Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common focal epilepsy, with many patients developing drug-resistant epilepsy. Surgical interventions, including stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)-guided temporal lobe resection (TLR) and SEEG-guided responsive neurostimulation (RNS), are key treatment options. This systematic review compares the efficacy and safety of these interventions in drug-resistant TLE.

A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search of multiple databases was performed (January 23–February 14, 2025). Eligible studies included adult patients with drug-resistant TLE undergoing SEEG-guided TLR or RNS (where SEEG was used pre-implant for localization). Primary outcomes assessed included seizure freedom, seizure reduction, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL) improvements. Quality assessments were performed using appropriate tools for randomized and observational studies.

Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria, with sample sizes ranging from 10 to 440 participants. SEEG-guided TLR achieved an average seizure freedom rate of 58.5% (range: 32–85%) and a mean seizure reduction of 75% (range: 60–90%). SEEG-guided RNS resulted in an average seizure freedom rate of 12.85% and seizure reduction of 63.2%, with variability across studies. QoL improvements were reported in 80–82% of patients. Adverse events were infrequent but varied between interventions.

This review highlights the effectiveness of SEEG-guided TLR and RNS in managing drug-resistant TLE. While both interventions reduce seizure burden and improve QoL, seizure freedom rates are higher with resection. However, gaps remain in understanding long-term cognitive outcomes and demographic influences on treatment response. Future research should address these factors to refine patient selection and optimize epilepsy care.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is now considered to be among the most prevalent chronic liver diseases worldwide. Its comprehensive management encompasses multiple stages, including risk assessment, early detection, stratified intervention, and long-term follow-up. Among these, improving diagnostic accuracy and optimizing individualized therapeutic strategies remain key challenges in both research and clinical practice. In recent years, artificial intelligence and smart devices have developed rapidly and have gradually been applied in the medical field, offering novel tools and pathways for MASLD risk stratification, non-invasive diagnosis, therapeutic evaluation, and patient self-management. This review summarizes the current applications of artificial intelligence and smart devices in MASLD care, highlights their benefits and limitations, and discusses future directions to support precision diagnosis and treatment strategies.

The existing wound assessment tools, which are based on modern medical theory, limit the clinical application of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) nursing. This research aimed to develop a scientific, standardized, and characteristic TCM nursing evaluation form for chronic wounds.

Based on a literature review and research group discussions, an initial draft of an expert consultation questionnaire, based on literature from the past five years (2017–2021) from databases such as CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed, was formulated. The authority of the experts was expressed using the authority coefficient, derived from self-evaluations, which is critical for ensuring the scientific validity and rationality of the indicator system. After three rounds of Delphi expert consultation, the TCM nursing assessment form for wound surfaces was finalized.

The effective response rate for the three rounds of expert consultation questionnaires was 100%. The judgment coefficient was 0.85, the familiarity coefficient was 0.89, and the authority coefficient was 0.87. The coefficients of variation for the three rounds were 0.172, 0.044, and 0.013, respectively, while the Kendall’s coefficients of concordance were 0.406, 0.269, and 0.502, respectively, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). The final TCM nursing assessment form for wound surfaces included four basic information items, two primary indicators, 17 secondary indicators, and 13 tertiary indicators.

The TCM nursing assessment form integrates TCM syndrome differentiation principles and provides a standardized tool for the assessment of chronic wounds.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a life-threatening syndrome characterized by systemic inflammation and immune dysregulation, in which macrophages play a key role in organ injury. This study aimed to investigate the role and mechanism of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4) in ACLF to identify therapeutic targets that modulate macrophage function and mitigate ACLF progression.

Single-cell RNA sequencing data from healthy and ACLF liver tissues were analyzed from the Sequence Read Archive database. Transcriptomic data of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from ACLF patients (GSE168048) were also examined. In vitro experiments assessed PDK4 expression and macrophage polarization, and conditioned-medium studies evaluated effects on LO2 hepatocytes. In vivo validation was performed in ACLF mouse models treated with a PDK4 inhibitor.

Single-cell analysis revealed a predominance of M1-polarized hepatic macrophages in ACLF with marked upregulation of PDK4. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell transcriptomics showed that higher PDK4 expression correlated with 28-day mortality. In vitro, PDK4 expression increased in M1 macrophages; PDK4 inhibition attenuated M1 polarization and reduced cytotoxic effects on LO2 cells. In vivo, pharmacologic inhibition of PDK4 suppressed M1 polarization in macrophages, alleviated liver inflammation, and reduced tissue injury. Mechanistically, PDK4 promoted M1 polarization via activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 signaling.

PDK4 is a key pro-inflammatory regulator in ACLF by promoting M1 macrophage polarization. Targeting PDK4 may be a promising strategy to attenuate inflammation and improve clinical outcomes in ACLF.

Bone marrow metastasis (BMM) from non-hematolymphoid malignancies with resultant cytopenia(s) can mimic primary hematolymphoid disorders. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics of BMM from non-hematopoietic tumors.

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with BMM by non-hematolymphoid malignancies at our institution over the past 10 years. Demographic and clinical characteristics, histopathological findings of bone marrow, types of metastatic tumors, and prognosis were analyzed.

A total of 54 cases were included. The four most common malignancies with BMM, regardless of gender, were prostatic adenocarcinoma (29.6%), breast carcinoma (25.9%), colorectal adenocarcinoma (5.5%), and lung carcinoma (5.5%). The main clinical and laboratory manifestations were anemia (90.7%), reticulocytosis (80.5%), thrombocytopenia (73.9%), bone pain (55.5%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (39.6%), leukoerythroblastosis (35.3%), and leukopenia (24%). The vast majority (96.3%) of metastatic tumors were identified by morphology alone; however, in approximately 2.7% of cases, immunohistochemistry was required due to subtle morphologic features. In 29.6% (16/54) of patients, BMM was identified prior to or concurrently with other metastatic sites. The median time interval between the initial diagnosis of non-hematolymphoid malignancies and BMM was 29 months. Although patients who received anti-tumor treatment after BMM diagnosis showed significantly improved prognosis (P < 0.01), no significant differences were observed between those treated with immunotherapy versus chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (P = 0.145).

Prostate and breast carcinomas are the most common malignancies associated with BMM, with anemia, reticulocytosis, and thrombocytopenia being the most frequent clinical manifestations. While our data demonstrate that anti-neoplastic treatments, regardless of regimen, significantly improve overall survival after BMM, no significant survival differences were observed when prostate and breast carcinomas were compared with other types of BMM.