCl4 or bile duct ligation mouse model. Further research into this technique as a brand-new exosome-delivered innovative treatment is under intensive investigation. And these artificial exosomes were primarily taken up by hepatic macrophages.103 Similarly, a different research team created the LIVE hybrid exosome-liposome drug delivery system, successfully delivering clodronate (referred to herein as CLD) and nintedanib (referred to herein as NIN) to the liver tissues. Combining the inhibitory effects of NIN on liver fibroblasts and CLD on KCs, this artificial exosomal delivery system showed an enhanced antifibrotic effect in the CCl4-induced mouse model.104 Furthermore, researchers have used optically reversible protein-protein interactions to load effector proteins into exosomes. For example, Exo-srIB inhibits NF-κB signaling in KCs to reduce LF through exosomes.105 They successfully delivered exosomes loaded with the super suppressor IB (Exo-srIB) to the liver using a novel optogenetically engineered exosome technology called “exosomes loaded with proteins via optically reversible protein-protein interactions”. Exo-srIB markedly reduced the levels of fibrosis-associated gene expression in HSCs following three-day injections.

Exosomes targeting macrophages to promote LF

Hepatocytes-derived exosomes

Damaged hepatocytes contribute to the progression of hepatic fibrosis by releasing signals to stimulate macrophage infiltration and HSC activation. It has been generally agreed that exosomes play an essential role in this process. For example, lipid activation of DR5 stimulated hepatocytes to produce exosomes, which in turn triggered a macrophage-mediated inflammatory phenotype.106 Release of exosomes was inhibited by blocking DR5 signaling or rho-related coiled-coil protein kinase 1.106 In addition, hepatocyte-derived exosomes contained TNF-associated apoptosis-inducing ligands, which also stimulated mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages to produce inflammatory cytokines, such as IL1 and IL6, to maintain the inflammation microenvironment in the liver to promote LF.106 Furthermore, excessive buildup of fatty acids stimulated hepatocytes to produce excessive exosomes, facilitating liver fibrogenesis by activating surrounding HSCs and macrophages.107 By inhibiting the Rictor/Akt/FoxO1 signaling pathway, miR-192-5p-rich exosomes released from hepatocytes were found to activate pro-inflammatory macrophages.108 miR-192-5p was also found to increase vascular endothelial inflammation and vascular permeability and activate the NF-κB signaling pathway and NLRP3 to stimulate LF.109 miR-155 has been implicated in the high-fat, high-cholesterol, high-sugar diet-induced steatosis and LF, and it is found in exosomes released by hepatocytes.110 MiR-155 knockout mice had considerably less liver damage, decreased steatosis, and attenuated fibrosis when given a high-fat, high-cholesterol, high-sugar diet or CCl4 treatment in a fibrosis paradigm. However, KCs extracted from miR-155 KO mice displayed an M2 phenotype even when exposed to M1-stimulated environment.111 Furthermore, elevated levels of miR21 and Arg1 in hepatocyte-derived exosomes led to increased hepatic fibrosis and enhanced M2 polarization in mice.112

HSC-derived exosomes

The role of HSCs in the development of LF is believed to be mediated by macrophages. However, the relationship between HSCs activation and macrophage polarization has yet to be fully described. One study analyzed differential mRNAs expression using exosomal RNA sequencing from activated Lx-2 cells and a DHFR loss-of-function Lx-2 cell model. They found DHFR-containing exosomes are essential in the M1 polarization of macrophages.113 Another study demonstrated that exosomes from activated HSCs stimulated mouse and human macrophages to produce IL-6 and TNFα, and promoted macrophage migration.114 In addition, exosomes secreted by activated HSCs increased glycolysis in quiescent HSCs and KCs,115 indicating they were activated.116 It was also shown that ectodysplasin-A mRNA plays a significant role in the exosomes produced by HSCs to control macrophage activity, which stimulates the production of IL-6 and TNF-α and improves macrophage migration.116 Generally speaking, in the progression of LF, macrophages are the core hub of the regulation network (Table 2).98,100–106,109,110,112,117

Table 2

Roles of exosomes targeting macrophages in LF

OriginTargetExosome componentPathway/mediatorEffectReferences
MSCsMacrophagesmiR-148aKLF3/STAT3 signalingInhibit LF98
hucMSCsMacrophagesUnknownInhibit TGF-1/Smad pathwayInhibit LF100
Ezetimibe-treated hepatocytesMacrophagesUnknownInhibit NLRP3 Inflammatory vesiclesInhibit LF101
LSCsMacrophagesmiR-142a-5pInhibit CTSBInhibit LF102
Artificial exosomesMacrophagesRBP-J-ODNsInhibit Notch signalingInhibit LF103
Artificial exosomesMacrophagesCLD and NINRegulate liver fibroblasts/KCsInhibit LF104
Artificial exosomesMacrophagesExo-srIBInhibit fibrosis-associated geneInhibit LF105
HepatocytesMacrophagesTNF-associated apoptosis-inducing ligandsProduce inflammatory cytokinesPromote LF106
HepatocytesMacrophagesmiR-192-5pRictor/Akt/FoxO1 pathwayPromote LF109
HepatocytesMacrophagesmiR-155M1 polarizationPromote LF110
HepatocytesMacrophagesmiR-21 and Arg-1M1 polarizationPromote LF112
HSCsMacrophagesEDA mRNAImproves macrophage migrationPromote LF117

Arg-1, arginase-1; CLD, clodronate; CTSB, cathepsin B; EDA, ectodysplasin-A; HSCs, hepatic stellate cells; hucMSCs, human umbilical cord MSCs; KC, Kupffer cell; LF, liver fibrosis; LSCs, liver stem cells; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; NIN, nintedanib; RBP-J-ODNs, RBP-J hairpin decoy oligonucleotides.

Conclusions and perspective

Present investigations have revealed the significant role of exosomes and macrophages in LF. Figure 1 depicts exosomes as messengers between macrophages, hepatocytes, KCs and MSCs. It is interesting to note that, according to the currently available data, hepatocyte-derived exosomes that target macrophages primarily have a promoting influence on LF. In contrast, macrophage-derived exosomes that target hepatocytes primarily have an inhibiting effect. Various exosome-mediated intercellular exchanges exhibit distinct activities based on variations in exosome origin, composition, and pathological conditions. However, there is still much to be understood about the exact contribution of exosomes to the development of LF as different exosomes originating from various biological sources may have distinct roles in the progression of the illness at different stages.

Role of macrophage-associated exosomes in liver fibrosis.
Fig. 1  Role of macrophage-associated exosomes in liver fibrosis.

Damaged hepatocytes, activated HSCs, and MSCs regulate the functional state of macrophages via exosomes, while macrophages regulate hepatocytes and HSCs via exosomes. The opening of the arrow is the cell that releases the exosome, and the arrowhead points to the cell where the exosome acts. CAMSAP1, calmodulin-regulated spectrin associated protein 1; MFN2, mitofusin-2; KLF4, Krüppel-like factor 4; SMAP-5, small acidic protein-5; Stard13, StAR-related lipid transfer protein 13; IL1β, IL6, interleukin-1 beta; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the outcome of LF, and numerous studies have shown exosomes to play crucial roles in this disease, including promoting tumor growth and spread, preventing the immune system from recognizing and attacking tumors and enhancing tumor drug resistance.117,118 However, LF is reversible, and irreversible cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer only appear later in the disease course. Exosome composition and function will alter in line with this process. For instance, miR-122 levels in exosomes derived from hepatocellular carcinoma were lowered. They may be linked to the proliferation of cancer cells, but miR-122 levels in serum exosomes were enhanced in individuals with LF.119 The pathological pathway from LF to hepatocellular carcinoma will be aided by an additional understanding of this transition and its molecular mechanism. This may also lead to the discovery of new treatment targets and approaches for reversing LF and preventing hepatocarcinogenesis.

Exosomes have been extensively studied as a potential treatment for various illnesses, including LF. However, there are still several issues that still need to be solved. Firstly, most current techniques for isolating and purifying exosomes are still in the laboratory stage. Therefore, developing efficient, cost-effective, and standardized methods for isolating and preparing exosomes for clinical application is crucial. Secondly, delivering exosomes to specific tissues or organs remains a challenging task. Factors such as population, cell source, and health status must be carefully considered. Lastly, determining the optimal therapeutic dose of exosomes is still a research topic. Depending on the disease and population, personalized treatment regimens may be necessary as exosomes have varying therapeutic dosage requirements. With the rapid advancement of knowledge about exosomes and the emergence of new targeted delivery technologies, it is anticipated that exosomes will soon replace other therapy options for LF.

Abbreviations

CAMSAP1: 

calmodulin-regulated spectral-associated protein 1

CLD: 

clodronate

CTSB: 

cathepsin B

ECM: 

extracellular matrix

EDA: 

ectodysplasin-A

EV: 

extracellular vesicle

HCC: 

hepatocellular carcinoma

HSC: 

hepatic stellate cell

KC: 

Kupffer cell

KLF: 

Krüppel-like factor

LF: 

liver fibrosis

LPS: 

lipopolysaccharide

LSC: 

liver stem cell

miRNA: 

microRNA

MSC: 

mesenchymal stem cell

NIN: 

nintedanib

ODN: 

oligonucleotide

RHM: 

recruited hepatic macrophage

SMAP-5: 

smooth muscle cell-associated protein-5

TAZ: 

transcriptional activator with PDZ-binding

TGF-β: 

transforming growth factor-beta

Declarations

Funding

CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine: CAMS-2021-I2M-1-060, National Key Research and Development Program of China: 2018YFE0107500, Science and Technology Partnership Program, Ministry of Science and Technology of China: KY201904011. Qin Chuang Yuan recruited high-level innovation and entrepreneurship talents project of Science and Technology Department of Shaanxi Province: QCYRCXM-2022-56. Foreign Expert Service Project of Science and Technology Department of Shaanxi Province: 2023WGZJ-YB-39, Medical Research project of Xi’an Science and Technology Bureau: 22YXYJ0120.

Conflict of interest

LC has been an associate editor of Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology since 2013. The other authors have no conflict of interests related to this publication.

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the article and critically revised the manuscript (BH, YL, LC), obtained funding and provided administrative, technical, and material support (LC), performed literature searches and wrote the manuscript (BF, HX), updated the text of the manuscript (QT, QL), and performed critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content (QT, QL, TG).

References

  1. Kalluri R, LeBleu VS. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science 2020;367(6478):eaau6977 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  2. Barros FM, Carneiro F, Machado JC, Melo SA. Exosomes and Immune Response in Cancer: Friends or Foes?. Front Immunol 2018;9:730 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  3. Chen J, Li C, Li R, Chen H, Chen D, Li W. Exosomes in HIV infection. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2021;16(5):262-270 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  4. Liu Z, Li Y, Wang Y, Bai X, Zhang Y. Exosomes in HBV infection. Clin Chim Acta 2023;538:65-69 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  5. Isaac R, Reis FCG, Ying W, Olefsky JM. Exosomes as mediators of intercellular crosstalk in metabolism. Cell Metab 2021;33(9):1744-1762 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  6. Wang W, Zhu N, Yan T, Shi YN, Chen J, Zhang CJ, et al. The crosstalk: exosomes and lipid metabolism. Cell Commun Signal 2020;18(1):119 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  7. Zhang L, Yu D. Exosomes in cancer development, metastasis, and immunity. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2019;1871(2):455-468 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  8. Kok VC, Yu CC. Cancer-Derived Exosomes: Their Role in Cancer Biology and Biomarker Development. Int J Nanomedicine 2020;15:8019-8036 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  9. Zhou B, Xu K, Zheng X, Chen T, Wang J, Song Y, et al. Application of exosomes as liquid biopsy in clinical diagnosis. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2020;5(1):144 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  10. Liang Y, Duan L, Lu J, Xia J. Engineering exosomes for targeted drug delivery. Theranostics 2021;11(7):3183-3195 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  11. Xu Z, Zeng S, Gong Z, Yan Y. Exosome-based immunotherapy: a promising approach for cancer treatment. Mol Cancer 2020;19(1):160 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  12. Sun YF, Pi J, Xu JF. Emerging Role of Exosomes in Tuberculosis: From Immunity Regulations to Vaccine and Immunotherapy. Front Immunol 2021;12:628973 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  13. Sun H, Meng Q, Shi C, Yang H, Li X, Wu S, et al. Hypoxia-Inducible Exosomes Facilitate Liver-Tropic Premetastatic Niche in Colorectal Cancer. Hepatology 2021;74(5):2633-2651 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  14. Huang DQ, Mathurin P, Cortez-Pinto H, Loomba R. Global epidemiology of alcohol-associated cirrhosis and HCC: trends, projections and risk factors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023;20(1):37-49 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  15. Pellicoro A, Ramachandran P, Iredale JP, Fallowfield JA. Liver fibrosis and repair: immune regulation of wound healing in a solid organ. Nat Rev Immunol 2014;14(3):181-194 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  16. Koyama Y, Brenner DA. Liver inflammation and fibrosis. J Clin Invest 2017;127(1):55-64 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  17. Chen L, Brenner DA, Kisseleva T. Combatting Fibrosis: Exosome-Based Therapies in the Regression of Liver Fibrosis. Hepatol Commun 2019;3(2):180-192 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  18. Lucotti S, Kenific CM, Zhang H, Lyden D. Extracellular vesicles and particles impact the systemic landscape of cancer. EMBO J 2022;41(18):e109288 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  19. Wang G, Li J, Bojmar L, Chen H, Li Z, Tobias GC, et al. Tumour extracellular vesicles and particles induce liver metabolic dysfunction. Nature 2023;618(7964):374-382 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  20. Zhang Q, Jeppesen DK, Higginbotham JN, Franklin JL, Coffey RJ. Comprehensive isolation of extracellular vesicles and nanoparticles. Nat Protoc 2023;18(5):1462-1487 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  21. Zhang Z, Shang J, Yang Q, Dai Z, Liang Y, Lai C, et al. Exosomes derived from human adipose mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate hepatic fibrosis by inhibiting PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and remodeling choline metabolism. J Nanobiotechnology 2023;21(1):29 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  22. Gu L, Zhang F, Wu J, Zhuge Y. Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery for Liver Fibrosis. Front Mol Biosci 2021;8:804396 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  23. Cheng D, Chai J, Wang H, Fu L, Peng S, Ni X. Hepatic macrophages: Key players in the development and progression of liver fibrosis. Liver Int 2021;41(10):2279-2294 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  24. Kohlhepp MS, Liu H, Tacke F, Guillot A. The contradictory roles of macrophages in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and primary liver cancer-Challenges and opportunities. Front Mol Biosci 2023;10:1129831 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  25. van Niel G, D’Angelo G, Raposo G. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2018;19(4):213-228 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  26. Helliwell E, Choi D, Merritt J, Kreth J. Environmental influences on Streptococcus sanguinis membrane vesicle biogenesis. ISME J 2023;17(9):1430-1444 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  27. Xu Y, Yao Y, Yu L, Fung HL, Tang AHN, Ng IO, et al. Clathrin light chain A facilitates small extracellular vesicle uptake to promote hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Hepatol Int 2023 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  28. Mao Y, Zhang M, Wang L, Lu Y, Hu X, Chen Z. Role of microRNA carried by small extracellular vesicles in urological tumors. Front Cell Dev Biol 2023;11:1192937 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  29. Zhang H, Freitas D, Kim HS, Fabijanic K, Li Z, Chen H, et al. Identification of distinct nanoparticles and subsets of extracellular vesicles by asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation. Nat Cell Biol 2018;20(3):332-343 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  30. Rojas-Gómez A, Dosil SG, Chichón FJ, Fernández-Gallego N, Ferrarini A, Calvo E, et al. Chaperonin CCT controls extracellular vesicle production and cell metabolism through kinesin dynamics. J Extracell Vesicles 2023;12(6):e12333 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  31. Barile L. Extracellular Vesicles as Bridges Between Host Immune Cells and Graft Organ During Cellular Rejection. JACC Basic Transl Sci 2023;8(5):457-459 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  32. Dalmizrak A, Dalmizrak O. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes as new tools for delivery of miRNAs in the treatment of cancer. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10:956563 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  33. Dorayappan KDP, Gardner ML, Hisey CL, Zingarelli RA, Smith BQ, Lightfoot MDS, et al. A Microfluidic Chip Enables Isolation of Exosomes and Establishment of Their Protein Profiles and Associated Signaling Pathways in Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Res 2019;79(13):3503-3513 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  34. Jabbari N, Karimipour M, Khaksar M, Akbariazar E, Heidarzadeh M, Mojarad B, et al. Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles: insights into bystander effects of exosomes after irradiation. Lasers Med Sci 2020;35(3):531-545 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  35. Zhang Y, Liu Y, Liu H, Tang WH. Exosomes: biogenesis, biologic function and clinical potential. Cell Biosci 2019;9:19 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  36. Lam KCK, Lam MKN, Chim CS, Chan GCF, Li JCB. The functional role of surface molecules on extracellular vesicles in cancer, autoimmune diseases, and coagulopathy. J Leukoc Biol 2020;108(5):1565-1573 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  37. Dai J, Su Y, Zhong S, Cong L, Liu B, Yang J, et al. Exosomes: key players in cancer and potential therapeutic strategy. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2020;5(1):145 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  38. Greenberg AS, Reeves AR. The good and bad of adipose tissue macrophage exosomes in obesity. Cell Metab 2021;33(4):700-702 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  39. Li S, Wu Y, Ding F, Yang J, Li J, Gao X, et al. Engineering macrophage-derived exosomes for targeted chemotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer. Nanoscale 2020;12(19):10854-10862 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  40. Elsharkasy OM, Nordin JZ, Hagey DW, de Jong OG, Schiffelers RM, Andaloussi SE, et al. Extracellular vesicles as drug delivery systems: Why and how?. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2020;159:332-343 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  41. Du Z, Wu T, Liu L, Luo B, Wei C. Extracellular vesicles-derived miR-150-5p secreted by adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells inhibits CXCL1 expression to attenuate hepatic fibrosis. J Cell Mol Med 2021;25(2):701-715 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  42. Kim J, Lee C, Shin Y, Wang S, Han J, Kim M, et al. sEVs from tonsil-derived mesenchymal stromal cells alleviate activation of hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrosis through miR-486-5p. Mol Ther 2021;29(4):1471-1486 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  43. Pi L, Sun C, Jn-Simon N, Basha S, Thomas H, Figueroa V, et al. CCN2/CTGF promotes liver fibrosis through crosstalk with the Slit2/Robo signaling. J Cell Commun Signal 2023;17(1):137-150 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  44. Guillot A, Tacke F. Liver Macrophages: Old Dogmas and New Insights. Hepatol Commun 2019;3(6):730-743 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  45. Wang L, Zhang H, Sun L, Gao W, Xiong Y, Ma A, et al. Manipulation of macrophage polarization by peptide-coated gold nanoparticles and its protective effects on acute lung injury. J Nanobiotechnology 2020;18(1):38 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  46. Xu F, Guo M, Huang W, Feng L, Zhu J, Luo K, et al. Annexin A5 regulates hepatic macrophage polarization via directly targeting PKM2 and ameliorates NASH. Redox Biol 2020;36:101634 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  47. Yang Y, Ye YC, Chen Y, Zhao JL, Gao CC, Han H, et al. Crosstalk between hepatic tumor cells and macrophages via Wnt/β-catenin signaling promotes M2-like macrophage polarization and reinforces tumor malignant behaviors. Cell Death Dis 2018;9(8):793 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  48. Atri C, Guerfali FZ, Laouini D. Role of Human Macrophage Polarization in Inflammation during Infectious Diseases. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19(6):1801 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  49. Locati M, Curtale G, Mantovani A. Diversity, Mechanisms, and Significance of Macrophage Plasticity. Annu Rev Pathol 2020;15:123-147 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  50. Orecchioni M, Ghosheh Y, Pramod AB, Ley K. Macrophage Polarization: Different Gene Signatures in M1(LPS+) vs. Classically and M2(LPS-) vs. Alternatively Activated Macrophages. Front Immunol 2019;10:1084 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  51. Shapouri-Moghaddam A, Mohammadian S, Vazini H, Taghadosi M, Esmaeili SA, Mardani F, et al. Macrophage plasticity, polarization, and function in health and disease. J Cell Physiol 2018;233(9):6425-6440 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  52. Yunna C, Mengru H, Lei W, Weidong C. Macrophage M1/M2 polarization. Eur J Pharmacol 2020;877:173090 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  53. Tacke F, Zimmermann HW. Macrophage heterogeneity in liver injury and fibrosis. J Hepatol 2014;60(5):1090-1096 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  54. Ciesielska A, Matyjek M, Kwiatkowska K. TLR4 and CD14 trafficking and its influence on LPS-induced pro-inflammatory signaling. Cell Mol Life Sci 2021;78(4):1233-1261 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  55. Hu X, Chen J, Wang L, Ivashkiv LB. Crosstalk among Jak-STAT, Toll-like receptor, and ITAM-dependent pathways in macrophage activation. J Leukoc Biol 2007;82(2):237-243 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  56. Bao L, Li X. MicroRNA-32 targeting PTEN enhances M2 macrophage polarization in the glioma microenvironment and further promotes the progression of glioma. Mol Cell Biochem 2019;460(1-2):67-79 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  57. Yu X, Odenthal M, Fries JW. Exosomes as miRNA Carriers: Formation-Function-Future. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17(12):2028 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  58. He Y, Gao Y, Zhang Q, Zhou G, Cao F, Yao S. IL-4 Switches Microglia/macrophage M1/M2 Polarization and Alleviates Neurological Damage by Modulating the JAK1/STAT6 Pathway Following ICH. Neuroscience 2020;437:161-171 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  59. Qian M, Wang S, Guo X, Wang J, Zhang Z, Qiu W, et al. Hypoxic glioma-derived exosomes deliver microRNA-1246 to induce M2 macrophage polarization by targeting TERF2IP via the STAT3 and NF-κB pathways. Oncogene 2020;39(2):428-442 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  60. Pan Y, Hui X, Hoo RLC, Ye D, Chan CYC, Feng T, et al. Adipocyte-secreted exosomal microRNA-34a inhibits M2 macrophage polarization to promote obesity-induced adipose inflammation. J Clin Invest 2019;129(2):834-849 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  61. Li R, Zhao K, Ruan Q, Meng C, Yin F. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal microRNA-124-3p attenuates neurological damage in spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury by downregulating Ern1 and promoting M2 macrophage polarization. Arthritis Res Ther 2020;22(1):75 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  62. Li Q, He X, Yu Q, Wu Y, Du M, Chen J, et al. The Notch signal mediates macrophage polarization by regulating miR-125a/miR-99b expression. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 2019;47(1):833-843 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  63. Huang F, Zhao JL, Wang L, Gao CC, Liang SQ, An DJ, et al. miR-148a-3p Mediates Notch Signaling to Promote the Differentiation and M1 Activation of Macrophages. Front Immunol 2017;8:1327 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  64. Bai X, Li J, Li L, Liu M, Liu Y, Cao M, et al. Extracellular Vesicles From Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells Affect Notch-miR148a-3p Axis to Regulate Polarization of Macrophages and Alleviate Sepsis in Mice. Front Immunol 2020;11:1391 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  65. Yin Z, Ma T, Huang B, Lin L, Zhou Y, Yan J, et al. Macrophage-derived exosomal microRNA-501-3p promotes progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma through the TGFBR3-mediated TGF-β signaling pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2019;38(1):310 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  66. Baig MS, Roy A, Rajpoot S, Liu D, Savai R, Banerjee S, et al. Tumor-derived exosomes in the regulation of macrophage polarization. Inflamm Res 2020;69(5):435-451 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  67. Arabpour M, Saghazadeh A, Rezaei N. Anti-inflammatory and M2 macrophage polarization-promoting effect of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes. Int Immunopharmacol 2021;97:107823 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  68. Kishore A, Petrek M. Roles of Macrophage Polarization and Macrophage-Derived miRNAs in Pulmonary Fibrosis. Front Immunol 2021;12:678457 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  69. Xu Z, Chen Y, Ma L, Chen Y, Liu J, Guo Y, et al. Role of exosomal non-coding RNAs from tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages in the tumor microenvironment. Mol Ther 2022;30(10):3133-3154 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  70. Wang LX, Zhang SX, Wu HJ, Rong XL, Guo J. M2b macrophage polarization and its roles in diseases. J Leukoc Biol 2019;106(2):345-358 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  71. Kisseleva T, Brenner D. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of liver fibrosis and its regression. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;18(3):151-166 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  72. Song LJ, Yin XR, Mu SS, Li JH, Gao H, Zhang Y, et al. The Differential and Dynamic Progression of Hepatic Inflammation and Immune Responses During Liver Fibrosis Induced by Schistosoma japonicum or Carbon Tetrachloride in Mice. Front Immunol 2020;11:570524 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  73. Marra F, DeFranco R, Grappone C, Parola M, Milani S, Leonarduzzi G, et al. Expression of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 precedes monocyte recruitment in a rat model of acute liver injury, and is modulated by vitamin E. J Investig Med 1999;47(1):66-75 PubMed/NCBI
  74. Guicciardi ME, Malhi H, Mott JL, Gores GJ. Apoptosis and necrosis in the liver. Compr Physiol 2013;3(2):977-1010 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  75. Hou X, Yin S, Ren R, Liu S, Yong L, Liu Y, et al. Myeloid-Cell-Specific IL-6 Signaling Promotes MicroRNA-223-Enriched Exosome Production to Attenuate NAFLD-Associated Fibrosis. Hepatology 2021;74(1):116-132 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  76. Gao H, Jin Z, Bandyopadhyay G, Cunha E Rocha K, Liu X, Zhao H, et al. MiR-690 treatment causes decreased fibrosis and steatosis and restores specific Kupffer cell functions in NASH. Cell Metab 2022;34(7):978-990.e4 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  77. Wan Z, Yang X, Liu X, Sun Y, Yu P, Xu F, et al. M2 macrophage-derived exosomal microRNA-411-5p impedes the activation of hepatic stellate cells by targeting CAMSAP1 in NASH model. iScience 2022;25(7):104597 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  78. Hu M, Wang Y, Liu Z, Yu Z, Guan K, Liu M, et al. Hepatic macrophages act as a central hub for relaxin-mediated alleviation of liver fibrosis. Nat Nanotechnol 2021;16(4):466-477 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  79. Liu X, Wu Y, Li Y, Li K, Hou S, Ding M, et al. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) mediates the quiescence of activated hepatic stellate cells (aHSCs) by regulating M2 macrophage exosomal smooth muscle cell-associated protein 5 (SMAP-5). J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2023;24(3):248-261 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  80. Ma C, Wang C, Zhang Y, Li Y, Fu K, Gong L, et al. Phillygenin inhibited M1 macrophage polarization and reduced hepatic stellate cell activation by inhibiting macrophage exosomal miR-125b-5p. Biomed Pharmacother 2023;159:114264 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  81. Wang C, Ma C, Gong L, Guo Y, Fu K, Zhang Y, et al. Macrophage Polarization and Its Role in Liver Disease. Front Immunol 2021;12:803037 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  82. Peiseler M, Schwabe R, Hampe J, Kubes P, Heikenwälder M, Tacke F. Immune mechanisms linking metabolic injury to inflammation and fibrosis in fatty liver disease - novel insights into cellular communication circuits. J Hepatol 2022;77(4):1136-1160 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  83. Chen L, Huang Y, Duan Z, Huang P, Yao H, Zhou Y, et al. Exosomal miR-500 Derived From Lipopolysaccharide-Treated Macrophage Accelerates Liver Fibrosis by Suppressing MFN2. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:716209 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  84. Lin J, Lou A, Li X. [Lipopolysaccharide stimulates macrophages to secrete exosomes containing miR-155-5p to promote activation and migration of hepatic stellate cells]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2023;43(6):994-1001 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  85. Chen L, Yao X, Yao H, Ji Q, Ding G, Liu X. Exosomal miR-103-3p from LPS-activated THP-1 macrophage contributes to the activation of hepatic stellate cells. FASEB J 2020;34(4):5178-5192 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  86. Deng K, Dai Z, Yang P, Yang D, Zhou Y. LPS-induced macrophage exosomes promote the activation of hepatic stellate cells and the intervention study of total astragalus saponins combined with glycyrrhizic acid. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2023;306(12):3097-3105 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  87. Liu N, Liu D, Li Y, Zhang X, He J, Jiang Y, et al. Effects and mechanisms of substance P on the proliferation and angiogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: Bioinformatics and in vitro experiments. Genomics 2023;115(5):110679 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  88. Cheng F, Yang F, Wang Y, Zhou J, Qian H, Yan Y. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal miR-27b-3p alleviates liver fibrosis via downregulating YAP/LOXL2 pathway. J Nanobiotechnology 2023;21(1):195 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  89. Anger F, Camara M, Ellinger E, Germer CT, Schlegel N, Otto C, et al. Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Improve Liver Regeneration After Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in Mice. Stem Cells Dev 2019;28(21):1451-1462 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  90. Wu HW, Chen HD, Chen YH, Mao XL, Feng YY, Li SW, et al. The Effects of Programmed Cell Death of Mesenchymal Stem Cells on the Development of Liver Fibrosis. Stem Cells Int 2023;2023:4586398 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  91. Huang X, Kou X, Zhan T, Wei G, He F, Mao X, et al. Apoptotic vesicles resist oxidative damage in noise-induced hearing loss through activation of FOXO3a-SOD2 pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther 2023;14(1):88 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  92. Yao J, Zheng J, Cai J, Zeng K, Zhou C, Zhang J, et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells alleviate rat hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury by suppressing oxidative stress and neutrophil inflammatory response. FASEB J 2019;33(2):1695-1710 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  93. Herrera Sanchez MB, Previdi S, Bruno S, Fonsato V, Deregibus MC, Kholia S, et al. Extracellular vesicles from human liver stem cells restore argininosuccinate synthase deficiency. Stem Cell Res Ther 2017;8(1):176 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  94. Spiers HVM, Stadler LKJ, Smith H, Kosmoliaptsis V. Extracellular Vesicles as Drug Delivery Systems in Organ Transplantation: The Next Frontier. Pharmaceutics 2023;15(3):891 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  95. Chen L, Xiang B, Wang X, Xiang C. Exosomes derived from human menstrual blood-derived stem cells alleviate fulminant hepatic failure. Stem Cell Res Ther 2017;8(1):9 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  96. Zheng Y, Zhu S, Zheng X, Xu W, Li X, Li J, et al. Serum from Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure Patients May Affect Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplantation by Impairing the Immunosuppressive Function of Cells. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2021;9(4):503-513 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  97. Liu Y, Lou G, Li A, Zhang T, Qi J, Ye D, et al. AMSC-derived exosomes alleviate lipopolysaccharide/d-galactosamine-induced acute liver failure by miR-17-mediated reduction of TXNIP/NLRP3 inflammasome activation in macrophages. EBioMedicine 2018;36:140-150 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  98. Tian S, Zhou X, Zhang M, Cui L, Li B, Liu Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes protect against liver fibrosis via delivering miR-148a to target KLF6/STAT3 pathway in macrophages. Stem Cell Res Ther 2022;13(1):330 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  99. Tang Y, Wu P, Li L, Xu W, Jiang J. Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Small Extracellular Vesicles as Crucial Immunological Efficacy for Hepatic Diseases. Front Immunol 2022;13:880523 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  100. Li T, Yan Y, Wang B, Qian H, Zhang X, Shen L, et al. Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells alleviate liver fibrosis. Stem Cells Dev 2013;22(6):845-854 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  101. Kim SH, Kim G, Han DH, Lee M, Kim I, Kim B, et al. Ezetimibe ameliorates steatohepatitis via AMP activated protein kinase-TFEB-mediated activation of autophagy and NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition. Autophagy 2017;13(10):1767-1781 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  102. Hu Z, Zhao Y, Jiang J, Li W, Su G, Li L, et al. Exosome-derived miR-142-5p from liver stem cells improves the progression of liver fibrosis by regulating macrophage polarization through CTSB. Environ Toxicol 2023;38(8):1860-1873 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  103. He F, Li WN, Li XX, Yue KY, Duan JL, Ruan B, et al. Exosome-mediated delivery of RBP-J decoy oligodeoxynucleotides ameliorates hepatic fibrosis in mice. Theranostics 2022;12(4):1816-1828 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  104. Ji K, Fan M, Huang D, Sun L, Li B, Xu R, et al. Clodronate-nintedanib-loaded exosome-liposome hybridization enhances the liver fibrosis therapy by inhibiting Kupffer cell activity. Biomater Sci 2022;10(3):702-713 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  105. Kim HH, Shim YR, Choi SE, Falana TE, Yoo JK, Ahn SH, et al. Exosome-Based Delivery of Super-Repressor IκBα Alleviates Alcohol-Associated Liver Injury in Mice. Pharmaceutics 2023;15(2):636 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  106. Hirsova P, Ibrahim SH, Krishnan A, Verma VK, Bronk SF, Werneburg NW, et al. Lipid-Induced Signaling Causes Release of Inflammatory Extracellular Vesicles From Hepatocytes. Gastroenterology 2016;150(4):956-967 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  107. Dorairaj V, Sulaiman SA, Abu N, Abdul Murad NA. Extracellular Vesicles in the Development of the Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An Update. Biomolecules 2020;10(11):1494 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  108. Liu XL, Pan Q, Cao HX, Xin FZ, Zhao ZH, Yang RX, et al. Lipotoxic Hepatocyte-Derived Exosomal MicroRNA 192-5p Activates Macrophages Through Rictor/Akt/Forkhead Box Transcription Factor O1 Signaling in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Hepatology 2020;72(2):454-469 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  109. Jiang F, Chen Q, Wang W, Ling Y, Yan Y, Xia P. Hepatocyte-derived extracellular vesicles promote endothelial inflammation and atherogenesis via microRNA-1. J Hepatol 2020;72(1):156-166 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  110. Bala S, Ganz M, Babuta M, Zhuang Y, Csak T, Calenda CD, et al. Steatosis, inflammasome upregulation, and fibrosis are attenuated in miR-155 deficient mice in a high fat-cholesterol-sugar diet-induced model of NASH. Lab Invest 2021;101(12):1540-1549 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  111. Bala S, Csak T, Saha B, Zatsiorsky J, Kodys K, Catalano D, et al. The pro-inflammatory effects of miR-155 promote liver fibrosis and alcohol-induced steatohepatitis. J Hepatol 2016;64(6):1378-1387 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  112. Xue J, Xiao T, Wei S, Sun J, Zou Z, Shi M, et al. miR-21-regulated M2 polarization of macrophage is involved in arsenicosis-induced hepatic fibrosis through the activation of hepatic stellate cells. J Cell Physiol 2021;236(8):6025-6041 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  113. Peng Y, Li Z, Chen S, Zhou J. DHFR silence alleviated the development of liver fibrosis by affecting the crosstalk between hepatic stellate cells and macrophages. J Cell Mol Med 2021;25(21):10049-10060 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  114. Benbow JH, Marrero E, McGee RM, Brandon-Warner E, Attal N, Feilen NA, et al. Hepatic stellate cell-derived exosomes modulate macrophage inflammatory response. Exp Cell Res 2021;405(1):112663 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  115. Wan L, Xia T, Du Y, Liu J, Xie Y, Zhang Y, et al. Exosomes from activated hepatic stellate cells contain GLUT1 and PKM2: a role for exosomes in metabolic switch of liver nonparenchymal cells. FASEB J 2019;33(7):8530-8542 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  116. Marrero E, Attal N, Nimeri A, McGee RM, Benbow JH, Thompson KJ, et al. Ectodysplasin-A mRNA in exosomes released from activated hepatic stellate cells stimulates macrophage response. Exp Cell Res 2022;419(2):113297 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  117. Wei Y, Tang X, Ren Y, Yang Y, Song F, Fu J, et al. An RNA-RNA crosstalk network involving HMGB1 and RICTOR facilitates hepatocellular carcinoma tumorigenesis by promoting glutamine metabolism and impedes immunotherapy by PD-L1+ exosomes activity. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2021;6(1):421 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  118. Wang H, Lu Z, Zhao X. Tumorigenesis, diagnosis, and therapeutic potential of exosomes in liver cancer. J Hematol Oncol 2019;12(1):133 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  119. Szabo G, Momen-Heravi F. Extracellular vesicles in liver disease and potential as biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;14(8):455-466 View Article PubMed/NCBI
Copyright © 2024 Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0), permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology
  • pISSN 2225-0719
  • eISSN 2310-8819

Article Options

Metrics

Cite this Article

  • © 2024 Xia & He Publishing Inc.
  • Total visits : 2656166
  • Visits today : 1067
Back to Top

Role of Exosomal Modulation of Macrophages in Liver Fibrosis

Bin Fan, He Xie, Qi Tan, Qingyuan Li, Tao Gong, Baoren He, Yujia Li, Limin Chen
  • Reset Zoom
  • Download TIFF