Luteolin is a dietary flavonoid widely distributed in fruits and vegetables. It has attracted substantial preclinical interest due to its pleiotropic hepatoprotective effects against hepatic steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. By reviewing data from in vitro and in vivo studies, this review comprehensively synthesizes the full spectrum of liver-directed pharmacology of luteolin, covering metabolic and toxic liver injury, fibrosis, cancer, and viral hepatitis, while critically mapping each mechanism to specific disease contexts and systematically identifying the key challenges limiting its clinical translation. The underlying mechanisms of luteolin action involve activation of Nrf2-mediated antioxidant defense, suppression of NF-κB- and NLRP3-driven inflammatory responses, inhibition of hepatic stellate cell activation via the TGF-β/Smad and STAT3 pathways, and regulation of metabolic homeostasis through liver X receptor (LXR)/SREBP-1c and AMPK signaling. Despite well-characterized mechanisms in preclinical models, several critical gaps hinder its clinical translation: (1) Rigorous randomized controlled trials in well-defined patient populations are scarce, with only one combination supplement study reported. (2) The relative contribution of luteolin metabolites to its overall bioactivity remains poorly understood, even though derivatives such as luteolin-7-diglucuronide exhibit distinct pharmacological properties. Cell-type-specific delivery systems, which show promise in preclinical fibrosis and cancer models, have not been evaluated clinically. (3) Systematic studies on the synergistic effects of luteolin with standard-of-care drugs remain largely exploratory. Overall, luteolin is a promising multi-target nutraceutical for liver diseases, and its clinical translation requires optimized delivery strategies, investigation of metabolite activity, and well-designed human clinical trials.

The Asia-Pacific region accounts for a larger share of the hepatitis B burden than any other regions of the world, presenting a challenge to meeting the World Health Organization (WHO) 2030 elimination targets. In this study, we aimed to quantify the burden of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and project its trends through 2030 using the Global Burden of Disease 2023 framework, thereby identifying gaps and priorities for the Asia-Pacific region to achieve WHO 2030 targets.

Using data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023, we analyzed CHB prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years. We evaluated temporal trends (1990–2023) using average annual percent changes and projected the 2024–2030 burden using Bayesian age-period-cohort models.

In 2023, the Asia-Pacific region accounted for 63% of global CHB cases (178.0 million), 66% of deaths (259.1 thousand), and 65% of disability-adjusted life years (8.4 million). Regional prevalence and mortality rates exceeded global averages, although childhood (<5 years) prevalence was comparatively lower (590.3 vs. 1,325.3 per 100,000). East Asia bore the highest absolute burden (99.2 million cases), and South Asia had the largest pediatric caseload. Between 1990 and 2023, Western Asia showed the steepest decline in adult prevalence (−1.99%), whereas Southeast and Central Asia exhibited upward mortality trends. Projections indicate that the Asia-Pacific region is off track to meet the WHO 2030 disease elimination targets, as the prevalence rate in children under five years remains above the 0.1% target threshold and absolute mortality is projected to increase.

The Asia-Pacific region continues to contribute the largest share of the global CHB burden and now faces persistent gaps despite progress. Although substantial progress has been made in reducing prevalence through immunization, the region is currently off track to meet the WHO 2030 targets for both incidence and mortality.

Due to the lack of specific Western medicine therapies for post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome in clinical practice, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for post-COVID-19 syndrome using a cohort study design and to explore its clinical value in alleviating patients’ symptoms and improving clinical outcomes.

In this cohort study, patients were divided into two groups according to clinical treatment. The control group received conventional Western medicine, and the treatment group received additional TCM syndrome differentiation–based treatment. Propensity score matching methods were used to reduce selection bias by equating groups based on observed covariates. Clinical data, including TCM symptom scores, the Short Form 36 Health Survey, clinical efficacy, and adverse events at Day 7, were collected. The primary outcome was the efficacy rate, defined by improvement at Day 7 compared with the Day 0 score. Data were processed and analyzed using SPSS 23.0 and R 4.5.0 software.

A total of 434 patients were enrolled in the cohort, including 306 patients in the control group and 128 in the treatment group. After 1:1 matching, 94 matched pairs were analyzed. For the primary outcome, the effective rate in the treatment group was higher than that in the control group (30.8% vs. 17.2%; odds ratio (OR) = 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09–4.35, P = 0.003). After seven days of treatment, the TCM syndrome score improved more in the treatment group than in the control group (median difference (MD) = 2.00, 95% CI: 0.50–3.50, P = 0.009). Subgroup analyses showed generally favorable efficacy in the treatment group across subgroups, though not all reached statistical significance.

TCM syndrome differentiation–based therapy effectively relieves clinical symptoms in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome.