Due to the lack of specific Western medicine therapies for post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome in clinical practice, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for post-COVID-19 syndrome using a cohort study design and to explore its clinical value in alleviating patients’ symptoms and improving clinical outcomes.

In this cohort study, patients were divided into two groups according to clinical treatment. The control group received conventional Western medicine, and the treatment group received additional TCM syndrome differentiation–based treatment. Propensity score matching methods were used to reduce selection bias by equating groups based on observed covariates. Clinical data, including TCM symptom scores, the Short Form 36 Health Survey, clinical efficacy, and adverse events at Day 7, were collected. The primary outcome was the efficacy rate, defined by improvement at Day 7 compared with the Day 0 score. Data were processed and analyzed using SPSS 23.0 and R 4.5.0 software.

A total of 434 patients were enrolled in the cohort, including 306 patients in the control group and 128 in the treatment group. After 1:1 matching, 94 matched pairs were analyzed. For the primary outcome, the effective rate in the treatment group was higher than that in the control group (30.8% vs. 17.2%; odds ratio (OR) = 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09–4.35, P = 0.003). After seven days of treatment, the TCM syndrome score improved more in the treatment group than in the control group (median difference (MD) = 2.00, 95% CI: 0.50–3.50, P = 0.009). Subgroup analyses showed generally favorable efficacy in the treatment group across subgroups, though not all reached statistical significance.

TCM syndrome differentiation–based therapy effectively relieves clinical symptoms in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome.

The Asia-Pacific region accounts for a larger share of the hepatitis B burden than any other regions of the world, presenting a challenge to meeting the World Health Organization (WHO) 2030 elimination targets. In this study, we aimed to quantify the burden of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and project its trends through 2030 using the Global Burden of Disease 2023 framework, thereby identifying gaps and priorities for the Asia-Pacific region to achieve WHO 2030 targets.

Using data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023, we analyzed CHB prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years. We evaluated temporal trends (1990–2023) using average annual percent changes and projected the 2024–2030 burden using Bayesian age-period-cohort models.

In 2023, the Asia-Pacific region accounted for 63% of global CHB cases (178.0 million), 66% of deaths (259.1 thousand), and 65% of disability-adjusted life years (8.4 million). Regional prevalence and mortality rates exceeded global averages, although childhood (<5 years) prevalence was comparatively lower (590.3 vs. 1,325.3 per 100,000). East Asia bore the highest absolute burden (99.2 million cases), and South Asia had the largest pediatric caseload. Between 1990 and 2023, Western Asia showed the steepest decline in adult prevalence (−1.99%), whereas Southeast and Central Asia exhibited upward mortality trends. Projections indicate that the Asia-Pacific region is off track to meet the WHO 2030 disease elimination targets, as the prevalence rate in children under five years remains above the 0.1% target threshold and absolute mortality is projected to increase.

The Asia-Pacific region continues to contribute the largest share of the global CHB burden and now faces persistent gaps despite progress. Although substantial progress has been made in reducing prevalence through immunization, the region is currently off track to meet the WHO 2030 targets for both incidence and mortality.

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers account for approximately one-third of annual cancer-related deaths globally, while outcomes remain poor despite advances in surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Given the challenges of persistent resistance and treatment-related toxicities in current therapies, the pivotal roles of the gut microbiota and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in GI cancer therapy are increasingly recognized. This review aims to explore the potential and mechanisms of FMT as a therapeutic adjuvant in the treatment of GI cancers. FMT may enhance antitumor treatment efficacy and reduce treatment-related toxicity through multiple mechanisms, including enhancing antigen presentation, reshaping the tumor microenvironment, and preserving intestinal barrier function. Preliminary clinical evidence indicates that FMT combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy can improve treatment response rates in some trials and may reverse resistance and alleviate associated intestinal toxicities in selected cases. However, clinical application is hindered by donor microbiota functional heterogeneity, substantial interindividual variability in engraftment, and the absence of validated predictive models. To advance FMT toward precision intervention, we propose a functional screening framework: the Healthy Donor-derived Microbiota Xenograft model as a preclinical functional screening platform and its subsequent clinical application, Xenograft-screened FMT, which links donor-level functional validation with personalized microbiota delivery. By integrating mechanistic insights, emerging preclinical and clinical evidence, and a functional screening framework, this review contributes to advancing FMT from an empirical intervention toward a precision adjuvant strategy and offers insights into future clinical investigation of FMT as a therapeutic approach in GI oncology.