It is established that administration of the COVID-19 vaccine may be associated with an exaggerated immune response leading to enlargement of several lymph nodes. Although most cases are benign and self-limiting, some have been reported in the literature as B-cell or T-cell lymphomas, with no reported cases of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). We report two cases of follicular lymphoma and CLL that occurred a few weeks after COVID-19 vaccination. Case 1 is a 48-year-old woman who noticed two significantly palpable masses, one in each axilla, 48 h after receiving the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine for COVID-19. Seven days later, she noticed another mass on the right side of her neck, which was biopsied within 48 hours. Case 2 is a 75-year-old man who presented with localized swellings in the axilla and on the neck, noted 24 h after the first dose of the Moderna messenger RNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine. Neither patient reported any constitutional or associated symptoms. Surgical biopsy of the axillary lymph node in case 1 revealed a non-Hodgkin lymphoma, confirmed via immunohistochemistry as CD20-positive B-cell follicular lymphoma. The patient also had multiple pre- and para-aortic lymph nodes. In case 2, complete blood count showed lymphocytosis (total white blood cell – 148 × 109/L; lymphocyte differential – 92%), while peripheral blood film showed lymphocytosis with a predominance of small, mature-looking lymphocytes, both suggesting CLL. Although requested, immunophenotyping and molecular testing were not performed due to patient-related challenges. Although a chance occurrence is possible, lymphoid malignancies should be considered a strong differential. The vaccination history of patients presenting with clinical manifestations suggestive of a lymphoid malignancy should be thoroughly investigated, while ruling out other possible differentials such as a benign, self-limiting inflammatory process.

Systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare and potentially fatal disease characterized by the abnormal deposition of homogeneous, amorphous amyloid proteins in tissues and organs. This deposition leads to varying degrees of structural and functional abnormalities, ultimately causing organ dysfunction and failure. The disease often involves multiple systems and organs, including the heart, kidneys, gastrointestinal tract, liver, and nervous system, with cardiac and renal involvement being the most common. Due to its rarity, multisystem involvement, and rapid progression, a comprehensive summary of the diagnosis and treatment of AL amyloidosis is crucial for guiding clinical practice and advancing research in this field. This article reviews the progress in diagnosis and discusses future treatment of AL amyloidosis, aiming to provide expanded options for clinical practice.

Lactate exerts regulatory effects on both cellular homeostasis and disease progression, far beyond being a mere metabolic waste product. As lactate accumulates, the level of lactylation increases significantly. Lactylation, a novel type of post-translational modification, bridges metabolic reprogramming and epigenetic regulation in malignant tumors, including gynecological malignancies. Both lactate and lactylation play critical roles in the tumor microenvironment, ultimately promoting tumor proliferation, metastasis, and drug resistance. Therapies targeting lactate production and transport show considerable anticancer potential, particularly through the inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase and monocarboxylate transporters. These inhibitors can also act as immunotherapy potentiators, producing a synergistic therapeutic effect when combined with immunotherapy. This review emphasizes how lactate and lactylation drive the malignant progression of gynecological cancers and explores promising perspectives on potential therapeutic targets.

Sedation monitoring is crucial in neurosurgical intensive care units to ensure optimal patient comfort and safety. However, sedation practices vary significantly. This study aimed to evaluate and summarize the evidence related to sedation monitoring in neurocritical care patients, with a focus on identifying best practices for improving monitoring accuracy and patient outcomes.

This study was conducted as an evidence summary, following the evidence summary reporting standards of the Fudan University Evidence-based Nursing Center. The evidence on sedation monitoring management in neurocritical care patients was systematically retrieved using the 6S evidence model, including clinical decisions, best practices, guidelines, expert consensus, evidence summaries, systematic reviews, and more. Searches of domestic and international databases covered all records from the databases’ inception to June 2024. Two researchers independently selected literature that met the inclusion criteria and conducted quality assessment, evidence-level evaluation, and evidence synthesis.

Ten high-quality studies were ultimately included. From these, twenty pieces of best evidence were extracted, covering four categories: monitoring personnel, monitoring targets, monitoring tools, and monitoring timing and content. Among these, fifteen pieces of evidence were classified as strong recommendations, while five were classified as weak recommendations.

This study summarized the best evidence on sedation monitoring for neurocritical care patients, providing guidance for clinical staff to improve sedation monitoring accuracy and patient outcomes in neurosurgical intensive care units.