The optimal surgical management for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (SSICH) remains controversial because conventional approaches often fail to balance rapid decompression with effective hematoma evacuation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new combined surgical strategies (“two-in-one” and “three-in-one”) versus conventional methods for SSICH.
This retrospective cohort study included 451 SSICH patients treated between January 2019 and December 2023. Based on clinical severity, patients were stratified into Group I (non-herniation, n = 374) and Group II (herniation, n = 77). Within each subgroup, patients were further categorized by treatment period: a historical control cohort (2019–2020) receiving conventional surgery, and an intervention cohort (2021–2023) receiving combined strategies (“two-in-one” for Group I; “three-in-one” for Group II). Outcomes included decompression time, hematoma evacuation rate, complications, and six-month functional recovery (Glasgow Outcome Scale/modified Rankin Scale), were compared.
In Group I, the “two-in-one” strategy achieved faster decompression (4.65 min) and a high evacuation rate (92.15%), which was comparable to neuroendoscopy alone (90.58%) and significantly higher than stereotactic aspiration alone (44.55%). This was associated with improved six-month outcomes (poor outcome rates were 39.39%, 54.35%, and 42.86% in Groups I-A, I-B, and I-C, respectively, overall P = 0.034). In Group II, the “three-in-one” strategy demonstrated shorter decompression time (4.73 vs. 37.85 min, P < 0.001) and higher evacuation rates (80.51% vs. 63.50%, P < 0.001) than decompressive craniectomy alone. Logistic regression further supported the prognostic advantage of the “two-in-one” strategy in Group I.
These combined strategies may integrate the advantages of multiple techniques to enable rapid decompression and effective hematoma clearance in SSICH. Prospective studies are warranted.
Full article