Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease, including sleep disturbance, cognitive impairment, depression, and anxiety, are common and often undertreated, yet their responsiveness to mind-body exercises remains unclear. This scoping review evaluated the currently available evidence on the effects of Tai Chi and Qigong interventions on non-motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease.

We searched six databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PEDro) through February 28, 2026, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We included English-language RCTs that evaluated the effects of Qigong and Tai Chi interventions on non-motor outcomes in Parkinson’s disease and excluded non-RCTs, review articles, and protocol articles. We were predominantly interested in the following non-motor outcome measures: cognition, depression, anxiety, fatigue, and sleep quality.

This review identified 18 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria, including nine Tai Chi studies and nine Qigong studies. Most of the reviewed studies were of high quality according to the PEDro scale, but the small sample sizes limited our analysis to identifying trends in outcomes. A strong trend toward a beneficial effect was found for sleep quality and cognition, a moderate trend toward improvement was found in depression, anxiety and quality of life, and weak or unclear effects were found for other non-motor symptoms such as fatigue. Several studies also had high dropout rates.

Although these studies suggest that Tai Chi and Qigong may improve sleep quality and cognition, the evidence supporting their benefits in alleviating other non-motor symptoms is generally weak, primarily because of small sample sizes. The heterogeneity in methodologies across the reviewed studies and high dropout rates in some studies are significant limitations of previous RCTs.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive cardiovascular disease with an increasing global burden. Although hemolytic disorders are established causes of PAH, their contribution to the global PAH burden remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between hemolysis-associated disorders and PAH incidence and to identify the relative contribution of hemolytic disorder subtypes compared with socio-demographic factors.

Using Global Burden of Disease 2021 data, temporal trends in the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of PAH were analyzed using Joinpoint regression. Pearson correlation analysis assessed associations between PAH ASIR and the age-standardized prevalence rates of hemolytic disorder subtypes, hemolysis-related infections, malnutrition, and the Socio-demographic Index (SDI). Random forest regression was used to quantify the contributions of hemolytic disorders to PAH ASIR. Geographic distributions of PAH incidence and hemolytic disorder prevalence were compared, and Bayesian age-period-cohort modeling was used to project their burdens through 2050.

Global PAH ASIR increased from 0.50 to 0.52 per 100,000 from 1990 to 2021. The prevalence of hemoglobinopathies and hemolytic anemias correlated positively with PAH ASIR (R = 0.61, P = 7.70 × 10-22). The random forest model explained 73% of the variance in PAH ASIR (R² = 0.73, P = 0.01), with G6PD trait (percentage increase in mean squared error [%IncMSE]: 18.43), other hemoglobinopathies/hemolytic anemias of unknown etiology (%IncMSE: 18.38), and vitamin A deficiency (%IncMSE: 17.27) identified as the top predictors, surpassing SDI (%IncMSE: 13.25) and sex (%IncMSE: 1.25). Temporal changes in hemolytic disorder prevalence strongly mirrored changes in PAH incidence (R = 0.76, P = 6.34 × 10-39). Exploratory analyses suggested that natural product exposures may contribute to the unexplained hemolytic burden that drives PAH. Projections indicated a continued rise through 2050 in both PAH burden (ASIR increasing from 0.52 in 2022 to 0.57 per 100,000) and hemolytic disease burden (prevalence rising from 27,760.54 to 31,863.72 per 100,000).

Hemolysis-associated disorders, particularly G6PD trait, other hemoglobinopathies/hemolytic anemias, and vitamin A deficiency, are the predominant contributors to the global PAH burden. The projected continued rise in hemolytic disorder prevalence through 2050 signals a persistent exacerbation of the global PAH burden, underscoring the urgent need for targeted prevention strategies.

Due to the lack of specific Western medicine therapies for post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome in clinical practice, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for post-COVID-19 syndrome using a cohort study design and to explore its clinical value in alleviating patients’ symptoms and improving clinical outcomes.

In this cohort study, patients were divided into two groups according to clinical treatment. The control group received conventional Western medicine, and the treatment group received additional TCM syndrome differentiation–based treatment. Propensity score matching methods were used to reduce selection bias by equating groups based on observed covariates. Clinical data, including TCM symptom scores, the Short Form 36 Health Survey, clinical efficacy, and adverse events at Day 7, were collected. The primary outcome was the efficacy rate, defined by improvement at Day 7 compared with the Day 0 score. Data were processed and analyzed using SPSS 23.0 and R 4.5.0 software.

A total of 434 patients were enrolled in the cohort, including 306 patients in the control group and 128 in the treatment group. After 1:1 matching, 94 matched pairs were analyzed. For the primary outcome, the effective rate in the treatment group was higher than that in the control group (30.8% vs. 17.2%; odds ratio (OR) = 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09–4.35, P = 0.003). After seven days of treatment, the TCM syndrome score improved more in the treatment group than in the control group (median difference (MD) = 2.00, 95% CI: 0.50–3.50, P = 0.009). Subgroup analyses showed generally favorable efficacy in the treatment group across subgroups, though not all reached statistical significance.

TCM syndrome differentiation–based therapy effectively relieves clinical symptoms in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome.

This review explores the convergence of traditional wisdom and modern science in the realm of herbal medicines, focusing on the safety, efficacy, and bioactivity of these natural remedies in contemporary healthcare. The rich history of herbal medicines, deeply embedded in cultural traditions, is witnessing a resurgence as the quest for holistic and personalized healthcare gains momentum. Herbal medicine, a time-honored practice passed down through generations, is experiencing renewed interest amid the growing acknowledgment of its potential benefits. This review delves into the safety profiles of herbal remedies, subjecting them to rigorous scientific scrutiny. Additionally, it investigates the efficacy of herbal interventions, aiming to bridge the gap between historical anecdotes and empirical research. The complex bioactivity of herbal compounds, often containing numerous active ingredients, is a focal point, unraveling the mechanisms through which these natural substances interact with the human body. In a world where the synthesis of traditional wisdom and modern science holds promise for advancing healthcare, this review contributes to the ongoing dialogue. By critically examining the safety, efficacy, and bioactivity of herbal remedies, it aims to illuminate the evolving landscape of herbal medicine. The goal is to integrate the best of both worlds to enhance global well-being, acknowledging the potential of herbal medicine as a valuable complement to modern healthcare practices.

In recent years, there has been a notable shift towards a holistic approach to human health, recognizing the importance of integrating essential nutrients with traditional natural medicines. This review article examines the potential synergy between nutrition and traditional healing practices in promoting well-being and disease prevention. It explores the diverse landscape of traditional medicine systems worldwide, highlighting their cultural significance and accumulated wisdom over generations. Moreover, it sheds light on the scientific foundations of these traditional remedies, showcasing their relevance in modern healthcare. Traditional natural medicines, often sourced from plants, animals, or minerals, offer a wide array of therapeutic options addressing root causes rather than symptoms alone. This enduring wisdom has sparked interest in complementing modern healthcare with traditional practices, aiming for a harmonious integration of tradition and evidence-based medicine. Furthermore, the article underscores the critical role of nutrients in maintaining overall health and preventing chronic diseases. It emphasizes the holistic perspective of health, encompassing mental, emotional, and physical well-being. The relationship between nutrition and health is also explored, emphasizing the importance of a balanced diet. The synergy between traditional natural medicines and nutritional interventions presents a promising avenue for a comprehensive approach to healthcare. The article advocates for collaborative research, interdisciplinary dialogue, and cross-cultural exchanges to harness the collective wisdom of the past and present. By embracing both nutrients and traditional medicines, we can move towards achieving optimal health and wellness, recognizing the profound interconnectedness between humans and the natural world.

Globally, the integration of traditional medicine and modern medicine has been recognized as a global health priority aimed at improving healthcare accessibility, cultural relevance, and therapeutic effectiveness. This review systematically examines the global landscape of traditional medicine-modern medicine integration by analyzing policy developments, regulatory frameworks, and clinical implementation models across various regions, including Asia, Africa, Europe, and the USA. The scope of the review encompasses five key domains: (1) global policy initiatives, (2) regulatory and institutional frameworks, (3) clinical integration models, (4) impacts and outcomes of integrative practices, and (5) challenges and barriers to implementation. Based on peer-reviewed literature and official health policy documents published between 2000 and 2025, the present review investigates how countries have operationalized clinical integration models combining traditional and complementary medicine. Although interest in traditional and complementary medicine has grown worldwide, persistent challenges, such as limited scientific validation, lack of standardization, and professional resistance, continue to hinder progress. This review concludes that successful and sustainable integration requires evidence-based clinical approaches, inclusive regulatory reforms, and coordinated policy strategies. Countries such as China, India, and Brazil have made significant advances, offering valuable models for future implementation worldwide.