v
Search
Advanced Search

Publications > Journals > Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine > Article Full Text

  • OPEN ACCESS

Senescence in Aging, Within the Brain and Other Diseases: Mechanisms and Interventions

  • Swarup K. Chakrabarti1,*  and
  • Dhrubajyoti Chattopadhyay1,2
 Author information
Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine   2023;8(4):372-387

doi: 10.14218/ERHM.2023.00018

Abstract

Aging, shifting demographics, and lifestyle changes are some of the underlying factors contributing to an increase in the incidence and prevalence of age-related disorders. Brain health is correlated with cellular senescence and is an important indicator of physiological aging and several age-related diseases. Examining the current state of knowledge of the underlying mechanisms of senescence as well as prospective therapeutic modalities concerning aging and age-related diseases is thus crucial. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) of senescent cells (SnCs) results in a secretome, which is primarily composed of growth factors, cytokines/chemokines, and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling proteins secreted by the arrested cells. Increasingly, research suggests a causative role of senescence in various diseases such as osteoporosis, neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic dysfunction, among others. SnCs promote age-related diseases by affecting the differentiation and proliferation of stem cells. They do so, in part through disruption of the Wingless-related integration site (Wnt) signaling pathways and Yes-associated protein and its ortholog transcriptional coactivators with a PDZ-binding domain (YAP/TAZ) transcriptional regulation, affecting tissue regeneration and a decreased ability for the body to rejuvenate. Senescent cell-induced immune system dysregulation, e.g., immunosenescence, as well as senescent cell-secreted substances also cause persistent, low-grade inflammation in organisms known as inflammaging, which accelerates aging and results in tissue damage. During age-related senescence, key chromatin structural changes take place in the cells that affect nuclear transport, causing genomic instability, changes in nucleosome positioning, post-translational modifications of histones, global histone loss, etc. Elimination of SnCS using senolytics by targeting cellular and molecular pathways has emerged as a potential therapeutic strategy for delaying aging and improving age-related dysfunctions including brain diseases.

Keywords

Aging, Senescence, Neurological diseases, Brain disorders, Public health, Senolytics

Introduction

Population aging together with shifting demographics and related lifestyle alterations are among the underlying causes of an increased incidence and prevalence of age-related disorders. Such disorders include non-communicable diseases, which can pose severe problems, especially in older people. The greater likelihood of disease severity and frequency in old age increases the burden of healthcare costs, including out-of-pocket expenses in the absence of any employer-sponsored health insurance.1–4 Such expenses are further compounded by the rapid advancement of public health in most countries around the world. Global life expectancy is expected to increase, contributing to a significant rise in the number and proportion of older persons worldwide.5,6 It is predicted that between 2015 and 2030, the number of individuals aged 60 and above will rise by 56%, reaching 1.4 billion, or the equivalent of 16.5% of the world’s population.7 An aging demographic augments the pressure on public health care systems to adapt to meet with increasing demand for age-related care and treatment of diseases, underscoring the importance of a 2030 agenda for sustainable development, which necessitates fulfillment of all Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).8,9 Concerning health, SDGs include encompassing all segments of society, with a special emphasis on the most vulnerable, including the older population.

Older persons contribute significantly to social capital

The United Nations (UN) strongly recognizes the diversity of older persons in terms of their capabilities and needs, including wisdom in the form of social capital that they bring to the workforce, and needs that are shaped by their age, including accelerated aging.10 Older persons are often seen as role models and mentors in society, as they have a great deal of experience in their respective fields and provide valuable advice and guidance on difficult issues. Notably, the concept of “old age” is multidimensional, which includes not only chronological age (based on birth date) but also, biological age.11,12 Multidimensional measures reflect the human body’s ability to actively engage in physical activities, which may be affected by factors unrelated to age, like psycho-socioeconomic factors, which often lead to an accelerated aging process that is generally prevalent in low-and-middle-income countries, and results in premature aging.13

Brain health is a critical indicator of aging and aging-related diseases

Significantly, multiple aspects of orchestrated physiological brain aging with marked accelerated deterioration of brain function primarily characterize human aging.14–16 Consequently, the prevalence of dementia globally will dramatically rise due to population aging. Therefore, the burden of neurological disorders associated with aging needs to be limited, along with meeting the growing challenges in preserving brain health among the older population in society.

Brain health is a critical aspect of public health management of age-related diseases

The cost of the economic burden for people with age-related neurological disorders, resulting in physical disability, cognitive or mental disorders, and social dysfunction could be enormous.17,18 Moreover, considering the link between brain health and wider health determinants, public health policies in any country obligate immense importance for maintaining the brain health of the population.19,20 Indeed, brain health is critical for physical and mental health, social well-being, productivity in the workplace, and creativity. In recent times, it is important to highlight that apart from causing severe damage to the physical and mental health of many people, fortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic has compelled a large number of professionals to embrace virtual working environments. Such environments necessitate an enormous amount of adjustments in terms of creative thinking, generating increased opportunities for transdisciplinary collaboration among neurologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, neuro- and socio-behavioral scientists, policymakers, as well as citizens. Such cross-disciplinary interconnectedness fosters brain health.21,22

Between health and diseases, cellular senescence is tightly regulated

Simplistically, senescent cells (SnCs) are cells that have stopped dividing.23–27 In essence, senescence is a physiological process in the form of a cellular response characterized by permanent growth arrest (cell cycle arrest), as a tumor suppressive stress response, to prevent the possible occurrence of cancer cells in older age. Cell cycle arrest occurs in part due to the ineffectiveness of DNA repair mechanisms, among others, such as other phenotypic changes that distinguish senescent cells from young cells, which include a proinflammatory secretome, associated with aging phenotype.28–30 Senescence, as opposed to being a static endpoint, seems to be the outcome of a succession of evolving and phenotypically varied cellular states that emerge following the initial growth arrest. Given the wide range of processes in which senescence is involved, including embryonic development, wound healing, tissue repair, cancer and aging, it is unclear if the characteristics of the SnCs involved in these processes are fundamentally distinct.31 For instance, acute senescence appears to be primarily involved in tightly controlled biological phenomena (such as wound recovery, recovery from tissue damage, and embryological growth) to stop the growth of specific cells. On the other hand, persistent senescence typically results after chronic stress on cells leading to cell cycle arrest. Moreover, chronic senescence seems to affect all cell types and is not programmed. Some progress has been made in understanding cellular senescence during the last few decades. Researchers have made significant progress in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying senescence because of the finding of the cell replicative senescence phenomena in human diploid fibroblasts 60 years ago, as shown in Table 1.32–53

Table 1

History of Cellular Senescence and Senotherapy: Some Fascinating Advancements in This Area are Presented

YearKey Finding(s)
1961Discovery of replicative senescence in human diploid fibroblasts.32
1965It is hypothesized that cellular senescence accelerates aging by impairing tissue repair ability.33
1970The age of the donor being biopsied and cell replicative life span are connected.34
1980Replicative senescence is linked to considerable variation in each individual cell’s capacity to divide both within the population as a whole and within a subpopulation of a clonal cell.35
1995Discovery of SA-ß-Gal as a marker of senescent cells.36
1996The master regulator of senescence cell cycle arrest, CDK inhibitor P16INK4A, has been identified.37
1999In terms of protection from external natural hazards, cells arising from species of longer life spans are typically better protected than cells from species of relatively shorter life spans.38
2002In human atherogenic plaques, senescent endothelial cells are seen.39
2004Use of SA-beta-gal and P16INK4A as biomarkers to identify SnCs in aged primate and rodent tissue.40
2007Stochastic heterogeneity in telomere-driven replicative senescence.41
2008Identification of SASP in SnCs.33
2010The primary function of DNA damage response (DDR) for maintaining the state of profound cellular senescence.42
2011Senolysis; the elimination of senescent cells, extends the lifespan of mice.43
2014Many senescent cells are highly resistant to the induction of apoptosis.44
2015It turns out that senescent cells are advantageous for growth, development, wound healing, and tissue repair.45
2016Discovery of the senolytic properties of BCL-2 family inhibitors. Atherosclerosis has been demonstrated to be inhibited by SnCs clearance using genetic and pharmacological methods.46,47
2017The therapeutic benefit of senolysis in the management of osteoarthritis has been demonstrated.48
2019Senescent cells consist of non-canonical MHC molecule like human leukocyte antigen E (HLA-E) that binds to inhibitory receptors present on NK cells along with CD8 cells, resulting in reduced immune clearance. Senolysis has been shown to improve the course of diabetes resulting from accelerated pancreatic beta-cell aging.49,50
2020An analysis of 279 human genes implicated in cellular senescence reveals that these genes statistically overlap with genes associated with short life spans rather than those associated with long life spans.51
2023Senolytic agents like dasatinib and quercetin possess senolytic effects, decreasing age-related increases in senescence-associated-galactosidase, p16 and p21 gene expression, and P16 protein; Senolytics decrease the expression of SARS-CoV-2 and virus-induced senescence in human brain organoids (preprint).52,53

Characteristics of SnCs

SnCs are unable to divide in the presence of nutrients and growth-stimulating mitogens, despite being viable and metabolically active. SnCs’ senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) permits extensive signaling from the non-proliferating cells to the external environment, resulting in a secretome, which is primarily made up of growth factors, cytokines/chemokines, as well as proteins that remodel the ECM and are secreted by the arrested cells.30,54–56 SnCs typically share signature features like enlarged and flat morphology.56 Members of the p53/p21 confer their non-proliferating ability together with the networks of p16/RB tumor-suppressor that serve to stop proliferation and contribute to the longevity of the senescent condition.57,58

SnCs are linked to embryonic development as well as a wide range of human diseases

Apart from its role in embryonic development, senescence has been shown to play key roles in fibrosis and wound healing.59,60 For example, SnCs prevent liver fibrosis in mice by activating hepatic stellate cells, preventing their proliferations so that ECM cannot be deposited in the fibrotic scar in response to liver damage.61 Additionally, similar to apoptosis, cellular senescence also contributes to embryonic development, in a developmentally programmed manner. Moreover, accumulating research tends to suggest a causative role of cellular senescence in a multitude of diseases such as osteoporosis, frailty, osteoarthritis, https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/frailtypulmonary fibrosis, https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/pulmonary-fibrosishttps://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/nephropathyrenal diseases, hepatic steatosis, neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic dysfunction.62–77 Therefore, given the key roles of senescence in a wide range of age-related diseases, it is crucial to look at both general and underlying disease-specific mechanisms contributing to the etiology and progression of each disease.

Cellular senescence in aging and age-induced diseases: the underlying mechanisms

Simplistically, single-cell dysfunction can potentially harm the whole multicellular organism. Thus, nature uses a two-pronged approach to control such events. First, a malfunctioning cell can recognize its dysfunction and limit its ability to grow. Second, fully functional healthy cells rely on their ability to recognize the malfunctioning cell and destroy it. Thus, cellular senescence essentially makes use of these inherent cellular properties to keep human health in good shape and mitigate diseases. For example, when a cell recognizes its dysfunction, it induces a permanent inhibition of the cell cycle by causing cell cycle inhibitors like p16INK4A and p21CIP1 to become active, followed by imparting signals to the immune system, that can then recognize and destroy the often-unwanted SnCs.78,79 Aging is associated with the progressive building up of SnCs in the body, which further promotes accelerated physiological aging and age-induced dysfunctions. SnCs may accumulate with age due to a variety of factors, including an aging immune system that fails to effectively remove them from tissues, ineffective SASP released by SnCs, a combination of both, and other factors that are currently unknown.80–84 Furthermore, tissue regeneration and restoration may be affected by cellular senescence, hastening the aging process. Therefore, it is likely that the elimination of SnCs can potentially ameliorate age-induced cellular dysfunction and prolong life span, contributing to a better quality of life in old age.

Senescence promotes age-related diseases by affecting the maturation and growth of stem cells to further exacerbate disease pathology

Multipotent cells that can self-renew and differentiate are known as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).85,86 Although there is growing evidence of the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs observed in a variety of clinical settings, MSCs eventually become incapable of regenerating themselves as they get older, which increases cellular dysfunction. Prior to going senescent, MSCs only experience a limited number of population doublings as opposed to endless growth.87 As a result, it is generally speculated that the age of stem cells and replicative senescence are the primary causes of age-related malfunction of stem cells. Among other mechanisms, physiological levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are necessary for cellular growth and maturation, although abundance can potentially elicit senescence in many tissues throughout the body, including in stem cells.88 How ROS contributes to cellular senescence has been extensively reviewed elsewhere.89

The role of Wingless-related integration site (Wnt) Signaling in stem cell senescence

It is established that Wnt signaling regulates cell proliferation and cell polarity, along with many critical biological processes.90,91 Significantly, stem cell maintenance and proliferation depend on the Wnt signaling pathway. Yes-associated protein (YAP) and its ortholog transcriptional coactivators with a PDZ-binding domain (TAZ) can be regulated by both canonical and noncanonical Wnt signaling.92,93 YAP/TAZ proteins translocate to the nucleus after activation, resulting in a complex formation with transcriptional enhanced associate domain transcription factors, to regulate critical cellular functions like cell proliferation and differentiation.94 For instance, in the intestine, YAP has been shown to induce epithelial regeneration.94 SnCs can affect stem cell differentiation and proliferation by disrupting Wnt signaling pathways as well as YAP/TAZ transcriptional regulation. The disruption resulted in impaired tissue regeneration and decreased ability of the body to rejuvenate itself over time, presumably by affecting the self-renewal and/or multi-differentiation capability of tissue-resident progenitor and stem cells.95,96

Paracrine roles of senescent stem cells in age-related diseases

There is mounting evidence that dysfunction or unregulated activation of senescence contributes to tumor advancement and malignancy.97,98 In numerous cancer types, including breast cancer, homing of MSCs to tumors has been documented.99 By attracting and differentiating additional stromal cells, increasing the proliferation, motility, and invasiveness of cancer cells, and remodeling the ECM to facilitate cancer cell invasion and metastasis, proinflammatory molecules and degrading enzymes in the SASP contribute to the progression of cancer.100 For instance, senescent MSCs have been shown to promote the proliferation and metastatic spread of breast cancer cells, modulated by SASP components that mediate through the paracrine signaling, altering ECM and tumor microenvironment, resulting in favorable milieu for tumor progression.101 Therefore, a thorough understanding of how paracrine factors from stem cells slow down or stop aging-induced diseases, such as brain disorders, is essential for their future clinical use. For example, adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells have a strong paracrine effect because they can release a variety of cell growth factors and chemokines that promote angiogenesis, endogenous stem cell activation, inflammation control, and wound healing.102 In addition, exosomes produced and released by stem cells are increasingly recognized as essential components of intracellular communication, metabolic clearance, tissue regeneration at distant sites, and the immunological response.103,104 As such, they may play crucial roles in reducing the adverse effects of aging-related brain disorders.

Cellular senescence mediates brain aging and exacerbates brain-related diseases by affecting stem cells, and transplantation of stem cells can potentially ameliorate diseases

Aging is a complex phenomenon that not only affects many aspects of the human body and disease development but can also have detrimental effects. For instance, on the progression of brain disorders, in part, through alteration of the quantity and quality of endogenous stem cells such as neural stem cells (NSCs).105–108 Resident stem cells that maintain a self-renewal and proliferative capacity to produce new neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes over time can be found in the central nervous system (CNS) of adults.108 The ability of CNS stem cells to self-renew and regenerate themselves decreases with aging, leading to a progressive loss of function. Physiological aging is therefore associated with a progressive loss of function and a decline in the self-renewal and regenerative capacities of CNS stem cells.109 For example, NSCs found in neurogenic niches, undergo progressive loss of proliferation along with differentiation and maturation with the advancement of age, primarily due to a progressive hostile microenvironment causing extensive DNA damage.110 Additionally, many studies seem to suggest the importance of donor age negatively affecting the quality of stem cells in terms of differentiation, in vivo or ex vivo expansion, and immunogenicity, together with a noticeable loss of reprogramming efficiency of stem cells to be transplanted.110,111

Aging neural stem cells underlie the development of brain diseases

The quality and quantity of NSCs can be significantly influenced by age-related cellular senescence. Over time, NSCs lose their capacity to enter the cell cycle effectively. p16INK4A, a marker for senescence and a negatively regulated cell cycle, is highly elevated with aging in the brain comprised of subventricular zone, which may be responsible for the concurrent drop in new neuron development mediated by the inhibition of cell cycle of NSCs and NPCs.112–114 It is likely that inhibition of this cell cycle is mediated by p16INK4A causing senescence. Indeed, p16INK4A overexpression leads to replicative senescence (irreversible loss of cell proliferation and altered cell behavior) in ESC-derived NSCs.113,114 On the other hand, NSCs expansion and cognitive improvement can be facilitated by the induction of pro-cell cycle regulators including the Polycomb family member BMI-1 (PCGF4) and cyclin-dependent kinases.115,116 BMI-1 is known to be a transcriptional negative regulator of cell cycles, and overexpression of this gene in hippocampal NSCs induces self-renewal.117 Furthermore, a transgene delivered by lentivirus in vivo boosted hippocampus neural growth and reversed some facets of age-linked cognitive deterioration in older mice (16-month-old pups) by co-overexpressing cyclin D1 and CDK4 in the NSCs present in the hippocampus.118 Furthermore, the removal of SnCs that express p16INK4A delays the onset of age-related diseases.119

The role of neural stem cells in the management of cerebrovascular diseases

One of the main mechanisms behind many cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is cellular senescence.120 A distinct secretory phenotype, activation of tumor suppressor pathway, a persistent growth arrest, and resistance to apoptosis are all characteristics of the stress or damage response associated with senescence.121–123 CVD, such as stroke is the major etiology of prolonged morbidity and the second greatest cause of death globally.124 However, to date, there are only two Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies; tissue plasminogen activator, and thrombectomy. The usefulness of such therapies is limited by the fact that they can only be applied to acute patients, encompassing only a small number of CVD patients.125–127 Additionally, the majority of recent therapeutic trials have mostly aimed to manage apoptosis, immunological and inflammatory responses, and excitotoxicity—late-onset secondary damage mechanisms—with little to no success. Interestingly, in addition to NSCs’ ability to repair tissue damage in the initial stages of disease development, they also have the ability to respond continuously to environmental cues, along with the ability to secrete paracrine growth factors and signaling factors in the right quantities. This results in a tailored long-term cellular response against stroke-related injuries, allowing NSCs to slow the progression of early cerebrovascular insult. This is in sharp contrast to conventional drug therapies used for the treatment of stroke.128 Thus, despite the numerous challenges associated with repairing neural damage, such as the fact that neurons are highly differentiated terminal cells, which restricts their capacity for regeneration, the likelihood that they secrete less than optimal levels of neurotropic substances like BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) and the overproduction of inflammatory substances like cytokines, in principle, NSCs could provide a novel and effective alternative therapy for the management of stroke. The promotion of extension and growth of synapses, which results in synaptic plasticity and the regeneration of axons, together with relief from the creation of brain scars at the location of injuries are among the potential benefits of NSC transplantation in stroke patients.129–131

Neural stem cells can improve brain functions after catastrophic head injury

One of the most common reasons for hospitalization, disability, and death worldwide is traumatic brain injury (TBI).132 TBI affects about 10 million people annually and results from extensive brain tissue damage brought on by a variety of external forces, including direct head impacts from car accidents, blast waves from explosions, etc. Recent studies point to DNA damage-induced cellular senescence as a potential cause of sequelae associated with mild TBI.133 Post-TBI complications such as visual impairment, long-term cognitive dysfunction, hearing loss, etc., can affect patients and their families to a great extent. The underlying mechanisms of TBI are manifold including degradation of the blood-brain barrier; induction of marked neural inflammation, along with impaired neuronal degeneration.134,135 A growing body of evidence appears to point to a critical role of NSCs in hippocampus-induced learning and memory processes, as well as in the proper functioning of olfactory systems in the brain.136 Additionally, following TBI, greater neurogenic regeneration capacity has been observed in a variety of animal brain damage models as well as in a limited number of human studies.137,138 That said, solid evidence of neurogenesis induced by TBI in the human brain is limited, to date, primarily due to hurdles of obtaining human brain samples, together with inherent technical difficulties, in order to be able to effectively address the detailed underlying mechanisms of de-novo neurogenesis through retrospective birth dating of NSC in patients.139 Further challenge is associated with the limiting amount of endogenous NSCs that demands supplementation of exogenous NSCs through transplantation to the damaged brain tissue in a targeted manner for successful post-traumatic nerve cell regeneration. Apart from replacing the damaged neural cells, it is conceivable that the secretome of exogenous stem cells can further alleviate the proinflammatory reaction at the injury site to assist with the overall healing process, and to improve brain health post-injury.

The potential impact of MSCs on cellular senescence-induced neurodegenerative disorders

It is speculated that cellular senescence contributes significantly to the physiological aging process and aging-induced diseases, such as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and Parkinson’s Disease (PD).140,141 Senescent astrocytes, microglia, endothelial cells, and neurons have been seen in the brains of AD patients and AD animal models.AD, which is characterized by the accumulation of ß-amyloid peptides in the ECM between neurons, also known as amyloid plaques, and the development of neurofibrillary tangles within the cells as a result of tau protein hyperphosphorylation in neurons, is the primary cause (50–70%) of dementia cases worldwide.142 The aforementioned factors cause progressive neuronal loss due to neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. In 2015, nine individuals with mild to moderate AD underwent the first phase of a clinical trial using MSCs from human umbilical cord blood.143 Due to the lack of any adverse reactions observed in the patients, MSCs were stereotactically injected into the hippocampus and anterior hippocampus, indicating the viability and safety of the stem cell administration. Since that time, a variety of clinical trials are still being conducted on AD patients and are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the trial numbers NCT01547689, NCT02672306, NCT02054208, and NCT02600130.

On the other hand, substantia nigra’s dopaminergic neuron loss in PD patients characteristically manifests as a typical movement problem.144 In theory, it might be possible to convert MSCs into astrocytes and neuron-like cells in the culture before transplanting those cells back into the patients. As an alternative, the astrocytes in PD patients can be transdifferentiated (direct differentiation) to produce dopamine-releasing neurons endogenously or through an intermediate formation of NSCs, by adjusting the environmental cues, which regulate the origin of neurons by specifying a targeted developmental pathway.145–147 Having said that, to fully understand NSCs or MSCs’ potential in treating neurodegenerative illnesses, more research is required in this field.

The function of cellular senescence in the growth and progression of brain tumors

Cellular senescence in cancer is brought on by a variety of stressors, such as DNA damage, oncogene activation, therapeutic drugs, or reactive oxygen species.148,149 The primary malignant brain tumor that affects adults most frequently is glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).150 However, it is still resistant to systemic therapy. Senescent cell removal has become a potentially effective new cancer treatment strategy. SnCs are identified in patients and mouse GBMs.151 After partial elimination of p16INK4A-expressing malignant SnCs, which make up less than 7% of a tumor, female mice with GBM have improved survival. By integrating single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry, and genetic knockdowns, this study identifies nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 transcription factor as a determinant of the senescent phenotype.

The potential benefits of stem cells and mechanisms of action in the management of brain tumors

Interestingly, adult stem cells may potentially be a powerful tool and could offer a great therapeutic resource for the management of brain tumors. NSCs and MSCs both migrate extensively towards primary and metastatic cancers in the brain, based on transplant trials performed on animals with brain tumors.152 The ability of stem cells to target tumors effectively enables the delivery of cytotoxic substances and signals, such as apoptosis-inducing proteins, anti-angiogenic factors, nanoparticles, oncolytic viruses, cell cycle modulators, and inducers of cellular differentiation, among others, to the tumour cells while sparing healthy cells.153 The immunomodulatory qualities of the transplanted stem cells may suppress tumor growth by altering the tumor microenvironment in addition to their potential impact on cancer stem cells; an area that warrants further investigation.153–156 Prior to being effectively translated into clinical settings, the adoption of relatively new therapeutic technologies, such as genetically engineered stem cells that give anti-tumor capabilities, would necessitate a more thorough understanding of underlying mechanisms. Nevertheless, human tissue-derived MSCs are generally regarded as one of the most promising approaches in delivering therapeutics and preventing the critical loss of cells in the brain, due to the abundance of MSCs available, especially from adipose tissue and/or bone marrow, together with easy isolation and ex vivo expansions for clinical use and fewer ethical concerns. Moreover, recent studies tend to show that transplanted MSCs can even disrupt the blood-brain barrier and target damaged tissue, where they can exert therapeutic effects through multidirectional differentiation, execute paracrine effects along with the release of extracellular vesicles, and even transfer mitochondria to the damaged neurons through tunneling nanotubes, improving syntactic function and enhancing higher-order cognitive functions.157,158 However, to produce fully functional exogenous sources of neural cells that can be easily grafted into damaged neural tissue in the face of hostile environments caused by insults such as brain injury, more research is required to precisely decipher the in vivo mechanisms that guide NSC differentiation to functional neurons. Also, more thorough pre-clinical and clinical research is urgently needed to accurately determine the safety and efficacy of stem cell therapy by considering the effects of aging on stem cells and the transplant recipients to preserve brain health and to ameliorate a wide range of brain disorders. In addition to the functional dysregulation of stem cells mediated by cellular senescence, it would be interesting to explore the specific immune and molecular pathways that drive age-related diseases.

SnCs-mediated dysregulation of the immune system aggravates age-related diseases by inducing immunosenescence and inflammaging

The progressive decline of the physiological characteristics and dysregulation of the immune processes with age, as a result of immune cell senescence, which is known as immunosenescence, is believed to cause reduced elimination of SnCs in the body.159,160 SnCs accumulate as a result of decreased senescent cell clearance and surveillance due to the lower numbers of immune cells, such as macrophages together with their dysfunctions. Additionally, aging causes an imbalance between immunological and inflammatory responses that lower immune response effectiveness and produce an immunosuppressive microenvironment.161 As a compensatory response, inflammatory mediators like regulatory T (Treg) cells and M2 macrophages, which are immunosuppressive, while promoting myelopoiesis by releasing immunosuppressive substances like transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), ROS, and interleukin-10 (IL10).162,163 The promotion of growth and activation of M2 macrophages and Treg cells are then further aided by IL10.164 In fact, a few of these substances inhibit specific immune system components and accelerate immunosenescence. TGF-β, for example, may inhibit helper T (Th) cell development, reduce the cytotoxicity of CD8 T cells and NK cells, and diminish the immunological response of B cells, all of which can result in immune paralysis, a chronic immune system dysfunction.165,166 Significantly, immunosenescence along with secreted factors from SnCs, additionally results in a chronic low-grade inflammatory response known as “inflammaging” in organisms, which promotes aging and causes tissue damage.167,168 The factors released from SnCs such as proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines normally attract and induce immune cells for the destruction of SnCs. However, an impaired immune system fails to resolve these inflammatory signals due to immune cell senescence, causing inflammation to be further intensified together with the establishment of a chronic inflammatory cycle, resulting in a greater accumulation of SnCs. Chronic inflammation can interfere with physiological functions, and play a role in the development and/or progression of diseases such as atherosclerosis, type II diabetes, and osteoporosis. Furthermore, it is conceivable that the aging brain might reduce the efficacy of transplanted stem cells due to increased neuroinflammation associated with aging.169,170

Immunosenescence is exacerbated by age-related telomere shortening

The immune system is particularly vulnerable to the effects of aging because its cells adaptively respond to immunological challenges with massive proliferation and constriction. Telomeres have drawn attention since they have proven to be a great indicator of proliferative history and replicative reserve.171,172 Age-related declines in lymphocyte telomerase activity and average telomere length are both observed in the immune system.173 Telomere shortening might result in DNA deterioration and cell cycle arrest, which would impair immune cell function and make pathogen removal less effective.174 Telomerase affects immunological activation, differentiation, and immunosenescence by regulating critical immunomodulatory proteins such as NF-κB and β-catenin.175 The immune response is negatively impacted by the downregulation of telomerase activity, which also activates ageing cells to exacerbate age-related immune dysfunctions.176

Immunosenescence is exacerbated by an age-related metabolic decline

In the course of research, it has been clear that nutritional metabolism has a significant impact on immune function. Age causes a decline in glycolytic metabolism as well as aberrant mitochondrial energy metabolism, which affects T and B cell activation.177 Coenzyme NAD+ catalyzes metabolic processes in the cell and transforms into NADH. Age-related decreases in NAD+ are caused by a decrease in production. Furthermore, age-related decreases in NAD+ metabolism activate NLRP3 inflammasomes, which may be the cause of inflammatory disorders.178 Inflammatory and SnCs seen in aged tissue contribute to metabolic failure, exacerbating the immunological dysfunction linked to immunosenescence.179

Chromatin architectural changes regulate aging and exacerbate age-related diseases

During physiological aging and senescence, prominent chromatin structural changes take place resulting in alterations: (1) in the nuclear envelope that affects nuclear transport; (2) genomic instability such as DNA damage and telomere attrition; (3) changes in nucleosome positioning; (4) post-translational modifications of histones; (5) global histone loss together with loss of heterochromatic regions and; (6) chromatin spatial interaction changes together with large-scale chromatin rearrangements.180–189

Nuclear envelope dysfunctions lead to aging-related diseases

Aging affects nuclear transport by disrupting the structure and function of the nuclear envelope (NE). As we age, NE becomes more fragile and less effective at keeping nucleic acids and proteins within the tight compartment of the nucleus, since in eukaryotic cells the NE serves as a communication link between the cytoplasm and nucleus.190 The nuclear lamina, a bilayer membrane, and the nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) make up the majority of the NE dynamic cellular compartment and are primarily composed of three components: the nuclear lamina, a double membrane, and the NPCs.191 The double membrane, which is made up of the inner nuclear membrane and the outer nuclear membrane, is divided by the perinuclear space. When these two membranes link at various points, supramolecular structures called NPCs are produced. These structures act as channels for the selective import and export of macromolecules. These protein complexes are structurally made up of nucleoporins (Nups), which are essential functional elements of the diffusion barrier and transport channels. When any of the three components of NE become damaged or lose their integrity with age, NE becomes dysfunctional and eventually ruptures, leading to aberrant nuclear transport. Importantly, a defective NE can impair the transport of proteins and other molecules, including transcription factors, across the NE, resulting in flaws in DNA repair mechanisms, changing the expression of numerous age-related genes, and causing cellular senescence or even cell death.

Genomic instability associated with aging promotes aging-related diseases

Endogenous DNA damage, especially DNA double-strand breaks, is considered a major marker of genomic instability.192 As a compensatory response, when DNA is damaged, the DNA damage response and cell cycle checkpoint pathways, such as the p53/p21 and p16INK4A/pRb pathways, are activated to block the cell cycle and prevent the transmission of damaged genetic material to progeny cells.193,194 Importantly, previous studies seem to suggest that compared to the general population, centenarians exhibit fewer somatic and germ cell mutations, which suggests that their DNA repair mechanisms are more effective at maintaining genomic stability, underscoring its importance in age-related diseases. Nuclear DNA damage foci that persist have been observed in SnCs.195 This is further compounded by the fact that in addition to DNA damage, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is highly susceptible to age-related DNA damage, as it contains only exons together with the fact that its genome is not enveloped in the form of chromatin, to be able to elicit effective DNA damage responses and repair the defects.196 Because of such traits, mtDNA is more prone to mutations than nuclear DNA. Additionally, a high-energy electron leakage in the respiratory chain is also possible because mitochondria are the powerhouses of the cell. When electrons leave cytochrome c oxidase before reducing oxygen to water, superoxide is produced, resulting in oxidative stress, which increases the rate of mtDNA mutations. Additionally, the activity of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) declines with age due to wider negative transcriptional regulation of genes impacting mitochondrial energetics, resulting in cellular senescence.196,197

Alterations in nucleosome positioning in chromatin in aging and age-related diseases

The nucleosome is chromatin’s primary structural component. Each nucleosome contains an octamer of core histone proteins (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, each in two copies), 146–147 base pairs of DNA that are wrapped around in approximately 1.7 turns, and about 54 base pairs of linker DNA (10–90 base pairs).198,199 Nucleosome arrays have approximately an 11 nm diameter and a 5.5 nm height, resembling beads strung together. The main structure of chromatin is made up of these nucleosome arrays, also known as 10 nm fibres. The chromatin is typically separated into regions with darkly stained heterochromatin (in which genes are repressed) and lightly stained euchromatin (in which genes are expressed) using staining techniques.200 Chromatin provides the framework that enables the regulation of all genomic processes because the machinery that mediates transcription, repair, and DNA replication is relatively non-sequence specific, and if the genome were naked, they would likely carry out their tasks randomly and in an unregulated manner. Thus, alterations in nucleosome positioning, especially in the promoter region of the genome, with age, can have deleterious consequences in terms of gene expression and genomic instability like DNA breaks along with replication errors, chromosomal translocation, and also when mtDNA is transferred into the nuclear genome, as often observed in lower eukaryotes like yeast.201

The role of post-translational modifications of histones comprising of chromatin in age-related diseases

Although a definite causal relationship has not yet been shown with certainty, posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of histones, whether spontaneous or physiological/pathological, are emerging as significant indicators of aging and aging-related diseases.202 The best-studied modifications are acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitylation, and ADP-ribosylation. PTMs are the consequence of chemical changes that can be dynamically added and removed by chromatin-modifying enzymes. These marks, along with other more recently recognized modifications like crotonylation, succinylation, and malonylation have the potential to change the interactions between histone and DNA as well as histone and other histones, making them key regulators of nucleosome dynamics, affecting large varieties of gene expression including aging-related genes.203–205 For example, histone methylation and histone acetylation are increasingly being considered prominent histone modification methods by which epigenetic changes are mediated during aging.206 These modifications can potentially serve as therapeutic targets in the pursuit of rejuvenation.207

Epigenetic alterations of heterochromatin and global histone loss mediate aging and associated diseases

Heterochromatin is further divided into constitutive and facultative types. Constitutive heterochromatin describes stronger heterochromatin domains that are primarily found in telomeric regions and contain transposable elements along with satellite sequences. These areas’ densely packed constitutive heterochromatic state prevents damaging chromosomal rearrangements that could lead to genomic instability by suppressing double-strand breaks and nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR), especially during meiosis.208 On the other hand, a DNA sequence may be found in euchromatin in one cell but facultative heterochromatin in another.209 Reactive oxygen species continuously wreak havoc on cellular genomes through a multitude of mechanisms. There is evidence that higher-order condensed chromatin structures shield DNA from both radiation- and hydroxyl radical-induced DNA double-strand breaks, underscoring the importance of heterochromatin in increasing the need for cellular defense with aging to prevent the induction of oxidative DNA damage. Thus large-scale heterochromatin loss during aging can result in the unwanted transcriptional activation of aging-related genes together with increased susceptibility to DNA damage. Importantly, loss of heterochromatin also occurs during senescence. SnCs have facultative heterochromatin domains known as senescence-associated heterochromatin foci, which silence genes that typically promote cell division.210,211 Additionally, nucleosome loss has been shown to cause global transcriptional upregulation and genomic instability during yeast aging.201

Spatial chromatin architectural alterations and large-scale chromatin rearrangements confer to aging events

The arrangement of higher-order chromatin has received a lot of attention lately. With the introduction of high-resolution nuclear microscopy and chromosomal conformation capture (3C) methods, our understanding of chromatin organization has advanced dramatically.212,213 The introduction of 3C has additionally provided advanced insight into how alterations of chromatin occur with aging and cellular senescence. ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling complexes can regulate the nucleosome distribution throughout chromatin, resulting in either more compact or more accessible chromatin.214 Inactivation or deletion of the chromatin remodeler ISW2 in budding yeast extends life span in a target of rapamycin (TOR)-independent way.215 The nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase that has been linked to aging, is an additional ATP-dependent remodeling complex, albeit its precise molecular mechanism of action is yet unknown.216 The link between chromatin arrangement, aging, and the underlying mechanisms of cellular senescence has been investigated recently.

After examining the immunological and molecular mechanisms that underlie age-related diseases, it is critical to consider whether and how therapeutic interventions using pharmacological approaches would stop the emergence and further propagation of age-related diseases.

The anti-aging properties of senolytics may potentially improve the health of older persons, and prevent aging-related diseases

Senolytics are substances that can be used to specifically kill SnCs as a result of accumulating research that strongly suggests the primary role senescence in physiological aging and age-induced illnesses in model organisms.217–219 Such evidence is in tune with the Geroscience Hypothesis, which contends that by pharmacologically delaying the development or severity of several chronic diseases by targeting fundamental aging mechanisms, common underlying risk factors for these diseases will be reduced.220 Two methods are utilized to find senolytics: drug library screening on several senescent cell types in vitro, and senescent cell anti-apoptotic pathways (SCAPs) for drug development.221 SnCs have been demonstrated to build up with aging in a variety of tissues and contribute to a wide range of chronic illnesses, including diabetes, cancer, osteoarthritis, and Alzheimer’s disease, among others.222 Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that removing SnCs via genetic methods might reduce a number of illnesses linked to senescence, and delay the development of age-associated disorders. As a result, in order to cure a variety of age-related diseases and improve health and longevity, efforts to promote senolysis are therefore a realistic option. According to class, senolytics reported to date are: (1) ABT-263 (Navitoclax), A-1331852, A-1155463, and ABT-737, which are BCL-2 family inhibitors, (2) Inhibitors that inhibit HSP90 such as 17-DMAG (Alvespimycin), Geldanamycin, 17-AAG (Tanespimycin), Ganetespib, (3) Compounds that target P53 pathway e.g., FOXO4-DRI, UBX0101, RG7112 (R05045337), P5091, etc., (4) Curcumin, Fisetin, O-vanillin, etc., that are either natural products or their analogs, (5) Ouabagenin, Quabin, Bufalin, K-strophanthin, etc., which are cardiac glycosides, (6) Prodrugs that modify galactose e.g., 5FURGa, Nay-Gal, SSK1, among others, (7) PROTACs such as PZ15227, and ARV825 (8) Miscellaneous, e.g., MitoTam, Panobinostat, AT-406, etc., (9) Senolytic combinations like Dasatinib + Quercetin, Piperlongumine along with ABT-263, Tamatinib in combination with ABT-263, (10) Chemotherapeutic and senolytic combinations like Olaparib in combination with ABT-263, Taxol + Panobinostat, etc.223,224

The BCL-2 protein family is essential for the control of cell death by a multitude of mechanisms, including apoptosis and autophagy.225 Yosef et al. evaluated the effect of the BCL-2 family’s individual members and their combinations on the viability of SnCs.226 Increased levels of BCL-W and BCL-XL were shown to make SnCs more resistant to apoptosis, and their combined inhibition resulted in SnCs’ death. This mechanism is thought to underlie the senolytic actions of compounds that inhibit BCL-2 like ABT-737 or ABT-263. Moreover, as an HSP90 inhibitor, 17-dimethylaminoethyalamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-DMAG) competes with ATP at its binding site and obstructs HSP90’s intrinsic ATPase activity.227 Thus, 17-DMAG’s inhibition of HSP90 may ultimately result in cell death to be considered an effective senolytic drug. It has been proposed that one senescence mechanism involves increasing p53 transcriptional activity by preventing it from interacting with forkhead box protein 4 (FOXO4) or mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2). The drug UBX0101 and the engineered peptide FOXO-DRI both successfully eliminated SnCs from mice by inhibiting MDM2/P53, respectively.228 On the other hand, senescent lung fibroblasts (IMR90) that had undergone ionizing radiation-induced senescence were reported to be specifically killed by RG-7112.229 The natural substance ouabain, a member of the GC family of cardiac glycosides, was once thought to be a particular inhibitor of Na+ K+-ATPase, but later found to be a general senolytic drug.230 Interestingly, lysosomal β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) is often elevated, and this is mostly seen in SnCs.231 Pro-drugs with a cleavable galactose moiety connected to the cytotoxic component can be processed specifically in SnCs due to the increased SA-β-gal activity, releasing the cytotoxic compound and only killing senescent cells.232 Li Zhang et al. performed an exhaustive analysis of the unique mechanisms of action for all other kinds of senolytics; this analysis is not covered in the scope of the article.223

Senolytics in stem cell rejuvenation

Senolytics, which selectively eliminate senescent cells, have been found to enhance stem cell activity and induce tissue regeneration in recent research. Senolytics can create a more favorable environment for stem cells to function and preserve tissue homeostasis by eliminating these damaging cells. MSCs are prone to replicative senescence and senescence-associated functional decline, which limits their application in regenerative medicine.233 Senescent MSCs may be removed using senolytics during in vitro expansion or bioprocessing for transplantation.234,235 Some investigated chemicals examined in vitro are found to play a significant effect in the senescence, rejuvenation, and transplanting of MSCs. Study identified the long-term expansion capacity of MSCs, as well as effects on telomere attrition, SA-β-gal staining, and senescence-associated DNA methylation alterations, are molecular markers for replicative senescence. The four compounds that could have senolytic effects included navitoclax (ABT-263) nicotinamide riboside, quercetin, and danazol.236,237 Only ABT-263, one of the four tested medicines, had a senolytic impact on MSCs of human origin, and therapy using this substance did restore telomere length or other critical signatures of aging cells such as epigenetics, among others, in MSCs. Therefore, senolytics are indeed in the early stage of development, necessitating greater efforts to find more effective senolytic drugs. Furthermore, senolytics have been shown to increase the capacity of elderly mice’s bone marrow MSCs to produce bone.235 Additionally, the pharmacological elimination of senescent cells with acute systemic administration of the senolytic drug ABT-263, which improves learning and memory in middle-aged mice, caused a rapid increase in NPC proliferation and neurogenesis.238 Hippocampal NPCs are also stimulated by the genetic ablation of SnCs.239

Targeting epigenetic regulators of senescence as potential therapeutics

One of the potential approaches for the epigenetic intervention of senescence is the inhibition of the SASP.240 Several investigations have found that the SASP is specifically driven by epigenetic mechanisms that can be targeted by therapeutic means. For example, sirtuin-1 (SIRT1) has been found to directly regulate the expression of the SASP.241 Another study found that SIRT1 knockdown or its reduced expression, which normally happens during senescence, causes increased acetylation of H3K9 and H4K16 at the promoter of IL6 and IL8. This results in the transcriptional activation of these cytokines.242 Moreover, in addition to directly regulating SASP expression, epigenetic factors can also activate the pro-inflammatory signaling that drives SASP activation. For example, during senescence induction, the mixed lineage leukemia gene (MLL1) protein increases the activation of cell cycle genes related to proliferation, resulting in hyper-proliferative stress and the susceptibility of DNA to a damage response.243 This results in the sensitization of the NF-κB signaling pathway kinked to pro-inflammatory response, which augments the expression of the SASP. Additionally, this study reveals that inhibition of MLL1 downregulates SASP gene expression without allowing senescent cells to evade proliferative restriction, suggesting the therapeutic effect associated with the intervention of MLL1. Furthermore, as cells age, DNA damage response induces epigenetic modifications that activate the SASP gene.245,245 The G9a and G9a-like protein histone methyltransferases are degraded by proteasomes as part of the DNA damage response of G9a-like protein (GLP).246 This causes a decrease in H3K9 dimethylation, an indicator of transcriptional repression, imprinted at the promoter of SASP, leading to enhanced gene expression. Importantly, following chromatin remodeling, the DNA damage response can also stimulate and strengthen the SASP without causing actual DNA breaks.247 The expression of osteopontin, a crucial pro-inflammatory SASP component, has been shown to rise specifically in response to histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) inhibition, which results in hyperacetylation of histone and non-histone proteins.248 As a result, HDAC1 inhibition causes the development of a protumorigenic milieu and tumour growth in vivo by abrogating senescence. Tetramethylpyrazine has also been shown to effectively decrease the senescent phenotype of cells by influencing EZH2, which catalyzes tri-methylation of the histone H3 protein’s 27th lysine residue.249,250 Also, increasing mitochondrial NAD+ levels by overexpressing nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase and nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase 3 and delaying replicative senescence can more effectively reprogram aged MSCs.251

Challenges associated with senolytics intervention

Senescent cells have been shown to be essential for processes like wound healing and parturition; however, this comes with a caveat and complications when using senolytics. In principle, senescent cells can be removed by senolytics on an irregular schedule as they develop with aging or disease. Senolytics can be administered sporadically, together with the fact that they can be discontinued for various reasons for patients’ safety in cases such as pregnancy, wound healing, and other disorders. More importantly, other than lysing and removal of senescent cells, no senolytic strategy should interfere with the systems or pathways that govern the physiological processes like cell cycle or senescence that may trigger the abnormal growth of tumor cells, leading to cancer. Other approaches for reducing pathological consequences and limiting the number of senescent cells associated with aging include regulating the immune clearance of senescent cells. Senescent cells tend to overexpress specific cell surface proteins compared to other cell types, which led to the development of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells, vaccinations, and antibody-drug conjugates that specifically target these cell surface markers.252,253 Although they are not fully specific in their removal of senescent cells, in certain instances they also inactivated macrophages and other non-senescent cell types. On the contrary, small-molecule senolytics may be more advantageous as compared to vaccinations or Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell therapy, since senolytic therapy can be stopped whenever senescent cells are needed, such as during wound healing, tissue remodeling, or pregnancy.254,255

Future directions

The fascinating field of aging research, and more specifically how intervention in aging-related mechanisms may be able to potentially reverse the pathological consequences of aging cells to improve the quality of life in older age, is still a relatively underexplored area of research. There are many open questions and it is essential to continuously track the new knowledge, however, incremental it may be, to assist by asking more concise questions. For example, the underlying mechanisms of SASP heterogeneity, which can make a sizeable proportion of senescent cells resistant to clearing by macrophages and may even promote tissue degeneration, including in brain tissues, during chronic cellular stress like that brought on by aging, are largely unknown. Also, it would be intriguing to see if donor-derived MSCs may reach highly resistant senescent cells and transfer their immunomodulatory properties, which might facilitate the immune clearance of the cells. Such an approach is especially important, as cells with SASP do not necessarily possess senescent cell-specific antigens to be targeted by small molecules. Additionally, senolytics’ potential efficacy in selectively eradicating resistant cells also needs to be further investigated. Moreover, a majority of the findings in the literature come from studies of senescence in mice, but whether senescent cells in mice are an accurate representation of those found in humans has to be determined. Therefore, more animal models, senescent cell culture techniques, and additional human translational research are all clearly needed for the field to advance. Also, there is no single phenotype for senescent cells, to date, and epigenetic modifications in senescence are primarily diverse and dynamic. Thus, the continuation of research investigating the histone code, and epigenetic protein/nucleotide interactions might result in the discovery of the epigenetic signature of highly resistant senescent cells together with the origin of SASP, which will improve the efficacy of epigenetic drugs to selectively target senescent cells. Last, due to invasive methods required by our present methodology to get tissue samples, so much less is known about the true cases of senescence in different diseases. Our understanding of these cells’ molecular signatures by single-cell transcriptomics and epigenomics and SASP patterns is limited. Especially, given the absence of a reliable tool to locate and count senescent cells in dysfunctional tissue, hindering the detailed understanding of SASP patterns in the absence of a robust method to retrieve and quantify senescent cells in diseased tissues.256 Having said that, senolytic research has seen exciting times recently, leading to a greater knowledge of the role senescence plays in human health and diseases, which will help control a wide range of diseases through public health policies globally.

Conclusion

The removal of senescent cells has become a viable therapeutic approach for preventing, delaying aging, or curing a range of illnesses and age-related dysfunctions. Significantly, the present article critically examines the key cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying aging and aging-related diseases, based on a substantial body of crucial information gathered over the years, with a specific focus on brain disorders that may be connected to other age-related diseases. It will provide the policy leaders with a helpful updated informational platform so they may construct efficient public health intervention approaches to limit the age-related disease burden, including neurological diseases. Having said that, further extensive research is critical to better understand the complete potential of senolytics. The encouraging preclinical results of senolytics seem to suggest the effectiveness of medicinal and restrictive approaches for ameliorating multimorbidity and extending lifespan. Control trials that are randomized in nature must be undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of senolytic treatments before they may be applied in clinical settings to meet the demands of pressing scientific and societal issues.

Abbreviations

AD: 

Alzheimer’s Disease

CDK: 

cyclin-dependent kinase

CVD: 

cardiovascular diseases

CNS: 

central nervous system

ECM: 

extracellular matrix

GBM: 

glioblastoma multiforme

MHC: 

major histocompatibility complex

MLL1: 

mixed lineage leukemia gene

mtDNA: 

mitochondrial DNA

MSCs: 

mesenchymal stem cells

NE: 

nuclear envelope

NPCs: 

nuclear pore complexes

NSCs: 

neural stem cells

PD: 

Parkinson’s Disease

ROS: 

reactive oxygen species

SASP: 

senescence-associated secretory phenotype

SIRT1: 

sirtuin-1

SnCs: 

senescent cells

TAZ: 

coactivator with PDZ-binding motif

TBI: 

traumatic brain injury

TGF-β: 

transforming growth factor-β

Wnt: 

Wingless-related integration site

YAP: 

Yes-associated protein

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to all whose works have contributed to the review article, even if not directly mentioned in the body of the work.

Funding

The research has received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to report.

Authors’ contributions

SKC wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. DC reviewed and edited the manuscript.

References

  1. McKeown RE. The epidemiologic transition: Changing patterns of mortality and population dynamics. Am J Lifestyle Med 2009;3(1 Suppl):19S-26S View Article PubMed/NCBI
  2. Omran AR. The epidemiologic transition: a theory of the epidemiology of population change. Milbank Q 2005;83(4):731-757 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  3. Tur-Sinai A. Out-of-pocket expenditure on medical services among older adults: A longitudinal analysis. Front Public Health 2022;10:836675 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  4. Salinas-Rodríguez A, Manrique-Espinoza B, Torres Mussot I, Montañez-Hernández JC. Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures in dependent older adults: Results from an economic evaluation study in Mexico. Front Public Health 2020;8:329 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  5. Galvani-Townsend S, Martinez I, Pandey A. Is life expectancy higher in countries and territories with publicly funded health care? Global analysis of health care access and the social determinants of health. J Glob Health 2022;12:04091 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  6. Brown GC. Living too long: the current focus of medical research on increasing the quantity, rather than the quality, of life is damaging our health and harming the economy. EMBO Rep 2015;16(2):137-141 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  7. Khavinson V, Popovich I, Mikhailova O. Towards realization of longer life. Acta Biomed 2020;91(3):e2020054 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  8. Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, Sadana R, Pot AM, Michel JP, et al. The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet 2016;387(10033):2145-2154 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  9. Dietler D, Leuenberger A, Bempong NE, Campbell-Lendrum D, Cramer C, Eggen RIL, et al. Health in the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: from framework to action, transforming challenges into opportunities. J Glob Health 2019;9(2):020201 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  10. Shevelkova V, Mattocks C, Lafortune L. Efforts to address the Sustainable Development Goals in older populations: a scoping review. BMC Public Health 2023;23(1):456 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  11. da Costa JP, Vitorino R, Silva GM, Vogel C, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos T. A synopsis on aging-Theories, mechanisms and future prospects. Ageing Res Rev 2016;29:90-112 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  12. Chan MY, Na J, Agres PF, Savalia NK, Park DC, Wig GS. Socioeconomic status moderates age-related differences in the brain’s functional network organization and anatomy across the adult lifespan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018;115(22):E5144-E5153 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  13. Tan MP. Healthcare for older people in lower and middle income countries. Age Ageing 2022;51(4):afac016 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  14. Peters R. Ageing and the brain. Postgrad Med J 2006;82(964):84-88 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  15. Murman DL. The impact of age on cognition. Semin Hear 2015;36(3):111-121 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  16. Guaita A, Colombo M, Vaccaro R, Fossi S, Vitali SF, Forloni G, et al. Brain aging and dementia during the transition from late adulthood to old age: design and methodology of the “Invece.Ab” population-based study. BMC Geriatr 2013;13:98 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  17. Maresova P, Hruska J, Klimova B, Barakovic S, Krejcar O. Activities of daily living and associated costs in the most widespread neurodegenerative diseases: A systematic review. Clin Interv Aging 2020;15:1841-1862 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  18. Galvin JE, Howard DH, Denny SS, Dickinson S, Tatton N. The social and economic burden of frontotemporal degeneration. Neurology 2017;89(20):2049-2056 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  19. Röhr S, Pabst A, Baber R, Engel C, Glaesmer H, Hinz A, et al. Social determinants and lifestyle factors for brain health: implications for risk reduction of cognitive decline and dementia. Sci Rep 2022;12(1):12965 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  20. Hilal S, Brayne C. Epidemiologic trends, social determinants, and brain health: The role of life course inequalities. Stroke 2022;53(2):437-443 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  21. Tønnessen Ø, Dhir A, Flåten BT. Digital knowledge sharing and creative performance: Work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2021;170:120866 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  22. Huang J, Pan W, Liu Y, Wang X, Liu W. Advances in Creativity, Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Communication of Design. Cham: Springer; 2020, 159-166 View Article
  23. Di Micco R, Krizhanovsky V, Baker D, d’Adda di Fagagna F. Cellular senescence in ageing: from mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2021;22(2):75-95 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  24. Song S, Lam EW, Tchkonia T, Kirkland JL, Sun Y. Senescent cells: Emerging targets for human aging and age-related diseases. Trends Biochem Sci 2020;45(7):578-592 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  25. Roger L, Tomas F, Gire V. Mechanisms and regulation of cellular senescence. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22(23):13173 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  26. Dodig S, Čepelak I, Pavić I. Hallmarks of senescence and aging. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2019;29(3):030501 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  27. Wissler Gerdes EO, Zhu Y, Weigand BM, Tripathi U, Burns TC, Tchkonia T, et al. Cellular senescence in aging and age-related diseases: Implications for neurodegenerative diseases. Int Rev Neurobiol 2020;155:203-234 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  28. McHugh D, Gil J. Senescence and aging: Causes, consequences, and therapeutic avenues. J Cell Biol 2018;217(1):65-77 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  29. Nacarelli T, Lau L, Fukumoto T, Zundell J, Fatkhutdinov N, Wu S, et al. NAD(+) metabolism governs the proinflammatory senescence-associated secretome. Nat Cell Biol 2019;21(3):397-407 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  30. Coppé JP, Desprez PY, Krtolica A, Campisi J. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu Rev Pathol 2010;5:99-118 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  31. van Deursen JM. The role of senescent cells in ageing. Nature 2014;509(7501):439-446 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  32. Jeyapalan JC, Sedivy JM. Cellular senescence and organismal aging. Mech Ageing Dev 2008;129(7-8):467-474 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  33. Childs BG, Gluscevic M, Baker DJ, Laberge RM, Marquess D, Dananberg J, et al. Senescent cells: an emerging target for diseases of ageing. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2017;16(10):718-735 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  34. Martin GM, Sprague CA, Epstein CJ. Replicative life-span of cultivated human cells. Effects of donor’s age, tissue, and genotype. Lab Invest 1970;23(1):86-92 PubMed/NCBI
  35. Smith JR, Whitney RG. Intraclonal variation in proliferative potential of human diploid fibroblasts: stochastic mechanism for cellular aging. Science 1980;207(4426):82-84 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  36. Pawlikowski JS, Adams PD, Nelson DM. Senescence at a glance. J Cell Sci 2013;126(Pt 18):4061-4067 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  37. Al-Khalaf HH, Mohideen P, Nallar SC, Kalvakolanu DV, Aboussekhra A. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16INK4a physically interacts with transcription factor Sp1 and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 to transactivate microRNA-141 and microRNA-146b-5p spontaneously and in response to ultraviolet light-induced DNA damage. J Biol Chem 2013;288(49):35511-35525 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  38. Tian X, Seluanov A, Gorbunova V. Molecular mechanisms determining lifespan in short- and long-lived species. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2017;28(10):722-734 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  39. Minamino T, Miyauchi H, Yoshida T, Ishida Y, Yoshida H, Komuro I. Endothelial cell senescence in human atherosclerosis: role of telomere in endothelial dysfunction. Circulation 2002;105(13):1541-1544 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  40. Hall BM, Balan V, Gleiberman AS, Strom E, Krasnov P, Virtuoso LP, et al. Aging of mice is associated with p16(Ink4a)- and β-galactosidase-positive macrophage accumulation that can be induced in young mice by senescent cells. Aging (Albany NY) 2016;8(7):1294-1315 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  41. Xu Z, Teixeira MT. The many types of heterogeneity in replicative senescence. Yeast 2019;36(11):637-648 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  42. Schumacher B, Pothof J, Vijg J, Hoeijmakers JHJ. The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process. Nature 2021;592(7856):695-703 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  43. Xu M, Pirtskhalava T, Farr JN, Weigand BM, Palmer AK, Weivoda MM, et al. Senolytics improve physical function and increase lifespan in old age. Nat Med 2018;24(8):1246-1256 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  44. Hu L, Li H, Zi M, Li W, Liu J, Yang Y, et al. Why senescent cells are resistant to apoptosis: An insight for senolytic development. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022;10:822816 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  45. Thanapaul RJRS, Shvedova M, Shin GH, Roh DS. An insight into aging, senescence, and their impacts on wound healing. Adv Geriatr Med Res 2021;3(3):e210017 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  46. Rysanek D, Vasicova P, Kolla JN, Sedlak D, Andera L, Bartek J, et al. Synergism of BCL-2 family inhibitors facilitates selective elimination of senescent cells. Aging (Albany NY) 2022;14(16):6381-6414 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  47. Childs BG, Zhang C, Shuja F, Sturmlechner I, Trewartha S, Fierro Velasco R, et al. Senescent cells suppress innate smooth muscle cell repair functions in atherosclerosis. Nat Aging 2021;1(8):698-714 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  48. Gil TH, Zheng H, Lee HG, Shin JW, Hwang SW, Jang KM, et al. Senolytic drugs relieve pain by reducing peripheral nociceptive signaling without modifying joint tissue damage in spontaneous osteoarthritis. Aging (Albany NY) 2022;14(15):6006-6027 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  49. Pereira BI, Devine OP, Vukmanovic-Stejic M, Chambers ES, Subramanian P, Patel N, et al. Senescent cells evade immune clearance via HLA-E-mediated NK and CD8(+) T cell inhibition. Nat Commun 2019;10(1):2387 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  50. Aguayo-Mazzucato C, Andle J, Lee TB, Midha A, Talemal L, Chipashvili V, et al. Acceleration of β cell aging determines diabetes and senolysis improves disease outcomes. Cell Metab 2019;30(1):129-142.e4 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  51. Avelar RA, Ortega JG, Tacutu R, Tyler EJ, Bennett D, Binetti P, et al. A multidimensional systems biology analysis of cellular senescence in aging and disease. Genome Biol 2020;21(1):91 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  52. Novais EJ, Tran VA, Johnston SN, Darris KR, Roupas AJ, Sessions GA, et al. Long-term treatment with senolytic drugs Dasatinib and Quercetin ameliorates age-dependent intervertebral disc degeneration in mice. Nat Commun 2021;12(1):5213 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  53. Augodo A, Amarilla AA, Fard AT, Albornoz EA, Tyshkovskiy A, Schwabenland M. Senolytic therapy alleviates physiological human brain aging and COVID-19 neuropathology. bioRxiv [Preprint] 2023 View Article
  54. Cuollo L, Antonangeli F, Santoni A, Soriani A. The Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype (SASP) in the challenging future of cancer therapy and age-related diseases. Biology (Basel) 2020;9(12):485 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  55. Lopes-Paciencia S, Saint-Germain E, Rowell MC, Ruiz AF, Kalegari P, Ferbeyre G. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype and its regulation. Cytokine 2019;117:15-22 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  56. Noren Hooten N, Evans MK. Techniques to induce and quantify cellular senescence. J Vis Exp 2017;123:e55533 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  57. Lin AW, Barradas M, Stone JC, van Aelst L, Serrano M, Lowe SW. Premature senescence involving p53 and p16 is activated in response to constitutive MEK/MAPK mitogenic signaling. Genes Dev 1998;12(19):3008-3019 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  58. Qian Y, Chen X. Tumor suppression by p53: making cells senescent. Histol Histopathol 2010;25(4):515-526 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  59. Tominaga K. The emerging role of senescent cells in tissue homeostasis and pathophysiology. Pathobiol Aging Age Relat Dis 2015;5:27743 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  60. Muñoz-Espín D, Cañamero M, Maraver A, Gómez-López G, Contreras J, Murillo-Cuesta S, et al. Programmed cell senescence during mammalian embryonic development. Cell 2013;155(5):1104-1118 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  61. Krizhanovsky V, Yon M, Dickins RA, Hearn S, Simon J, Miething C, et al. Senescence of activated stellate cells limits liver fibrosis. Cell 2008;134(4):657-667 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  62. Pignolo RJ, Law SF, Chandra A. Bone aging, cellular senescence, and osteoporosis. JBMR Plus 2021;5(4):e10488 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  63. Boccardi V, Mecocci P. The importance of cellular senescence in frailty and cardiovascular diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol 2020;1216:79-86 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  64. Jeon OH, David N, Campisi J, Elisseeff JH. Senescent cells and osteoarthritis: a painful connection. J Clin Invest 2018;128(4):1229-1237 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  65. Hernandez-Gonzalez F, Faner R, Rojas M, Agustí A, Serrano M, Sellarés J. Cellular Senescence in Lung Fibrosis. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22(13):7012 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  66. Zhou B, Wan Y, Chen R, Zhang C, Li X, Meng F, et al. The emerging role of cellular senescence in renal diseases. J Cell Mol Med 2020;24(3):2087-2097 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  67. Ogrodnik M, Miwa S, Tchkonia T, Tiniakos D, Wilson CL, Lahat A, et al. Cellular senescence drives age-dependent hepatic steatosis. Nat Commun 2017;8:15691 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  68. Martínez-Cué C, Rueda N. Cellular Senescence in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front Cell Neurosci 2020;14:16 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  69. Si Z, Sun L, Wang X. Evidence and perspectives of cell senescence in neurodegenerative diseases. Biomed Pharmacother 2021;137:111327 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  70. Sahu MR, Rani L, Subba R, Mondal AC. Cellular senescence in the aging brain: A promising target for neurodegenerative diseases. Mech Ageing Dev 2022;204:111675 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  71. Shimizu I, Minamino T. Cellular senescence in cardiac diseases. J Cardiol 2019;74(4):313-319 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  72. Hu C, Zhang X, Teng T, Ma ZG, Tang QZ. Cellular senescence in cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review. Aging Dis 2022;13(1):103-128 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  73. Evangelou K, Vasileiou PVS, Papaspyropoulos A, Hazapis O, Petty R, Demaria M, et al. Cellular senescence and cardiovascular diseases: moving to the “heart” of the problem. Physiol Rev 2023;103(1):609-647 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  74. Lee G. Cellular senescence: The villain of metabolic disease?: Discovery of a distinct senescent cell population in obesity-induced metabolic dysfunction. Mol Cells 2022;45(8):531-533 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  75. Schafer MJ, Miller JD, LeBrasseur NK. Cellular senescence: Implications for metabolic disease. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2017;455:93-102 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  76. Wiley CD, Campisi J. The metabolic roots of senescence: mechanisms and opportunities for intervention. Nat Metab 2021;3(10):1290-1301 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  77. Palmer AK, Tchkonia T, Kirkland JL. Targeting cellular senescence in metabolic disease. Mol Metab 2022;66:101601 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  78. Chen J, Huang X, Halicka D, Brodsky S, Avram A, Eskander J, et al. Contribution of p16INK4a and p21CIP1 pathways to induction of premature senescence of human endothelial cells: permissive role of p53. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006;290(4):H1575-H1586 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  79. Vogt M, Haggblom C, Yeargin J, Christiansen-Weber T, Haas M. Independent induction of senescence by p16INK4a and p21CIP1 in spontaneously immortalized human fibroblasts. Cell Growth Differ 1998;9(2):139-146 PubMed/NCBI
  80. Song S, Tchkonia T, Jiang J, Kirkland JL, Sun Y. Targeting senescent cells for a healthier aging: challenges and opportunities. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2020;7(23):2002611 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  81. Pignolo RJ, Passos JF, Khosla S, Tchkonia T, Kirkland JL. Reducing senescent cell burden in aging and disease. Trends Mol Med 2020;26(7):630-638 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  82. Riessland M. Cellular senescence in health, disease and aging: blessing or curse?. Life (Basel) 2021;11(6):541 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  83. Mylonas A, O’Loghlen A. Cellular senescence and ageing: Mechanisms and interventions. Front Aging 2022;3:866718 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  84. LeBrasseur NK, Tchkonia T, Kirkland JL. Cellular senescence and the biology of aging, disease, and frailty. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser 2015;83:11-18 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  85. Glenn JD, Whartenby KA. Mesenchymal stem cells: Emerging mechanisms of immunomodulation and therapy. World J Stem Cells 2014;6(5):526-539 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  86. Sarugaser R, Hanoun L, Keating A, Stanford WL, Davies JE. Human mesenchymal stem cells self-renew and differentiate according to a deterministic hierarchy. PLoS One 2009;4(8):e6498 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  87. Wagner W, Horn P, Castoldi M, Diehlmann A, Bork S, Saffrich R, et al. Replicative senescence of mesenchymal stem cells: a continuous and organized process. PLoS One 2008;3(5):e2213 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  88. Davalli P, Mitic T, Caporali A, Lauriola A, D’Arca D. ROS, cell senescence, and novel molecular mechanisms in aging and age-related diseases. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016;2016:3565127 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  89. Colavitti R, Finkel T. Reactive oxygen species as mediators of cellular senescence. IUBMB Life 2005;57(4-5):277-281 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  90. Komiya Y, Habas R. Wnt signal transduction pathways. Organogenesis 2008;4(2):68-75 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  91. Nayak L, Bhattacharyya NP, De RK. Wnt signal transduction pathways: modules, development and evolution. BMC Syst Biol 2016;10 Suppl 2:44 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  92. Range RC. Canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways define the expression domains of Frizzled 5/8 and Frizzled 1/2/7 along the early anterior-posterior axis in sea urchin embryos. Dev Biol 2018;444(2):83-92 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  93. Gibault F, Sturbaut M, Bailly F, Melnyk P, Cotelle P. Targeting transcriptional enhanced associate domains (TEADs). J Med Chem 2018;61(12):5057-5072 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  94. Chen R, Guan KL. Colonic epithelium rejuvenation through YAP/TAZ. EMBO J 2018;37(2):164-166 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  95. Van Camp JK, Beckers S, Zegers D, Van Hul W. Wnt signaling and the control of human stem cell fate. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2014;10(2):207-229 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  96. Ring A, Kim YM, Kahn M. Wnt/catenin signaling in adult stem cell physiology and disease. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2014;10(4):512-525 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  97. Fane M, Weeraratna AT. How the ageing microenvironment influences tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2020;20(2):89-106 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  98. Lin W, Huang L, Li Y, Fang B, Li G, Chen L, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells and cancer: Clinical challenges and opportunities. Biomed Res Int 2019;2019:2820853 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  99. Ghosh D, Mejia Pena C, Quach N, Xuan B, Lee AH, Dawson MR. Senescent mesenchymal stem cells remodel extracellular matrix driving breast cancer cells to a more-invasive phenotype. J Cell Sci 2020;133(2):jcs232470 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  100. Lan T, Luo M, Wei X. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells in cancer therapy. J Hematol Oncol 2021;14(1):195 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  101. Walker C, Mojares E, Del Río Hernández A. Role of extracellular matrix in development and cancer progression. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19(10):3028 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  102. Trzyna A, Banaś-Ząbczyk A. Adipose-derived stem cells secretome and its potential application in “stem cell-free therapy”. Biomolecules 2021;11(6):878 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  103. Kalluri R, LeBleu VS. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science 2020;367:6478 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  104. Hade MD, Suire CN, Suo Z. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes: applications in regenerative medicine. Cells 2021;10(8):1959 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  105. Navarro Negredo P, Yeo RW, Brunet A. Aging and rejuvenation of neural stem cells and their niches. Cell Stem Cell 2020;27(2):202-223 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  106. Audesse AJ, Webb AE. Mechanisms of enhanced quiescence in neural stem cell aging. Mech Ageing Dev 2020;191:111323 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  107. Nicaise AM, Willis CM, Crocker SJ, Pluchino S. Stem cells of the aging brain. Front Aging Neurosci 2020;12:247 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  108. Llorente V, Velarde P, Desco M, Gómez-Gaviro MV. Current understanding of the neural stem cell niches. Cells 2022;11(19):3002 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  109. Horinouchi CD, Barisón MJ, Robert AW, Kuligovski C, Aguiar AM, Dallagiovanna B. Influence of donor age on the differentiation and division capacity of human adipose-derived stem cells. World J Stem Cells 2020;12(12):1640-1651 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  110. Siennicka K, Zołocińska A, Dębski T, Pojda Z. Comparison of the donor age-dependent and in vitro culture-dependent mesenchymal stem cell aging in rat model. Stem Cells Int 2021;2021:6665358 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  111. Choudhery MS. Strategies to improve regenerative potential of mesenchymal stem cells. World J Stem Cells 2021;13(12):1845-1862 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  112. Molofsky AV, Slutsky SG, Joseph NM, He S, Pardal R, Krishnamurthy J, et al. Increasing p16INK4a expression decreases forebrain progenitors and neurogenesis during ageing. Nature 2006;443(7110):448-452 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  113. Perez-Campo FM, Costa G, Lie-A-Ling M, Stifani S, Kouskoff V, Lacaud G. MOZ-mediated repression of p16(INK) (4) (a) is critical for the self-renewal of neural and hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cells 2014;32(6):1591-1601 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  114. Jacobs JJ, Kieboom K, Marino S, DePinho RA, van Lohuizen M. The oncogene and Polycomb-group gene bmi-1 regulates cell proliferation and senescence through the ink4a locus. Nature 1999;397(6715):164-168 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  115. Ganapathi M, Boles NC, Charniga C, Lotz S, Campbell M, Temple S, et al. Effect of Bmi1 over-expression on gene expression in adult and embryonic murine neural stem cells. Sci Rep 2018;8(1):7464 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  116. Marqués-Torrejón MÁ, Porlan E, Banito A, Gómez-Ibarlucea E, Lopez-Contreras AJ, Fernández-Capetillo O, et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 controls adult neural stem cell expansion by regulating Sox2 gene expression. Cell Stem Cell 2013;12(1):88-100 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  117. Zelentsova-Levytskyi K, Talmi Z, Abboud-Jarrous G, Capucha T, Sapir T, Burstyn-Cohen T. Protein S negatively regulates neural stem cell self-renewal through bmi-1 signaling. Front Mol Neurosci 2017;10:124 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  118. van Hooijdonk LW, Ichwan M, Dijkmans TF, Schouten TG, de Backer MW, Adan RA, et al. Lentivirus-mediated transgene delivery to the hippocampus reveals sub-field specific differences in expression. BMC Neurosci 2009;10:2 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  119. Baker DJ, Wijshake T, Tchkonia T, LeBrasseur NK, Childs BG, van de Sluis B, et al. Clearance of p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells delays ageing-associated disorders. Nature 2011;479(7372):232-236 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  120. Banerjee P, Kotla S, Reddy Velatooru L, Abe RJ, Davis EA, Cooke JP, et al. Senescence-associated secretory phenotype as a hinge between cardiovascular diseases and cancer. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:763930 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  121. Men H, Cai H, Cheng Q, Zhou W, Wang X, Huang S, et al. The regulatory roles of p53 in cardiovascular health and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 2021;78(5):2001-2018 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  122. Owens WA, Walaszczyk A, Spyridopoulos I, Dookun E, Richardson GD. Senescence and senolytics in cardiovascular disease: Promise and potential pitfalls. Mech Ageing Dev 2021;198:111540 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  123. Donkor ES. Stroke in the 21(st) century: a snapshot of the burden, epidemiology, and quality of life. Stroke Res Treat 2018;2018:3238165 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  124. Fugate JE, Rabinstein AA. Absolute and relative contraindications to IV rt-PA for acute ischemic stroke. Neurohospitalist 2015;5(3):110-121 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  125. Khosravi A, Rajabi D, Pourmoghaddas M, Roohi A, Esmaeili M. The role of manual thrombectomy in cardiovascular outcome among patients with total cutoff vessel myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. ARYA Atheroscler 2017;13(2):66-72 PubMed/NCBI
  126. Lapchak PA. Critical early thrombolytic and endovascular reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke victims: a call for adjunct neuroprotection. Transl Stroke Res 2015;6(5):345-354 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  127. Bansal S, Sangha KS, Khatri P. Drug treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2013;13(1):57-69 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  128. Baker EW, Kinder HA, West FD. Neural stem cell therapy for stroke: A multimechanistic approach to restoring neurological function. Brain Behav 2019;9(3):e01214 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  129. de Freria CM, Van Niekerk E, Blesch A, Lu P. Neural stem cells: Promoting axonal regeneration and spinal cord connectivity. Cells 2021;10(12):3296 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  130. Jiao Y, Liu YW, Chen WG, Liu J. Neuroregeneration and functional recovery after stroke: advancing neural stem cell therapy toward clinical application. Neural Regen Res 2021;16(1):80-92 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  131. Meamar R, Dehghani L, Ghasemi M, Khorvash F, Shaygannejad V. Stem cell therapy in stroke: a review literature. Int J Prev Med 2013;4(Suppl 2):S139-146 PubMed/NCBI
  132. Abio A, Bovet P, Valentin B, Bärnighausen T, Shaikh MA, Posti JP, et al. Changes in mortality related to traumatic brain injuries in the seychelles from 1989 to 2018. Front Neurol 2021;12:720434 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  133. Schwab N, Leung E, Hazrati LN. Cellular senescence in traumatic brain injury: Evidence and perspectives. Front Aging Neurosci 2021;13:742632 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  134. Cash A, Theus MH. Mechanisms of blood-brain barrier dysfunction in traumatic brain injury. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21(9):3344 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  135. Chodobski A, Zink BJ, Szmydynger-Chodobska J. Blood-brain barrier pathophysiology in traumatic brain injury. Transl Stroke Res 2011;2(4):492-516 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  136. Toda T, Parylak SL, Linker SB, Gage FH. The role of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in brain health and disease. Mol Psychiatry 2019;24(1):67-87 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  137. Bramlett HM, Dietrich WD. Long-term consequences of traumatic brain injury: current status of potential mechanisms of injury and neurological outcomes. J Neurotrauma 2015;32(23):1834-1848 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  138. Richardson RM, Sun D, Bullock MR. Neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2007;18(1):169-181 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  139. Spalding KL, Bhardwaj RD, Buchholz BA, Druid H, Frisén J. Retrospective birth dating of cells in humans. Cell 2005;122(1):133-143 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  140. Liu RM. Aging, cellular senescence, and alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23(4):1989 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  141. Kritsilis M, V Rizou S, Koutsoudaki PN, Evangelou K, Gorgoulis VG, Papadopoulos D. Ageing, cellular senescence and neurodegenerative disease. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19(10):2937 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  142. Murphy MP, LeVine H. Alzheimer’s disease and the amyloid-beta peptide. J Alzheimers Dis 2010;19(1):311-323 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  143. Chen GF, Xu TH, Yan Y, Zhou YR, Jiang Y, Melcher K, et al. Amyloid beta: structure, biology and structure-based therapeutic development. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2017;38(9):1205-1235 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  144. Kim HJ, Cho KR, Jang H, Lee NK, Jung YH, Kim JP, et al. Intracerebroventricular injection of human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells in patients with Alzheimer’s disease dementia: a phase I clinical trial. Alzheimers Res Ther 2021;13(1):154 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  145. Surmeier DJ. Determinants of dopaminergic neuron loss in Parkinson’s disease. FEBS J 2018;285(19):3657-3668 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  146. Mollinari C, Zhao J, Lupacchini L, Garaci E, Merlo D, Pei G. Transdifferentiation: a new promise for neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Death Dis 2018;9(8):830 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  147. Vasan L, Park E, David LA, Fleming T, Schuurmans C. Direct Neuronal reprogramming: bridging the gap between basic science and clinical application. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:681087 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  148. Liou GY, Storz P. Reactive oxygen species in cancer. Free Radic Res 2010;44(5):479-496 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  149. Ogrunc M, Di Micco R, Liontos M, Bombardelli L, Mione M, Fumagalli M, et al. Oncogene-induced reactive oxygen species fuel hyperproliferation and DNA damage response activation. Cell Death Differ 2014;21(6):998-1012 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  150. Hanif F, Muzaffar K, Perveen K, Malhi SM, Simjee ShU. Glioblastoma multiforme: A review of its epidemiology and pathogenesis through clinical presentation and treatment. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2017;18(1):3-9 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  151. Salam R, Saliou A, Bielle F, Bertrand M, Antoniewski C, Carpentier C, et al. Cellular senescence in malignant cells promotes tumor progression in mouse and patient Glioblastoma. Nat Commun 2023;14(1):441 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  152. Shah K. Stem cell-based therapies for tumors in the brain: are we there yet?. Neuro Oncol 2016;18(8):1066-1078 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  153. Chu DT, Nguyen TT, Tien NLB, Tran DK, Jeong JH, Anh PG, et al. Recent progress of stem cell therapy in cancer treatment: molecular mechanisms and potential applications. Cells 2020;9(3):563 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  154. Rivera-Cruz CM, Shearer JJ, Figueiredo Neto M, Figueiredo ML. The immunomodulatory effects of mesenchymal stem cell polarization within the tumor microenvironment niche. Stem Cells Int 2017;2017:4015039 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  155. Walcher L, Kistenmacher AK, Suo H, Kitte R, Dluczek S, Strauß A, et al. Cancer stem cells-origins and biomarkers: Perspectives for targeted personalized therapies. Front Immunol 2020;11:1280 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  156. Liu L, Eckert MA, Riazifar H, Kang DK, Agalliu D, Zhao W. From blood to the brain: can systemically transplanted mesenchymal stem cells cross the blood-brain barrier?. Stem Cells Int 2013;2013:435093 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  157. Xiang BY, Chen L, Wang XJ, Xiang C. Mesenchymal stem cells as therapeutic agents and in gene delivery for the treatment of glioma. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2017;18(9):737-746 View Article
  158. Yang Y, Ye G, Zhang YL, He HW, Yu BQ, Hong YM, et al. Transfer of mitochondria from mesenchymal stem cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells attenuates hypoxia-ischemia-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in PC12 cells. Neural Regen Res 2020;15(3):464-472 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  159. Allen JC, Toapanta FR, Chen W, Tennant SM. Understanding immunosenescence and its impact on vaccination of older adults. Vaccine 2020;38(52):8264-8272 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  160. Aiello A, Farzaneh F, Candore G, Caruso C, Davinelli S, Gambino CM, et al. Immunosenescence and its hallmarks: how to oppose aging strategically? a review of potential options for therapeutic intervention. Front Immunol 2019;10:2247 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  161. Ponnappan S, Ponnappan U. Aging and immune function: molecular mechanisms to interventions. Antioxid Redox Signal 2011;14(8):1551-1585 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  162. Groth C, Hu X, Weber R, Fleming V, Altevogt P, Utikal J, et al. Immunosuppression mediated by myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) during tumour progression. Br J Cancer 2019;120(1):16-25 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  163. Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2009;9(3):162-174 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  164. Saraiva M, Vieira P, O’Garra A. Biology and therapeutic potential of interleukin-10. J Exp Med 2020;217(1):e20190418 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  165. Tinoco R, Alcalde V, Yang Y, Sauer K, Zuniga EI. Cell-intrinsic transforming growth factor-beta signaling mediates virus-specific CD8+ T cell deletion and viral persistence in vivo. Immunity 2009;31(1):145-157 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  166. Frazier WJ, Hall MW. Immunoparalysis and adverse outcomes from critical illness. Pediatr Clin North Am 2008;55(3):647-668 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  167. Xia S, Zhang X, Zheng S, Khanabdali R, Kalionis B, Wu J, et al. An update on inflamm-aging: mechanisms, prevention, and treatment. J Immunol Res 2016;2016:8426874 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  168. Baylis D, Bartlett DB, Patel HP, Roberts HC. Understanding how we age: insights into inflammaging. Longev Healthspan 2013;2(1):8 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  169. Di Benedetto S, Müller L. Nutrition and Immunity. Cham: Springer; 2019, 301-322 View Article
  170. DiSabato DJ, Quan N, Godbout JP. Neuroinflammation: the devil is in the details. J Neurochem 2016;139 Suppl 2:136-153 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  171. Calado RT, Young NS. Telomere diseases. N Engl J Med 2009;361(24):2353-2365 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  172. Vaiserman A, Krasnienkov D. Telomere length as a marker of biological age: state-of-the-art, open issues, and future perspectives. Front Genet 2020;11:630186 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  173. Roast MJ, Eastwood JR, Aranzamendi NH, Fan M, Teunissen N, Verhulst S, et al. Telomere length declines with age, but relates to immune function independent of age in a wild passerine. R Soc Open Sci 2022;9(4):212012 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  174. Lin J, Epel E. Stress and telomere shortening: Insights from cellular mechanisms. Ageing Res Rev 2022;73:101507 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  175. de Punder K, Heim C, Wadhwa PD, Entringer S. Stress and immunosenescence: The role of telomerase. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2019;101:87-100 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  176. Hornsby PJ. Telomerase and the aging process. Exp Gerontol 2007;42(7):575-581 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  177. Yin F, Boveris A, Cadenas E. Mitochondrial energy metabolism and redox signaling in brain aging and neurodegeneration. Antioxid Redox Signal 2014;20(2):353-371 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  178. Shim DW, Cho HJ, Hwang I, Jung TY, Kim HS, Ryu JH, et al. Intracellular NAD(+) depletion confers a priming signal for NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Front Immunol 2021;12:765477 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  179. Lee KA, Flores RR, Jang IH, Saathoff A, Robbins PD. Immune senescence, immunosenescence and aging. Front Aging 2022;3:900028 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  180. Sun L, Yu R, Dang W. Chromatin architectural changes during cellular senescence and aging. Genes (Basel) 2018;9(4):211 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  181. Criscione SW, Teo YV, Neretti N. The chromatin landscape of cellular senescence. Trends Genet 2016;32(11):751-761 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  182. Hetzer MW. The nuclear envelope. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010;2(3):a000539 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  183. Chatterjee N, Walker GC. Mechanisms of DNA damage, repair, and mutagenesis. Environ Mol Mutagen 2017;58(5):235-263 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  184. Srinivas N, Rachakonda S, Kumar R. Telomeres and telomere length: a general overview. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12(3):558 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  185. Zhang W, Li Y, Kulik M, Tiedemann RL, Robertson KD, Dalton S, et al. Nucleosome positioning changes during human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Epigenetics 2016;11(6):426-437 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  186. Strahl BD, Allis CD. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 2000;403(6765):41-45 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  187. Yi SJ, Kim K. New insights into the role of histone changes in aging. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21(21):8241 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  188. Allshire RC, Madhani HD. Ten principles of heterochromatin formation and function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2018;19(4):229-244 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  189. Brero A, Easwaran HP, Nowak D, Grunewald I, Cremer T, Leonhardt H, et al. Methyl CpG-binding proteins induce large-scale chromatin reorganization during terminal differentiation. J Cell Biol 2005;169(5):733-743 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  190. Scaffidi P, Gordon L, Misteli T. The cell nucleus and aging: tantalizing clues and hopeful promises. PLoS Biol 2005;3(11):e395 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  191. Otsuka S, Ellenberg J. Mechanisms of nuclear pore complex assembly - two different ways of building one molecular machine. FEBS Lett 2018;592(4):475-488 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  192. Cannan WJ, Pederson DS. Mechanisms and consequences of double-strand DNA break formation in chromatin. J Cell Physiol 2016;231(1):3-14 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  193. Bazarov AV, Lee WJ, Bazarov I, Bosire M, Hines WC, Stankovich B, et al. The specific role of pRb in p16 (INK4A) -mediated arrest of normal and malignant human breast cells. Cell Cycle 2012;11(5):1008-1013 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  194. Chen J. The cell-cycle arrest and apoptotic functions of p53 in tumor initiation and progression. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2016;6(3):a026104 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  195. Chen JH, Hales CN, Ozanne SE. DNA damage, cellular senescence and organismal ageing: causal or correlative?. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35(22):7417-7428 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  196. Pinto M, Moraes CT. Mechanisms linking mtDNA damage and aging. Free Radic Biol Med 2015;85:250-258 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  197. Preston CC, Oberlin AS, Holmuhamedov EL, Gupta A, Sagar S, Syed RH, et al. Aging-induced alterations in gene transcripts and functional activity of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation complexes in the heart. Mech Ageing Dev 2008;129(6):304-312 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  198. McGinty RK, Tan S. Nucleosome structure and function. Chem Rev 2015;115(6):2255-2273 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  199. Cutter AR, Hayes JJ. A brief review of nucleosome structure. FEBS Lett 2015;589(20 Pt A):2914-2922 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  200. Morrison O, Thakur J. Molecular complexes at euchromatin, heterochromatin and centromeric chromatin. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22(13):6922 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  201. Hu Z, Chen K, Xia Z, Chavez M, Pal S, Seol JH, et al. Nucleosome loss leads to global transcriptional up-regulation and genomic instability during yeast aging. Genes Dev 2014;28(4):396-408 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  202. Santos AL, Lindner AB. Protein posttranslational modifications: Roles in aging and age-related disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2017;2017:5716409 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  203. Ntorla A, Burgoyne JR. The regulation and function of histone crotonylation. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:624914 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  204. Xie Z, Dai J, Dai L, Tan M, Cheng Z, Wu Y, et al. Lysine succinylation and lysine malonylation in histones. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012;11(5):100-107 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  205. Liu J, Shangguan Y, Tang D, Dai Y. Histone succinylation and its function on the nucleosome. J Cell Mol Med 2021;25(15):7101-7109 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  206. Wang Y, Yuan Q, Xie L. Histone modifications in aging: The underlying mechanisms and implications. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2018;13(2):125-135 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  207. Zhang W, Qu J, Liu GH, Belmonte JCI. The ageing epigenome and its rejuvenation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2020;21(3):137-150 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  208. Robberecht C, Voet T, Zamani Esteki M, Nowakowska BA, Vermeesch JR. Nonallelic homologous recombination between retrotransposable elements is a driver of de novo unbalanced translocations. Genome Res 2013;23(3):411-418 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  209. Trojer P, Reinberg D. Facultative heterochromatin: is there a distinctive molecular signature?. Mol Cell 2007;28(1):1-13 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  210. Aird KM, Zhang R. Detection of senescence-associated heterochromatin foci (SAHF). Methods Mol Biol 2013;965:185-196 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  211. Kosar M, Bartkova J, Hubackova S, Hodny Z, Lukas J, Bartek J. Senescence-associated heterochromatin foci are dispensable for cellular senescence, occur in a cell type- and insult-dependent manner and follow expression of p16(ink4a). Cell Cycle 2011;10(3):457-468 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  212. de Wit E, de Laat W. A decade of 3C technologies: insights into nuclear organization. Genes Dev 2012;26(1):11-24 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  213. Goel VY, Hansen AS. The macro and micro of chromosome conformation capture. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 2021;10(6):e395 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  214. Sif S. ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling complexes: enzymes tailored to deal with chromatin. J Cell Biochem 2004;91(6):1087-1098 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  215. Dang W, Sutphin GL, Dorsey JA, Otte GL, Cao K, Perry RM, et al. Inactivation of yeast Isw2 chromatin remodeling enzyme mimics longevity effect of calorie restriction via induction of genotoxic stress response. Cell Metab 2014;19(6):952-966 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  216. Xue Y, Wong J, Moreno GT, Young MK, Côté J, Wang W. NURD, a novel complex with both ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling and histone deacetylase activities. Mol Cell 1998;2(6):851-861 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  217. Wu Y, Shen S, Shi Y, Tian N, Zhou Y, Zhang X. Senolytics: eliminating senescent cells and alleviating intervertebral disc degeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10:823945 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  218. Kirkland JL, Tchkonia T. Senolytic drugs: from discovery to translation. J Intern Med 2020;288(5):518-536 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  219. Al-Naggar IMA, Kuchel GA, Xu M. Senolytics: targeting senescent cells for age-associated diseases. Curr Mol Biol Rep 2020;6(4):161-172 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  220. Sierra F. The emergence of geroscience as an interdisciplinary approach to the enhancement of health span and life span. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2016;6(4):a025163 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  221. Kirkland JL, Tchkonia T. Cellular senescence: a translational perspective. EBioMedicine 2017;21:21-28 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  222. Katzir I, Adler M, Karin O, Mendelsohn-Cohen N, Mayo A, Alon U. Senescent cells and the incidence of age-related diseases. Aging Cell 2021;20(3):e13314 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  223. Zhang L, Pitcher LE, Prahalad V, Niedernhofer LJ, Robbins PD. Recent advances in the discovery of senolytics. Mech Ageing Dev 2021;200:111587 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  224. Zhang L, Pitcher LE, Yousefzadeh MJ, Niedernhofer LJ, Robbins PD, Zhu Y. Cellular senescence: a key therapeutic target in aging and diseases. J Clin Invest 2022;132(15):e158450 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  225. Zhang L, Pitcher LE, Prahalad V, Niedernhofer LJ, Robbins PD. Targeting cellular senescence with senotherapeutics: senolytics and senomorphics. FEBS J 2023;290(5):1362-1383 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  226. Hardwick JM, Soane L. Multiple functions of BCL-2 family proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013;5(2):a008722 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  227. Yosef R, Pilpel N, Tokarsky-Amiel R, Biran A, Ovadya Y, Cohen S, et al. Directed elimination of senescent cells by inhibition of BCL-W and BCL-XL. Nat Commun 2016;7:11190 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  228. Kim JG, Lee SC, Kim OH, Kim KH, Song KY, Lee SK, et al. HSP90 inhibitor 17-DMAG exerts anticancer effects against gastric cancer cells principally by altering oxidant-antioxidant balance. Oncotarget 2017;8(34):56473-56489 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  229. Benhamú B, Martín-Fontecha M, Vázquez-Villa H, López-Rodríguez ML, Ortega-Gutiérrez S. New Trends in Aging Drug Discovery. Biomedicines 2022;10(8):2006 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  230. Cherif H, Bisson DG, Mannarino M, Rabau O, Ouellet JA, Haglund L. Senotherapeutic drugs for human intervertebral disc degeneration and low back pain. Elife 2020;9:e54693 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  231. Guerrero A, Herranz N, Sun B, Wagner V, Gallage S, Guiho R, et al. Cardiac glycosides are broad-spectrum senolytics. Nat Metab 2019;1(11):1074-1088 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  232. Lee BY, Han JA, Im JS, Morrone A, Johung K, Goodwin EC, et al. Senescence-associated beta-galactosidase is lysosomal beta-galactosidase. Aging Cell 2006;5(2):187-195 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  233. Campisi J. The biology of replicative senescence. Eur J Cancer 1997;33(5):703-709 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  234. Grezella C, Fernandez-Rebollo E, Franzen J, Ventura Ferreira MS, Beier F, Wagner W. Effects of senolytic drugs on human mesenchymal stromal cells. Stem Cell Res Ther 2018;9(1):108 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  235. Zhang D, Yu K, Yang J, Xie S, Yang J, Tan L. Senolytic controls bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells fate improving bone formation. Am J Transl Res 2020;12(6):3078-3088 PubMed/NCBI
  236. Hwang HV, Tran DT, Rebuffatti MN, Li CS, Knowlton AA. Investigation of quercetin and hyperoside as senolytics in adult human endothelial cells. PLoS One 2018;13(1):e0190374 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  237. Sato K, Iwasaki S, Yoshino H. Effects and related mechanisms of the senolytic agent ABT-263 on the survival of irradiated A549 and Ca9-22 cancer cells. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22(24):13233 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  238. Sharma AK, Roberts RL, Benson RD, Pierce JL, Yu K, Hamrick MW, et al. The senolytic drug navitoclax (ABT-263) causes trabecular bone loss and impaired osteoprogenitor function in aged mice. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020;8:354 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  239. Fatt MP, Tran LM, Vetere G, Storer MA, Simonetta JV, Miller FD, et al. Restoration of hippocampal neural precursor function by ablation of senescent cells in the aging stem cell niche. Stem Cell Reports 2022;17(2):259-275 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  240. Crouch J, Shvedova M, Thanapaul RJRS, Botchkarev V, Roh D. Epigenetic regulation of cellular senescence. Cells 2022;11(4):672 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  241. Hayakawa T, Iwai M, Aoki S, Takimoto K, Maruyama M, Maruyama W, et al. SIRT1 suppresses the senescence-associated secretory phenotype through epigenetic gene regulation. PLoS One 2015;10(1):e0116480 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  242. Yang Y, Liu Y, Wang Y, Chao Y, Zhang J, Jia Y, et al. Regulation of SIRT1 and its roles in inflammation. Front Immunol 2022;13:831168 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  243. Capell BC, Drake AM, Zhu J, Shah PP, Dou Z, Dorsey J, et al. MLL1 is essential for the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. Genes Dev 2016;30(3):321-336 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  244. Yang N, Sen P. The senescent cell epigenome. Aging (Albany NY) 2018;10(11):3590-3609 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  245. Paluvai H, Di Giorgio E, Brancolini C. The histone code of senescence. Cells 2020;9(2):466 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  246. Ginjala V, Rodriguez-Colon L, Ganguly B, Gangidi P, Gallina P, Al-Hraishawi H, et al. Protein-lysine methyltransferases G9a and GLP1 promote responses to DNA damage. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):16613 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  247. Olivieri F, Albertini MC, Orciani M, Ceka A, Cricca M, Procopio AD, et al. DNA damage response (DDR) and senescence: shuttled inflamma-miRNAs on the stage of inflamm-aging. Oncotarget 2015;6(34):35509-35521 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  248. Pazolli E, Alspach E, Milczarek A, Prior J, Piwnica-Worms D, Stewart SA. Chromatin remodeling underlies the senescence-associated secretory phenotype of tumor stromal fibroblasts that supports cancer progression. Cancer Res 2012;72(9):2251-2261 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  249. Gao B, Lin X, Jing H, Fan J, Ji C, Jie Q, et al. Local delivery of tetramethylpyrazine eliminates the senescent phenotype of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells and creates an anti-inflammatory and angiogenic environment in aging mice. Aging Cell 2018;17(3):e12741 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  250. Sneeringer CJ, Scott MP, Kuntz KW, Knutson SK, Pollock RM, Richon VM, et al. Coordinated activities of wild-type plus mutant EZH2 drive tumor-associated hypertrimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 (H3K27) in human B-cell lymphomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107(49):20980-20985 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  251. Son MJ, Kwon Y, Son T, Cho YS. Restoration of mitochondrial NAD(+) levels delays stem cell senescence and facilitates reprogramming of aged somatic cells. Stem Cells 2016;34(12):2840-2851 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  252. Feins S, Kong W, Williams EF, Milone MC, Fraietta JA. An introduction to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy for human cancer. Am J Hematol 2019;94(S1):S3-S9 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  253. Pettinato MC. Introduction to Antibody-Drug Conjugates. Antibodies (Basel) 2021;10(4):42 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  254. Li W, Qin L, Feng R, Hu G, Sun H, He Y, et al. Emerging senolytic agents derived from natural products. Mech Ageing Dev 2019;181:1-6 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  255. Ge M, Hu L, Ao H, Zi M, Kong Q, He Y. Senolytic targets and new strategies for clearing senescent cells. Mech Ageing Dev 2021;195:111468 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  256. Birch J, Gil J. Senescence and the SASP: many therapeutic avenues. Genes Dev 2020;34(23-24):1565-1576 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  • Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine
  • pISSN 2993-5113
  • eISSN 2472-0712