OSA and lung cancer prevalence and incidence
A recent cross-sectional study combining the SAIL (Sleep Apnea in Lung Cancer) and SAILS (Sleep Apnea in Lung Cancer Screening) cohorts (n = 302; NCT02764866) provided further evidence supporting the predominant role of nocturnal hypoxemia. Using home sleep apnea testing, moderate-to-severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) > 15) was associated with an 8% higher prevalence of lung cancer compared to AHI < 15, with statistical significance maintained after propensity score matching (P = 0.015) and nearest-neighbor matching (P = 0.041). Adjusted binary logistic regression revealed associations of nocturnal hypoxemia indices—T90% (P = 0.005) and ODI3% (P = 0.02)—with lung cancer presence.8 The prospective SAILS study (NCT02764866) investigated OSA prevalence in 236 high-risk smokers (mean age 63.6 years, 45 pack-years) undergoing lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography. Moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15) was highly prevalent, and nocturnal hypoxemia (T90), reduced diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, greater tobacco exposure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were significantly associated with OSA severity. After multivariate adjustment, nocturnal hypoxemia emerged as an independent predictor of positive screening findings (lung nodules ≥ 6 mm; odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–6.09, P = 0.027).9
Previous studies have identified a significant association between nocturnal oxygen desaturation (a hallmark of OSA) and increased incidence of smoking-related cancers, including lung cancer.10 Regarding the association between OSA and lung cancer incidence, epidemiological evidence exhibits considerable inconsistency. This review synthesizes findings from eight relevant studies, encompassing diverse populations, study designs, and time spans, to elucidate the relationship between OSA, its severity (measured by the AHI, nocturnal hypoxemia indicators [T90%], or mean oxygen saturation [SaO2]), and lung cancer incidence. These studies include retrospective cohort, prospective cohort, and matched-control designs, involving populations such as veterans, Asian cohorts, female nurses, and the general population. Lung cancer risk was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models or standardized incidence ratios (SIR).
Gozal et al.,6 utilizing a large U.S. health insurance database of approximately 5.6 million individuals, found no statistically significant association between OSA and lung cancer incidence (hazard ratio (HR) 1.02, 95% CI 0.99–1.06), nor was OSA linked to lung cancer progression or mortality. However, OSA was associated with a significantly increased risk of pancreatic, kidney, and melanoma cancers, while risks for colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers were lower. This suggests that OSA may have a limited overall impact on lung cancer but exerts a more pronounced effect on other cancer types. Similarly, Marriott et al.11 conducted a study on a cohort of 20,289 patients from a sleep clinic in Western Australia (median follow-up of 11.2 years) and found no significant association between AHI (AHI > 30 vs. AHI < 5, HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.51–1.26) or T90% (T90% ≥ 2.2 vs. T90% < 0.1, HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.67–1.38) and lung cancer incidence. Although nocturnal hypoxemia was independently associated with baseline cancer prevalence, after adjusting for confounders such as age, sex, body mass index, and smoking, OSA severity showed no independent association with cancer incidence, including lung cancer, suggesting that OSA may not be a direct driver of lung cancer.
In contrast, Jara et al.12 conducted a study on 1,377,285 patients within the Veterans Health Care System (median follow-up of 7.4 years) and reported a significant increase in overall cancer risk associated with OSA (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.94–2.00), with a 32% increased incidence of lung cancer (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.27–1.38). After adjusting for confounders such as age, sex, smoking, and obesity, OSA remained an independent risk factor for cancer development, particularly in the predominantly male veteran population, suggesting that OSA may influence lung cancer risk through specific carcinogenic mechanisms. Similarly, Kendzerska et al.,4 in a multicenter retrospective study in Canada (N = 33,711, median follow-up of 7 years), found that severe OSA was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.00–1.80), whereas mild-to-moderate OSA showed no such association. Nocturnal hypoxemia (mean SaO2 < 93.4%) was also identified as an independent risk factor for lung cancer, indicating a significant contribution of severe hypoxemia to lung cancer risk.4 Justeau et al.13 further underscored the role of nocturnal hypoxemia in a multicenter cohort study (N = 8,748, median follow-up of 5.8 years). They found no direct association between AHI and lung cancer incidence, but T90% (percentage of sleep time with oxygen saturation < 90%) was an independent risk factor for lung cancer development (T90% ≥ 13% vs. T90% < 0.01, HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.01–4.54), suggesting that chronic IH may be a critical carcinogenic mechanism. A prospective study in 2021 (Nurses’ Health Study, N = 65,330, women, mean age 73.3 years, follow-up of 8 years) also found a significant association between OSA and lung cancer risk (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.07–2.17).14 Among non-smokers, OSA patients had approximately three times the lung cancer incidence compared to non-OSA patients (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.42–6.18). However, this study relied on self-reported OSA diagnoses via questionnaires rather than polysomnography, potentially introducing diagnostic bias. Nevertheless, the stronger association in non-smokers suggests that hypoxemia may amplify lung cancer risk in the absence of smoking exposure.
However, some studies have reported contrasting findings. Sillah et al.5 investigated 34,402 OSA patients (mean follow-up of 5.3 years) and observed an elevated overall cancer incidence (SIR 1.26, 95% CI 1.20–1.32), but lung cancer incidence was lower than expected (SIR 0.66, 95% CI 0.54–0.79, with 115 observed cases compared to 175 expected cases), suggesting a potential protective effect of OSA against lung cancer. Similarly, a 2023 study based on a 12-year follow-up from the Korea National Health Insurance Service found a significantly reduced lung cancer incidence among OSA patients (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82–0.93), particularly in male patients (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78–0.90), while no significant association was observed in female patients (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.91–1.21).15 This gender-specific protective effect may be related to genetic or environmental factors specific to Asian populations.
The observed discrepancies in study findings may stem from several underlying factors. Firstly, studies reporting an elevated lung cancer risk associated with OSA often involve follow-up periods exceeding seven years.12–14 Given the chronic nature of both OSA and lung cancer, with their prolonged latency periods, the interval between disease onset and clinical diagnosis can span several years. Establishing a causal link between OSA’s physiological effects and cancer progression requires OSA to persist for an extended period before cancer detection, even if undiagnosed. For instance, research suggests that squamous cell lung carcinoma typically requires approximately eight years to reach a radiologically detectable size. Secondly, many epidemiological studies rely on national health insurance databases to identify patients with OSA.12,13 While these datasets offer valuable large-scale insights, they are prone to inherent biases. Key confounding variables, such as obesity and smoking status, are often inadequately documented or challenging to assess accurately in such registries. Insufficient adjustment for these factors can significantly skew study outcomes, leading to inconsistent findings across investigations due to variations in risk factor prevalence. Moreover, identifying OSA patients through administrative databases introduces risks of selection bias and exposure misclassification. Control groups labeled as “unexposed” (lacking an OSA diagnosis) may inadvertently include undiagnosed OSA cases, particularly in clinical cohorts with prevalent OSA-related risk factors, such as obesity. Conversely, diagnosed OSA patients may not fully represent the broader OSA population, as they often exhibit more severe symptoms or comorbidities. To address these limitations, community-based studies employing objective diagnostic tools, such as polysomnography, could yield more accurate estimates of OSA prevalence. However, such studies are resource-intensive, often resulting in smaller sample sizes that constrain statistical power. Another critical factor is the variability in adjusting for confounders, such as smoking, body mass index, and comorbidities. Inconsistent control for these variables may obscure or exaggerate the true association between OSA and lung cancer risk. Notably, several studies (e.g., Justeau, Kendzerska) indicate that nocturnal hypoxemia—measured by metrics like T90% (time spent with oxygen saturation below 90%) or low SaO2—is a stronger predictor of lung cancer risk than the AHI.4,14 This suggests that chronic IH may be a primary oncogenic mechanism in OSA-related carcinogenesis. Although AHI is a widely used diagnostic metric, it primarily quantifies the frequency of respiratory disturbances and does not fully capture OSA’s pathophysiological complexity. The clinical impact of OSA extends beyond apnea and hypopnea events, encompassing the severity and cumulative duration of oxygen desaturation. As a standalone measure, AHI may fail to account for systemic effects, such as chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and activation of the HIF pathway, all of which are critical in cancer initiation and progression (Table 1).4–6,11–15
Table 1Summary of major epidemiological studies on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), nocturnal hypoxemia, and lung cancer incidence
| First author, Year | Country/Region | Study design | N | Follow-up (median) | OSA diagnosis | Key notes |
|---|
| Gozal, 20166 | USA | cohort | 5.6 million | 3.2 y | ICD codes | No association with lung cancer |
| Kendzerska, 20214 | Canada | Multicenter retrospective | 33,711 | 7 y | PSG | The severity of OSA and nocturnal hypoxemia was independently associated with incident cancer |
| Jara, 202012 | USA (Veterans) | Retrospective cohort | 1,377,285 | 7.4 y | ICD codes | Association with lung cancer |
| Justeau, 202013 | France | multicenter cohort | 8,748 | 5.8 y | PSG | Nocturnal hypoxemia was associated with lung malignancies |
| Sillah, 20185 | USA | Community cohort | 34,402 | 5.3 y | ICD codes | Paradoxical lower incidence |
| Huang, 202014 | USA | Sleep clinic cohort | 65,330 | 8 y | Self report | OSA was associated with significantly increased risk of lung cancer |
| Marriott, 202311 | Australia | Sleep clinic cohort | 20,289 | 11.2 y | PSG | No association |
| Park, 202315 | Korea | NHIS national cohort | 267,849 | 12 y | operational code | Protective in Asian males |
OSA and mortality of lung cancer
A retrospective case series analysis of a sleep cohort with suspected OSA (2009–2014), comprising 8,261 patients, reported a lung cancer incidence rate of 242.1 per 100,000 individuals—significantly higher than that of the general adult population in Taiwan (51.5 per 100,000, P < 0.01).16 Notably, cancer-related mortality at three years increased progressively with OSA severity: 25% for AHI < 15, 50% for AHI 15–29, and 80% for AHI ≥ 30 (chi-squared test for trend, P = 0.03). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis further demonstrated that stage III–IV lung cancer patients with AHI < 30 had significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival compared to those with severe OSA (P = 0.02).
Another study conducted at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (2017) evaluated 45 patients with surgically resectable lung cancer alongside a control group. After one year of follow-up, the OSA subgroup exhibited a significantly higher overall deterioration rate (encompassing death, recurrence, and metastasis) compared to the non-OSA subgroup (P < 0.05). However, individual outcomes—mortality, recurrence, and metastasis rates—did not reach statistical significance (OSA subgroup: 3 deaths, 5 recurrences, 4 metastases; non-OSA subgroup: 1 death, 4 recurrences, 2 metastases).17
Current epidemiological findings underscore a strong association between severe OSA and elevated mortality risk in lung cancer patients, with evidence suggesting that OSA may accelerate disease progression through mechanisms such as chronic nocturnal hypoxemia. These observations highlight the need for greater clinical consideration of OSA in lung cancer management and further research into its pathophysiological role (Table 2).16,17
Table 2Summary of major epidemiological studies on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), nocturnal hypoxemia, and lung cancer mortality
| First author, Year | Country/Region | Study design | N | Follow-up (median) | OSA diagnosis | Key notes |
|---|
| Huang, 202016 | Taiwan | Sleep cohort | 8,261 | 5 y | PSG | OSA is associated with an increased risk of cancer mortality |
| Liu, 201917 | China | Prospective SAILS screening | 45 | 1 y | HSAT | The mortality, recurrence rate, and metastasis rate increased in lung cancer patients with OSA during the one-year follow-up period |